Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus - Finalmente um excelente tablet Android
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 575 g | 5.7 mm | 12.40" | 2800x1752 | |
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 641 g | 5.9 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleUltra Wide-angle5X zoomLow-light photography
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 441 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.01
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4" | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 31% | -10% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 441 | 625 42% | 606 37% | 446 1% |
| Brightness | 447 | 599 34% | 579 30% | 445 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 87 -11% | 89 -9% | 86 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.32 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.3 46% | 2.9 -21% | 2.7 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 2.7 34% | 6 -46% | 5.4 -32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.8 38% | 4.3 -48% | 2.1 28% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6469 100% | 6765 96% | 7272 89% | 6468 100% |
| Contrast | 1330 | 1894 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245.1 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting | |
| ≤ 1.73 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % (1.73 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) () | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) () | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) () | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12355 - 14979, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 117, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (110 - 134, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 82, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (121.7 - 131.5, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -20% | 20% | -17% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1675 | 1789 7% | 1416 -15% | 1742 ? 4% | 1045 ? -38% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 732 | 399 -45% | 522 -29% | 1160 ? 58% | 686 ? -6% |
| Random Read 4KB | 230.1 | 224.6 -2% | 191.6 -17% | 286 ? 24% | 189.4 ? -18% |
| Random Write 4KB | 205 | 262.4 28% | 170.2 -17% | 319 ? 56% | 189.9 ? -7% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.8 ? | 82.4 ? -4% | 70.5 ? -18% | 75.9 ? -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 69.3 ? | 71.7 ? 3% | 54.5 ? -21% | 61.9 ? -11% |
PUBG Compare
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.41 / 3.4 / 3.43 Watt |
| Carga |
6.63 / 10.29 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 9720 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -77% | -17% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.41 | 1.22 49% | 1.98 18% | 1.96 19% |
| Idle Average * | 3.4 | 8.68 -155% | 5.66 -66% | 2.8 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.43 | 8.75 -155% | 5.69 -66% | 2.82 18% |
| Load Average * | 6.63 | 11.72 -77% | 6.96 -5% | 5.31 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.29 | 15.25 -48% | 6.98 32% | 11.91 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 9720 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | 58% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 898 | 1827 103% | 1877 109% | 1276 42% |
| H.264 | 620 | 738 19% | 909 47% | 872 41% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 425 | 905 113% | 891 110% | 556 31% |
| Load | 355 | 167 -53% | 233 -34% | 340 -4% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Tablet poderoso, mas não o top
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ é atualmente o maior tablet premium no espaço Android. A tela Super AMOLED de 12,4 polegadas oferece uma excelente reprodução de cores. No entanto, não é suficientemente brilhante para ser utilizada em exteriores. É uma pena que a Samsung não tenha conseguido implementar aqui a sua tecnologia Dynamic AMOLED.
O desempenho do Wi-Fi é muito instável. No entanto, no uso diário, o desempenho nunca cai abaixo de um limite crítico. No entanto, a Samsung deve fazer algumas melhorias aqui. Isto também se aplica às durações da bateria, que são bastante fracas mesmo com brilho mínimo, quando os módulos de comunicação estão habilitados.
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+ é um tablet premium poderoso, adequado para consumo de mídia e uso profissional.
Em seu núcleo, o Tab S7+ é bom. Aqui a Samsung tem feito muito certo. O Tab S7+ possui um SoC muito rápido e sua tela de 120 Hz melhora a experiência do usuário não apenas durante os jogos. A S Pen, incluída na caixa, é uma ferramenta poderosa para fazer anotações, desenhar e fazer apresentações. Além disso, o tablet Android também vem com um modem 5G opcional, o que deve tornar o Tab S7+ apto para o futuro se a Samsung cumprir suas promessas em relação às atualizações de software.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
