Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 15-da0405ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 1400:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
59.26% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.09% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 SHARP LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Chi Mei (CMN15D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW BOE NV156FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA Chi Mei N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-da0405ng BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Chi Mei CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 55% | 55% | 64% | -1% | -1% | 0% | -1% | 6% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 40.21 | 66.5 65% | 66.6 66% | 67.8 69% | 39.83 -1% | 39.85 -1% | 40.23 0% | 39.52 -2% | 42.27 5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 59.6 | 86.9 46% | 87.3 46% | 91.6 54% | 58.5 -2% | 58.8 -1% | 60 1% | 59.4 0% | 63.5 7% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.54 | 63.5 53% | 63.8 54% | 69.8 68% | 41.15 -1% | 41.17 -1% | 41.6 0% | 40.83 -2% | 43.69 5% | |
Response Times | 12077% | 11926% | 98% | 14416% | 12200% | 47749% | 13869% | 16102% | 13862% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 47.9 ? -4% | 53.2 ? -16% | 39.6 ? 14% | 43.3 ? 6% | 48.4 ? -5% | 44 ? 4% | 40 ? 13% | 41 ? 11% | 40 ? 13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 33.7 ? 1% | 41.6 ? -22% | 29.3 ? 14% | 13.8 ? 59% | 37.6 ? -11% | 31 ? 9% | 25 ? 26% | 13 ? 62% | 32 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 21800 ? 36233% | 21550 ? 35817% | 220 ? 267% | 25970 ? 43183% | 22030 ? 36617% | 86000 ? 143233% | 25000 ? 41567% | 29000 ? 48233% | 25000 ? 41567% |
Screen | 4% | 8% | -7% | -103% | -24% | -21% | -70% | -65% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 280 | 296 6% | 283 1% | 370 32% | 246 -12% | 292 4% | 283 1% | 185 -34% | 176 -37% | 259 -7% |
Brightness | 267 | 288 8% | 269 1% | 355 33% | 225 -16% | 272 2% | 252 -6% | 166 -38% | 164 -39% | 230 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 89 5% | 87 2% | 90 6% | 81 -5% | 84 -1% | 75 -12% | 76 -11% | 69 -19% | 82 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.32 -60% | 0.23 -15% | 0.23 -15% | 0.51 -155% | 0.3 -50% | 0.63 -215% | 0.37 -85% | 0.31 -55% | 0.19 5% |
Contrast | 1400 | 925 -34% | 1230 -12% | 1609 15% | 482 -66% | 973 -30% | 449 -68% | 500 -64% | 568 -59% | 1363 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 4.3 14% | 4.68 6% | 6.9 -38% | 11 -120% | 5.8 -16% | 4.02 20% | 11.26 -125% | 11.4 -128% | 3.13 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 8.7 -10% | 8 -1% | 12.2 -54% | 32.4 -310% | 22.4 -184% | 8.77 -11% | 18.65 -136% | 19.76 -150% | 7.81 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.6 | 2.5 31% | 1.4 61% | 4.6 -28% | 4.03 -12% | 2.99 17% | 3.09 14% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3 19% | 4.32 -17% | 7.4 -100% | 11.6 -214% | 2.3 38% | 0.8 78% | 11.56 -212% | 12.75 -245% | 1.42 62% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.36 93% | 1.76 125% | 1.91 115% | 2.12 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.59 85% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 7309 89% | 7100 92% | 7612 85% | 7529 86% | 11807 55% | 6223 104% | 6552 99% | 11788 55% | 14899 44% | 6391 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.09 | 56.83 49% | 57 50% | 37.6 -1% | 38 0% | 38 0% | 38 0% | 40 5% | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.26 | 86.86 47% | 87 47% | 58 -2% | 58 -2% | 60 1% | 59 0% | 63 6% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4045% /
2277% | 3996% /
2120% | 52% /
28% | 7157% /
3527% | 4058% /
2272% | 15909% /
8413% | 4600% /
2556% | 5345% /
2799% | 4626% /
2453% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3153 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4544 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3194 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1 | HP 15-da0405ng SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Average Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -0% | 67% | -9% | 1% | 129% | 12% | 6% | 74% | 4% | |
Write 4K | 77.3 | 80.9 5% | 112 45% | 71.8 -7% | 81.8 6% | 150 94% | 101.4 31% | 97.6 26% | 82.8 ? 7% | |
Read 4K | 29.77 | 28.23 -5% | 32.44 9% | 21.23 -29% | 33.33 12% | 36 21% | 26.75 -10% | 39.08 31% | 33 ? 11% | |
Write Seq | 442.5 | 266.3 -40% | 598 35% | 257.1 -42% | 131.1 -70% | 1057 139% | 158.1 -64% | 383 -13% | 571 29% | 402 ? -9% |
Read Seq | 442.7 | 495.5 12% | 1157 161% | 476.3 8% | 910 106% | 1074 143% | 892 101% | 432.4 -2% | 1110 151% | 500 ? 13% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 173.8 | 255 47% | 255.5 47% | 202.6 17% | 122.1 -30% | 429 147% | 162.2 -7% | 292.1 68% | 235.7 36% | 192.2 ? 11% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 233.6 | 288.3 23% | 287.5 23% | 282 21% | 199.3 -15% | 441 89% | 320.4 37% | 225.1 -4% | 297 27% | 295 ? 26% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 510 | 265.6 -48% | 594 16% | 265.6 -48% | 133 -74% | 1283 152% | 160.2 -69% | 382.8 -25% | 812 59% | 392 ? -23% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 530 | 556 5% | 1568 196% | 559 5% | 935 76% | 1838 247% | 933 76% | 526 -1% | 1742 229% | 491 ? -7% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2400 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10015 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1647 pontos | |
Ajuda |
FIFA 18 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (100.1 - 112.9, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (56.2 - 62.4, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (49.2 - 49.9, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (43.5 - 47.5, n=2) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR |
Overwatch | |
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (87 - 91.3, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (60.4 - 67.9, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
1920x1080 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (27.9 - 28.1, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (15.5 - 15.8, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) |
Fortnite | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (62.7 - 66.1, n=3) | |
Honor Magicbook | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Honor Magicbook | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (19.9 - 41.8, n=3) | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
Honor Magicbook | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (14.1 - 17.3, n=3) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
Honor Magicbook | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (9.3 - 12.8, n=3) | |
Honor Magicbook | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.9 / 30.6 / 35 dB |
HDD |
| 30.6 dB |
Carga |
| 38.8 / 45.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.8 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.6 / 8.6 / 8.7 Watt |
Carga |
39.9 / 59.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR R5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP i5-8550U, Radeon 530, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA i3-8130U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-da0405ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -19% | 9% | 24% | -2% | -29% | 21% | 15% | 14% | 8% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 5.1 9% | 6.9 -23% | 3.3 41% | 3.4 39% | 3.7 34% | 8.2 -46% | 5 11% | 5.4 4% | 3.8 32% | 4.4 ? 21% | 4.46 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 7.6 12% | 9.6 -12% | 5.6 35% | 6.7 22% | 7.5 13% | 8.4 2% | 7.6 12% | 8.2 5% | 6.2 28% | 7.37 ? 14% | 7.42 ? 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 8.2 6% | 11.8 -36% | 7.8 10% | 7.7 11% | 8 8% | 8.4 3% | 8.6 1% | 8.4 3% | 6.7 23% | 7.63 ? 12% | 8.9 ? -2% |
Load Average * | 39.9 | 49.4 -24% | 50 -25% | 54 -35% | 31.1 22% | 49 -23% | 62.6 -57% | 25.6 36% | 32.2 19% | 40.8 -2% | 40.9 ? -3% | 42 ? -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.2 | 42.1 -27% | 50.6 -52% | 53.6 -61% | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 59.9 | 68 -14% | 60 -0% | 63 -5% | 42.9 28% | 55.2 8% | 66.8 -12% | 34 43% | 32.6 46% | 65.2 -9% | 62 ? -4% | 61.6 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR R5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP i5-8550U, Radeon 530, 56 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA i3-8130U, UHD Graphics 620, 37 Wh | HP 15-da0405ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, 41 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | 5% | 30% | 20% | 56% | 30% | 13% | -17% | 4% | 78% | |
Reader / Idle | 613 | 867 41% | 724 18% | 864 41% | 857 40% | 754 23% | 1234 ? 101% | ||||
H.264 | 465 | 525 13% | 366 -21% | 516 11% | 435 -6% | 632 36% | 716 ? 54% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 340 | 350 3% | 401 18% | 505 49% | 421 24% | 597 76% | 408 20% | 350 3% | 281 -17% | 355 4% | 608 ? 79% |
Load | 162 | 109 | 118 | 96 | 122 | 114 | 113 | 117.4 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 83 | 142 ? |
Pro
Contra
É difícil obter um veredicto adequado sobre o Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15,6. Crucialmente, o dispositivo está atualmente indisponível no mundo ocidental, o que gera numerosos problemas relacionados à garantia caso o dispositivo apresente uma falha. Além disso, o dispositivo só vem com uma versão chinesa do Windows 10, que requer algumas alterações demoradas, a menos que você saiba chinês. Esses fatores por si só podem afastar as pessoas que não querem nenhum problema associado ao seu portátil.
O dispositivo em si é de excelente valor pelo dinheiro. O Mi Notebook 15.6 é feito em grande parte de plástico, mas tem um bom acabamento e mantém a estética de design minimalista da Xiaomi. O teclado e o trackpad também são excepcionais para um dispositivo de menos de 600 euros (~$ 690).
Por outro lado, as impressões tela são confusas. O brilho é bom o suficiente para a maioria dos usos, enquanto o acabamento mate e a alta taxa de contraste são bônus bem-vindos. No entanto, a tela tem uma precisão de cores e uma cobertura de espaço de cores comparativamente ruim.
O Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 é caracterizado por sua atraente relação preço-desempenho. Sua disponibilidade atual somente na China limitará o sucesso do dispositivo na Europa e nos EUA.
Um destaque do Mi Notebook 15.6 é o quão bem ele funciona. O Core i5-8250U oferece um desempenho excepcional sob uso intenso contínuo, e o MX110 oferece taxas de quadros reproduzíveis em jogos modernos, apesar de ser uma GPU para portáteis de nível de entrada da Nvidia..
Nosso dispositivo de teste também funciona de forma silenciosa, mas os ventiladores ficam altos quando o sistema é estressado. Igualmente, a Xiaomi se concentrou em manter o desempenho máximo às custas de altas temperaturas.
No geral, o Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 é um ótimo dispositivo para o dinheiro e um que oferece muito mais do que outros portáteis de preço equivalente. Você pode economizar cerca de 200 Euros (~$230) comprando o Mi Notebook 15.6, em comparação com outros dispositivos disponíveis no mundo todo, mas os riscos de garantia associados à importação de um dispositivo da China podem ser grandes obstáculos para algumas pessoas.
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
- 10/12/2018 v6 (old)
J. Simon Leitner