Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot King Kong

Name: Cubot King Kong
Brand: Cubot

Tão forte quanto um gorila? Acessível e robusto, é assim que o Cubot King Kong se apresenta. É um smartphone de 5 polegadas com uma SoC medianamente rápida protegida em uma carcaça pesada, protegida contra água e poeira. Será que isso é suficiente para a dura realidade da vida cotidiana?

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/22/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Cubot

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Cubot King Kong (King Kong Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6580M 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-400 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 polegadas, Card Reader: microSD de até 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/1700/1900/2100), Dual SIM, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14.85 x 153 x 80.2

Bateria

16.7 Wh, 4400 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @720p
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um só alto-falantes na traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, mini chave de fenda, SAR values: 0.72 W/kg (body), 0.31 W/kg (head); IP68 certified, fanless, ruggedized

peso

246 g, Suprimento de energia: 52 g

Preço

119 Euro

Links

Cubot página inicial
Cubot Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel WP5000 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s +89%
Ulefone Armor X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	103 MBit/s +79%
Cubot King Kong Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	57.7 MBit/s
CAT S31 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.3 MBit/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Mali-T720, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash	37.9 MBit/s -34%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel WP5000 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash	114 MBit/s +110%
Ulefone Armor X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.3 MBit/s +81%
Cubot King Kong Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.4 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Mali-T720, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.2 MBit/s -10%
CAT S31 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash	41.6 MBit/s -24%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


454 cd/m²	443 cd/m²	450 cd/m²
461 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	431 cd/m²
459 cd/m²	457 cd/m²	419 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 466 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 448.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 466 cd/m²
Contraste: 1864:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Cubot King Kong IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Oukitel WP5000 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	CAT S31 IPS, 1280x720, 4.7"	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Ulefone Armor X IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		-60%	19%	-25%	9%
Brightness middle	466	506 9%	784 68%	445 -5%	564 21%
Brightness	449	503 12%	750 67%	437 -3%	541 20%
Brightness Distribution	90	86 -4%	92 2%	88 -2%	91 1%
Black Level *	0.25	0.97 -288%	0.45 -80%	0.67 -168%	0.37 -48%
Contrast	1864	522 -72%	1742 -7%	664 -64%	1524 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.03	9.4 -34%	4.28 39%	6.5 8%	5.1 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.25	19.9 -22%	8.75 46%	10.6 35%	9.6 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.1	13 -83%	6.1 14%	7.2 -1%	5.4 24%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.59 ^85%	2.49 ^88%	2.53 ^87%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	7244 ^90%	10219 ^64%	7175 ^91%	8274 ^79%	7755 ^84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 43 ms rise
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	23540 Points
Oukitel WP5000	57489 Points +144%
CAT S31	24865 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	35379 Points +50%
Ulefone Armor X	37586 Points +60%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10)	22450 Points -5%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	21088 Points
Oukitel WP5000	78088 Points +270%
Ulefone Armor X	46435 Points +120%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4)	19302 Points -8%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	3041 Points
Oukitel WP5000	4947 Points +63%
CAT S31	3080 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	4508 Points +48%
Ulefone Armor X	4298 Points +41%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=12)	2715 Points -11%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	0 Points
Oukitel WP5000	4174 Points
CAT S31	2300 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	3446 Points
Ulefone Armor X	3184 Points
Average Mediatek MT6580M (0 - 0, n=2)	0 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	420 Points
Oukitel WP5000	1409 Points +235%
CAT S31	1 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	706 Points +68%
Ulefone Armor X	206 Points -51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (144 - 432, n=11)	328 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +1390%
System (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	985 Points
Oukitel WP5000	3225 Points +227%
CAT S31	899 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	1396 Points +42%
Ulefone Armor X	1491 Points +51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (957 - 1011, n=11)	978 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +929%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	403 Points
Oukitel WP5000	1229 Points +205%
CAT S31	328 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	1066 Points +165%
Ulefone Armor X	900 Points +123%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (189 - 404, n=11)	326 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +1566%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	138 Points
Oukitel WP5000	1120 Points +712%
CAT S31	256 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	253 Points +83%
Ulefone Armor X	188 Points +36%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (136 - 145, n=11)	140.5 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +12046%
Web (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	567 Points
Oukitel WP5000	888 Points +57%
CAT S31	10 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	661 Points +17%
Ulefone Armor X	7 Points -99%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (9 - 640, n=11)	421 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +175%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	425 Points
Oukitel WP5000	863 Points +103%
CAT S31	437 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	629 Points +48%
Ulefone Armor X	662 Points +56%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (394 - 437, n=6)	421 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +1176%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	1237 Points
Oukitel WP5000	3943 Points +219%
CAT S31	1135 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	1855 Points +50%
Ulefone Armor X	1847 Points +49%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1131 - 1237, n=6)	1167 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +1104%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	773 Points
Oukitel WP5000	2663 Points +245%
Ulefone Armor X	1416 Points +83%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (773 - 875, n=5)	842 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +1443%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	2841 Points
Oukitel WP5000	Points -100%
CAT S31	5291 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	4661 Points +64%
Ulefone Armor X	4188 Points +47%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=12)	2912 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	2396 Points
Oukitel WP5000	Points -100%
CAT S31	5042 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	3985 Points +66%
Ulefone Armor X	3585 Points +50%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=12)	2464 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	8112 Points
Oukitel WP5000	Points -100%
CAT S31	6396 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	11459 Points +41%
Ulefone Armor X	10195 Points +26%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=12)	8034 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	7.5 fps
Oukitel WP5000	31 fps +313%
CAT S31	9.8 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	11 fps +47%
Ulefone Armor X	9.2 fps +23%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 12, n=12)	8.74 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +1043%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong	4.2 fps
Oukitel WP5000	24 fps +471%
CAT S31	5.6 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	6.8 fps +62%
Ulefone Armor X	5.9 fps +40%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=12)	4.89 fps +16%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +6543%

Legend

Cubot King Kong Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel WP5000 Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6580M

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)	26.91 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)	20.99 Points +64%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	18.15 Points +42%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10)	13.2 Points +3%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)	12.79 Points
CAT S31	12.44 Points -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +1564%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)	5132 Points +132%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	3151 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)	3133 Points +42%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)	2208 Points
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10)	2066 Points -6%
CAT S31	2010 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)	18388 ms *
CAT S31	17828 ms * +3%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=11)	16993 ms * +8%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	15876 ms * +14%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)	11130 ms * +39%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)	10209 ms * +44%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +91%

* ... smaller is better

	Cubot King Kong	Oukitel WP5000	CAT S31	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4	Ulefone Armor X	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		177%	159%	172%	203%	110%	3098%
Sequential Read 256KB	77.3	257.5 233%	71.1 -8%	181.6 135%	255.3 230%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) 113%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 2273%
Sequential Write 256KB	32.6	162.1 397%	62.1 90%	73.6 126%	82.8 154%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) 32%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 4274%
Random Read 4KB	17.2	66.9 289%	14.28 -17%	21.8 27%	14.7 -15%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) 26%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 1516%
Random Write 4KB	7	9.89 41%	14.81 112%	11.9 70%	10.17 45%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) 15%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 4329%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	20.6 ?(Kingston 32GB)	21.11 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	81.8 297%	69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 235%	81.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 296%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) 187%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	10.3 ?(Kingston 32GB)	20.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 99%	59.5 478%	55.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 441%	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 508%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) 286%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


34 °C	32.5 °C	33.1 °C
34.9 °C	32.4 °C	33.6 °C
34.7 °C	32.5 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C


31.4 °C	31.6 °C	34.9 °C
31.3 °C	31.7 °C	36.9 °C
31.7 °C	32.1 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 33 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Cubot King Kong audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 52.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt
Carga	3.8 / 5.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Cubot King Kong 4400 mAh	Oukitel WP5000 5200 mAh	CAT S31 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh	Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6580M	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-28%	-4%	0%	-30%	-14%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	1.18 -69%	0.73 -4%	0.56 20%	1.22 -74%	0.805 ?(0.56 - 1.1, n=11) -15%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.6	2.17 -36%	2.21 -38%	1.57 2%	2.07 -29%	1.736 ?(1.36 - 2.26, n=11) -9%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	2.26 -26%	2.25 -25%	1.68 7%	2.14 -19%	2.1 ?(1.38 - 2.39, n=11) -17%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	3.8	3.68 3%	2.99 21%	4.6 -21%	4.92 -29%	4.82 ?(3.11 - 6.97, n=11) -27%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -69%
Load Maximum *	5.5	6.06 -10%	4.12 25%	5.92 -8%	5.4 2%	5.68 ?(3.59 - 7.03, n=11) -3%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -75%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		18h 18min

	Cubot King Kong 4400 mAh	Oukitel WP5000 5200 mAh	CAT S31 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh	Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh
Battery Runtime		8%	-2%	-39%	-23%
WiFi v1.3	1098	1189 8%	1074 -2%	668 -39%	845 -23%
Reader / Idle				1388
H.264				681
Load				205

Pro

+ Muito boas durações da bateria

+ Baixo consumo de energia

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas

+ Certificação IP68

+ Preço acessível

+ Android puro

+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Fotos embaçadas e granuladas da câmera

- Longos tempos de carga

- Sem LTE

- Desempenho relativamente lento

- Tela relativamente desprotegida

- Apenas botões tácteis para a operação

- Software desatualizado

- A tela tem uma tonalidade visível

Não deixe o Cubot King Kong te enganar: Apesar de sua carcaça pesada, a tela está pouco protegida, e os botões tácteis dificultam o uso com luvas. Também oferece baixo desempenho e não é ideal para usar em ambientes claros. Outros fabricantes oferecem dispositivos que realmente merecem o nome de "smartphone para exteriores". Mas leve em conta que este dispositivo tem uma certificação IP68, longas durações de bateria e Android puro.

Este aqui onde suas expectativas sobre este smartphone devem terminar. A câmera tira fotos desbotadas, na melhor das hipóteses, e o alto-falante não é digno de seu nome - é muito baixo, embora o som que produz seja bom. A falta de suporte para LTE pode ser considerado um problema por muitas pessoas.

Certas limitações não podem ser evitadas nessa faixa de preço. No entanto, o Cubot King Kong oferece tempos de duração de bateria muito bons e é resistente à água e à poeira.

Se você estiver procurando por um dispositivo que possa ser usado em ambientes hostis, talvez você queira gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro e obter um dispositivo mais potente que possa ser usado em qualquer lugar. No entanto, se você é simplesmente desajeitado e o design pesado agrada a você, você terá um smartphone decente por pouco dinheiro.

Cubot King Kong - 2018-06-19 06/19/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

31 / 60 → 51%

Peso

87%

Bateria

100%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

4 / 63 → 7%

Desempenho da aplicação

24 / 70 → 34%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

61 / 91 → 67%

Camera

39%

Médio

66%

76%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot King Kong

Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-22 (Update: 2018-07- 3)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Cubot King Kong audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison