Breve Análise do Smartphone Alcatel 5
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 495 cd/m²
Contraste: 1686:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
| Alcatel 5 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | BQ Aquaris VS Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 12% | -31% | -11% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 489 | 761 56% | 417 -15% | 528 8% | 634 30% |
| Brightness | 480 | 723 51% | 421 -12% | 525 9% | 635 32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 90 -5% | 88 -7% | 89 -6% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.69 -138% | 0.61 -110% | 0.51 -76% | 0.49 -69% |
| Contrast | 1686 | 1103 -35% | 684 -59% | 1035 -39% | 1294 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 2.4 54% | 6.1 -17% | 4.7 10% | 5.9 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.31 | 5.2 44% | 11.2 -20% | 8.9 4% | 11.6 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 1.8 72% | 7.1 -9% | 6.4 2% | 7.8 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.286 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8727 74% | 6312 103% | 8362 78% | 7987 81% | 8464 77% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 24524, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 5 | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Nokia 6 2018 | Huawei P20 Lite | BQ Aquaris VS Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 128% | 50% | 139% | 53% | 43% | 1045% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 271 | 286.6 6% | 272.6 1% | 293.9 8% | 274.3 1% | 242 ? -11% | 1863 ? 587% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 127.8 | 216.1 69% | 118.3 -7% | 198.3 55% | 205.1 60% | 100.5 ? -21% | 1446 ? 1031% |
| Random Read 4KB | 57 | 58.4 2% | 38.78 -32% | 48.19 -15% | 48.3 -15% | 43.2 ? -24% | 278 ? 388% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.59 | 62.8 362% | 15.3 13% | 71.1 423% | 6.4 -53% | 22.4 ? 65% | 309 ? 2174% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 36.5 ? | 83.7 ? 129% | 83.4 ? 128% | 83.5 ? 129% | 84.5 ? 132% | 71.8 ? 97% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 20.8 ? | 62.1 ? 199% | 61.3 ? 195% | 69 ? 232% | 60.6 ? 191% | 52.9 ? 154% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel 5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.4 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt |
| Carga |
4.5 / 6.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alcatel 5 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | 31% | 13% | 11% | 0% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 0.5 64% | 0.67 52% | 0.98 30% | 0.79 44% | 1.13 ? 19% | 0.885 ? 37% |
| Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.78 6% | 1.76 7% | 2 -5% | 2.29 -21% | 2.02 ? -6% | 1.451 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.4 | 1.81 25% | 1.78 26% | 2.11 12% | 2.3 4% | 2.42 ? -1% | 1.608 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 4.5 | 3.3 27% | 2.82 37% | 3.9 13% | 3.84 15% | 5.21 ? -16% | 6.55 ? -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.8 | 5.14 24% | 4.56 33% | 5.62 17% | 5.95 12% | 6.56 ? 4% | 9.92 ? -46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 5 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 702 -8% | 942 23% | 582 -24% | 644 -16% |
Pro
Contra
O Alcatel 5 atrai usuários que estão procurando um design diferente e são conscientes dos preços. Por um preço a partir de 230 Euros (~$269), os compradores interessados recebem um smartphone com um sistema operacional desatualizado e que tem desempenho suficiente para dominar todas as tarefas diárias habituais. A duração da bateria também é boa e o acabamento não dá motivos para reclamar.
Embora venha com o Android 7, o Alcatel 5 não oferece um sistema operacional atual, é capaz de ganhar alguns pontos positivos com o seu design e boa duração da bateria.
No entanto, outros fabricantes podem oferecer um pouco mais pelo mesmo preço. Particularmente no desempenho do sistema, na função da câmera e em termos de atualização, alguns concorrentes fazem um trabalho melhor. Com sua baixa resolução, a tela também não está mais atualizada, oferece cores vibrantes e um bom contraste. No final, o gosto do design e a prioridade de um comprador interessado em um sistema atual decidirão se o Alcatel 5 é uma boa opção ou não.
Alcatel 5
- 07/02/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
