Breve Análise do Smartphone Bluboo S8
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 544.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 812:1 (Preto: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01
| Bluboo S8 SHARP, IPS, 5.7", 1440x720 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, 5.8", 2960x1440 | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Super AMOLED, 5.7", 2560x1440 | Huawei Y7 IPS, 5.5", 1280x720 | LG Q6 IPS, 5.5", 2160x1080 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 5.5", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 90% | 88% | 9% | 21% | 89% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 5.6 ? 88% | 4.8 ? 89% | 59.2 ? -30% | 38 ? 17% | 4.8 ? 89% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 3.2 ? 91% | 4.8 ? 86% | 18.4 ? 47% | 26 ? 24% | 4 ? 88% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 | 231.5 | 2315 ? | 257.7 | ||
| Screen | 31% | 6% | 24% | 29% | 27% | |
| Brightness middle | 544.2 | 566 4% | 338 -38% | 467 -14% | 523 -4% | 454 -17% |
| Brightness | 539 | 564 5% | 341 -37% | 456 -15% | 498 -8% | 463 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 94 -1% | 90 -5% | 92 -3% | 88 -7% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.39 42% | 0.24 64% | |||
| Contrast | 812 | 1197 47% | 2179 168% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 2.7 64% | 3.7 50% | 4.3 42% | 6.4 14% | 2 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 5.4 50% | 7.9 27% | 6.8 37% | 11 -2% | 5.3 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 3.1 62% | 4.9 40% | 3.5 57% | 7.4 9% | 1.7 79% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.35 94% | 2.4 92% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 8989 72% | 6335 103% | 7286 89% | 7273 89% | 8641 75% | 6394 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 61% /
45% | 47% /
27% | 17% /
21% | 25% /
28% | 58% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Computer Vision score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Storage score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Work performance score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Medium Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Epic Citadel | |
| Ultra High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| High Quality | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| High Performance | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Bluboo S8 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S8 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei Y7 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG Q6 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 95% | 52% | -17% | 18% | -16% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 55.9 | 53.5 -4% | 62.6 12% | 62.6 12% | 62.6 12% | 63.9 14% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.9 | 63.9 -16% | 83.4 10% | 82.5 9% | 84.8 12% | 76.1 0% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.37 | 15.25 23% | 13.51 9% | 6.9 -44% | 9.2 -26% | 10.54 -15% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.24 | 127.2 233% | 88.4 131% | 53.2 39% | 54.3 42% | 25.86 -32% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.6 | 193.2 149% | 142.8 84% | 33.2 -57% | 133.5 72% | 53 -32% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 281 | 793 182% | 458.9 63% | 119.4 -58% | 263.1 -6% | 198.5 -29% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Bluboo S8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.99 / 1.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.6 / 2.4 / 2.5 Watt |
| Carga |
6.5 / 4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Bluboo S8 MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL SD 821, Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Huawei Y7 435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG Q6 435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash, Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 33% | 2% | 35% | 22% | 56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.78 51% | 0.88 45% | 0.57 64% | 0.92 42% | 0.39 76% |
| Idle Average * | 2.4 | 1.1 54% | 1.24 48% | 1.61 33% | 2.19 9% | 1.06 56% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.5 | 1.16 54% | 1.26 50% | 1.62 35% | 2.24 10% | 1.08 57% |
| Load Average * | 6.5 | 4.15 36% | 7.71 -19% | 3.09 52% | 3.38 48% | 1.82 72% |
| Load Maximum * | 4 | 5.12 -28% | 8.64 -116% | 4.26 -7% | 4 -0% | 3.21 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Bluboo S8 MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20, Wh | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL SD 821, Adreno 530, Wh | Huawei Y7 435, Adreno 505, 15.2 Wh | LG Q6 435, Adreno 505, 10.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 48% | 13% | 74% | 18% | 107% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1069 | 1667 56% | 1476 38% | 1914 79% | 1367 28% | 1950 82% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 390 | 719 84% | 444 14% | 716 84% | 502 29% | 904 132% |
| Load | 255 | 264 4% | 221 -13% | 402 58% | 251 -2% | 525 106% |
Pro
Contra
O Bluboo S8 parece ótimo, se sente bem para segurar, e tem uma tela surpreendentemente brilhante 18: 9. Todo o resto é simplesmente morno, na melhor das hipóteses, ou nem mesmo funcional, na pior das hipóteses.
Para começar, os usuários norte-americanos devem estar cientes de que o Bluboo S8 não possui as frequências de rádio 3G ou 4G necessárias para as principais operadoras. Em segundo lugar, o aplicativo de telefone dá erro em nossa unidade de teste, mesmo depois de atualizar para a versão mais recente do software. A vibração é fraca, as cores são mortas, precisa fazer várias tentativas no leitor de digitais, a qualidade da câmera é granulada, há uma sensação estática do alto-falante, aparentemente em intervalos aleatórios, e a falta de um conector de áudio parece ser insultante, especialmente quando o básico falha tanto. Talvez simplesmente recebemos uma unidade defeituosa, mas, ao mesmo tempo, isso certamente reflete mal nos padrões de garantia de qualidade da Bluboo e na longevidade do dispositivo.
Um clone Galaxy S8 na superfície, mas um telefone de ultra-orçamento por dentro. Não esperamos muito de um smartphone por menos de $150 USD, exceto um funcionamento básico, mas o Bluboo S8 não consegue sequer fazer chamadas e que o alto-falante funcione de forma confiável.
Bluboo S8
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
