Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone Go

Vai, ZenFone, vai! Hoje em dia até os aparelho de gama média-baixa devem ter recursos especiais. É por isso que o Asus ZenFone Go vem com um design ergonômico, tela HD, e bateria removível. Neste relatório, vamos esclarecer se o acessível ZenFone Go é convincente.
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (Zenfone Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.63 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 polegadas, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola, FM radio
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR rates: 0.484 W/kg (head); 1.02 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.25 x 143.7 x 71
Bateria
10.1 Wh, 2600 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante traseiro, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, Asus Service Center, temas, desempenho, assistente de áudio, gerenciador móvel, ZenFone Service, ZenTalk, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
135 g, Suprimento de energia: 56 g
Preço
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

148.9 mm 74.9 mm 7.9 mm 139 g143.7 mm 71 mm 11.25 mm 135 g147.2 mm 72.9 mm 7.6 mm 147 g143 mm 70.7 mm 8.55 mm 145 g141.9 mm 70.3 mm 8.2 mm 140 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s -49%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s -50%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s -45%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s -48%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s -53%
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Woods
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Woods
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone Go: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
407
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 452.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
Contraste: 1093:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.23% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Wiko U Feel
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Lenovo K6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
-11%
14%
5%
9%
Brightness middle
459
381
-17%
500
9%
470
2%
575
25%
Brightness
452
352
-22%
485
7%
461
2%
559
24%
Brightness Distribution
84
85
1%
83
-1%
88
5%
91
8%
Black Level *
0.42
0.2
52%
0.22
48%
0.38
10%
0.39
7%
Contrast
1093
1905
74%
2273
108%
1237
13%
1474
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
7.3
-62%
6.3
-40%
5.2
-16%
5.2
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.6
21.2
-100%
14.4
-36%
9.5
10%
10.3
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
7.4
-14%
5.2
20%
5.6
14%
7.2
-11%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.17 101%
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
CCT
7791 83%
8417 77%
7536 86%
7924 82%
7224 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
22218 Points
LG X Power K220
30432 Points +37%
Wiko U Feel
28175 Points +27%
Lenovo K6
43673 Points +97%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points +156%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
391 Points
LG X Power K220
560 Points +43%
Lenovo K6
613 Points +57%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
780 Points +99%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
918 Points
LG X Power K220
1506 Points +64%
Lenovo K6
1706 Points +86%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3240 Points +253%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
4298 Points
LG X Power K220
4960 Points +15%
Wiko U Feel
4969 Points +16%
Lenovo K6
9537 Points +122%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3836 Points
LG X Power K220
4330 Points +13%
Wiko U Feel
4355 Points +14%
Lenovo K6
9691 Points +153%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points +191%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
7429 Points
LG X Power K220
10103 Points +36%
Wiko U Feel
9801 Points +32%
Lenovo K6
9034 Points +22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
53 Points
LG X Power K220
201 Points +279%
Wiko U Feel
202 Points +281%
Lenovo K6
554 Points +945%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points +1043%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42 Points
LG X Power K220
165 Points +293%
Wiko U Feel
166 Points +295%
Lenovo K6
491 Points +1069%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points +1129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
558 Points
LG X Power K220
860 Points +54%
Wiko U Feel
860 Points +54%
Lenovo K6
1002 Points +80%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points +177%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
9.4 fps
LG X Power K220
15 fps +60%
Wiko U Feel
14 fps +49%
Lenovo K6
15 fps +60%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps +102%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
5.2 fps
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps +62%
Wiko U Feel
8.4 fps +62%
Lenovo K6
16 fps +208%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps +246%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3.8 fps
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps +74%
Wiko U Feel
5.9 fps +55%
Lenovo K6
7 fps +84%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps +124%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1.8 fps
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps +72%
Wiko U Feel
3 fps +67%
Lenovo K6
7.1 fps +294%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps +339%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points
LG X Power K220
3759 Points +70%
Wiko U Feel
3856 Points +74%
Lenovo K6
3387 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points +99%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points
LG X Power K220
200 Points -62%
Wiko U Feel
544 Points +3%
Lenovo K6
263 Points -50%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points -17%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
887 Points
LG X Power K220
1092 Points +23%
Wiko U Feel
1121 Points +26%
Lenovo K6
1282 Points +45%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points +204%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points
LG X Power K220
521 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel
455 Points -13%
Lenovo K6
530 Points +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points +215%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
308 Points
LG X Power K220
290 Points -6%
Wiko U Feel
288 Points -6%
Lenovo K6
732 Points +138%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points +168%
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
533 Points
LG X Power K220
10 Points -98%
Wiko U Feel
595 Points +12%
Lenovo K6
10 Points -98%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points -98%

Legend

 
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1938 Points
LG X Power K220
2657 Points +37%
Wiko U Feel
2723 Points +41%
Lenovo K6
3438 Points +77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4630 Points +139%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.1 Points
LG X Power K220
18.13 Points +29%
Wiko U Feel
18 Points +28%
Lenovo K6
21.44 Points +52%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
29.5 Points +109%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
15895 ms *
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * +17%
Wiko U Feel
13599 ms * +14%
Lenovo K6
10850 ms * +32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8768 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
143 MB/s
LG X Power K220
196.8 MB/s +38%
Wiko U Feel
234.8 MB/s +64%
Lenovo K6
262.6 MB/s +84%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
165.8 MB/s +16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42.4 MB/s
LG X Power K220
43.74 MB/s +3%
Wiko U Feel
39.94 MB/s -6%
Lenovo K6
46.66 MB/s +10%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
42 MB/s -1%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
19.7 MB/s
LG X Power K220
18.78 MB/s -5%
Wiko U Feel
23.24 MB/s +18%
Lenovo K6
32.01 MB/s +62%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
38.7 MB/s +96%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
6.9 MB/s
LG X Power K220
7.32 MB/s +6%
Wiko U Feel
8.83 MB/s +28%
Lenovo K6
10.5 MB/s +52%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8 MB/s +16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
17.7 MB/s
LG X Power K220
32.08 MB/s +81%
Wiko U Feel
30.25 MB/s +71%
Lenovo K6
78.2 MB/s +342%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
53.1 MB/s +200%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.4 MB/s
LG X Power K220
18.17 MB/s +26%
Wiko U Feel
16.24 MB/s +13%
Lenovo K6
50.4 MB/s +250%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
32.1 MB/s +123%
Carga Máxima
 33 °C35 °C35.2 °C 
 36.1 °C35.8 °C38 °C 
 36.1 °C36.4 °C37.3 °C 
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
34.5 °C35.3 °C35.3 °C
33.3 °C34.3 °C35.3 °C
34.3 °C35.2 °C35 °C
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.330.929.32528.129.528.13127.527.327.54028.73128.75027.527.327.56326.42726.48030.92530.910027.223.727.212532.930.232.916029.623.829.620036.32336.325039.722.639.731545.122.845.140050.222.350.250056.122.956.163059.819.459.880065.817.965.8100066.517.766.5125066.318.666.3160066.215.966.2200066.715.766.7250068.615.568.6315068.515.468.5400064.715.464.7500067.315.167.3630066.815.266.8800068.115.268.11000063.715.263.71250057.315.157.31600042.315.242.3SPL78.429.678.4N41.11.341.1median 63.7median 17.7median 63.7Delta10.93.810.93629.93642.228.342.238.229.238.231.730.331.731.229.731.227.925.827.931.823.531.827.72427.731.125.131.126.121.826.132.221.732.237.324.737.34524.14551.521.851.557.922.457.963.219.863.26518.56565.318.465.367.11967.168.717.268.768.316.168.369.51669.570.916.470.97515.87577.214.677.272.514.672.572.914.772.974.514.974.569.414.769.455.514.755.583.629.883.653.11.353.1median 65.3median 18.4median 65.311.93.311.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone Go ZB500KLHuawei P8 lite 2017
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.41 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.76 / 1.85 Watt
Carga midlight 3.47 / 4.22 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
10%
-22%
2%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.64
30%
0.82
11%
0.65
29%
1.44
-57%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.3
26%
1.61
9%
1.65
6%
2.47
-40%
Idle Maximum *
1.85
1.34
28%
1.8
3%
1.67
10%
2.58
-39%
Load Average *
3.47
4.18
-20%
5.99
-73%
3.58
-3%
4.55
-31%
Load Maximum *
4.22
4.87
-15%
6.7
-59%
5.58
-32%
6.3
-49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 24min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 37min
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Wiko U Feel
2500 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
53%
-3%
22%
5%
Reader / Idle
1224
1626
33%
1326
8%
H.264
617
633
3%
644
4%
WiFi v1.3
572
987
73%
552
-3%
715
25%
604
6%
Load
277
365
32%
350
26%
283
2%

Pro

+ Design ergonômico
+ Carcaça estável e leve
+ Bom software
+ WiFi veloz
+ Tela com cores relativamente precisos
+ Bateria removível
+ Durações práticas da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais
- Módulo GPS instável
- Fotos medíocres da câmera sob luz baixa
- Alto valor de preto
- Iluminação heterogênea
- Baixo desempenho
- Às vezes, alto consumo de energia
- Longos tempos de carga
In review: Asus ZenFone Go. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone Go. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

Com o ZenFone Go, a Asus entrega um smartphone que se posiciona com firmeza na gama média-baixa. A carcaça sólida, a bateria removível, e as boas fotos da câmera em boas condições de iluminação falam pelo aparelho. No entanto, o comprador deve aceitar o desempenho relativamente baixo, que apresenta ao navegar pelo menu. Além disso, o módulo GPS tem falhas e a tela alcança um contraste médio e tem uma iluminação irregular.

Em nossa opinião, é agradável que a Asus entregue seu aparelho com as correções de segurança mais recentes da Google via atualizações. No entanto, uma atualização para o sistema operacional mais recente não deve ser esperada nesta faixa de preços. A precisão de cores relativamente expansiva da tela, e o bom manuseio também são pontos positivos.

O ZenFone Go oferece aspectos positivos, como a bateria removível  e a sólida carcaça. No entanto, a Asus poderia ter lhe outorgado um pouco mais de poder.

No geral, podemos recomendar o ZenFone Go para usuários que não dependem do alto desempenho. No entanto, o comprador deve estar ciente de que existem alguns modelos impressionantes da concorrência, como o Huawei P8 lite (2017) ou o Lenovo K6, pelo mesmo preço ou apenas um pouco mais alto.

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL - 04/03/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
81%
Teclado
62 / 75 → 82%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 61%
Peso
94%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
76%
Desempenho do jogos
9 / 63 → 13%
Desempenho da aplicação
23 / 70 → 33%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
65%
Médio
67%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone Go
Florian Wimmer, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-16)