Breve Análise do Razer Blade 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q: O mesmo portátil, só que mais rápido
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 345.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1016:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr Samsung SDC4145, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -7% | -5% | -5% | 24% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 69.5 0% | 64.9 -6% | 65.3 -6% | 67.7 -2% | 88.5 28% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.8 | 99.6 1% | 91 -8% | 95.5 -3% | 91.6 -7% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.5 | 70.8 0% | 65.9 -7% | 66.5 -6% | 67.1 -5% | 99.9 42% |
Response Times | -179% | -68% | -208% | -260% | 71% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.2 ? | 14 ? -338% | 7.2 ? -125% | 15.2 ? -375% | 19 ? -494% | 0.8 ? 75% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 9.6 ? -20% | 8.8 ? -10% | 11.2 ? -40% | 10 ? -25% | 2.7 ? 66% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 242.7 ? | ||||
Screen | 9% | -1% | 1% | 17% | -18% | |
Brightness middle | 345.4 | 316 -9% | 286 -17% | 266 -23% | 477 38% | 374.3 8% |
Brightness | 342 | 311 -9% | 275 -20% | 248 -27% | 431 26% | 379 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 90 0% | 89 -1% | 84 -7% | 91 1% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.21 38% | 0.37 -9% | 0.31 9% | 0.175 49% | |
Contrast | 1016 | 1505 48% | 773 -24% | 858 -16% | 2726 168% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 3.03 5% | 2.19 31% | 2.78 13% | 4.17 -31% | 5.47 -72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.57 | 7.32 -11% | 4.4 33% | 5.96 9% | 6.97 -6% | 8.22 -25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.77 | 1.1 38% | 2.27 -28% | 0.91 49% | 2.51 -42% | 4.61 -160% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 3.9 -3% | 2.2 42% | 3.58 6% | 3.49 8% | 2.3 39% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.42 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.5 88% | 2.09 105% |
CCT | 7109 91% | 7439 87% | 6405 101% | 7186 90% | 7076 92% | 6340 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.3 | 65 1% | 59 -8% | 62 -4% | 60 -7% | 87.8 37% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 100 1% | 91 -8% | 96 -3% | 91 -8% | 100 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -57% /
-16% | -25% /
-10% | -71% /
-26% | -83% /
-22% | 26% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32) | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32) | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37) | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Dell G5 15 5590 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30) | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27) | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (4719 - 5840, n=2) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (6081 - 6825, n=2) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5840 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6825 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6739 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Aorus 15G XB | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 0% | -17% | -12% | -51% | |
Seq Read | 1957 | 1065 -46% | 2506 28% | 2517 29% | 1372 -30% |
Seq Write | 2092 | 2360 13% | 1712 -18% | 924 -56% | 746 -64% |
4K Read | 50.2 | 48.09 -4% | 48.32 -4% | 59.1 18% | 35.42 -29% |
4K Write | 96.5 | 110.7 15% | 103.6 7% | 126.5 31% | 99.9 4% |
4K-64 Read | 1594 | 1635 3% | 624 -61% | 876 -45% | 302.1 -81% |
4K-64 Write | 2005 | 1829 -9% | 1253 -38% | 922 -54% | 191.4 -90% |
Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.071 -25% | 0.08 -40% | 0.042 26% | 0.132 -132% |
Access Time Write * | 0.112 | 0.034 70% | 0.04 64% | 0.065 42% | 0.037 67% |
Score Read | 1840 | 1790 -3% | 923 -50% | 1186 -36% | 475 -74% |
Score Write | 2310 | 2176 -6% | 1528 -34% | 1141 -51% | 366 -84% |
Score Total | 5103 | 4950 -3% | 2896 -43% | 2870 -44% | 1065 -79% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1793 | 2086 16% | 1062 -41% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 573 | 454.2 -21% | 426 -26% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1418 | 1141 -20% | 650 -54% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -7% | -19% | -14% | -47% | |
Write 4K | 139.8 | 131.3 -6% | 97 -31% | 115.5 -17% | 134.2 -4% |
Read 4K | 48.62 | 45.84 -6% | 49.58 2% | 58 19% | 37.72 -22% |
Write Seq | 2260 | 2370 5% | 1838 -19% | 1555 -31% | 389.2 -83% |
Read Seq | 2135 | 1509 -29% | 2421 13% | 2590 21% | 1030 -52% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 499.3 | 481.5 -4% | 326.9 -35% | 369.3 -26% | 238.9 -52% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 552 | 560 1% | 372.9 -32% | 441.7 -20% | 343.9 -38% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2960 | 2392 -19% | 1894 -36% | 1547 -48% | 789 -73% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3269 | 3232 -1% | 2828 -13% | 2969 -9% | 1502 -54% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 293.4 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 405.8 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-3% | -18% /
-18% | -13% /
-13% | -49% /
-50% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (24244 - 28900, n=10) | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (12819 - 16347, n=9) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
3DMark 11 Performance | 23678 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 48815 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17915 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8052 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (80 - 83.7, n=2) | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 348.3 | 235.4 | 141.4 | 74 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 144 | 132 | 127 | 120 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 162 | 110 | 83.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 121 | 109 | 90 |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -16% | -16% | -15% | -3% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 27 | 30 -11% | 30 -11% | 30 -11% | 30 -11% | 30.1 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 27 | 32 -19% | 31 -15% | 31 -15% | 31.3 -16% | 30.1 -11% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 34 -26% | 33 -22% | 34 -26% | 31.3 -16% | 30.1 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 39 -44% | 38 -41% | 39 -44% | 31.3 -16% | 30.1 -11% |
Load Average * | 44.7 | 53 -19% | 50 -12% | 46 -3% | 42 6% | 46.8 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.2 | 48 6% | 53 -4% | 53 -4% | 42.1 18% | 48.4 5% |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 53 2% | 56 -4% | 55 -2% | 46.5 14% | 46 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 27 / 27 / 27 dB |
Carga |
| 44.7 / 54 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.55 / 0.93 Watt |
Ocioso | 14.3 / 22.3 / 36.9 Watt |
Carga |
118.4 / 220.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -17% | -2% | -2% | 24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.3 | 13 9% | 24 -68% | 21 -47% | 22.2 -55% | 10.6 26% |
Idle Average * | 22.3 | 16 28% | 27 -21% | 23 -3% | 24.9 -12% | 13.1 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 36.9 | 27 27% | 33 11% | 32 13% | 30.6 17% | 15.8 57% |
Load Average * | 118.4 | 109 8% | 129 -9% | 97 18% | 101 15% | 131 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 153.7 | 155 -1% | 176 -15% | 148 4% | 143 7% | 146 5% |
Load Maximum * | 220.8 | 236 -7% | 216 2% | 213 4% | 186 16% | 169 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 83 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | -42% | 11% | -53% | -5% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 380 | 364 -4% | 220 -42% | 421 11% | 179 -53% | 361 -5% |
Reader / Idle | 505 | 353 | 545 | 900 | ||
Load | 102 | 62 | 181 | 97 |
Pro
Contra
Atualizar da configuração GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q para a configuração GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q trará cerca de 15 por cento a mais de desempenho sem afetar a vida útil da bateria, ruído do ventilador, consumo de energia ou temperatura, de forma significativa. É uma diferença de $ 400 entre esses dois SKUs, entretanto, então os usuários devem decidir cuidadosamente se eles acham que o aumento nos gráficos valeria o investimento extra em relação à nossa opção GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q mais barata.
Quando tudo estiver dito e feito, a GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q tem um desempenho mais semelhante a uma GeForce RTX 2060 de desktop comum, mas em um atraente portátil. Este continua sendo um dos melhores portáteis para jogos ultrafinos que você pode obter no momento em termos de desempenho e design visual, mesmo depois de levar em consideração as mesmas desvantagens que vimos nos anos anteriores. Se você não quer gastar muito no último Blade 15, a GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q não é muito diferente da GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q mais antiga e mais barata.
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- 08/19/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo