Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3

Name: Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Brand: Asus

Peça de designer. A Asus outorgou ao ZenFone 3 de 5,5 polegadas um visual premium enquanto mantém o desempenho e a configuração em mente. O resultado é um smartphone bom e acessível de gama média que não mostrou quase nenhuma desvantagem no teste.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Zenfone Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 506, Análises do: 650 MHz

Memória

4 GB

, LPDDR3

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil de 10 dedos, modo luvas, IPS, Filtro de luz azul, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51.7 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, Wi-Fi Direct, USB-OTG, DLNA, Miracast, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), max. download 150 MBit/s, max. upload 50 MBit/s, SAR: 0.493 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 152.6 x 77.4

Bateria

3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, dual-LED flash, autofoco, HDR, estabilizador de imagem ótico, gravações de vídeo em 4K (3840 x 2160 Pixel)/1080p/720p a 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, gravações de vídeo de máx. 1080p a 30 fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB Type-C cable, fonte de alimentação modular, fones in-ear, guia de início rápido, Asus ZenUI 3.0, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless

peso

155 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g

Preço

359 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	323 MBit/s +935%
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +855%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +924%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	320 MBit/s +873%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


635 cd/m²	634 cd/m²	651 cd/m²
630 cd/m²	658 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
625 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	620 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 658 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 633.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.22 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 658 cd/m²
Contraste: 997:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		-9%	18%	-6%	-18%
Brightness middle	658	419 -36%	378 -43%	451 -31%	328 -50%
Brightness	633	431 -32%	380 -40%	443 -30%	334 -47%
Brightness Distribution	93	84 -10%	91 -2%	93 0%	88 -5%
Black Level *	0.66			0.4 39%
Contrast	997			1128 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.9	4.1 16%	1.95 60%	5.4 -10%	4.6 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.1	12 -32%	3.09 66%	9.9 -9%	14.7 -62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	3.3 43%	1.86 68%	6.7 -16%	2.8 52%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.1 ^105%	2.13 ^103%	2.33 ^94%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	7840 ^83%	6550 ^99%	6376 ^102%	8262 ^79%	6612 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points +96%
Honor 8	94671 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points -33%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +127%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points -4%
Honor 8	5481 Points +36%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points +56%
Honor 8	1726 Points +110%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points +114%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points +67%
Honor 8	20235 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points -43%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +117%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points +81%
Honor 8	22157 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points -44%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +153%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points +28%
Honor 8	15531 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points -41%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points +220%
Honor 8	1273 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points -60%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +307%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points +542%
Honor 8	1112 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points -62%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points +544%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points -48%
Honor 8	2587 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points -30%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps +152%
Honor 8	43 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -33%
OnePlus 3	60 fps +186%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps +283%
Honor 8	41 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -39%
OnePlus 3	89 fps +287%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps +189%
Honor 8	19 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -61%
OnePlus 3	46 fps +374%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps +294%
Honor 8	19 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -62%
OnePlus 3	47 fps +375%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.1 fps
ZTE Axon 7	16 fps +162%
Honor 8	11 fps +80%
OnePlus 3	30 fps +392%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	31 fps +400%
Honor 8	10 fps +61%
OnePlus 3	31 fps +400%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points -27%
Honor 8	6735 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points -41%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points +78%
Honor 8	2034 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points -33%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +105%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points +13%
Honor 8	3952 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points -26%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +21%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points +43%
Honor 8	2556 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points -47%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +97%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points +354%
Honor 8	1703 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points -52%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +372%
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points +37%
Honor 8	994 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points +6%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +58%

Legend

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3611 Points -26%
Honor 8	10692 Points +118%
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points +64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms *
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * +64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11887 ms * -48%
Honor 8	2979 ms * +63%
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms * +61%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	84 Points
OnePlus 3	122 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	64 Points -24%
Honor 8	138 Points +64%
ZTE Axon 7	111 Points +32%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22 Points -29%
Honor 8	64 Points +106%
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points +44%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s
OnePlus 3	408.7 MB/s +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	209.4 MB/s -26%
Honor 8	247.5 MB/s -12%
ZTE Axon 7	406.5 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	60.4 MB/s -68%
Honor 8	119.3 MB/s -37%
ZTE Axon 7	150.9 MB/s -20%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s
OnePlus 3	137.6 MB/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22.9 MB/s -69%
Honor 8	34.16 MB/s -54%
ZTE Axon 7	121.1 MB/s +64%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s +146%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11.2 MB/s +51%
Honor 8	31.5 MB/s +326%
ZTE Axon 7	16.22 MB/s +119%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s
Honor 8	53.7 MB/s -32%
ZTE Axon 7	78.4 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s
Honor 8	23.59 MB/s -53%
ZTE Axon 7	51.3 MB/s +2%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	29 fps
	very low	29 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.8 °C	38.2 °C	38.6 °C
37.3 °C	36.8 °C	37.9 °C
36 °C	36.3 °C	36.4 °C

Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C


34.6 °C	36.2 °C	39.1 °C
35.1 °C	35.9 °C	38 °C
34.5 °C	34.9 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 36 °C

alimentação elétrica 33 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.06 / 0.24 Watt
Ocioso	0.83 / 2.11 / 2.12 Watt
Carga	3.41 / 5.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh
Power Consumption		-12%	9%	-7%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	0.83	0.57 31%	0.96 -16%	0.78 6%	0.64 23%
Idle Average *	2.11	1.24 41%	1.64 22%	1.89 10%	0.84 60%
Idle Maximum *	2.12	1.36 36%	1.71 19%	2.02 5%	0.87 59%
Load Average *	3.41	5.92 -74%	2.98 13%	5.28 -55%	6.02 -77%
Load Maximum *	5.46	10.53 -93%	5.08 7%	5.44 -0%	10.45 -91%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 52min

	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh
Battery Runtime		-9%	11%	-27%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1502	1338 -11%	2323 55%	1487 -1%	1735 16%
H.264	905	847 -6%	672 -26%	526 -42%	704 -22%
WiFi v1.3	797	840 5%	626 -21%	499 -37%	411 -48%
Load	352	268 -24%	483 37%	255 -28%	245 -30%

Pro

+ Construção de alta qualidade

+ Sensor de digitais

+ Painel Full HD muito brilhante

+ Android 6.0

+ Porta USB Type-C

+ LTE e dual-SIM

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Boa câmera

+ Carga rápida 3.0

Contra

- Desempenho ruim do WiFi

- LTE sem toda sua velocidade

- Muito bloatware

- Sem App2SD

- Sem NFC

- Teclas Android não iluminadas

In review: Asus Zenfone 3. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

A Asus coloca um smartphone de 5,5 polegadas e muito elegante na linha de partida, e também convence com seus valores. Com um processador octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 e 4 GB de RAM, o ZenFone tem muito poder que será suficiente para todos os aplicativos e jogos atuais. Além disso, recursos como um painel Full HD muito brilhante e com ângulos de visão estáveis e uma câmera de 16-megapixels que tira fotos satisfatórias, também está presente. A boa configuração também inclui LTE, um slot dual-SIM, uma porta USB Type-C reversível incluindo a tecnologia Carga Rápida, e um leitor de digitais. O mais recente Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow, que a Asus cobre com a nova versão de sua interface ZenUI, completa o bem-sucedido pacote. A longa duração da bateria e a baixa temperatura durante o uso não pode deixar de ser mencionado.

A Asus criou uma peça de designer com o seu ZenFone 3. O smartphone de gama média tem uma aparência que parece ser bastante mais cara do que realmente é.

Não há muito o que criticar. A teclas Android abaixo da tela não são iluminadas e as taxas de transferência via WiFi são um pouco lentas. A Asus também é muito generosa com a configuração do software e pré-carrega de forma desnecessária muitos aplicativos no smartphone. No teste, não conseguimos mover aplicativos para nossos cartões micro-SD dado que não puderam ser formatadas como armazenamento interno.

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL - 2016-10-21 10/21/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

91%

Teclado

72 / 75 → 96%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 76%

Peso

92%

Bateria

96%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

32 / 63 → 51%

Desempenho da aplicação

52 / 70 → 74%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

73 / 91 → 80%

Camera

72%

Médio

76%

86%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3

Manuel Masiero, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)