Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil de Jogos Aorus 17 YA: Desempenho extremo, ruído extremo
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 3.8 kg | 38 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 4.7 kg | 48 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 4.8 kg | 42 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 18.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus 17 YA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus 17 YA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 253 cd/m²
Contraste: 1265:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Aorus 17 YA AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus ROG G703GXR AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | -9% | -8% | -9% | -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 84.8 21% | 63.2 -10% | 64.4 -8% | 62.6 -11% | 60.6 -14% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 99.9 2% | 92 -6% | 92.1 -6% | 93.5 -5% | 89 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.4 | 98.6 36% | 64.7 -11% | 65.5 -10% | 64.7 -11% | 62.1 -14% |
| Response Times | 6% | 23% | -5% | 33% | 36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 15.2 ? 5% | 6.4 ? 60% | 16.8 ? -5% | 7.2 ? 55% | 6.8 ? 57% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 10.4 ? 7% | 12.8 ? -14% | 11.6 ? -4% | 10 ? 11% | 9.6 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | |||||
| Screen | -124% | -101% | -136% | -10% | -64% | |
| Brightness middle | 253 | 346.7 37% | 290 15% | 288 14% | 366 45% | 299.3 18% |
| Brightness | 252 | 332 32% | 281 12% | 271 8% | 343 36% | 294 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 85 -9% | 91 -2% | 94 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.27 -35% | 0.2 -0% | 0.2 -0% | 0.29 -45% | 0.29 -45% |
| Contrast | 1265 | 1284 2% | 1450 15% | 1440 14% | 1262 0% | 1032 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.14 | 5.62 -393% | 4.77 -318% | 5.79 -408% | 1.51 -32% | 2.55 -124% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.01 | 9.36 -366% | 9.08 -352% | 11.89 -492% | 3.22 -60% | 4.73 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 3.81 -277% | 1.46 -45% | 1.89 -87% | 0.71 30% | 2.9 -187% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.12 | 5.5 -391% | 5.83 -421% | 6.92 -518% | 1.93 -72% | 3.5 -213% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.47 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6366 102% | 6175 105% | 8076 80% | 8433 77% | 6881 94% | 7101 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66 | 87.2 32% | 59 -11% | 60 -9% | 60 -9% | 57 -14% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 100 2% | 92 -6% | 92 -6% | 94 -4% | 88.7 -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-81% | -29% /
-68% | -50% /
-95% | 5% /
-5% | -13% /
-42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5731 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6524 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7082 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Aorus 17 YA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Asus ROG G703GXR Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0) | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -12% | 15% | 12% | -23% | |
| Write 4K | 139.6 | 99.3 -29% | 115.3 -17% | 95.5 -32% | 100.7 -28% |
| Read 4K | 62.9 | 40.25 -36% | 41.79 -34% | 42.59 -32% | 41.03 -35% |
| Write Seq | 1573 | 2001 27% | 2841 81% | 2851 81% | 1146 -27% |
| Read Seq | 2808 | 2107 -25% | 2547 -9% | 2696 -4% | 1115 -60% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 509 | 348.3 -32% | 498.6 -2% | 402.6 -21% | 384.6 -24% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 639 | 391.5 -39% | 555 -13% | 443.9 -31% | 429.5 -33% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1573 | 2003 27% | 3123 99% | 3420 117% | 1859 18% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3082 | 3482 13% | 3476 13% | 3514 14% | 3179 3% |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 47736 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
| Asus ROG G703GXR | |
| Aorus 17 YA | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 244, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 17 YA | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Aorus 17 YA | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
| Aorus 17 YA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 200 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 95.4 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152.8 | 144.7 | 140.7 | 133.8 |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 107 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 42 / 44 / 52 dB |
| Carga |
| 56 / 64 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 20% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 42 | 33 21% | 30 29% | 31 26% | 28.2 33% | 25.5 ? 39% |
| Idle Average * | 44 | 34 23% | 34 23% | 32 27% | 28.2 36% | 27.2 ? 38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 52 | 35 33% | 45 13% | 38 27% | 30.8 41% | 30.2 ? 42% |
| Load Average * | 56 | 38 32% | 40 29% | 47 16% | 42 25% | 42.4 ? 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 50 17% | 57 5% | 48 20% | 51 15% | |
| Load Maximum * | 64 | 54 16% | 60 6% | 49 23% | 53 17% | 53.4 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -3% | -19% | 2% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 46 -0% | 37 20% | 55 -20% | 43 7% | 46.2 ? -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 49 -0% | 40 18% | 65 -33% | 47.2 4% | 49.2 ? -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 31 -11% | 34 -21% | 30 -7% | 27.2 3% | 31.2 ? -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 32 -14% | 36 -29% | 32 -14% | 30 -7% | 32.2 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus 17 YA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 2 / 3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 34 / 37 / 41 Watt |
| Carga |
123 / 386 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 7% | 9% | 42% | 38% | 38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 34.2 -1% | 27 21% | 28 18% | 13 62% | 16.2 52% | 13.6 ? 60% |
| Idle Average * | 37 | 37.2 -1% | 32 14% | 34 8% | 17 54% | 20.4 45% | 19 ? 49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 41 | 50 -22% | 39 5% | 45 -10% | 25 39% | 26.1 36% | 26.8 ? 35% |
| Load Average * | 123 | 106.1 14% | 124 -1% | 98 20% | 96 22% | 96.5 22% | 106.9 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 250 | 178.7 29% | 274 -10% | 263 -5% | 156 38% | 182.9 27% | |
| Load Maximum * | 386 | 223.6 42% | 338 12% | 307 20% | 239 38% | 214.3 44% | 251 ? 35% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus 17 YA i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 72 Wh | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | 6% | -36% | 10% | -2% | 19% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 235 | 223 -5% | 367 56% | 168 -29% | 357 52% | 280 19% | 375 ? 60% |
| Load | 111 | 61 -45% | 63 -43% | 74 -33% | 86 -23% | 85.3 ? -23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 484 | 213 | 461 | 295 | 565 ? | ||
| H.264 | 410 | 408 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um forte desempenho em detrimento do desenvolvimento de ruído
Em nossos testes, o Aorus 17 YA mostra-se como é: um portátil de jogos para gamers apaixonados. O hardware é capaz de trazer os jogos atuais para a tela Full-HD sem problemas e fluentemente, e as correspondentes reservas de desempenho também preparam o portátil para o futuro. A CPU é capaz de usar seu desempenho pleno e também não há limites para a placa de vídeo. Os usuários podem influenciar fortemente o comportamento do portátil usando o controle do ventilador no Centro de Controle, o que garante uma alta flexibilidade. Além disso, existem excelentes opções de manutenção, uma tela que já está bem calibrada na entrega e amplo equipamento de conexão.
Graças ao bom sistema de resfriamento, o hardware pode usar seu desempenho pleno no Aorus 17 YA. No entanto, o ruído do ventilador acaba sendo limitado.
Um poderoso sistema de resfriamento permite o desempenho de primeira classe, mas isso também leva à maior reclamação sobre o Aorus 17 YA. Embora o alto consumo de energia seja esperado em um portátil com esse tipo de equipamento, o volume do ruído do ventilador é outra coisa, mesmo para um dispositivo de jogos. Quem exige o desempenho pleno ficará feliz em usar fones de ouvido e ainda incomodará outros jogadores que possam estar na mesma sala. Além disso, os compradores receberão um portátil para jogos realmente de alta qualidade que até oferece um teclado mecânico em cima.
Aorus 17 YA
-
12/04/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
