Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone X
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 600 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Apple iPhone 8 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | -52% | -23% | -48% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 600 | 559 -7% | 566 -6% | 426 -29% | 578 -4% | 629 5% |
| Brightness | 606 | 538 -11% | 564 -7% | 431 -29% | 568 -6% | 636 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 90 -4% | 94 0% | 93 -1% | 92 -2% | 94 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.62 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.3 -8% | 2.7 -125% | 1.6 -33% | 2.8 -133% | 1.7 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 2.7 10% | 5.4 -80% | 4.1 -37% | 5.1 -70% | 3.6 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 3.1 -94% | 1.7 -6% | 2.8 -75% | 2.4 -50% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6707 97% | 6797 96% | 6335 103% | 6329 103% | 6728 97% | 6337 103% |
| Contrast | 1471 | 932 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.85 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.81 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG G6 (Chrome 57) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 59 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.66 / 0.18 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.03 / 2.4 / 2.6 Watt |
| Carga |
2.96 / 6.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | 13% | 30% | 62% | 29% | 12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1292 | 2085 61% | 1629 26% | 1565 21% | 1744 35% | 1754 36% | 1534 19% |
| H.264 | 634 | 733 16% | 698 10% | 742 17% | 929 47% | 802 26% | 623 -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 564 | 657 16% | 585 4% | 736 30% | 818 45% | 695 23% | 518 -8% |
| Load | 180 | 211 17% | 202 12% | 275 53% | 398 121% | 236 31% | 247 37% |
Pro
Contra
As especificações e características do Apple iPhone X são muito semelhantes às do iPhone 8 Plus, mas isto não é algo ruim. As diferenças são importantes e dizem respeito ao visual. A Apple não usa apenas um painel 2:1 pela primeira vez, também é o maior painel em um iPhone até agora e o primeiro baseado na tecnologia OLED. A tela é muito boa, mas o design bastante incomum é certamente uma questão de gosto.
A falta de um botão Home e Touch ID é a segunda grande mudança. Ambos foram subtituidos pelo Face ID. Ele analisa o rosto, mas considerando as possibilidades se os dados forem mal utilizados, o recurso deve ser visto criticamente do ponto de vista da privacidade. A Apple diz que a informação só é armazenada no iPhone e os aplicativos só podem fazer consultas se a identidade é correta, mas no final é uma questão de confiança. Este ceticismo também foi um tópico quando o leitor de digitais foi lançado, mas ninguém se preocupa com isso agora, porque esse recurso facilita nossas vidas. O Face ID é realmente muito confortável e já funciona muito bem.
Tecnologia poderosa, novo design e Face ID - este é o iPhone X. Mas isso não é suficiente para ganhar a coroa dos smartphones.
Você também recebe uma boa câmera, que tira fotos decentes e certamente é a referência quando deseja gravar vídeos com o seu smartphone. A Apple atualmente é o único fabricante com gravação Ultra HD a 60 FPS. O smartphone também gerencia uma boa relação tela-corpo e o iPhone X não é tão volumoso quanto o iPhone 8 Plus, mas ainda é pesado. Caso contrário, você recebe todas as especificações que espera de um moderno smartphone de gama alta. Você ainda não pode expandir o armazenamento, mas não esperávamos isso. Há também mais e mais smartphones Android sem slot microSD. Achamos que as durações da bateria têm muito espaço para melhorias. Você passará o dia, mas não muito mais. O iPhone X também é o último em nosso grupo de comparação. O Huawei Mate 10 Pro, por exemplo, é muito melhor neste quesito.
Depois está o preço. O iPhone X está partir de 1149 Euros ($999), e você deve pagar 1319 Euros ($1149) pela versão de 256 GB. Para comparação: A Apple vende o iPhone 8 básico por 799 Euros ($699), e o 8 Plus por 909 Euros ($799). No final, a Apple cobra um preço premium por um novo design e Face ID, mas isso não justifica uma atualização dos modelos iPhone 8 ou 7.
Apple iPhone X
- 11/22/2017 v6 (old)
Patrick Afschar, Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
