Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X2 Pro

More power!

A BQ produziu uma nova edição de seus principais smartphones - incluindo a versão Pro. As formas e cores agradáveis encontram um SoC de nível superior, muito espaço de armazenamento, novas câmeras - e um alto preço. Será que o modelo Pro vale esse preço premium? Descubra em nossa análise.
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Aquaris Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 512, Análises do: 650 MHz
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.65 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 427 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva de 10-pontos, LTPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.8 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, Hall sensor, eCompass, giroscópio, FM radio, OTG, USB-PD, Galileo
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 e 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 7 e 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.35 x 150.7 x 72.3
Bateria
3100 mAh Lítio-Ion, QuickCharge 4+
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung S5K2L8, aperture f/1.8, 1.29 μm/pixel, 6 Largan lenses, Dual-Tone flash, autofocus with phase recognition Dual-PD) + 5 MP (Samsung S5K5E8, 1.12 μm), Ultra-HD video incl. stabilization
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Samsung S5K4H7, aperture f/2.0, 1.12 μm/pixel, 4 lenses, front falsh, Full-HD video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, guia de início rápido, informação de segurança, Android One, BQ Plus, 24 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 1.495 W/Kg, body SAR: 1.451 W/Kg, IP52-certified , fanless
peso
168 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The gap dimensions are not very even.
The gap dimensions are not very even.

Size Comparison

158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g156.5 mm 76.5 mm 6.75 mm 156 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.35 mm 168 g149.2 mm 70.6 mm 8.4 mm 172 g149.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.7 mm 153 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.8 mm 158 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s -22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s -32%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s -32%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s -14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s -17%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s -25%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - overview
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - overview
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - junction
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - junction
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - round of the lake
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - round of the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - junction
Garmin Edge 500 - junction
Garmin Edge 500 - round of the lake
Garmin Edge 500 - round of the lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
621
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 675 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 650.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 675 cd/m²
Contraste: 1467:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6"
Screen
-31%
15%
-10%
15%
6%
Brightness middle
675
458
-32%
555
-18%
446
-34%
458
-32%
541
-20%
Brightness
650
473
-27%
537
-17%
451
-31%
463
-29%
538
-17%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
94
2%
93
1%
92
0%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.46
0.51
-11%
0.39
15%
0.22
52%
Contrast
1467
898
-39%
1423
-3%
2082
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.9
7.1
-20%
2.3
61%
6.58
-12%
4
32%
5.8
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.5
14.5
-53%
6
37%
11.94
-26%
7.4
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.6
10.5
-59%
3.9
41%
3.6
45%
4.7
29%
2.7
59%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.28 96%
2.19 100%
2.199 100%
2.19 100%
2.07 106%
CCT
7846 83%
8951 73%
6212 105%
7116 91%
7425 88%
6570 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 46 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 46 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points
Honor 10
174272 Points +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points -43%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
93813 Points -19%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points 0%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points
Honor 10
205297 Points +46%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points -42%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
115656 Points -18%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points -2%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points
Honor 10
8530 Points +35%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6457 Points +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=11)
6676 Points +5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points
Honor 10
7046 Points +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points -18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
5640 Points -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6426, n=13)
6050 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points
Honor 10
3374 Points +41%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points -45%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2044 Points -15%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=12)
2307 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +164%
System (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points
Honor 10
5882 Points +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points -31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4628 Points -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=11)
4927 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +102%
Memory (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points
Honor 10
3808 Points +53%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points -58%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2208 Points -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=11)
2349 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +172%
Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points
Honor 10
4397 Points +93%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1625 Points -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=11)
2241 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +653%
Web (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points
Honor 10
1316 Points +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points -30%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1052 Points -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1334, n=11)
1114 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +37%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points
Honor 10
1890 Points +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points -41%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1330 Points -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +247%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points
Honor 10
6610 Points +13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points -25%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4941 Points -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +157%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points
Honor 10
8634 Points +52%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4501 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +111%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points
Honor 10
29111 Points +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points -47%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
19873 Points -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points -44%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=12)
25633 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points
Honor 10
32674 Points +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
20908 Points -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=12)
28454 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points
Honor 10
21070 Points +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16939 Points -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=12)
19093 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points
Honor 10
3358 Points +63%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1474 Points -28%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points -51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2104, n=13)
2021 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points
Honor 10
3573 Points +84%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points -63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1333 Points -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points -55%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1986, n=13)
1893 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points
Honor 10
2773 Points +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2337 Points -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=13)
2672 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points
Honor 10
2891 Points +112%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points -66%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
953 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1124 - 1374, n=15)
1328 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points
Honor 10
2993 Points +150%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points -68%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
815 Points -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1206, n=14)
1172 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points
Honor 10
2582 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2327 Points -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=14)
2587 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps
Honor 10
59 fps +16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
35 fps -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 59, n=14)
48.1 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps +69%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps
Honor 10
124 fps +170%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps -50%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
36 fps -22%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=14)
48.4 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps +515%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps
Honor 10
50 fps +127%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
15 fps -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps -32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 40, n=14)
22.6 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +243%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps
Honor 10
59 fps +157%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16 fps -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=14)
22.1 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps +627%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps
Honor 10
34 fps +143%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
9.8 fps -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps -31%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 30, n=15)
14.7 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps
Honor 10
39 fps +160%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
10 fps -33%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.2 - 15, n=14)
13.6 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps +690%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps
Honor 10
20 fps +133%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6 fps -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 18, n=15)
9.13 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps +457%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps
Honor 10
23 fps +153%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps -62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6.3 fps -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8 - 9.1, n=14)
8.84 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps +682%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 ()
15.1 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6X
353 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2)
351 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)
2316 Points

Legend

 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.5 Points +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.9 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12)
52 Points +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
44.59 Points -10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.24 Points -10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.84 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37278 Points +289%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14)
9973 Points +4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points -6%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points -11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8742 ms * -114%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * -18%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * -16%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275 ms * -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13)
4115 ms * -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4094 ms *
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937 ms * +4%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1563 ms * +62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
170.9 Points +7%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points +6%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points +3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
154 Points -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points -46%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +156%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
69 Points +19%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points +9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
58 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9)
57.1 Points -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

BQ Aquaris X2 ProBQ Aquaris X ProNokia 7 PlusSamsung Galaxy A8 2018Motorola Moto Z3 PlayAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
7%
2%
75%
16%
874%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.8
270.5
-4%
283.1
1%
299.9
7%
271.7
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.8
139.6
-32%
211.6
3%
104.2
-49%
182.5
-11%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
51.3
37.97
-26%
54.7
7%
82.6
61%
60.6
18%
Random Write 4KB
15.43
12.07
-22%
19.62
27%
14.69
-5%
84.1
445%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
82.2
-1%
77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.7
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
62.3
2%
62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
62.7
3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 HD30 fps
Carga Máxima
 40.1 °C39.1 °C39.9 °C 
 39.9 °C39 °C38.9 °C 
 39.5 °C37.5 °C37.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 39 °C
35.8 °C38.6 °C39.1 °C
35.9 °C37.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 37.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.929.52528.437.73136.130.54030.929.25030.6326322.225.68024.922.310024.422.712523.52716020.327.720019.845.725018.249.231517.458.240016.661.950017.16263015.961.380015.957.1100015.963.6125016.773.316001674.5200015.970.9250016.272.8315016.471.540001774.1500016.573.3630016.468.4800016.665.6100001765.31250016.5571600016.949.2SPL28.683.2N1.151.8median 16.6median 62Delta0.99.835.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4median 68.22.211hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBQ Aquaris X2 ProNokia 7 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.16 / 2.18 Watt
Carga midlight 4.48 / 7.87 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
4%
-14%
27%
-30%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.67
-6%
0.65
-3%
1.3
-106%
0.67
-6%
1.052 ?(0.56 - 2.9, n=14)
-67%
Idle Average *
2.16
1.7
21%
1.76
19%
2
7%
1.02
53%
2.62 ?(1.4 - 8.6, n=14)
-21%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
1.78
18%
1.78
18%
2.7
-24%
1.1
50%
2.88 ?(1.54 - 8.9, n=14)
-32%
Load Average *
4.48
4.42
1%
4.47
-0%
3.7
17%
3.86
14%
Load Maximum *
7.87
6.3
20%
9.13
-16%
5.1
35%
5.97
24%
9.08 ?(5.93 - 18.5, n=14)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 54min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 67)
10h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 25min
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 10
3400 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
32%
6%
13%
34%
2%
Reader / Idle
1374
1162
-15%
1840
34%
1245
-9%
1703
24%
1546
13%
H.264
658
662
1%
644
-2%
648
-2%
706
7%
908
38%
WiFi v1.3
605
663
10%
730
21%
595
-2%
672
11%
646
7%
617
2%
Load
145
216
49%
254
75%
199
37%
158
9%
260
79%

Pro

+ Brilhante tela LTPS
+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Android One
+ USB 3.1 com saída de imagem
+ Localização precisa
+ Boa câmera dupla
+ Suporte para QC4
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- A tela poderia ter melhor precisão de cor
- Sem VoLTE, nem VoWiFI
- Não suporta muitas frequências LTE
- Acabamento imperfeito
- SIM híbrido (não completamente Dual-SIM)
Review: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Test unit provided by BQ Germany.
Review: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Test unit provided by BQ Germany.

A BQ decidiu tornar os dois modelos da nova série X2 mais semelhantes e equipou ambas as versões com as mesmas câmeras. Portanto, as únicas diferenças estão no material do carcaça, no armazenamento e memória, e no processador. Se você comparar as duas versões de 64 GB entre si, a única diferença perceptível é o material da parte traseira do telefone, o SoC e 50 Euros (~$60). No final, é uma questão de escolha - as opções são vidro ou plástico. A menos que você também espere que seu smartphone possa rodar jogos exigentes. Nesse caso, você terá que optar pela versão Pro. Pessoalmente, achamos que o cargo adicional de cerca de 120 Euros (~$140) é um pouco alto demais pela memória maior (6 GB de RAM) e armazenamento interno (128 GB) - não temos certeza se a versão Pro realmente terá sucesso.

O Aquaris X2 Pro é uma atualização bem-sucedida do smartphone mais caro da BQ, mas ele precisa aceitar algumas críticas.

O X2 Pro nos impressionou com seus recursos, sua tela brilhante, longa duração da bateria e boas câmeras. O novo módulo de câmera dupla tira ótimas fotos - é uma pena que não use mais o sensor superior da Samsung. Se a BQ não tivesse feito essa mudança, as câmeras poderiam ter sido ainda melhores. O fabricante também poderia ter adicionado uma opção para escolher uma reprodução de cor mais natural para a tela.

Ficamos muito felizes com a qualidade das chamadas do BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. É uma pena que a taxa de transferência seja limitada ao LTE Cat. 6, mas ainda podemos viver com isso. No entanto, não podemos entender por que um fabricante europeu não suporta todas as bandas de frequência usadas na UE e por que o VoLTE e o VoWifi não são suportados desde o lançamento do telefone. Teríamos também esperado algumas bandas mais básicas fora das regiões europeias. 

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - 07/26/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
58 / 60 → 97%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 63 → 85%
Desempenho da aplicação
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
73%
Médio
78%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-08- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 4)