Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy A20e: Equipamento topo de linha a um preço acessível

Name: Samsung Galaxy A20e
Brand: Samsung

Um bom negócio.

Gastar muito dinheiro por um smartphone? Não tem que ser assim, diz a Samsung, apresentando seu acessível Galaxy A20e de nível de entrada por 179 Euros (~$199). É capaz de ganhar pontos com um equipamento surpreendentemente abrangente, oferecendo um SoC octa-core, uma câmera dupla, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, dual SIM e VoLTE, entre outras coisas.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/29/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A20e (Galaxy A20 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 7884B 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Memória

3 GB

, LPDDR4

Pantalha

5.80 polegadas 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, HD+, Gorilla Glass 3, 16 Million colors, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 21.1 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB (exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de psoição, sensor de aceleração, sensor geomagnético, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, Wi-Fi Direct, VoLTE, VoWiFi, aptX, DRM Widevine Level 1

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), downloads/uploads up to 150/50 Mbps, head Sar 0.498 W/kg, body SAR 1.303 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 147.4 x 69.7

Bateria

3000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix dual camera: 13 MP wide angle (f/1.9, 28 mm) + 5 MP ultra-wide angle (f/2.2, 12 mm), videos em até 1920x1080 pixels @ 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, luz de selfie

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Carregador modular de 15 watts (9V/1.67A, 5V/2A), cabo USB (Type-C para Type-A), SIM tool, headset, instruções de início rápido, instruções de garantia, One UI 1.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

141 g, Suprimento de energia: 25 g

Preço

179 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	238 (189^min - 285^max) MBit/s +499%
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 (90^min - 111^max) MBit/s +157%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (23^min - 50^max) MBit/s
LG K40 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.6 (10^min - 54^max) MBit/s 0%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (24^min - 40^max) MBit/s -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.6 (2^min - 36^max) MBit/s -71%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	350 (327^min - 361^max) MBit/s +483%
LG K40 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	221 (107^min - 246^max) MBit/s +268%
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 (81^min - 129^max) MBit/s +113%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (47^min - 67^max) MBit/s
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (35^min - 52^max) MBit/s -12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34.8 (27^min - 44^max) MBit/s -42%

Samsung Galaxy A20e; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø59.4 (47-67)

Samsung Galaxy A20e; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø39.6 (23-50)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


455 cd/m²	491 cd/m²	482 cd/m²
468 cd/m²	475 cd/m²	476 cd/m²
476 cd/m²	473 cd/m²	462 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 473.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 475 cd/m²
Contraste: 1357:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33

	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"	LG K40 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7"
Screen		30%	13%	5%	38%	10%
Brightness middle	475	541 14%	445 -6%	475 0%	533 12%	479 1%
Brightness	473	540 14%	424 -10%	467 -1%	533 13%	481 2%
Brightness Distribution	93	91 -2%	91 -2%	90 -3%	89 -4%	94 1%
Black Level *	0.35	0.33 6%	0.26 26%	0.32 9%	0.25 29%	0.37 -6%
Contrast	1357	1639 21%	1712 26%	1484 9%	2132 57%	1295 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.8	2.7 60%	5.9 13%	5.95 12%	2.8 59%	4.91 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.4	4.6 66%	9.3 31%	12.62 6%	5.1 62%	9.47 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.7	3.1 64%	6.8 22%	7.9 9%	1.9 78%	6.4 26%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.26 ^97%	2.2 ^100%	2.331 ^94%	2.11 ^104%	2.108 ^104%
CCT	9385 ^69%	6853 ^95%	8443 ^77%	8202 ^79%	6149 ^106%	7292 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

349.7 Hz

≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 349.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 349.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1212 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1639 Points +35%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points -26%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	758 Points -37%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1194 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1168 - 1216, n=3)	1199 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +353%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3714 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5913 Points +59%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points -12%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3375 Points -9%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4179 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (3590 - 4082, n=3)	3795 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +306%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3271 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5576 Points +70%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points -3%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2638 Points -19%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3628 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (2832 - 3569, n=3)	3224 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +267%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6870 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points -10%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4404 Points -36%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6385 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7321 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6316 - 6902, n=3)	6680 Points -3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6187 Points +17%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points -13%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3805 Points -28%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4912 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	5930 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5136 - 5309, n=3)	5250 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11565 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26308 Points +127%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points +14%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10721 Points -7%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10340 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15000 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11324 - 13688, n=3)	12192 Points +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11427 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29496 Points +158%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points +18%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10531 Points -8%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10008 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	14603 Points +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11335 - 13711, n=3)	12158 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12075 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19087 Points +58%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points +3%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11443 Points -5%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11696 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	16576 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11287 - 13610, n=3)	12324 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points +181%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points +9%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	567 Points -23%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	684 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (681 - 876, n=3)	765 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +470%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1925 Points +202%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points +11%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	512 Points -20%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	624 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (582 - 766, n=3)	662 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +644%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2834 Points +72%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points -5%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points -45%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1026 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1646 - 1756, n=3)	1692 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points +173%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points +6%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	734 Points -3%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	715 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (746 - 937, n=3)	814 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +1364%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2006 Points +204%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points +8%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	695 Points +5%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	663 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (646 - 826, n=3)	710 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +2891%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2772 Points +71%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points -7%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points -44%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	987 Points -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1624 - 1768, n=3)	1674 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +208%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1358 Points +158%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points -16%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	355 Points -33%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	439 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (526 - 654, n=3)	570 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +486%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1189 Points +168%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points -17%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	303 Points -32%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	378 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (443 - 555, n=3)	481 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +637%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2708 Points +66%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points -3%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	881 Points -46%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	998 Points -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1630 - 1747, n=3)	1686 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1436 Points +174%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points -6%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	488 Points -7%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	451 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (524 - 588, n=3)	546 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +1379%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1262 Points +187%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points -6%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	431 Points -2%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	391 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (439 - 498, n=3)	459 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +2522%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2768 Points +70%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points -8%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points -44%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	980 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1554 - 1628, n=3)	1599 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points -18%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (576 - 598, n=3)	584 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +376%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points -19%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (477 - 498, n=3)	485 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +521%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points +8%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (2018 - 2105, n=3)	2058 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +34%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	44 fps +42%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps +10%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	26 fps -16%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	37 fps +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (31 - 41, n=3)	34.3 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +178%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	51 fps +155%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps +15%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	19 fps -5%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	24 fps +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20 - 25, n=3)	21.7 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +1300%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	20 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps -10%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	16 fps -20%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	20 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20 - 27, n=3)	22.3 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +278%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps +109%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps -11%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.7 fps -12%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	10 fps -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (10 - 13, n=3)	11.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +1403%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	13 fps -7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps -7%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11 fps -21%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15 fps +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (14 - 19, n=3)	15.7 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps +131%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps -2%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6 fps -8%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.9 fps +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)	7.03 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +1703%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.8 fps -9%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps -19%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4 fps -53%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7.9 fps -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (8.6 - 12, n=3)	9.77 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +456%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps +117%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps -17%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.8 fps -33%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.9 fps -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)	4.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +1581%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.6 fps -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps -15%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.8 fps -13%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.8 fps -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (7.8 - 10, n=3)	8.57 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +535%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.7 fps +118%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps -10%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.7 fps -7%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.8 fps -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4 - 5, n=3)	4.33 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +1895%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	4.8 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps -19%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps -10%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4.3 fps -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)	5.33 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +679%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	3.2 fps +129%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps -14%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.3 fps -7%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1.3 fps -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)	1.533 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +2186%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	95464 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	143352 Points +50%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	77652 Points -19%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	71347 Points -25%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	77798 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	97294 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (89089 - 102121, n=3)	95558 Points 0%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +460%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)	22.5 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.49 Points
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.92 Points -26%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	13.68 Points -36%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +530%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.63 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)	21.5 runs/min -1%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	18.23 runs/min -16%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	14.7 runs/min -32%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +210%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	61 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)	47 Points -2%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points -21%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	30 Points -37%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	29 Points -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +397%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	10679 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	8185 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)	7152 Points -4%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points -36%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	4422 Points -41%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	4197 Points -44%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	11955 ms * -116%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	11185 ms * -102%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768 ms * -76%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)	5763 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546 ms *
Motorola Moto G7 Play	4806 ms * +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	3948 ms * +29%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +72%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A20e	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7	Nokia 4.2	LG K40	Sony Xperia L3	Motorola Moto G7 Play	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		19%	-41%	-15%	-10%	76%	-4%	1070%
Sequential Read 256KB	300.4	283.4 -6%	220.4 -27%	261.7 -13%	290.9 -3%	289 -4%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -19%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 512%
Sequential Write 256KB	103.6	204.7 98%	18.17 -82%	100.5 -3%	87.5 -16%	111 7%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -3%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1275%
Random Read 4KB	79.8	82.9 4%	17.51 -78%	52.6 -34%	28.83 -64%	74 -7%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -46%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 247%
Random Write 4KB	13.18	16.06 22%	4.31 -67%	10 -24%	16.36 24%	73 454%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 70%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 2244%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	86.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	77.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	65.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	57.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	61.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	64.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -18%

Samsung Galaxy A20e; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.1: Ø59.8 (49-61)

Samsung Galaxy A20e; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.6.3a: Ø24.5 (2-29)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


34.8 °C	33.6 °C	32.8 °C
35.1 °C	35.1 °C	33.2 °C
34.2 °C	34.2 °C	33.6 °C

Máximo: 35.1 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C


30.7 °C	31.4 °C	32.7 °C
30.7 °C	32 °C	34.2 °C
30.4 °C	31 °C	34.3 °C

Máximo: 34.3 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 24.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Ocioso	0.66 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Carga	2.77 / 3.66 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	LG K40 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 7884B	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-50%	-17%	-15%	1%	-48%	-14%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.61 8%	0.74 -12%	0.68 -3%	0.57 14%	1 -52%	0.67 ?(0.65 - 0.7, n=3) -2%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	1.63	1.95 -20%	1.9 -17%	1.53 6%	1.5 8%	1.7 -4%	1.617 ?(1.6 - 1.63, n=3) 1%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Maximum *	1.67	2.03 -22%	2.21 -32%	1.95 -17%	1.51 10%	2.6 -56%	1.777 ?(1.66 - 2, n=3) -6%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 3%
Load Average *	2.77	4.56 -65%	3.04 -10%	3.5 -26%	3.09 -12%	4.1 -48%	3.73 ?(2.77 - 5.4, n=3) -35%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -133%
Load Maximum *	3.66	9.15 -150%	4.15 -13%	4.9 -34%	4.15 -13%	6.5 -78%	4.67 ?(3.66 - 6, n=3) -28%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -168%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		23h 52min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 10min

	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	LG K40 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		18%	-3%	4%	9%	-3%
Reader / Idle	1432	1950 36%			2127 49%
H.264	753	940 25%			750 0%
WiFi v1.3	715	768 7%	696 -3%	745 4%	641 -10%	690 -3%
Load	250	259 4%			242 -3%

Pro

+ Carcaça elegante e estável

+ Bluetooth 5.0 + aptX

+ Dual-SIM + microSD

+ VoLTE e VoWiFi

+ NFC

+ DRM Widevine L1

+ Sólido desempenho

+ Boa imagens com a luz do dia

+ Carregador rápido

Contra

- WLAN lento

- Adware pré instalado

- Câmera de selfies fraca

- Apenas IPS em vez de uma tela AMOLED

- Os jogos rodam com limitações

Veredicto - Muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro

Testing the Samsung Galaxy A20e. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Aqueles que planejaram apenas um pequeno orçamento para o seu novo smartphone terão muito valor pelo seu dinheiro com o Samsung Galaxy A20e. Claro, a carcaça é de plástico liso e você tem que gostar do formato pequeno. No entanto, se você ainda decidir pelo peso leve de 141 gramas, será recompensado com um equipamento abrangente e desempenho rápido.

Um negócio bem completo: O Samsung Galaxy A20e, que custa oficialmente 179 euros (~US$199), oferece equipamento surpreendentemente abrangente e recompensa os compradores com acabamento e sensação táctil agradável.

Com o seu SoC Exynos 7884B octa-core e 3 GB of RAM, o Galaxy A20e oferece suficiente desempenho para usar aplicativos cotidianos como YouTube e Whatsapp. Em termos de tecnologia de comunicação, está bem equipado com dual SIM, VoLTE, VoWiFi, NFC e Bluetooth 5.0, incluindo suporte para aptX. No entanto, não suporta uma grande quantidade de bandas LTE, mas a cobertura de frequencias é completamente suficiente para utilizá-lo na Europa.

Um bom recurso extra é o suporte do DRM Widevine L1, permitindo que o Galaxy A20e também transmita vídeos HD de provedores de streaming, como a Netflix. Outras vantagens são uma câmera dupla que tira fotos boas durante o dia e o carregador rápido incluído que pode recarregar a bateria completamente em 1,5 horas.

Por outro lado, você tem que se contentar com velocidades WLAN lentas no Galaxy A20e, e também com uma câmera selfie que só pode oferecer qualidade de fotografia instantânea na melhor das hipóteses. A Samsung também usa apenas uma tela IPS no dispositivo de entrada acessível. Embora faça um bom trabalho, é inferior à tecnologia dos painéis AMOLED nos modelos Galaxy-A mais caros.

Samsung Galaxy A20e - 10/31/2019 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

79%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

41 / 70 → 59%

Peso

93%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

7 / 64 → 10%

Desempenho da aplicação

49 / 86 → 57%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

57%

Médio

70%

76%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy A20e: Equipamento topo de linha a um preço acessível

Manuel Masiero, 2019-07-29 (Update: 2019-07-30)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro

More articles related to this device

Price comparison