Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS270

Name: Gigaset GS270
Brand: Gigaset

Corredor de longa distância acessível. Por um preço de 200 euros ($234), a Gigaset oferece um smartphone de nível básico equipado com uma bateria de 5000 mAh. Não deve ser uma surpresa que o GS270 consiga uma longa duração de bateria com isso. Avaliamos em nosso teste o que o comprador interessado pode esperar além disso.

Mike Wobker, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Gigaset Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigaset GS270 (GS Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Resistente a arranhões e repelente à poeira, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 12 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: Slot microSD (compartilhado, até 128GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Sensor de posição, sensor de proximidade, sensor de brilho, microUSB

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.95 x 149.5 x 74

Bateria

5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 47 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 26 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 850 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 700 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Headset, USB charger, USB Type-A-to-MicroUSB cable, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR body: 1.356 W/kg, SAR head: 0.562, fanless

peso

160 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g

Preço

200 Euro

Links

Gigaset página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigaset GS270 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s -8%
HTC Desire 12 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	81.8 MBit/s -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s -50%
Huawei Y6 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.2 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s +1%
Gigaset GS270 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	110 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.1 MBit/s -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -51%
Huawei Y6 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 MBit/s -54%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


410 cd/m²	412 cd/m²	405 cd/m²
412 cd/m²	427 cd/m²	431 cd/m²
413 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	435 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 418.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1581:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9

	Gigaset GS270 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Oukitel U18 LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.9"	Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	HTC Desire 12 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		-9%	1%	12%	23%
Brightness middle	427	565 32%	483 13%	620 45%	502 18%
Brightness	418	535 28%	460 10%	612 46%	499 19%
Brightness Distribution	93	83 -11%	88 -5%	96 3%	84 -10%
Black Level *	0.27	0.55 -104%	0.4 -48%	0.57 -111%	0.2 26%
Contrast	1581	1027 -35%	1208 -24%	1088 -31%	2510 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.4	7.1 -11%	5.8 9%	3.46 46%	5.4 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.24	13.7 4%	12.6 12%	7.88 45%	10.8 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.6	6.2 28%	5 42%	3.9 55%	6.2 28%
Gamma	1.9 ^116%	2.85 ^77%	2.6 ^85%	2.073 ^106%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7366 ^88%	7153 ^91%	7709 ^84%	7230 ^90%	7660 ^85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	42649 Points
Huawei Y6 2018	39089 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	60490 Points +42%
HTC Desire 12	36253 Points -15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17)	41781 Points -2%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	Points
Oukitel U18	54989 Points
Huawei Y6 2018	46710 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	76178 Points
HTC Desire 12	46366 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)	54391 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	4287 Points
Oukitel U18	4532 Points +6%
Huawei Y6 2018	4756 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	5801 Points +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3667 - 4532, n=13)	4271 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	3230 Points
Oukitel U18	3358 Points +4%
Huawei Y6 2018	3629 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4905 Points +52%
HTC Desire 12	3320 Points +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2782 - 3394, n=17)	3221 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	312 Points
Oukitel U18	899 Points +188%
Huawei Y6 2018	743 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1229 Points +294%
HTC Desire 12	637 Points +104%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (253 - 965, n=19)	663 Points +113%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +1939%
System (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	1837 Points
Oukitel U18	1838 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	1043 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3236 Points +76%
HTC Desire 12	1526 Points -17%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1077 - 2003, n=19)	1776 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +455%
Memory (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	834 Points
Oukitel U18	798 Points -4%
Huawei Y6 2018	1069 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	961 Points +15%
HTC Desire 12	984 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (609 - 1288, n=19)	833 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +721%
Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	639 Points
Oukitel U18	640 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	443 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1017 Points +59%
HTC Desire 12	18 Points -97%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=19)	585 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +2614%
Web (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	10 Points
Oukitel U18	698 Points +6880%
Huawei Y6 2018	616 Points +6060%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	722 Points +7120%
HTC Desire 12	591 Points +5810%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=19)	446 Points +4360%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +15590%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	615 Points
Oukitel U18	608 Points -1%
Huawei Y6 2018	692 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	870 Points +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=18)	618 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5555 Points +803%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	2623 Points
Oukitel U18	2617 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	1939 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4292 Points +64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=18)	2520 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15472 Points +490%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	1718 Points
Huawei Y6 2018	1419 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3316 Points +93%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=16)	1705 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=60, last 2 years)	12476 Points +626%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	9580 Points
Oukitel U18	10117 Points +6%
Huawei Y6 2018	6067 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13682 Points +43%
HTC Desire 12	4188 Points -56%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5606 - 10269, n=18)	9018 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	10010 Points
Oukitel U18	10100 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2018	5426 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13219 Points +32%
HTC Desire 12	3597 Points -64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5884 - 10361, n=18)	9007 Points -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	8329 Points
Oukitel U18	10143 Points +22%
Huawei Y6 2018	10344 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	15593 Points +87%
HTC Desire 12	9856 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (4811 - 10553, n=18)	9040 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	548 Points
Oukitel U18	559 Points +2%
Huawei Y6 2018	70 Points -87%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	854 Points +56%
HTC Desire 12	178 Points -68%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=18)	471 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +667%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	478 Points
Oukitel U18	484 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2018	55 Points -88%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	732 Points +53%
HTC Desire 12	148 Points -69%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=18)	411 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +892%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	1122 Points
Oukitel U18	1219 Points +9%
Huawei Y6 2018	907 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2058 Points +83%
HTC Desire 12	593 Points -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (694 - 1219, n=18)	1059 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	385 Points
Oukitel U18	393 Points +2%
Huawei Y6 2018	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	463 Points +20%
HTC Desire 12	113 Points -71%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (105 - 393, n=19)	324 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)	3075 Points +699%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	324 Points
Oukitel U18	329 Points +2%
Huawei Y6 2018	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	379 Points +17%
HTC Desire 12	92 Points -72%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (83 - 329, n=19)	272 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)	3259 Points +906%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	1111 Points
Oukitel U18	1195 Points +8%
Huawei Y6 2018	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2038 Points +83%
HTC Desire 12	589 Points -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (702 - 1233, n=19)	1086 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)	3280 Points +195%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U18	25 fps
Huawei Y6 2018	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	17 fps
HTC Desire 12	9.7 fps
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16)	20.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U18	17 fps
Huawei Y6 2018	7.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	23 fps
HTC Desire 12	5.9 fps
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16)	15.1 fps
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	289 fps

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	6.8 fps
Oukitel U18	13 fps +91%
Huawei Y6 2018	5.9 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.4 fps +38%
HTC Desire 12	5.4 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17)	10 fps +47%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +1022%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	6.8 fps
Oukitel U18	6.8 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	2.8 fps -59%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.9 fps +46%
HTC Desire 12	2.7 fps -60%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17)	6.26 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	170.1 fps +2401%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	4.5 fps
Oukitel U18	10 fps +122%
Huawei Y6 2018	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.2 fps +38%
HTC Desire 12	3.5 fps -22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17)	7.46 fps +66%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.6 fps +1380%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	4.6 fps
Oukitel U18	4.6 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.5 fps +41%
HTC Desire 12	1.6 fps -65%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17)	4.18 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120.8 fps +2526%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	2.4 fps
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.4 fps +42%
HTC Desire 12	1.5 fps -37%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=18)	3.57 fps +49%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.7 fps +1929%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270	2.4 fps
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2018	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.5 fps +46%
HTC Desire 12	0.91 fps -62%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=18)	2.24 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +2933%

Legend

Gigaset GS270 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6750

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	23.1 Points +25%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	18.55 Points 0%
Gigaset GS270	18.48 Points
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	18.33 Points -1%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19)	18.2 Points -2%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	15.79 Points -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37721 Points +1088%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	4424 Points +39%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	3377 Points +6%
Gigaset GS270	3175 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19)	3095 Points -3%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	2930 Points -8%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	2582 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	17134 ms * -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	16192 ms * -15%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	14566 ms * -3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19)	14563 ms * -3%
Gigaset GS270	14103 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	10895 ms * +23%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +89%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	112 Points
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)	71 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)	61 Points

* ... smaller is better

	Gigaset GS270	Oukitel U18	Huawei Y6 2018	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	HTC Desire 12	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		20%	9%	74%	7%	-27%	1794%
Sequential Read 256KB	269	273.1 2%	254.3 -5%	270 0%	211.4 -21%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -39%	1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 594%
Sequential Write 256KB	44.86	109.2 143%	65.6 46%	194.5 334%	103.8 131%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -4%	1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 3135%
Random Read 4KB	34.64	28.7 -17%	38.8 12%	79.5 130%	16.69 -52%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -37%	279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 705%
Random Write 4KB	10.95	12.96 18%	9 -18%	7.1 -35%	7.54 -31%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -26%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 2740%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	75.8	71.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -6%	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	84.4 11%	81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.9	47.02 ?(Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401) -20%	64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	59.5 1%	61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -32%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.3 °C	24.5 °C	38.3 °C
38.4 °C	34.9 °C	40.1 °C
38.1 °C	34.8 °C	38.1 °C

Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C


33.2 °C	35.5 °C	38.4 °C
33.1 °C	35.5 °C	38.5 °C
34 °C	35.1 °C	37.1 °C

Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigaset GS270 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC Desire 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga	3.7 / 5.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigaset GS270 5000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6750	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-83%	-58%	-35%	-10%	-29%	-27%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	1.12 -40%	1.7 -113%	0.7 12%	1.13 -41%	1.13 ?(0.57 - 2.3, n=19) -41%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Average *	1.6	2.27 -42%	2.5 -56%	2.8 -75%	2.03 -27%	2.02 ?(1.42 - 3.5, n=19) -26%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	2	2.49 -25%	3.2 -60%	3.4 -70%	2.05 -3%	2.42 ?(1.47 - 5.9, n=19) -21%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 20%
Load Average *	3.7	10.75 -191%	5.2 -41%	4.2 -14%	3.68 1%	5.21 ?(3.24 - 10.8, n=19) -41%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -77%
Load Maximum *	5.7	12.39 -117%	6.8 -19%	7.2 -26%	4.52 21%	6.56 ?(3.3 - 12.4, n=19) -15%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -74%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		12h 15min

	Gigaset GS270 5000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	735	639 -13%	643 -13%	497 -32%	440 -40%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Boa razão de contraste

+ Acabamento sólido

Contra

- Câmera medíocre

- Baixo brilho da tela

- Alto falante ruim

Testing the Gigaset GS270. Test unit provided by Gigaset Germany.

Em nosso teste, o Gigaset GS270 apresenta-se como um smartphone de gama média inferior que não apresenta muitas fraquezas importantes. O desempenho oferecido está no nível esperado do hardware integrado e, além da versão ligeiramente antiga do Android, quase não há motivo para reclamações. Embora muitos dispositivos concorrentes ofereçam melhores resultados em algumas áreas, eles apresentam problemas em outras.

Os compradores da GS270 obtêm exatamente o que a Gigaset prometeu: um smartphone Android por 200 Euros (~$234) com uma bateria de longa duração e um sistema fluente para o uso diário.

A um preço de cerca de 200 euros (~234), os compradores interessados devem pensar sobre os recursos de um smartphone que são importantes para eles. Qualquer pessoa que tire fotos apenas ocasionalmente e não precise rodar programas exigentes, terá um dispositivo sólido com o Gigaset GS270, que é adequado para fazer chamadas telefônicas e pode lidar com todos os aplicativos usuais. Além disso, ultrapassa a maioria dos concorrentes com sua longa duração de bateria.

Gigaset GS270 - 05/27/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

37 / 60 → 62%

Peso

91%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

20 / 63 → 32%

Desempenho da aplicação

36 / 70 → 51%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

65%

Médio

66%

79%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS270

Mike Wobker, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-17)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Gigaset GS270 audio analysis

HTC Desire 12 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison