Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 619 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | |||||||
Brightness middle | 464 | 554 19% | 485 5% | 696 50% | 402 -13% | 557 20% | 297 -36% |
Brightness | 468 | 552 18% | 490 5% | 680 45% | 408 -13% | 553 18% | 297 -37% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 96 13% | 92 8% | 93 9% | 85 0% | 97 14% | 93 9% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.35 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.59 50% | 2.1 34% | 4.3 -34% | 4 -25% | 1.4 56% | 2.67 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.5 | 2.56 76% | 5.5 48% | 9.4 10% | 10.1 4% | 3.1 70% | 3.98 62% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.01 -44% | 2.6 -86% | 4.8 -243% | 3.2 -129% | 1.3 7% | 2.81 -101% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.01 109% | 2.23 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 6590 99% | 6321 103% | 6843 95% | 7255 90% | 7037 92% | 6667 97% | 6379 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | 88.14 | 63.1 | 66.31 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 | 100 | 99.83 | 99.79 | |||
Contrast | 1657 | 1591 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235.8 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | Lenovo Moto Z | Huawei Mate 9 | Google Pixel XL 2016 | Apple iPhone 7 Plus | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | |||||||
Random Read 4KB | 100.9 | 86.7 -14% | 117.2 16% | 94.7 -6% | 87.7 -13% | ||
Random Write 4KB | 14.55 | 15.79 9% | 74.9 415% | 8.77 -40% | 14.56 0% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB | 163.1 | 145.1 -11% | 168.3 3% | 142.9 -12% | 83.4 -49% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB | 409 | 487.3 19% | 439.7 8% | 594 45% | 258.2 -37% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59 | 50.4 -15% | 45.64 -23% | 29.53 -50% | |||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.8 | 76.4 -2% | 78.5 1% | 54 -31% | |||
BaseMark OS II | |||||||
Memory | 2051 | 2072 1% | 2190 7% | 3850 88% | 1677 -18% | 1319 -36% | 1945 -5% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 59 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.03 / 0.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.85 / 1.2 / 1.25 Watt |
Carga |
6.97 / 9.74 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 22% | -20% | 23% | -19% | -113% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.63 26% | 0.66 22% | 0.78 8% | 0.53 38% | 0.77 9% | 2.85 -235% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.1 8% | 1.01 16% | 2.13 -78% | 1.07 11% | 2.04 -70% | 2.95 -146% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.25 | 1.56 -25% | 1.09 13% | 2.17 -74% | 1.12 10% | 2.24 -79% | 3.26 -161% |
Load Average * | 6.97 | 5.95 15% | 3.97 43% | 6.32 9% | 5.53 21% | 4.69 33% | 8.92 -28% |
Load Maximum * | 9.74 | 6.7 31% | 8.34 14% | 6.49 33% | 6.26 36% | 8.66 11% | 9.39 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 64% | 23% | 35% | 6% | 28% | -12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1393 | 1663 19% | 1371 -2% | 1538 10% | 1333 -4% | 1835 32% | 1078 -23% |
H.264 | 799 | 914 14% | 724 -9% | 947 19% | 505 -37% | 813 2% | 611 -24% |
WiFi v1.3 | 463 | 732 58% | 407 -12% | 758 64% | 505 9% | 587 27% | 369 -20% |
Load | 149 | 392 163% | 320 115% | 219 47% | 230 54% | 225 51% | 179 20% |
Pro
Contra
A sensação do Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe é agradável quando é segurado pela primeira vez, graças a sua carcaça de alta qualidade e especialmente ao seu metal sólido. Este esconde um armazenamento de 128 GB UFS 2.0 e exuberantes 6 GB de RAM além do Snapdragon, e assim o smartphone é bastante capaz de competir com outros dispositivos de gama alta de 2016 em termos de desempenho. A conectividade com uma porta USB Type-C, tela Always-On opcional e um slot híbrido dual-SIM/micro-SD, entre outras coisas, também é adequada. Ambas as câmeras de alta resolução conseguem ganhar pontos de bônus. A câmera principal adicionalmente se beneficia de uma sistema autofoco especialmente veloz. No entanto, existe mais espaço para melhorias, particularmente em situações com baixa iluminação e a textura de imagem geralmente granulada. O painel AMOLED de alta-resolução de 5,7 polegadas é grande, mas o aparelho é apenas condicionalmente adequado para aplicativos de RV devido à resolução Full HD. A IU ZenUI 3.0 modificada da Asus oferece diversas funções extra - mas nem todos os usuários gostarão do fato de que 19 GB da generosa capacidade de armazenamento esteja reservada. Além disso, alguns rivais oferecem durações de bateria consideravelmente mais longas.
Os usuários que não precisem das capacidades de realidade virtual e que gostem da interface de usuário extensamente modificada encontrarão um smartphone de alta qualidade de gama premium com apenas algumas desvantagens no Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe.
No entanto, é questionável se o modelo de teste conta com suficientes destaques para justificar o atual preço inicial de 799 Euros especialmente quando comparado com os rivais com preço bastante reduzido. Ele não consegue servir com uma borda curva como o Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge ou com as extensões modulares do Lenovo Moto Z. Ese não tem o icônico status do Apple iPhone e o seu Android não é atualizado tão rápido quanto o do smartphone Google Pixel XL. E os usuário à procura de uma tela que sej ao maior possível encontrá uma tela maior com quase as mesmas dimensões externas no Huawei Mate 9. Apesar disso, o ZenFone 3 Deluxe é uma alternativa que encontrará amigos na gama premium de smartphones graças à sua sólida tecnologia, funcionalidade dual-SIM e o design bem-sucedido.
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL
- 02/16/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Kilian