Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019: Retorno do Exótico
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Mi Gaming Laptop Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1110 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 GB
, NVMe-SSD, Slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-Zoll
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 500 g
Preço
1400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 21 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.7 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 316 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 295.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 279 cd/m²
Contraste: 1374:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.64
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL65 9SEK AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -42% | -1% | -37% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 36.63 -44% | 64.5 -1% | 40.13 -38% | 85.7 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 55 -40% | 91.6 -1% | 60.3 -35% | 100 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.4 | 37.85 -43% | 65.9 -1% | 41.48 -38% | 99 49% |
| Response Times | -175% | 9% | -154% | -304% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.8 ? | 26.4 ? -200% | 8.8 ? -0% | 26 ? -195% | 49 ? -457% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 30 ? -150% | 10 ? 17% | 25.6 ? -113% | 30 ? -150% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -49% | -8% | -65% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 316 | 277.3 -12% | 284 -10% | 290.1 -8% | 365 16% |
| Brightness | 295 | 256 -13% | 277 -6% | 274 -7% | 357 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 87 0% | 86 -1% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.2 13% | 0.3 -30% | 0.54 -135% | 0.275 -20% |
| Contrast | 1374 | 1387 1% | 947 -31% | 537 -61% | 1327 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 5.25 -37% | 3.53 8% | 5.16 -34% | 0.99 74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.69 | 19.43 -241% | 6.11 -7% | 18.09 -218% | 1.89 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.64 | 4.39 -168% | 1.81 -10% | 4.35 -165% | 1.01 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.66 | 3.5 4% | 3.56 3% | 4.4 -20% | 1.29 65% |
| Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.1 105% | 2.47 89% | 2.1 105% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7165 91% | 6895 94% | 7257 90% | 7362 88% | 6548 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 35 -42% | 59 -2% | 38.1 -36% | 88 47% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 55 -40% | 91 -1% | 60 -35% | 100 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -89% /
-63% | 0% /
-5% | -85% /
-71% | -82% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1096 (1015.87-1242.3)
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1103 (1087.93-1223.2)
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | MSI GL65 9SEK WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -3% | 10% | -16% | 14% | |
| Write 4K | 110.3 | 150.2 36% | 131.7 19% | 121.9 11% | 109 -1% |
| Read 4K | 47.17 | 43.46 -8% | 48.06 2% | 53.6 14% | 41.33 -12% |
| Write Seq | 1381 | 1412 2% | 1234 -11% | 967 -30% | 2535 84% |
| Read Seq | 1327 | 1340 1% | 973 -27% | 1461 10% | 1538 16% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 404.7 | 482.2 19% | 576 42% | 431.4 7% | 396.6 -2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 437.2 | 535 22% | 655 50% | 337.3 -23% | 603 38% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2960 | 1454 -51% | 3012 2% | 972 -67% | 2542 -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3278 | 1744 -47% | 3481 6% | 1727 -47% | 3324 1% |
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2960 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
437.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
404.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1327 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
47.17 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
110.3 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18262 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35196 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15004 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6209 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G: Ø62.8 (58-66)
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø56.5 (52-63)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø55.8 (52-60)
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GL65 9SEK | |
| Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| MSI GL65 9SEK | |
| Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 113 | 60.6 | ||||
| Fortnite (2018) | 130 | 107 | ||||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 87.4 | 62.3 | ||||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 68 | 50 | ||||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 106 | 103 | ||||
| Darksiders III (2018) | 106 | 93.4 | ||||
| Just Cause 4 (2018) | 89.2 | 82.1 | ||||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 127 | 74 | ||||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 67.1 | 37.3 | ||||
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 99.6 | 93.2 | 87.7 | 74.9 | 54.4 | 29.6 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 99.6 | 93.8 | 87.6 | 61.9 | 30.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 42 dB |
| Carga |
| 52 / 59 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 10% | 11% | 14% | 18% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.1 6% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 30.4 -1% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 31.4 -1% | 30 3% | 28.8 7% | 30.6 1% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 31.5 2% | 32 -0% | 31.4 2% | 30.6 4% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 42 | 33.5 20% | 34 19% | 33.3 21% | 30.6 27% | 30.2 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 52 | 49.3 5% | 44 15% | 46.2 11% | 44 15% | 42.5 ? 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 59 | 51.3 13% | 48 19% | 50.5 14% | 43.9 26% | |
| Load Maximum * | 59 | 58 2% | 52 12% | 51.3 13% | 44.2 25% | 53.4 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -25% | -25% | -5% | 1% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 49 4% | 47 8% | 43.4 15% | 44.6 13% | 46.1 ? 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 54.2 5% | 60 -5% | 49.2 14% | 57.2 -0% | 49.2 ? 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 40.4 -50% | 37 -37% | 30.8 -14% | 27.4 -1% | 31.2 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 40 -60% | 41 -64% | 34 -36% | 27.6 -10% | 32.2 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 13 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
100 / 196 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -115% | -25% | -17% | 7% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 41 -310% | 15 -50% | 10.9 -9% | 7.6 24% | 13.5 ? -35% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 45.3 -248% | 20 -54% | 14.7 -13% | 13.6 -5% | 18.9 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 47.1 -136% | 33 -65% | 32.4 -62% | 18.2 9% | 26.7 ? -34% |
| Load Average * | 100 | 94.9 5% | 88 12% | 121.9 -22% | 102 -2% | 106.6 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 159 | 149.4 6% | 128 19% | 143.5 10% | 144 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 196 | 214.2 -9% | 213 -9% | 209.6 -7% | 183 7% | 249 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57 Wh | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 84 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | -8% | -58% | 106% | 58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 370 | 262 -29% | 233 -37% | 822 122% | 565 ? 53% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 264 | 230 -13% | 192 -27% | 112 -58% | 518 96% | 376 ? 42% |
| Load | 48 | 60 25% | 67 40% | 96 100% | 85.3 ? 78% | |
| H.264 | 388 | 408 ? |
Pro
+ Tela de 144 Hz de alto contraste altamente responsiva
+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Design simples
Contra
- Compra muito complicada por conta da disponibilidade, idioma, etc.
- Apenas uma saída de vídeo externa
- Extremamente barulhento sob carga 3D
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Os prós e contras da edição 2019 da Xiaomi do Mi Gaming Laptop são praticamente idênticos aos do seu predecessor.
No lado positivo, temos uma carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade, com seu design simples que se encaixa em praticamente todos os lugares. Também gostamos de seus dispositivos de entrada, pois eles eram adequados para o escritório e jogos. A falta do Thunderbolt 3 é compensada por uma tela rápida de 144 Hz e um leitor de cartões mais rápido.
Suas maiores desvantagens são as emissões de ruído, principalmente em 3D. Simplificando, o portátil de 15 polegadas é significativamente barulhento demais, algo que nem mesmo a excelente relação preço-desempenho pode compensar.
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
