Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 250 cd/m²
Contraste: 1230:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 1920x1080 | Medion Erazer X6603 LP156WF6-SPK3, AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -40% | 2% | -33% | -41% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 37.07 -44% | 65.8 -1% | 41.7 -37% | 36.82 -45% |
| sRGB Coverage | 87.3 | 55.6 -36% | 90.9 4% | 62.2 -29% | 54.9 -37% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.8 | 38.32 -40% | 66.5 4% | 43.17 -32% | 38.09 -40% |
| Response Times | 34% | 22% | 41% | -15% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53.2 ? | 35.6 ? 33% | 43.2 ? 19% | 35 ? 34% | 46 ? 14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 41.6 ? | 27.6 ? 34% | 31.2 ? 25% | 22 ? 47% | 29 ? 30% |
| PWM Frequency | 21550 ? | 2174 ? -90% | |||
| Screen | -31% | 8% | -16% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle | 283 | 235.4 -17% | 304 7% | 276 -2% | 252 -11% |
| Brightness | 269 | 223 -17% | 289 7% | 265 -1% | 246 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 86 -1% | 91 5% | 94 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.28 -22% | 0.26 -13% | 0.25 -9% | 0.23 -0% |
| Contrast | 1230 | 841 -32% | 1169 -5% | 1104 -10% | 1096 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.68 | 5.6 -20% | 3.46 26% | 5.06 -8% | 7.83 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8 | 20.3 -154% | 7.72 3% | 10.13 -27% | 15.5 -94% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.5 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 3.6 17% | 2.46 43% | 6.25 -45% | 7.11 -65% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.38 92% | 1.76 125% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7612 85% | 7214 90% | 6915 94% | 6873 95% | 7930 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 35.2 -38% | 59 4% | 40 -30% | 35 -39% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 55.4 -36% | 91 5% | 62 -29% | 55 -37% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-24% | 11% /
8% | -3% /
-12% | -30% /
-31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21550 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21550 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21550 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3910 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4912 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4197 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 15-ce002ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Medion Erazer X6603 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 165% | 29% | 175% | ||
| Seq Read | 502 | 2652 428% | 1404 180% | 2805 459% | |
| Seq Write | 450.1 | 1181 162% | 521 16% | 1081 140% | |
| 4K Read | 38.11 | 46.95 23% | 27.86 -27% | 46.58 22% | |
| 4K Write | 104.1 | 100.2 -4% | 75 -28% | 129.3 24% | |
| Score Read | 343 | 1241 262% | 446 30% | 1162 239% | |
| Score Write | 302 | 594 97% | 344 14% | 750 148% | |
| Score Total | 834 | 2405 188% | 984 18% | 2431 191% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11106 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16619 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9249 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72.8 | 40.3 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 36.5 | 35.1 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 70.9 | 54 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 91.5 | 81.4 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39.8 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 43.6 | 36 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 62 | 59 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 34 / 38 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 44 / 55 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 18% | 5% | 9% | 10% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28 7% | 30 -0% | 30.6 -2% | 30.9 -3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 28 7% | 30 -0% | 30.6 -2% | 30.9 -3% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 28 18% | 33 3% | 30.7 10% | 30.9 9% | 27.3 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 28 26% | 37 3% | 30.7 19% | 31.6 17% | 30.3 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 30.3 31% | 41 7% | 43 2% | 38.5 12% | 42.5 ? 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 39.5 21% | 42 16% | 39.7 21% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 46.5 15% | 50 9% | 45.8 17% | 40.8 26% | 53.4 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 13% | -11% | 16% | 18% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 44 4% | 47 -2% | 41.1 11% | 44.3 4% | 46.2 ? -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 52 | 43.8 16% | 54 -4% | 38.8 25% | 39.5 24% | 49.2 ? 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 26 19% | 36 -13% | 28.7 10% | 24.8 22% | 31.2 ? 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 28 12% | 40 -25% | 26.9 16% | 24.6 23% | 32.2 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 13 / 19 Watt |
| Carga |
68 / 136 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | -41% | 24% | 29% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 7.1 29% | 18 -80% | 4.1 59% | 4.7 53% | 13.5 ? -35% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 7.6 42% | 23 -77% | 6.9 47% | 7.6 42% | 18.9 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19 | 8.6 55% | 30 -58% | 9.5 50% | 9.2 52% | 26.6 ? -40% |
| Load Average * | 68 | 59.5 12% | 85 -25% | 83 -22% | 81 -19% | 106.7 ? -57% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 110 | 89 19% | 96 13% | 108 2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 136 | 112.8 17% | 158 -16% | 126 7% | 112 18% | 249 ? -83% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 55 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, 56 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 48 Wh | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 45 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 47% | -19% | 43% | -19% | 36% | |
| Reader / Idle | 386 | 659 71% | 256 -34% | 893 131% | 340 -12% | 566 ? 47% |
| H.264 | 265 | 224 -15% | 309 17% | 227 -14% | 408 ? 54% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 275 | 416 51% | 198 -28% | 400 45% | 257 -7% | 376 ? 37% |
| Load | 80 | 96 20% | 80 0% | 63 -21% | 46 -42% | 85.6 ? 7% |
Pro
Contra
Bens baratos do Extremo Oriente? Embora esse preconceito possa se encaixar em muitos produtos, não combina com o Mi Gaming Laptop. Na maioria das categorias, o portátil de 15 polegadas pode acompanhar facilmente a concorrência ou até superá-la.
Embora a carcaça não seja leve e existam portáteis de gama alta ainda mais finos, ficamos muito entusiasmados com a carcaça. O acabamento, a qualidade dos materiais e o design são irrepreensíveis. Os dispositivos de entrada e o som também se sentem melhor do que em alguns portáteis de 2000 ou 3000 Euros (~$2309-3464).
Mas, claro, nem tudo o que brilha é ouro. A fim de manter o preço atraente, a Xiaomi foi forçada a fazer alguns recortes em alguns detalhes, como o leitor de cartões, o lento desempenho do Wi-Fi ou a falta de certas conexões (Thunderbolt 3, Kensington Lock). Embora 8 GB de RAM e um SSD de 128 GB também sejam escassos, você também pode comprar o dispositivo em uma configuração com 16 GB e um SSD de 256 GB.
Mas poderíamos superar todos esses pontos, em nossa opinião. O que é claramente mais irritante é o alto nível de ruído na operação 3D e o comportamento dos ventiladores sem sentido, no modo inativo. Embora estes sejam fenômenos típicos em portáteis de jogos, os competidores geralmente permitem alivia-los através de ajustes manuais. Se você considera ou não a falta da tecnologia G-Sync como um ponto negativo, é uma questão de gosto. Em vez disso, a Xiaomi implementa o Optimus, o que ajuda a duração da bateria.
A tela deixa alguns sentimentos contraditórios. Por um lado, gostamos do alto contraste e dos ângulos de visão estáveis, mas, por outro lado, alguns dos atuais critérios de gamers (120/144 Hz, tempo de resposta curto) permanecem desatendidos. Antes da compra, você também deve saber que, devido ao software chinês, o Mi Gaming Laptop destina-se apenas de forma limitada para o mercado da UE ou dos EUA. No entanto, aqueles que não se assustam com os obstáculos da entrada e têm a sorte de receber uma unidade diretamente ou através de alguns desvios, receberão um pacote geral bem-sucedido a preço de banana.
No final do dia, o perdedor avança para uma dica privilegiada e consegue uma colocação alta em nossa lista dos 10 melhores portáteis de jogos de orçamento.
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
- 05/28/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
