Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - O melhor smartphone dobrável

Name: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Brand: Samsung

Flip, flip, hooray!

Com o Galaxy Z Flip, a Samsung está lançando seu segundo smartphone dobrável, que apresenta um conceito dobrável semelhante ao do Razr. O preço também é igualmente alto, mas o celular Samsung promete uma configuração mais forte com base em sua folha de dados. Nesta análise, você descobrirá se o Galaxy Z Flip também convence na vida cotidiana ou se é apenas uma dispositivo caro que está de moda.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/25/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Galaxy Z Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Memória

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Pantalha

6.70 polegadas 22:9, 2636 x 1080 pixel 425 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Dynamic AMOLED, Infinity Flex O display, dobrável; tampa da tela: 1.1", 112x300, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 223.1 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, sensor de posição, orientation sensor, sensor G, magnetômetro, barômetro, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 und 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34 and 39), LTE Cat. 16 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 34, 38, 39, 40 and 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.2 x 167.3 x 73.6

Bateria

12.9 Wh, 3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 2 células: (célula 1: 9.15 Wh, 2370 mAh, 4,43 V; célula 2: 3.474 Wh, 900 mAh, 3,86 V)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Wide angle, f/1.8, 27 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (ultra wide angle, f/2.2, 12 mm, 1.12 µm); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.4, 26 mm, 1.22 µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: on-screen, Carregador rápido, adaptador OTG, SIM tool, cabo USB (Type-A para Type-C), fones, capa transparente, One UI 2.0, Netflix, Spotify, Galaxy Apps, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, 24 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.369 W/kg, body SAR: 1.546 W/kg, single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS and SBAS, DRM Widevine L1, fanless

peso

183 g, Suprimento de energia: 59 g

Preço

1480 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.5 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip SD 855+, Adreno 640	183 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	2636x1080
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640	206 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	3120x1440
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	198 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	3040x1440
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Samsung Galaxy Fold SD 855, Adreno 640	276 g	512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7.30"	2152x1536
89 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176

Size comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip OnePlus 7T Pro Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Galaxy Fold Huawei Mate 30 Pro DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s +104%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	576 (544^min - 601^max) MBit/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	548 (399^min - 599^max) MBit/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	474 (405^min - 541^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	352 (311^min - 375^max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s +67%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Adreno 640, SD 855, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	662 (623^min - 679^max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	605 (299^min - 640^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	567 (371^min - 667^max) MBit/s -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (347^min - 505^max) MBit/s -22%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø595 (299-640)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø474 (405-541)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: 7.36 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 12.33 ∆E


696 cd/m²	714 cd/m²	716 cd/m²
704 cd/m²	705 cd/m²	719 cd/m²
705 cd/m²	708 cd/m²	718 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 719 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 709.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.64 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 705 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Dynamic AMOLED, 2636x1080, 6.7"	OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy Fold Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3"	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"
Screen		-3%	-13%	9%	-2%
Brightness middle	705	606 -14%	735 4%	531 -25%	592 -16%
Brightness	709	611 -14%	735 4%	532 -25%	605 -15%
Brightness Distribution	97	95 -2%	94 -3%	97 0%	96 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.1	3.46 -12%	3.9 -26%	2.3 26%	2.5 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.4	5.64 -4%	10.9 -102%	3.7 31%	5.5 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	2 26%	1.4 48%	1.5 44%	2.6 4%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.258 ^97%	2.09 ^105%	2.15 ^102%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6264 ^104%	6779 ^96%	6549 ^99%	6631 ^98%	6173 ^105%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

245.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	738 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	781 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (738 - 764, n=2)	751 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points +41%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2665 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3062 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2652 - 2665, n=2)	2659 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points +30%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2365 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4491 Points +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ()	2365 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +216%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2096 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4043 Points +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ()	2096 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +279%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3898 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3603 - 3705, n=2)	3654 Points
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10489 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12280 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9705 - 11388, n=2)	10547 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10192 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12228 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (7196 - 8317, n=2)	7757 Points
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12665 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12645 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9557 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	12276 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (10286 - 15510, n=6)	13201 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10261 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10442 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7704 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9655 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (8702 - 11690, n=6)	10315 Points +1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	80419 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	72173 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	54087 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	68675 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	64626 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (69829 - 81679, n=6)	75314 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	108418 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	118129 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	66990 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106066 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75073 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (108418 - 118129, n=6)	114593 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	42240 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	30561 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32308 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	30743 Points -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43459 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (30069 - 42240, n=6)	34737 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7363 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8165 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7479 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6452 - 8338, n=6)	7770 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9480 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10637 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6058 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9918 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9328 - 11259, n=6)	10354 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4133 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4503 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3448 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4019 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3103 - 4503, n=6)	4165 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6601 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8605 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4766 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7434 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6601 - 8651, n=6)	7952 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7751 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11448 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5307 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9489 Points +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (7751 - 11448, n=6)	10562 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +154%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4344 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4604 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3513 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4228 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3143 - 4725, n=6)	4323 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5679 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6266 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4579 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5722 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5174 - 6319, n=6)	5993 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6314 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7044 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5152 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6350 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6314 - 7150, n=6)	6826 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4201 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4519 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3296 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4250 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3166 - 4519, n=6)	4223 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5141 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6916 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4821 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6227 Points +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5141 - 6916, n=6)	6358 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5424 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8006 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5418 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7114 Points +31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5424 - 8006, n=6)	7358 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4348 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4683 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3480 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4336 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3137 - 4737, n=6)	4371 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3981 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5509 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4515 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4974 Points +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3981 - 5530, n=5)	5023 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4250 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6527 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5565 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5884 Points +38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4250 - 6640, n=5)	5966 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3259 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3564 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2720 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3228 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2587 - 3565, n=5)	3293 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points -18%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (59 - 61, n=4)	60 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	166 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	97 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	115 fps -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (166 - 185, n=4)	175.5 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +78%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	56 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	58 fps +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (56 - 61, n=4)	58.3 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +36%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	73 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	111 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	90 fps +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (73 - 112, n=4)	99 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +140%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	40 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	46 fps +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (40 - 58, n=4)	49.3 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +63%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	51 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	62 fps +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (51 - 79, n=4)	70 fps +37%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +144%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	25 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	32 fps +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (24 - 41, n=4)	32 fps +28%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +98%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	31 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	48 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (31 - 48, n=4)	42.3 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +141%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	23 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	32 fps +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23 - 41, n=5)	31.2 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +120%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	16 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +194%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps +188%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps +163%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps +206%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (16 - 47, n=5)	40.8 fps +155%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +431%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	34 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (17 - 34, n=5)	24.4 fps -28%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	39 fps
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	19 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	17 fps -56%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (18 - 39, n=5)	22.6 fps -42%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps -13%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	463291 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	486654 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	483224 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (462125 - 501784, n=4)	478464 Points +3%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	44.62 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33.9 (9.36^min - 74.72^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (38.9 - 44.6, n=2)	41.8 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	28.5 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31.12 (11.09^min - 63.1^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (28.5 - 35, n=2)	31.8 fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	45.28 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29.22 (4.07^min - 95.16^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (42.2 - 45.3, n=2)	43.7 fps

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4986 Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4997 Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4986 - 5025, n=2)	5006 Score
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4998 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4992 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4226 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4835 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4992 - 5335, n=5)	5151 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +30%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8507 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9294 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7793 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	8825 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (8507 - 9294, n=5)	8896 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5434 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5091 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4502 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4945 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4869 - 6077, n=5)	5378 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9334 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10618 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8981 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9510 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9334 - 10618, n=5)	10312 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +93%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1446 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1236 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1012 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1317 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (1236 - 1546, n=5)	1436 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +9%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +97%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 70.9, n=5)	65.8 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	63.1 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	62.4 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1)	53.8 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)	44.35 Points -30%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (113.9 - 120.8, n=5)	117.4 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	115.4 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	113.9 Points
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	113.7 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	90.9 Points -20%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +130%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min +19%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)	66.4 runs/min +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	62.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	61.5 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=4)	59.3 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	57 runs/min -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	129 Points +32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	115 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (89 - 111, n=5)	98.2 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	98 Points
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	93 Points -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23781 - 25353, n=5)	24606 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	24128 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	23999 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	23781 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	20653 Points -13%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	2134 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (Chrome 80)	2077 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=5)	2054 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1)	2003 ms * +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms * +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	1823 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip	OnePlus 7T Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	Samsung Galaxy Fold	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-29%	-53%	-33%	11%	5%	77%
Sequential Read 256KB	1443	1489 3%	816 -43%	1303 -10%	1781 23%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) 7%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 31%
Sequential Write 256KB	523	405 -23%	246.3 -53%	394.5 -25%	401.8 -23%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) 10%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 181%
Random Read 4KB	184.5	169 -8%	135 -27%	158.4 -14%	226.4 23%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) 14%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 51%
Random Write 4KB	212.9	26 -88%	23.79 -89%	34.41 -84%	259.2 22%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) -11%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 46%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.9 (19-41)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (28-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.6 °C	37.6 °C	30.6 °C
38.8 °C	36.8 °C	30.4 °C
38.6 °C	37.7 °C	30.5 °C

Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C


28.8 °C	34.1 °C	35.1 °C
28.8 °C	32.4 °C	35.3 °C
28.2 °C	34.2 °C	35.8 °C

Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ocioso	0.59 / 0.88 / 0.95 Watt
Carga	4.97 / 8.37 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3300 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-154%	-50%	-0%	-39%	-72%	-48%
Idle Minimum *	0.59	2.1 -256%	0.66 -12%	0.6 -2%	0.87 -47%	1.183 ?(0.59 - 2.1, n=6) -101%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) -50%
Idle Average *	0.88	3 -241%	1.82 -107%	0.85 3%	1.75 -99%	1.883 ?(0.88 - 3, n=6) -114%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) -67%
Idle Maximum *	0.95	3.5 -268%	1.83 -93%	1 -5%	1.83 -93%	2.32 ?(0.95 - 3.5, n=6) -144%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) -71%
Load Average *	4.97	5.3 -7%	6.11 -23%	4.47 10%	3.85 23%	4.91 ?(4.14 - 5.3, n=6) 1%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -32%
Load Maximum *	8.37	8.3 1%	9.81 -17%	9.02 -8%	6.64 21%	8.59 ?(8.3 - 9.2, n=6) -3%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 80)		10h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 37min

	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3300 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		55%	56%	47%	50%
Reader / Idle	1741	2015 16%	2340 34%	1724 -1%	2174 25%
H.264	527	957 82%	1047 99%	1027 95%	1098 108%
WiFi v1.3	647	912 41%	533 -18%	600 -7%	823 27%
Load	157	283 80%	327 108%	316 101%	219 39%

Pro

+ Celular dobrável elegante e compacto

+ Painel OLED brilhante e com cores precisas

+ SoC Snapdragon veloz

+ Boas câmeras

+ Dual-SIM via eSIM

+ Ampla faixa de frequências

Contra

- Nenhuma expansão de armazenamento possível

- O Wi-Fi deveria ser mais rápido

- Qualidade de chamada moderada

- As propriedades de deslizamento da tela poderiam ser melhores

Veredicto - Alto preço pelo formato

In review: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (SM-F700F)

O Samsung Galaxy Z Flip é particularmente convincente com seu conceito dobrável, que é muito mais fácil de manusear na vida cotidiana do que outros smartphones com uma tela tão grande. Além disso, é simplesmente divertido dobrar o smartphone com uma mão. A função de suporte integrado conectada à dobradiça também é bastante prática, e a usamos com mais frequência do que o esperado.

O Galaxy Z Flip não é barato nem perfeito, mas é simplesmente divertido.

O maior incômodo é, na verdade, a qualidade da superfície da tela. A película protetora é uma solução necessária, mas não se sente de uma qualidade particularmente alta e não se compara a uma superfície de vidro medianamente decente. Além disso, gostaríamos de ter uma configuração de câmera mais versátil em vista do preço.

Se você procura um smartphone com uma forte relação preço-desempenho, precisará procurar outra alternativa. Aqueles que desejem ter um elegante dispositivo do futuro terão que fazer alguns compromissos no lado do hardware, mas isso raramente é importante no uso diário.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

81%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

85%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 72%

Peso

90%

Bateria

83%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

52 / 64 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

79 / 86 → 92%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

70 / 90 → 78%

Camera

69%

Médio

77%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Z Flip - O melhor smartphone dobrável

Daniel Schmidt, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)

Comparison devices

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip audio analysis

OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Alto preço pelo formato

More articles related to this device

Price comparison