Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot J3 Pro
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Wiko View Lite |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 476 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 12.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.273
Cubot J3 Pro IPS, 960x480, 5.5" | Blackview A20 IPS, 960x480, 5.5" | Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Wiko View Lite IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -11% | 28% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 476 | 364 -24% | 338 -29% | 524 10% |
Brightness | 459 | 375 -18% | 327 -29% | 499 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 82 -7% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.75 | 0.71 5% | 0.27 64% | 0.6 20% |
Contrast | 635 | 513 -19% | 1252 97% | 873 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.14 | 10.12 -24% | 5.36 34% | 4.75 42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.68 | 19.63 -18% | 9.77 41% | 8.45 49% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.2 | 11.1 9% | 6.2 49% | 4.3 65% |
Gamma | 2.273 97% | 2.722 81% | 2.345 94% | 2.248 98% |
CCT | 7643 85% | 10121 64% | 8460 77% | 7261 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Cubot J3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Cubot J3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Cubot J3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Cubot J3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Cubot J3 | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
GFXBench - on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot J3 Pro | |
Blackview A20 | |
Nokia 2.1 | |
Wiko View Lite | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) | |
Cubot J3 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16) | |
Wiko View Lite (Chrome 67) | |
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot J3 Pro | Blackview A20 | Nokia 2.1 | Wiko View Lite | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -70% | 26% | 4% | -22% | 1868% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 235.6 | 90.2 -62% | 288.3 22% | 253.2 7% | 164.5 ? -30% | 1834 ? 678% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 47.5 | 8 -83% | 51.2 8% | 44.45 -6% | 43 ? -9% | 1426 ? 2902% |
Random Read 4KB | 27.2 | 11.3 -58% | 50.5 86% | 27.35 1% | 21.7 ? -20% | 278 ? 922% |
Random Write 4KB | 10.1 | 3.4 -66% | 13.45 33% | 11.05 9% | 8.08 ? -20% | 310 ? 2969% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 74.8 ? | 20.6 ? -72% | 79.4 ? 6% | 80.9 ? 8% | 59.1 ? -21% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.1 ? | 11.2 ? -81% | 61.9 ? 3% | 61.9 ? 3% | 39.8 ? -34% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Cubot J3 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 2.1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.4 / 1.8 / 2.4 Watt |
Carga |
5.5 / 7.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Cubot J3 Pro 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Wiko View Lite 3000 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6739 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | 36% | -3% | -4% | 8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 1.1 21% | 0.7 50% | 1.2 14% | 1.522 ? -9% | 0.895 ? 36% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.5 17% | 1.2 33% | 2 -11% | 2.17 ? -21% | 1.447 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.4 | 2.3 4% | 1.9 21% | 3.2 -33% | 2.86 ? -19% | 1.608 ? 33% |
Load Average * | 5.5 | 4.8 13% | 3.2 42% | 5.2 5% | 4.73 ? 14% | 6.41 ? -17% |
Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 6.5 10% | 4.8 33% | 6.4 11% | 5.99 ? 17% | 9.61 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot J3 Pro 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Wiko View Lite 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 556 5% | 809 52% | 638 20% |
Pro
Contra
O Cubot J3 Pro é certamente digno do cargo de €30 sobre o J3. Melhora em quase todas as áreas que seu irmão menor não o faz e também sem nenhuma falha séria. Além disso, mantém os aspectos positivos do J3 também, como a bateria substituível, juntamente com seus slots de cartão dual-SIM e microSD dedicados.
O Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone de orçamento bem equipado, com alguns compromissos típicos de dispositivos desta faixa de preço.
Nosso modelo de teste é, portanto, um dispositivo muito mais completo e melhor concebido do que seu irmão menor, embora tenha algumas desvantagens típicas de smartphones baratos. Sua tela não é tão precisa quanto a cor e seu alto-falante mono não é nada para se escrever. Da mesma forma, ele tem temperaturas de superfície mais altas do que muitos dispositivos de gama média, e talvez o mais importante é que seu SoC e RAM de 1 GB são notoriamente pouco potentes. Nós não somos fãs de sua carcaça de plástico, nem do seu módulo GPS impreciso.
Se você pode viver com todas essas restrições, então o Cubot J3 Pro é um smartphone decente para o seu valor. Você também recebe algumas coisas boas, como um sensor de digitais e câmeras duplas traseiras, o que nem sempre acontece em smartphones econômicos.
Cubot J3 Pro
-
04/09/2019 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt