Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone Go

Name: Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Brand: Asus

Vai, ZenFone, vai! Hoje em dia até os aparelho de gama média-baixa devem ter recursos especiais. É por isso que o Asus ZenFone Go vem com um design ergonômico, tela HD, e bateria removível. Neste relatório, vamos esclarecer se o acessível ZenFone Go é convincente.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL (Zenfone Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 306

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.63 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 polegadas, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola, FM radio

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20); bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR rates: 0.484 W/kg (head); 1.02 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.25 x 143.7 x 71

Bateria

10.1 Wh, 2600 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante traseiro, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, Asus Service Center, temas, desempenho, assistente de áudio, gerenciador móvel, ZenFone Service, ZenTalk, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

135 g, Suprimento de energia: 56 g

Preço

179 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	106 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -49%
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.5 MBit/s -50%
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.4 MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	99.7 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s -45%
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51.9 MBit/s -48%
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.1 MBit/s -53%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


407 cd/m²	452 cd/m²	478 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
434 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	483 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 452.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
Contraste: 1093:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.23% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG X Power K220 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"	Wiko U Feel IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Huawei P8 lite 2017 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-11%	14%	5%	9%
Brightness middle	459	381 -17%	500 9%	470 2%	575 25%
Brightness	452	352 -22%	485 7%	461 2%	559 24%
Brightness Distribution	84	85 1%	83 -1%	88 5%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.42	0.2 52%	0.22 48%	0.38 10%	0.39 7%
Contrast	1093	1905 74%	2273 108%	1237 13%	1474 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	7.3 -62%	6.3 -40%	5.2 -16%	5.2 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.6	21.2 -100%	14.4 -36%	9.5 10%	10.3 3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	7.4 -14%	5.2 20%	5.6 14%	7.2 -11%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.17 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	7791 ^83%	8417 ^77%	7536 ^86%	7924 ^82%	7224 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28 ms rise
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	22218 Points
LG X Power K220	30432 Points +37%
Wiko U Feel	28175 Points +27%
Lenovo K6	43673 Points +97%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	56798 Points +156%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	391 Points
LG X Power K220	560 Points +43%
Lenovo K6	613 Points +57%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	780 Points +99%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	918 Points
LG X Power K220	1506 Points +64%
Lenovo K6	1706 Points +86%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	3240 Points +253%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	4298 Points
LG X Power K220	4960 Points +15%
Wiko U Feel	4969 Points +16%
Lenovo K6	9537 Points +122%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11611 Points +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	3836 Points
LG X Power K220	4330 Points +13%
Wiko U Feel	4355 Points +14%
Lenovo K6	9691 Points +153%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	11147 Points +191%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	7429 Points
LG X Power K220	10103 Points +36%
Wiko U Feel	9801 Points +32%
Lenovo K6	9034 Points +22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	13590 Points +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	53 Points
LG X Power K220	201 Points +279%
Wiko U Feel	202 Points +281%
Lenovo K6	554 Points +945%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	606 Points +1043%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	42 Points
LG X Power K220	165 Points +293%
Wiko U Feel	166 Points +295%
Lenovo K6	491 Points +1069%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	516 Points +1129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	558 Points
LG X Power K220	860 Points +54%
Wiko U Feel	860 Points +54%
Lenovo K6	1002 Points +80%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1547 Points +177%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	9.4 fps
LG X Power K220	15 fps +60%
Wiko U Feel	14 fps +49%
Lenovo K6	15 fps +60%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	19 fps +102%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	5.2 fps
LG X Power K220	8.4 fps +62%
Wiko U Feel	8.4 fps +62%
Lenovo K6	16 fps +208%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	18 fps +246%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	3.8 fps
LG X Power K220	6.6 fps +74%
Wiko U Feel	5.9 fps +55%
Lenovo K6	7 fps +84%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8.5 fps +124%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	1.8 fps
LG X Power K220	3.1 fps +72%
Wiko U Feel	3 fps +67%
Lenovo K6	7.1 fps +294%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	7.9 fps +339%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	2217 Points
LG X Power K220	3759 Points +70%
Wiko U Feel	3856 Points +74%
Lenovo K6	3387 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4419 Points +99%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	526 Points
LG X Power K220	200 Points -62%
Wiko U Feel	544 Points +3%
Lenovo K6	263 Points -50%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	435 Points -17%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	887 Points
LG X Power K220	1092 Points +23%
Wiko U Feel	1121 Points +26%
Lenovo K6	1282 Points +45%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	2694 Points +204%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	526 Points
LG X Power K220	521 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel	455 Points -13%
Lenovo K6	530 Points +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	1658 Points +215%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	308 Points
LG X Power K220	290 Points -6%
Wiko U Feel	288 Points -6%
Lenovo K6	732 Points +138%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	826 Points +168%
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	533 Points
LG X Power K220	10 Points -98%
Wiko U Feel	595 Points +12%
Lenovo K6	10 Points -98%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	10 Points -98%

Legend

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko U Feel Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	1938 Points
LG X Power K220	2657 Points +37%
Wiko U Feel	2723 Points +41%
Lenovo K6	3438 Points +77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	4630 Points +139%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	14.1 Points
LG X Power K220	18.13 Points +29%
Wiko U Feel	18 Points +28%
Lenovo K6	21.44 Points +52%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	29.5 Points +109%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	15895 ms *
LG X Power K220	13196 ms * +17%
Wiko U Feel	13599 ms * +14%
Lenovo K6	10850 ms * +32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8768 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	143 MB/s
LG X Power K220	196.8 MB/s +38%
Wiko U Feel	234.8 MB/s +64%
Lenovo K6	262.6 MB/s +84%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	165.8 MB/s +16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	42.4 MB/s
LG X Power K220	43.74 MB/s +3%
Wiko U Feel	39.94 MB/s -6%
Lenovo K6	46.66 MB/s +10%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	42 MB/s -1%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	19.7 MB/s
LG X Power K220	18.78 MB/s -5%
Wiko U Feel	23.24 MB/s +18%
Lenovo K6	32.01 MB/s +62%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	38.7 MB/s +96%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	6.9 MB/s
LG X Power K220	7.32 MB/s +6%
Wiko U Feel	8.83 MB/s +28%
Lenovo K6	10.5 MB/s +52%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	8 MB/s +16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	17.7 MB/s
LG X Power K220	32.08 MB/s +81%
Wiko U Feel	30.25 MB/s +71%
Lenovo K6	78.2 MB/s +342%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	53.1 MB/s +200%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	14.4 MB/s
LG X Power K220	18.17 MB/s +26%
Wiko U Feel	16.24 MB/s +13%
Lenovo K6	50.4 MB/s +250%
Huawei P8 lite 2017	32.1 MB/s +123%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33 °C	35 °C	35.2 °C
36.1 °C	35.8 °C	38 °C
36.1 °C	36.4 °C	37.3 °C

Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C


34.5 °C	35.3 °C	35.3 °C
33.3 °C	34.3 °C	35.3 °C
34.3 °C	35.2 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.41 / 0.18 Watt
Ocioso	0.92 / 1.76 / 1.85 Watt
Carga	3.47 / 4.22 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh	LG X Power K220 4100 mAh	Wiko U Feel 2500 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		10%	-22%	2%	-43%
Idle Minimum *	0.92	0.64 30%	0.82 11%	0.65 29%	1.44 -57%
Idle Average *	1.76	1.3 26%	1.61 9%	1.65 6%	2.47 -40%
Idle Maximum *	1.85	1.34 28%	1.8 3%	1.67 10%	2.58 -39%
Load Average *	3.47	4.18 -20%	5.99 -73%	3.58 -3%	4.55 -31%
Load Maximum *	4.22	4.87 -15%	6.7 -59%	5.58 -32%	6.3 -49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 24min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 37min

	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh	LG X Power K220 4100 mAh	Wiko U Feel 2500 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2017 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		53%	-3%	22%	5%
Reader / Idle	1224			1626 33%	1326 8%
H.264	617			633 3%	644 4%
WiFi v1.3	572	987 73%	552 -3%	715 25%	604 6%
Load	277	365 32%		350 26%	283 2%

Pro

+ Design ergonômico

+ Carcaça estável e leve

+ Bom software

+ WiFi veloz

+ Tela com cores relativamente precisos

+ Bateria removível

+ Durações práticas da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais

- Módulo GPS instável

- Fotos medíocres da câmera sob luz baixa

- Alto valor de preto

- Iluminação heterogênea

- Baixo desempenho

- Às vezes, alto consumo de energia

- Longos tempos de carga

In review: Asus ZenFone Go. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

Com o ZenFone Go, a Asus entrega um smartphone que se posiciona com firmeza na gama média-baixa. A carcaça sólida, a bateria removível, e as boas fotos da câmera em boas condições de iluminação falam pelo aparelho. No entanto, o comprador deve aceitar o desempenho relativamente baixo, que apresenta ao navegar pelo menu. Além disso, o módulo GPS tem falhas e a tela alcança um contraste médio e tem uma iluminação irregular.

Em nossa opinião, é agradável que a Asus entregue seu aparelho com as correções de segurança mais recentes da Google via atualizações. No entanto, uma atualização para o sistema operacional mais recente não deve ser esperada nesta faixa de preços. A precisão de cores relativamente expansiva da tela, e o bom manuseio também são pontos positivos.

O ZenFone Go oferece aspectos positivos, como a bateria removível e a sólida carcaça. No entanto, a Asus poderia ter lhe outorgado um pouco mais de poder.

No geral, podemos recomendar o ZenFone Go para usuários que não dependem do alto desempenho. No entanto, o comprador deve estar ciente de que existem alguns modelos impressionantes da concorrência, como o Huawei P8 lite (2017) ou o Lenovo K6, pelo mesmo preço ou apenas um pouco mais alto.

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL - 2017-04-03 04/03/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

81%

Teclado

62 / 75 → 82%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

36 / 60 → 61%

Peso

94%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

76%

Desempenho do jogos

9 / 63 → 13%

Desempenho da aplicação

23 / 70 → 33%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

65%

Médio

67%

79%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone Go

Florian Wimmer, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-16)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison