Breve Análise do Smartphone CUBOT R11
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Cubot R11 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Blackview A20 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Cubot R11 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Blackview A20 | |
Lenovo Moto E4 |
|
iluminação: 72 %
iluminação com acumulador: 428 cd/m²
Contraste: 486:1 (Preto: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.718
Cubot R11 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Blackview A20 IPS, 960x480, 5.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto E4 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -18% | 20% | 53% | 54% | |
Brightness middle | 428 | 364 -15% | 503 18% | 488 14% | 256 -40% |
Brightness | 401 | 375 -6% | 499 24% | 474 18% | 251 -37% |
Brightness Distribution | 72 | 90 25% | 84 17% | 87 21% | 89 24% |
Black Level * | 0.88 | 0.71 19% | 0.73 17% | 0.3 66% | 0.12 86% |
Contrast | 486 | 513 6% | 689 42% | 1627 235% | 2133 339% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.29 | 10.12 -61% | 5.44 14% | 5.4 14% | 4.82 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.2 | 19.63 -49% | 10.01 24% | 9 32% | 11.75 11% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 11.1 -61% | 6.8 1% | 5.5 20% | 5.2 25% |
Gamma | 2.718 81% | 2.722 81% | 2.451 90% | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7296 89% | 10121 64% | 6590 99% | 7397 88% | 7107 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Nokia 1 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4) |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=12) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=12) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=12) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=12) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 12, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Cubot R11 | |
Blackview A20 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
Lenovo Moto E4 | |
Nokia 1 | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10) | |
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10) | |
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) | |
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=11) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot R11 | Blackview A20 | Xiaomi Redmi 5A | Lenovo Moto E4 | Nokia 1 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -12% | 293% | 215% | 13% | 158% | 1957% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 135.8 | 90.2 -34% | 293.8 116% | 187.6 38% | 208.3 53% | 164.5 ? 21% | 1847 ? 1260% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 52 | 8 -85% | 49.86 -4% | 45.3 -13% | 51.8 0% | 43 ? -17% | 1436 ? 2662% |
Random Read 4KB | 22.1 | 11.3 -49% | 42.32 91% | 18.7 -15% | 25.7 16% | 21.7 ? -2% | 277 ? 1153% |
Random Write 4KB | 10.8 | 3.4 -69% | 9.28 -14% | 29.2 170% | 9.1 -16% | 8.08 ? -25% | 308 ? 2752% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 10.8 ? | 20.6 ? 91% | 84.9 ? 686% | 65.4 506% | 59.1 ? 447% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 6.38 ? | 11.2 ? 76% | 62.6 ? 881% | 44.9 604% | 39.8 ? 524% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Cubot R11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.9 / 1.5 / 2.2 Watt |
Carga |
4.6 / 6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Cubot R11 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 2800 mAh | Nokia 1 2150 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6580M | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | 8% | 2% | 12% | 0% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 1.1 -22% | 1.2 -33% | 0.87 3% | 0.9 -0% | 0.805 ? 11% | 0.895 ? 1% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.5 -0% | 1.5 -0% | 2.38 -59% | 1.5 -0% | 1.736 ? -16% | 1.453 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 1.8 18% | 2.47 -12% | 2 9% | 2.1 ? 5% | 1.613 ? 27% |
Load Average * | 4.6 | 4.8 -4% | 2.9 37% | 2.63 43% | 3.5 24% | 4.82 ? -5% | 6.5 ? -41% |
Load Maximum * | 6 | 6.5 -8% | 4.8 20% | 3.86 36% | 4.3 28% | 5.68 ? 5% | 9.86 ? -64% |
* ... smaller is better
Cubot R11 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 2800 mAh | Nokia 1 2150 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -12% | 59% | -18% | -13% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 633 | 556 -12% | 1009 59% | 522 -18% | 552 -13% |
Reader / Idle | 1302 | ||||
H.264 | 608 | ||||
Load | 316 |
Pro
Contra
O CUBOT R11 é um dispositivo de menos de €100 que impressiona com sua carcaça robusta e longa duração da bateria. No entanto, agora há muitos dispositivos com preços semelhantes que oferecem mais potência, melhores câmeras e suporte para LTE. No lado positivo, o CUBOT R11 tem uma bateria substituível, uma relação de aspecto de 2:1 e dimensões compactas, a última das quais beneficiará aqueles com mãos menores.
O CUBOT R11 é um smartphone de baixo custo que tem boa duração de bateria, uma bateria substituível e uma carcaça robusta. No entanto, um SoC mais poderoso teria feito maravilhas.
No geral, o CUBOT R11 é um típico smartphone de nível básico que se sai bem em algumas áreas, mas em outras nem tanto.
Cubot R11
- 07/26/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer