Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot King Kong
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Cubot King Kong | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
CAT S31 |
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 466 cd/m²
Contraste: 1864:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Cubot King Kong IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Oukitel WP5000 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | CAT S31 IPS, 1280x720, 4.7" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Ulefone Armor X IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -60% | 19% | -25% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 466 | 506 9% | 784 68% | 445 -5% | 564 21% |
Brightness | 449 | 503 12% | 750 67% | 437 -3% | 541 20% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 92 2% | 88 -2% | 91 1% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.97 -288% | 0.45 -80% | 0.67 -168% | 0.37 -48% |
Contrast | 1864 | 522 -72% | 1742 -7% | 664 -64% | 1524 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.03 | 9.4 -34% | 4.28 39% | 6.5 8% | 5.1 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.25 | 19.9 -22% | 8.75 46% | 10.6 35% | 9.6 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 13 -83% | 6.1 14% | 7.2 -1% | 5.4 24% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.59 85% | 2.49 88% | 2.53 87% | 2.1 105% |
CCT | 7244 90% | 10219 64% | 7175 91% | 8274 79% | 7755 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 43 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=12) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (0 - 0, n=2) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=12) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=12) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Cubot King Kong | |
Oukitel WP5000 | |
CAT S31 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor X | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=12) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10) | |
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66) | |
CAT S31 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66) | |
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66) | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10) | |
CAT S31 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66) | |
CAT S31 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=11) | |
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot King Kong | Oukitel WP5000 | CAT S31 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | Ulefone Armor X | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 177% | 159% | 172% | 203% | 110% | 3101% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 77.3 | 257.5 233% | 71.1 -8% | 181.6 135% | 255.3 230% | 164.5 ? 113% | 1847 ? 2289% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 32.6 | 162.1 397% | 62.1 90% | 73.6 126% | 82.8 154% | 43 ? 32% | 1436 ? 4305% |
Random Read 4KB | 17.2 | 66.9 289% | 14.28 -17% | 21.8 27% | 14.7 -15% | 21.7 ? 26% | 277 ? 1510% |
Random Write 4KB | 7 | 9.89 41% | 14.81 112% | 11.9 70% | 10.17 45% | 8.08 ? 15% | 308 ? 4300% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 20.6 ? | 21.11 ? 2% | 81.8 297% | 69 ? 235% | 81.5 ? 296% | 59.1 ? 187% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 10.3 ? | 20.5 ? 99% | 59.5 478% | 55.7 ? 441% | 62.6 ? 508% | 39.8 ? 286% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Cubot King Kong audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.05 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.7 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt |
Carga |
3.8 / 5.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Cubot King Kong 4400 mAh | Oukitel WP5000 5200 mAh | CAT S31 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6580M | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -28% | -4% | 0% | -30% | -14% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 1.18 -69% | 0.73 -4% | 0.56 20% | 1.22 -74% | 0.805 ? -15% | 0.895 ? -28% |
Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.17 -36% | 2.21 -38% | 1.57 2% | 2.07 -29% | 1.736 ? -9% | 1.453 ? 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 2.26 -26% | 2.25 -25% | 1.68 7% | 2.14 -19% | 2.1 ? -17% | 1.613 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 3.8 | 3.68 3% | 2.99 21% | 4.6 -21% | 4.92 -29% | 4.82 ? -27% | 6.5 ? -71% |
Load Maximum * | 5.5 | 6.06 -10% | 4.12 25% | 5.92 -8% | 5.4 2% | 5.68 ? -3% | 9.86 ? -79% |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot King Kong 4400 mAh | Oukitel WP5000 5200 mAh | CAT S31 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | -2% | -39% | -23% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1098 | 1189 8% | 1074 -2% | 668 -39% | 845 -23% |
Reader / Idle | 1388 | ||||
H.264 | 681 | ||||
Load | 205 |
Pro
Contra
Não deixe o Cubot King Kong te enganar: Apesar de sua carcaça pesada, a tela está pouco protegida, e os botões tácteis dificultam o uso com luvas. Também oferece baixo desempenho e não é ideal para usar em ambientes claros. Outros fabricantes oferecem dispositivos que realmente merecem o nome de "smartphone para exteriores". Mas leve em conta que este dispositivo tem uma certificação IP68, longas durações de bateria e Android puro.
Este aqui onde suas expectativas sobre este smartphone devem terminar. A câmera tira fotos desbotadas, na melhor das hipóteses, e o alto-falante não é digno de seu nome - é muito baixo, embora o som que produz seja bom. A falta de suporte para LTE pode ser considerado um problema por muitas pessoas.
Certas limitações não podem ser evitadas nessa faixa de preço. No entanto, o Cubot King Kong oferece tempos de duração de bateria muito bons e é resistente à água e à poeira.
Se você estiver procurando por um dispositivo que possa ser usado em ambientes hostis, talvez você queira gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro e obter um dispositivo mais potente que possa ser usado em qualquer lugar. No entanto, se você é simplesmente desajeitado e o design pesado agrada a você, você terá um smartphone decente por pouco dinheiro.
Cubot King Kong
- 06/19/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer