Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS160

Name: Gigaset GS160
Brand: Gigaset

Gigacessível. O GS160 é o smartphone mais econômico da Gigaset até a data. O fabricante inclusive instalou um sensor de digitais por menos de 150 Euros (~$160). Mas será que o aparelho é especial ou apenas outro smartphone de baixo custo? Descubra no nosso relatório do teste.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/19/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Android ARM Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Gigaset Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigaset GS160 (GS Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memória

1024 MB

, LPDDR3

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.87 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: accelerometer, proximity meter

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B20); largura de banda (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR rate: 0.408 W/kg (head), 1.450 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 144 x 72.3

Bateria

9.5 Wh, 2500 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 440 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix auto-foco, f2.2, flash LED
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes na parte traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

139 g, Suprimento de energia: 41 g

Preço

149 Euro

Links

Gigaset página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo C2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	53.3 MBit/s +11%
Gigaset GS160 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.2 MBit/s
Alcatel Shine Lite Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	42.3 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo C2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 MBit/s +51%
Alcatel Shine Lite Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.5 MBit/s +39%
Gigaset GS160 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	33.5 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


466 cd/m²	492 cd/m²	478 cd/m²
469 cd/m²	489 cd/m²	484 cd/m²
475 cd/m²	481 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 478.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 489 cd/m²
Contraste: 889:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.08

	Gigaset GS160 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo C2 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Huawei Y6 II Compact IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		15%	11%	-4%	1%
Brightness middle	489	458 -6%	412 -16%	491 0%	374 -24%
Brightness	479	449 -6%	414 -14%	487 2%	343 -28%
Brightness Distribution	95	92 -3%	94 -1%	92 -3%	85 -11%
Black Level *	0.55	0.35 36%	0.42 24%	0.9 -64%	0.47 15%
Contrast	889	1309 47%	981 10%	546 -39%	796 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.3	6.5 22%	5.6 33%	6.6 20%	6 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.4	11.7 19%	9.7 33%	12.9 10%	11.9 17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.7	7.7 11%	6.9 21%	4.9 44%	6.7 23%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.15 ^102%	2.4 ^92%	2.12 ^104%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	9034 ^72%	8518 ^76%	8422 ^77%	7090 ^92%	8073 ^81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
276 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 116 ms rise
276 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 160 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	28459 Points
Lenovo C2	23825 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points 0%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	33786 Points +19%
Wiko Lenny 3	25237 Points -11%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	518 Points
Lenovo C2	424 Points -18%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	549 Points +6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	1453 Points
Lenovo C2	1192 Points -18%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1581 Points +9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	3780 Points
Lenovo C2	Points -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points +17%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4885 Points +29%
Wiko Lenny 3	2920 Points -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	3291 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points +17%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4296 Points +31%
Wiko Lenny 3	2476 Points -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	7881 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points +17%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	9393 Points +19%
Wiko Lenny 3	7849 Points 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	11 fps
Lenovo C2	8.5 fps -23%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps -13%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15 fps +36%
Wiko Lenny 3	8 fps -27%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	6 fps
Lenovo C2	5 fps -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps -13%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	8.4 fps +40%
Wiko Lenny 3	4.4 fps -27%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	4.7 fps
Lenovo C2	3.7 fps -21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps -13%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	6.1 fps +30%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	2.1 fps
Lenovo C2	fps -100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps -14%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2.8 fps +33%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	3.4 fps
Lenovo C2	2.7 fps -21%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4.1 fps +21%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	1.4 fps
Lenovo C2	1.2 fps -14%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1.7 fps +21%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	2563 Points
Lenovo C2	1908 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points +67%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	3400 Points +33%
Wiko Lenny 3	2832 Points +10%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	178 Points
Lenovo C2	147 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points +239%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	203 Points +14%
Wiko Lenny 3	399 Points +124%
System (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	1029 Points
Lenovo C2	826 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1093 Points +6%
Wiko Lenny 3	988 Points -4%
Memory (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	497 Points
Lenovo C2	332 Points -33%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points +49%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	571 Points +15%
Wiko Lenny 3	293 Points -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	208 Points
Lenovo C2	177 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points +50%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	283 Points +36%
Wiko Lenny 3	138 Points -34%
Web (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	9 Points
Lenovo C2	9 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points +6022%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	10 Points +11%
Wiko Lenny 3	632 Points +6922%

Legend

Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	47 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	48 Points +2%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	50 Points +6%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	14.43 Points
Lenovo C2	13.5 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points +18%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	18.3 Points +27%
Wiko Lenny 3	14.07 Points -2%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	2493 Points
Lenovo C2	2159 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points +11%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2805 Points +13%
Wiko Lenny 3	2133 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	13907 ms *
Lenovo C2	16585 ms * -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms * +7%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	13234 ms * +5%
Wiko Lenny 3	14863 ms * -7%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	200.5 MB/s
Lenovo C2	120.7 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	144.1 MB/s -28%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	211 MB/s +5%
Wiko Lenny 3	132.5 MB/s -34%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	46.6 MB/s
Lenovo C2	8 MB/s -83%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	43.95 MB/s -6%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	75 MB/s +61%
Wiko Lenny 3	11.6 MB/s -75%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	18.5 MB/s
Lenovo C2	14.5 MB/s -22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.9 MB/s -3%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	23 MB/s +24%
Wiko Lenny 3	15.1 MB/s -18%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	6.8 MB/s
Lenovo C2	4.7 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28.31 MB/s +316%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15.5 MB/s +128%
Wiko Lenny 3	6.2 MB/s -9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	30.71 MB/s
Lenovo C2	24.2 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	65.5 MB/s +113%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	31.57 MB/s +3%
Wiko Lenny 3	40.59 MB/s +32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Gigaset GS160	19.19 MB/s
Lenovo C2	16.1 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	51.1 MB/s +166%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	17.12 MB/s -11%
Wiko Lenny 3	19.59 MB/s +2%

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	32 fps

... comparado com

Temple Run 2
	Configurações	Valor
	default	59 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.7 °C	39.8 °C	41 °C
40.6 °C	39.2 °C	41.7 °C
40.1 °C	40.5 °C	39.8 °C

Máximo: 41.7 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C


34.4 °C	36.2 °C	36.7 °C
34.5 °C	36.7 °C	38.8 °C
35.7 °C	37.3 °C	39.2 °C

Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Gigaset GS160 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo C2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.07 Watt
Ocioso	0.56 / 1.7 / 1.75 Watt
Carga	4.17 / 5.07 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh	Lenovo C2 2750 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh
Power Consumption		8%	7%	7%	-23%
Idle Minimum *	0.56	0.71 -27%	0.68 -21%	0.57 -2%	0.76 -36%
Idle Average *	1.7	1.62 5%	1.58 7%	1.53 10%	2.16 -27%
Idle Maximum *	1.75	1.64 6%	1.61 8%	1.6 9%	2.35 -34%
Load Average *	4.17	3.24 22%	3.36 19%	2.82 32%	4.65 -12%
Load Maximum *	5.07	3.36 34%	3.91 23%	5.69 -12%	5.35 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		22h 06min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 04min

	Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh	Lenovo C2 2750 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		13%	19%	-6%	-25%
Reader / Idle	1326		1998 51%	1175 -11%	944 -29%
H.264	702		683 -3%	682 -3%
WiFi v1.3	615	662 8%	630 2%	623 1%	549 -11%
Load	244	287 18%	306 25%	222 -9%	155 -36%

Pro

+ Bateria removível

+ dual-SIM + micro-SD

+ 16 GB de armazenamento

+ Câmeras com resolução relativamente alta

+ Tela muito brilhante

+ Acessórios e peças disponíveis

+ Configurações de reprodução de cores

+ Baixo consumo de energia sob carga leve

+ Leitor de digitais

Contra

- Carcaça sensível á pressão

- Memória de trabalho limitada

- Alto falante que chia

- Tonalidade intensamente azul da tela

- Qualidade de chamada medíocre

- Apenas duas bandas UMTS

- Correções de segurança desatualizadas

In review: Gigaset GS160. Review sample courtesy of Gigaset Germany

A Gigaset foi inteligente em entrar ao mercado com smartphones de alta qualidade Por isso, o consumidor associa a marca com smartphones premium. O Gigaset GS160 nos traz de volta para a terra: O fabricante alemão não consegue fazer milagres com o orçamento limitado da categoria de nível de entrada. Consequentemente, está usando uma carcaça discreta e também poderia ser mais robusta. Qualidade das chamadas, alto falante, e desempenho: Embora estes sejam a média da categoria, nenhum destes pontos se destaca.

O leitor de digitais que a Gigaset instalou é uma exceção aqui. É bastante exclusivo para este setor e funciona com precisão. Muitas configurações são fornecidas para reproduzir imagens na tela, a qual também é muito brilhante. A duração da bateria é boa e o mesmo se aplica para o consumo de energia, particularmente durante cargas leves. A apertada configuração da memória de trabalho é bastante agravante dado que com frequência retarda o sistema e impede que um jogo sofisticado seja pausado no plano de fundo quando se abre outro aplicativo. O avanço do jogo poderia se perder e o aplicativo simplesmente é reiniciado.

O Gigaset GS160 não é perfeito, mas ele aproveita ao máximo o seu baixo orçamento. O sensor de digitais que é difícil de encontrar nesta categoria é um destaque.

Gostamos do fato que a Gigaset ofereça peças de reposição e acessórios, inclusive para um smartphone de tão baixo custo em sua loja online. Damos um ponto de bônus por isso e pelas diversas opções de personalização no software. O slot microSD dedicado, além dos slots dual-SIM também é um argumento para este ponto de bônus. A bateria removível agrada os usuários que viajam frequentemente. Embora a Gigaset não tenha montado um paco excelente, é um pacote completo que adiciona um ar de premium à classe de nível de entrada com seus pequenos extras.

Gigaset GS160 - 2017-02-07 02/07/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

85%

Conectividade

38 / 60 → 64%

Peso

93%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

6 / 63 → 9%

Desempenho da aplicação

24 / 70 → 35%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

65%

Impressão

+1%

Médio

63%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS160

Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-19 (Update: 2017-02-27)