Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Blackview R7

Smartphone carro-chefe de baixo orçamento? Smartphone carro-chefe de baixo orçamento? O R7 é o primeiro smartphone autodenominado carro-chefe do fabricante chinês Blackview – por um preço ao redor dos 160 Euros (~$180). Vamos ver como o novo carro-chefe se desempenha em nossa análise.
Blackview R7
Processador
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.43 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (até 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximidade, Acelerômetro, OTG, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz, 3G: 900 / 2100 MHz, 4G: LTE 800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 4G: 1900/ 2300/ 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 152 x 78
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 334 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: On-screen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força modular, cabo USB, protetor de tela, carcaça protetiva, Blackview UI, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
197 g, Suprimento de energia: 93 g
Preço
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

152 mm 78 mm 8.9 mm 197 g146.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.8 mm 140 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g139 mm 67.8 mm 7.9 mm 119 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
316 MBit/s +210%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s -51%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
265 MBit/s +234%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s -27%
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Blackview R7
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS Test Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
506
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 526.3 cd/m² Minimum: 28.36 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 552 cd/m²
Contraste: 863:1 (Preto: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 14.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Coolpad Torino S
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7"
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
25%
12%
18%
22%
36%
Brightness middle
552
312
-43%
360
-35%
370
-33%
515
-7%
598
8%
Brightness
526
302
-43%
358
-32%
355
-33%
498
-5%
566
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
79
-13%
87
-4%
92
1%
93
2%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.64
0.15
77%
0.45
30%
0.28
56%
0.49
23%
0.51
20%
Contrast
863
2080
141%
800
-7%
1321
53%
1051
22%
1173
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11
8.2
25%
6.8
38%
6.7
39%
6.2
44%
3.5
68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.8
16.5
21%
11.3
46%
17.8
14%
11.4
45%
6.1
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
14.3
9.2
36%
6.2
57%
7.9
45%
7.4
48%
3.5
76%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.29 96%
2.14 103%
2.21 100%
2.28 96%
2.29 96%
CCT
12996 50%
9017 72%
7975 82%
9072 72%
8664 75%
6532 100%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s +6%
Coolpad Torino S
16.54 MB/s +39%
LG K10
45 MB/s +279%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s +104%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s +46%
Coolpad Torino S
25.79 MB/s +66%
LG K10
75.5 MB/s +385%
Honor 5C
51.9 MB/s +234%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s -28%
Coolpad Torino S
6.94 MB/s -39%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s -34%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s +38%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s +19%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s -35%
Coolpad Torino S
18.34 MB/s -35%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s -67%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s +120%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.8 MB/s +281%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview R7
122.7 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.3 MB/s -43%
Coolpad Torino S
41.81 MB/s -66%
LG K10
78 MB/s -36%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s -38%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.3 MB/s +30%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview R7
247.6 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.3 MB/s -24%
Coolpad Torino S
140.3 MB/s -43%
LG K10
131 MB/s -47%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s +6%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.6 MB/s +86%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
50572 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points -53%
Coolpad Torino S
22766 Points -55%
LG K10
27383 Points -46%
Honor 5C
53143 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points +130%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
10762 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points -71%
Coolpad Torino S
4430 Points -59%
LG K10
4339 Points -60%
Honor 5C
11755 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points +172%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
10334 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points -74%
Coolpad Torino S
3858 Points -63%
LG K10
3774 Points -63%
Honor 5C
11319 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points +216%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview R7
12585 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points -44%
Coolpad Torino S
9205 Points -27%
LG K10
9106 Points -28%
Honor 5C
13588 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview R7
590 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points -79%
Coolpad Torino S
52 Points -91%
LG K10
52 Points -91%
Honor 5C
563 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points +500%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview R7
518 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points -81%
Coolpad Torino S
41 Points -92%
LG K10
41 Points -92%
Honor 5C
480 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points +780%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview R7
1155 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points -46%
Coolpad Torino S
735 Points -36%
LG K10
730 Points -37%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points +71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R7
17 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps -52%
Coolpad Torino S
5.3 fps -69%
LG K10
9.7 fps -43%
Honor 5C
20 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps +253%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R7
17 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps -71%
Coolpad Torino S
9.8 fps -42%
LG K10
5.2 fps -69%
Honor 5C
19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps +429%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview R7
4.7 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps -62%
Coolpad Torino S
1.8 fps -62%
LG K10
4.1 fps -13%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps +79%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps +794%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R7
4.7 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps -28%
Coolpad Torino S
4.3 fps -9%
LG K10
1.8 fps -62%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps +68%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps +794%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R7
2.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps -52%
LG K10
fps -100%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps +96%
Xiaomi Mi 5
31 fps +1140%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R7
2.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps 0%
LG K10
fps -100%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps +80%
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 fps +1100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
4364 Points
Coolpad Torino S
3932 Points -10%
LG K10
3999 Points -8%
Honor 5C
5120 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points +57%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview R7
338 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points +33%
Coolpad Torino S
602 Points +78%
LG K10
536 Points +59%
Honor 5C
1225 Points +262%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points +608%
System (sort by value)
Blackview R7
1971 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points -59%
Coolpad Torino S
1102 Points -44%
LG K10
1050 Points -47%
Honor 5C
2600 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points +85%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview R7
1030 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points -53%
Coolpad Torino S
607 Points -41%
LG K10
453 Points -56%
Honor 5C
1504 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points +75%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview R7
655 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points -73%
Coolpad Torino S
321 Points -51%
LG K10
310 Points -53%
Honor 5C
814 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points +590%
Web (sort by value)
Blackview R7
10 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points +5820%
Coolpad Torino S
599 Points +5890%
LG K10
562 Points +5520%
Honor 5C
707 Points +6970%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points +10960%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
25.35 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.73 Points -50%
Coolpad Torino S
14.45 Points -43%
LG K10
17.48 Points -31%
Honor 5C
27.93 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 5
54 Points +113%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R7
3885 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points -51%
Coolpad Torino S
2364 Points -39%
LG K10
2838 Points -27%
Honor 5C
4188 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 5
8619 Points +122%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Blackview R7
9748 ms *
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234 ms * -97%
Coolpad Torino S
15784 ms * -62%
LG K10
16638 ms * -71%
Honor 5C
9111 ms * +7%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2973 ms * +70%

Legend

 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 38.4 °C34.4 °C33.4 °C 
 39 °C35.2 °C35.1 °C 
 37.8 °C34.8 °C33.7 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C
32.2 °C34.2 °C40.1 °C
32.5 °C33.8 °C41.8 °C
32.6 °C34 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.323.124.324.32522.32122.722.33122.720.322.622.74023.723.229.623.75021.221.922.221.26319.119.32019.18017.617.118.517.610020.120.12120.112530.630.931.930.616016.71616.516.720018.218.317.318.225017.817.618.317.83151719.517.31740019.529.216.419.550027.13917.827.163030.643.414.830.68003850.915.738100042.35616.442.3125045.66015.845.6160047.861.713.647.8200050.963.114.850.9250050.26312.650.2315052.264.711.252.2400052.86510.952.8500053.4669.753.4630052.4659.652.4800048.6619.748.6100004153.69.4411250034.147.69.434.11600029.743.79.429.7SPL61.774.426.161.7N12.828.50.812.8median 38median 50.9median 14.8median 38Delta14.9173.314.936.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4median 55median 17.7median 68.49.910.41.79.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1median 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.313.61.714.338.234.432.438.235.235.731.335.228.932.631.728.931.1322631.139.640.339.439.634.133.236.234.126.626.428.626.62622.625.42626.723.121.326.720.823.523.320.824.620.222.524.627.421.222.427.438.923.821.338.944.429.118.444.45134.417.55156.140.117.556.164.546.917.264.568.252.416.868.268.152.617.368.170.154.517.470.170.852.916.670.871.454.117.371.47054.117.6706952.817.66970.954.617.770.96750.217.46769.153.317.769.171.554.717.971.567.951.218.167.963.946.718.163.981.164.729.881.146.116.91.346.1median 67median 50.2median 17.7median 671412.11.714hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview R7ZTE Blade V7 LiteHonor 5CCoolpad Torino S
Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Coolpad Torino S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.17 / 1.41 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.83 / 3.21 / 3.45 Watt
Carga midlight 5.67 / 9.16 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
57%
45%
41%
31%
Idle Minimum *
1.83
0.63
66%
0.68
63%
0.89
51%
0.45
75%
Idle Average *
3.21
1.37
57%
2.2
31%
2.07
36%
1.68
48%
Idle Maximum *
3.45
1.71
50%
2.26
34%
2.15
38%
1.71
50%
Load Average *
5.67
2.82
50%
3.47
39%
3.46
39%
6.7
-18%
Load Maximum *
9.16
3.36
63%
3.71
59%
5.18
43%
9.18
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
6h 52min
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
412
517
25%
397
-4%
453
10%
584
42%
504
22%

Pro

+ Resolução de 1080p
+ 4 GB de RAM
+ 32 GB de ROM
+ Painel IPS brilhante.
+ Leitor de digitais
+ LTE (banda 20)
+ Desempenho
+ Preço-desempenho

Contra

- Qualidade de construção dos botões
- Alto falantes
- Fotos da câmera com tonalidade de cores
- Peso
- Valor do preto/contraste da tela
In review: Blackview R7. Test model courtesy of Blackview.
In review: Blackview R7. Test model courtesy of Blackview.

Se avaliar-nos o Blackview R7 como o que é – um econômico smartphone convencional e não como um smartphone carro chefe, nosso veredicto é bastante positivo. O armazenamento interno de 32 GB e 4 GB de RAM estão quase sobre dimensionados para esta faixa de preços. A combinação com o Helio P10 SoC garante um desempenho fluente do sistema. Exceto pelos botões dedicados, inclusive a qualidade do chassi é convincente. 

Coisas que não gostamos muito incluem o lento leitor de cartões microSD integrado - leitor de cartões e a pobre qualidade do som do alto falante. A câmera principal de 13 MP, que geralmente é suficiente na prática, sofre de uma forte tonalidade de cor, o que afeta a qualidade da imagem – talvez isto ainda pode ser resolvido com uma atualização do software. Um peso de quase 200 gramas (~7 oz) também é bastante para um smartphone de 5,5-polegadas.

O R7 não consegue atender todas as expectativas criadas pela boa folha de especificações – simplesmente existem muitos compromissos. No entanto, ainda é um bom pacote no geral, por um preço de cerca de 160 Euros (~$ 180).

Blackview R7 - 09/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
88%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
23 / 63 → 36%
Desempenho da aplicação
39 / 70 → 56%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
61%
Médio
70%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Blackview R7
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-22)