Breve Análise do Smartphone CAT S61

Name: CAT S61
Brand: CAT

Multi-functional.

O robusto CAT S61 coloca todos aqueles que dizem que não há inovações no mercado de smartphones em vergonha. No entanto, com a câmera de imagem térmica integrada, um medidor de distância a laser e a medição automática da qualidade do ar interno, seus recursos mais importantes podem ser mais úteis para usuários profissionais.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

CAT S61 (S Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD de até 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro, termômetro, higrômetro, sensor da qualidade do ar (VOC), USB-C, câmera infravermelha, medição de distância a laser

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13 x 163 x 78

Bateria

17.1 Wh, 4500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carga rápida

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix Phase comparison AF, dual-LED flash, Videos @ 2160 p and 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda infeiror, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, Measure, Air, App Toolbox, FLIR, 24 Meses Garantia, Protegido pelo IP68 & IP69K; MIL SPEC 810G, Resistência de temperatura: suporta mudanças de temperatura entre -25 °C (-13 °F) e 55 °C (131 °F) durante até 24 horas; resistência à vibração: Category 4; resistente à umidade e sal; LTE Cat. 13 600 Mbps (download) Cat. 12 150 Mbps (upload); SAR value: 0.416 W/kg (head), 1.594 W/kg (body), fanless, ruggedized

peso

250 g, Suprimento de energia: 91 g

Preço

899 Euro

Links

CAT página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	354 MBit/s +4%
CAT S61 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	341 MBit/s
Crosscall Action-X3 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	201 MBit/s -41%
Land Rover Explore Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	62.7 MBit/s -82%
CAT S41 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38.7 MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	915 MBit/s +170%
CAT S61 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	339 MBit/s
Crosscall Action-X3 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	199 MBit/s -41%
Land Rover Explore Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	61.1 MBit/s -82%
CAT S41 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38.1 MBit/s -89%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


675 cd/m²	705 cd/m²	667 cd/m²
670 cd/m²	693 cd/m²	678 cd/m²
631 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	658 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 705 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 671.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 693 cd/m²
Contraste: 900:1 (Preto: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.834

	CAT S61 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Land Rover Explore IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Crosscall Action-X3 IPS, 1280x800, 5"	Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7"	CAT S41 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen		-15%	3%	38%	-7%
Brightness middle	693	633 -9%	417 -40%	604 -13%	537 -23%
Brightness	672	604 -10%	425 -37%	580 -14%	506 -25%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	91 1%	91 1%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.77	0.84 -9%	0.29 62%	0.44 43%	0.9 -17%
Contrast	900	754 -16%	1438 60%	1373 53%	597 -34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.23	6.41 -23%	7.12 -36%	1.2 77%	5.02 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.18	11.88 -17%	10.19 -0%	2.3 77%	7.98 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.9	9.2 -33%	6.1 12%	1.6 77%	5.3 23%
Gamma	2.834 ^78%	1.927 ^114%	2.687 ^82%	2.25 ^98%	2.154 ^102%
CCT	7137 ^91%	6165 ^105%	7687 ^85%	6688 ^97%	7226 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	44128 Points
Land Rover Explore	75939 Points +72%
Crosscall Action-X3	42924 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 8	204270 Points +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points +56%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	90674 Points
Land Rover Explore	107921 Points +19%
Crosscall Action-X3	57023 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points -1%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61	5548 Points
Land Rover Explore	5041 Points -9%
Crosscall Action-X3	4665 Points -16%
CAT S41	4778 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61	4748 Points
Land Rover Explore	4580 Points -4%
Crosscall Action-X3	3666 Points -23%
CAT S41	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
CAT S61	1526 Points
Land Rover Explore	1352 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	Points -100%
CAT S41	1255 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +326%
System (sort by value)
CAT S61	3283 Points
Land Rover Explore	2889 Points -12%
CAT S41	2372 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +215%
Memory (sort by value)
CAT S61	1228 Points
Land Rover Explore	1230 Points 0%
CAT S41	1269 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +475%
Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1499 Points
Land Rover Explore	1222 Points -18%
CAT S41	1126 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +1101%
Web (sort by value)
CAT S61	896 Points
Land Rover Explore	769 Points -14%
CAT S41	731 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +76%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	885 Points
Land Rover Explore	1739 Points +96%
Crosscall Action-X3	634 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 8	4162 Points +370%
CAT S41	869 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +534%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	4202 Points
Land Rover Explore	4927 Points +17%
Crosscall Action-X3	2360 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 8	10380 Points +147%
CAT S41	3414 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +275%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	3930 Points
Land Rover Explore	3605 Points -8%
Crosscall Action-X3	2045 Points -48%
CAT S41	2888 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +220%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	16808 Points
Land Rover Explore	14919 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	9231 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 8	62006 Points +269%
CAT S41	13404 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	18375 Points
Land Rover Explore	17173 Points -7%
Crosscall Action-X3	9342 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 8	112424 Points +512%
CAT S41	13844 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	12945 Points
Land Rover Explore	10223 Points -21%
Crosscall Action-X3	8864 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 8	24131 Points +86%
CAT S41	12063 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
CAT S61	1318 Points
Land Rover Explore	1186 Points -10%
Crosscall Action-X3	561 Points -57%
CAT S41	969 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +219%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1234 Points
Land Rover Explore	1103 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	492 Points -60%
CAT S41	909 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +284%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1729 Points
Land Rover Explore	1610 Points -7%
Crosscall Action-X3	1099 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 8	1774 Points +3%
CAT S41	1261 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
CAT S61	814 Points
Land Rover Explore	995 Points +22%
Crosscall Action-X3	284 Points -65%
Apple iPhone 8	2421 Points +197%
CAT S41	707 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	708 Points
Land Rover Explore	892 Points +26%
Crosscall Action-X3	234 Points -67%
Apple iPhone 8	2581 Points +265%
CAT S41	613 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +347%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1711 Points
Land Rover Explore	1668 Points -3%
Crosscall Action-X3	1098 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 8	1989 Points +16%
CAT S41	1529 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +91%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	29 fps
Land Rover Explore	33 fps +14%
Crosscall Action-X3	26 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 8	119.8 fps +313%
CAT S41	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +199%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	29 fps
Land Rover Explore	32 fps +10%
Crosscall Action-X3	15 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 8	161.3 fps +456%
CAT S41	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +921%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
CAT S61	13 fps
Land Rover Explore	19 fps +46%
Crosscall Action-X3	14 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 8	114.5 fps +781%
CAT S41	10 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +485%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	14 fps
Land Rover Explore	16 fps +14%
Crosscall Action-X3	6.7 fps -52%
Apple iPhone 8	70.8 fps +406%
CAT S41	10 fps -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +1150%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.3 fps
Land Rover Explore	13 fps +145%
Crosscall Action-X3	10 fps +89%
Apple iPhone 8	109.7 fps +1970%
CAT S41	6.8 fps +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps +77%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +1158%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	9.7 fps
Land Rover Explore	12 fps +24%
Crosscall Action-X3	4.4 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 8	54 fps +457%
CAT S41	6.8 fps -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +1181%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.4 fps
Land Rover Explore	7.3 fps +35%
Crosscall Action-X3	5.3 fps -2%
CAT S41	4 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +817%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.5 fps
Land Rover Explore	6.8 fps +24%
Crosscall Action-X3	2.4 fps -56%
CAT S41	4 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +1260%

Legend

CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Land Rover Explore MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Crosscall Action-X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)

CAT S41 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	206.7 Points +635%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	48.86 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points +1%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	28.14 Points
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	26.67 Points -5%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	18.05 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +649%
Apple iPhone 8	34163 Points +564%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	9798 Points +90%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	5146 Points
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	5024 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points -4%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	3251 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	13331 ms * -38%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	10444 ms * -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * -0%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	9692 ms *
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	4261 ms * +56%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +84%
Apple iPhone 8	731 ms * +92%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8	359 Points +212%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	156 Points +36%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	115 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	105.9 Points -8%

* ... smaller is better

	CAT S61	Land Rover Explore	Crosscall Action-X3	CAT S41	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-15%	-31%	18%	910%
Sequential Read 256KB	284.7	237.3 -17%	264.7 -7%	253 -11%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=204) -4%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 563%
Sequential Write 256KB	212.2	104.5 -51%	139.3 -34%	117.2 -45%	176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204) -17%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 593%
Random Read 4KB	44.7	28.7 -36%	47 5%	65.5 47%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=204) 33%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 522%
Random Write 4KB	15.1	11.2 -26%	8.4 -44%	12.99 -14%	32.2 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=204) 113%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 1960%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	23.87 -71%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	5 -92%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -8%

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Configurações	Valor
	High Quality	30 fps
	Standard / low	30 fps

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	31 fps
	high HD	31 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.4 °C	36.5 °C	33.9 °C
43.3 °C	36.8 °C	33.6 °C
42.2 °C	37.3 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 43.3 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C


34.2 °C	36.2 °C	42.1 °C
34.3 °C	36 °C	42.5 °C
33.9 °C	36.2 °C	41.3 °C

Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 47.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

CAT S61 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

CAT S41 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.9 Watt
Ocioso	1.4 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Carga	3.5 / 5.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh	Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	CAT S41 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-13%	-16%	19%	-11%	12%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	1.2 14%	1.1 21%	0.54 61%	1.4 -0%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) 48%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.5 21%	1.9 -0%	1.63 14%	2.2 -16%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) 3%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	3 -15%	2.9 -12%	1.67 36%	2.8 -8%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) 17%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 38%
Load Average *	3.5	4.5 -29%	4.8 -37%	2.74 22%	4.1 -17%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -9%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) -88%
Load Maximum *	5.6	8.6 -54%	8.4 -50%	7.78 -39%	6.4 -14%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -0%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) -77%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		31h 31min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 41min

	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh	Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	CAT S41 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-43%	-9%	-30%	3%
Reader / Idle	1891			1629 -14%
H.264	962			698 -27%
WiFi v1.3	923	529 -43%	843 -9%	585 -37%	953 3%
Load	341			202 -41%

Pro

+ Funções especiais abrangentes e práticas

+ Carcaça robusta e bem protegida

+ GPS bastante preciso

+ Ótima duração da bateria

+ Tela muito brilhante

+ Bom desempenho

+ Boas câmeras

Contra

- Só vale o seu preço se você usar as funções especiais

- Carcaça pesada

- Tela com baixa precisão de cor

In review: CAT S61. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O CAT S61 é, naturalmente, um especialista. Com seu exterior robusto e as funcionalidades adicionais muito específicas, não é realmente um smartphone para qualquer um. Mas quem geralmente usa uma câmera de imagem térmica pode aproveitar a solução integrada. A medição de distância via laser também funciona bem, mesmo que não seja tão fluente quanto um dispositivo dedicado.

Qualquer pessoa atraída pela medição de distância a laser, medição da qualidade do ar e uma câmera de imagem térmica terá uma ferramenta versátil em suas mãos com o CAT S61.

Naturalmente, outros recursos são mais importantes para profissionais do que para os clientes habituais, mas a tela e a câmera do CAT S61 são bastante utilizáveis. Da mesma forma, o desempenho é bom, há armazenamento suficiente e o GPS também funciona com bastante precisão. Enquanto o CAT S61 pode ser usado em muitas áreas, para alguém que não usa suas funcionalidades adicionais, há melhores opções na faixa de preço deste smartphone: Com mais desempenho, mais armazenamento e melhores câmeras. Existem também telefones reforçados mais acessíveis, como o Land Rover Explore ou o CAT S41, se você está apenas procurando por um smartphone robusto.

No geral, o CAT S61 é um dispositivo versátil que vale seu preço, contanto que você também use suas características especiais.

CAT S61 - 10/16/2019 v7 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

49 / 70 → 70%

Peso

87%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

10 / 64 → 15%

Desempenho da aplicação

45 / 86 → 53%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

56 / 90 → 62%

Camera

71%

Médio

71%

77%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone CAT S61

Florian Wimmer, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

CAT S61 audio analysis

CAT S41 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison