Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL

Longa duração da bateria, desempenho limitado. O Asus ZenFone 3 Max tem como objetivo impressionar com sua bateria de alta capacidade e satisfazer os fanáticos do tempo de funcionamento. No entanto, eles terão que fazer compromissos em outros aspectos, como mostram os nossos testes.
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Zenfone Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 32 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20); largura de banda (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR rate: 0.59 W/kg (head), 0.86 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.55 x 149.5 x 73.7
Bateria
15.6 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, flash LED, vídeos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante na traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Ferramenta SIM, carregador, cabo USB, adaptador USB OTG, ZenCircle, Photocollage, ZenSync, Mobile Manager, 12 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 48 g
Preço
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156 mm 77.5 mm 10.55 mm 202 g149.5 mm 73.7 mm 8.55 mm 148 g148.9 mm 74.9 mm 7.9 mm 139 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g144.2 mm 72.5 mm 8.95 mm 140 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s +8%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s -1%
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
431
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 507 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 474.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.77 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 507 cd/m²
Contraste: 957:1 (Preto: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"
Screen
-1%
-14%
-28%
-6%
-24%
Brightness middle
507
586
16%
515
2%
491
-3%
289
-43%
381
-25%
Brightness
474
566
19%
498
5%
487
3%
291
-39%
352
-26%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
93
9%
92
8%
96
13%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.53
0.57
-8%
0.49
8%
0.9
-70%
0.2
62%
Contrast
957
1028
7%
1051
10%
546
-43%
1905
99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.7
4.2
11%
6.2
-32%
6.6
-40%
4.7
-0%
7.3
-55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.2
8.4
-17%
11.4
-58%
12.9
-79%
7.3
-1%
21.2
-194%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
6.3
-31%
7.4
-54%
4.9
-2%
3
37%
7.4
-54%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.39 92%
2.28 96%
2.12 104%
2.03 108%
2.26 97%
CCT
6441 101%
6614 98%
8664 75%
7090 92%
6291 103%
8417 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 40 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points -14%
Honor 5C
53143 Points +75%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -10%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points 0%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
569 Points
Huawei Y6 II Compact
549 Points -4%
LG X Power K220
560 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1362 Points
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1581 Points +16%
LG X Power K220
1506 Points +11%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points +13%
Honor 5C
11755 Points +207%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points +15%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points +12%
Honor 5C
11319 Points +236%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points +14%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points +29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points +24%
Honor 5C
13588 Points +86%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points +24%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points -66%
Honor 5C
563 Points +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -66%
LG X Power K220
201 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points -67%
Honor 5C
480 Points +275%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -67%
LG X Power K220
165 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points -3%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +91%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -4%
LG X Power K220
860 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points
Honor 5C
383 Points +272%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points +20%
LG X Power K220
127 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points
Honor 5C
317 Points +282%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points +20%
LG X Power K220
102 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points
Honor 5C
1418 Points +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points +25%
LG X Power K220
854 Points +22%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps
Honor 5C
20 fps +100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -3%
LG X Power K220
15 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps -12%
Honor 5C
19 fps +222%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -12%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps +42%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps -62%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps +79%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -19%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps +40%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps +73%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -18%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps +41%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps
Honor 5C
4.9 fps +44%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4.1 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps +21%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps
Honor 5C
4.5 fps +221%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1.7 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
LG X Power K220
2 fps +43%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2517 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points +47%
Honor 5C
5120 Points +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points +64%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points +49%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points +6%
Honor 5C
1225 Points +108%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -1%
LG X Power K220
200 Points -66%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points +5%
Honor 5C
2600 Points +150%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points +2%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points +5%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points +2%
Honor 5C
1504 Points +93%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -18%
LG X Power K220
521 Points -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points +51%
Honor 5C
814 Points +288%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points +49%
LG X Power K220
290 Points +38%
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points -23%
Honor 5C
707 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points -22%
LG X Power K220
10 Points -99%

Legend

 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2534 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
2685 Points +6%
Honor 5C
4188 Points +65%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2805 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points +8%
LG X Power K220
2657 Points +5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
14983 ms *
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
13525 ms * +10%
Honor 5C
9111 ms * +39%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
13234 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * +13%
LG X Power K220
13196 ms * +12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
35 Points
Honor 5C
73 Points +109%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
50 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points +34%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
16.47 Points
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
17.53 Points +6%
Honor 5C
27.93 Points +70%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
18.3 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points +2%
LG X Power K220
18.13 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLAsus ZenFone Max ZC550KLHonor 5CHuawei Y6 II CompactSamsung Galaxy J5 2016LG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
54%
7%
24%
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB
174.2
130.6
-25%
263
51%
211
21%
147
-16%
196.8
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
65.2
31.1
-52%
75.5
16%
75
15%
72
10%
43.74
-33%
Random Read 4KB
20.9
9.1
-56%
61.7
195%
23
10%
21
0%
18.78
-10%
Random Write 4KB
9.1
3.6
-60%
15.7
73%
15.5
70%
11.6
27%
7.32
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
47.67
38.43
-19%
51.9
9%
31.57
-34%
79.8
67%
32.08
-33%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
29.59
18.93
-36%
24.21
-18%
17.12
-42%
46.61
58%
18.17
-39%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high15 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high27 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.8 °C37 °C40.4 °C 
 36.9 °C36.1 °C40.3 °C 
 36.1 °C35.8 °C39.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C35.3 °C
34 °C34 °C35.5 °C
33.9 °C33.7 °C33.6 °C
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6412525.4413125.335.44032.930.55033.633.36331.627.78028.429.61002727.512520.824.21602229.220021.326.725020.834.731521.242.940019.44950019.555.363017.760.880017.967.4100017.874.8125017.379.1160017.479200016.777.3250017.276.2315018.274.1400017.973.5500017.676.6630017.775.4800017.8781000017.9791250018.166.51600018.258.6SPL3088N1.368.5median 17.9median 68.5Delta1.414.631.653.425.432.925.33032.937.233.640.631.640.428.432.42729.220.823.82222.521.327.720.834.621.240.619.448.919.55517.760.417.969.217.874.917.380.117.477.116.773.717.27518.275.517.974.217.674.917.778.717.882.717.97718.166.818.264.83088.51.371.5median 17.9median 71.51.413.537.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.212.912.11.712.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLLG X Power K220Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.74 / 2.04 / 2.22 Watt
Carga midlight 5.57 / 6.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
8%
28%
38%
28%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
1.15
-55%
0.89
-20%
0.57
23%
0.61
18%
0.64
14%
Idle Average *
2.04
2.09
-2%
2.07
-1%
1.53
25%
1.41
31%
1.3
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.22
2.17
2%
2.15
3%
1.6
28%
1.51
32%
1.34
40%
Load Average *
5.57
5.38
3%
3.46
38%
2.82
49%
2.56
54%
4.18
25%
Load Maximum *
6.59
6.08
8%
5.18
21%
5.69
14%
3.1
53%
4.87
26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 22min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 01min
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-34%
-22%
0%
21%
Reader / Idle
1462
997
-32%
1175
-20%
1599
9%
H.264
845
602
-29%
682
-19%
658
-22%
WiFi v1.3
814
959
18%
584
-28%
623
-23%
643
-21%
987
21%
Load
301
156
-48%
222
-26%
402
34%
365
21%

Pro

+ Carcaça metálica sólida e fina
+ Boa configuração de memória
+ USB OTG
+ Dual-SIM
+ GPS relativamente veloz
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Muito boa duração da bateria
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Tela relativamente brilhante sem tonalidade azul

Contra

- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas
- Um pouco de software desconfortável
- Alto falante ruim
- Som diminuto do microfone
- Desempenho baixo ocasional
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

O Asus ZenFone 3 Max mantém sua promessa mais importante: Sua duração de bateria é extremamente longa. Por mais agradável que seja, temos de dizer que o LG X Power inclusive supera esta duração. Gostamos da carcaça do modelo de teste; ela é de muito alta qualidade para esta faixa de preços, mas não se destaca entre a multidão de smartphones. Mais qualidades positivas se encontram na boa tela, baixo consumo de energia no modo inativo e baixa emissão de temperaturas.

Não gostamos tanto do desempenho. O aparelho é mais lento que seus concorrentes em todos os aspectos. Talvez isto se deve à interface ZenUI da Asus? O aparelho somente é condicionalmente adequado para jogos 3D, mas websites mais sofisticados também poderiam ser um problema.

O ZenFone 3 Max oferece uma boa configuração de memória para esta faixa de preços, pode usar dois cartões SIM, e é leve e fino. O aparelho será uma boa opção para que se focar principalmente na duração da bateria.

Em comparação com o seu predecessor direto, o ZenFone Max, o nosso modelo de teste faz muitas coisa melhor, mas perdeu um pouco de seu tempo de duração. O Asus ZenFone 3 Max é uma atualização bem sucedida e é adequado principalmente para os fanáticos da duração da bateria. Todos os outros terão que fazer compromissos na câmera, alto falante, e qualidade das chamadas. Mas isto não é incomum nesta faixa de preços.

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL - 01/02/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
64 / 75 → 85%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 61%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 53%
Camera
65%
Médio
68%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 4)