Breve Análise do Portátil Toshiba Tecra X40-D (i7-7600U, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 283.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1136:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.55% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 59% | 48% | -0% | 53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.55 | 66.4 64% | 61.6 52% | 40.35 0% | 64.6 59% |
sRGB Coverage | 61 | 93.5 53% | 87.6 44% | 60.3 -1% | 88.8 46% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.89 | 66.6 59% | 62.6 49% | 41.72 0% | 64.8 55% |
Response Times | -4% | -20% | -38% | -22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 36.8 ? 3% | 48 ? -26% | 40.8 ? -7% | 46 ? -21% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 29.6 ? -10% | 30.4 ? -13% | 28.8 ? -7% | 33 ? -23% |
PWM Frequency | 20410 ? | 219.3 ? -99% | |||
Screen | 34% | 33% | 0% | 22% | |
Brightness middle | 283.9 | 332.6 17% | 278 -2% | 271.6 -4% | 404 42% |
Brightness | 261 | 323 24% | 271 4% | 264 1% | 382 46% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 86 1% | 91 7% | 88 4% | 91 7% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.28 -12% | 0.16 36% | 0.24 4% | 0.35 -40% |
Contrast | 1136 | 1188 5% | 1738 53% | 1132 0% | 1154 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 2.6 59% | 4.5 30% | 6.1 5% | 5.37 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.7 | 6.7 64% | 8.4 55% | 28.6 -53% | 9.46 49% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 2.5 60% | 3.2 49% | 3.4 46% | 6.44 -2% |
Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.12 104% | 2.02 109% | 2.12 104% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6511 100% | 6720 97% | 7042 92% | 6077 107% | 6738 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 62 63% | 57 50% | 38 0% | 58 53% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 94 57% | 87.5 46% | 60 0% | 89 48% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 30% /
34% | 20% /
29% | -13% /
-7% | 18% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20410 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 20410 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20410 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 5979 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3738 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4784 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4963 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2464 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -678% | -46% | -43% | 9% | 14% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 229 | 309.9 | 397.9 | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 172.4 | 291 | 426 | |||
Copy ISO MB/s | 623 | 797 | 720 | |||
Score Total | 3576 | 2687 -25% | 1398 -61% | 1638 -54% | 3875 8% | 3617 1% |
Score Write | 675 | 162 -76% | 337 -50% | 442 -35% | 803 19% | 1115 65% |
Score Read | 1963 | 1723 -12% | 726 -63% | 802 -59% | 2083 6% | 1654 -16% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 2.01 -7079% | 0.034 -21% | 0.033 -18% | 0.025 11% | 0.026 7% |
Access Time Read * | 0.061 | 0.05 18% | 0.102 -67% | 0.113 -85% | 0.06 2% | 0.042 31% |
4K-64 Write | 438.4 | 125.8 -71% | 149.6 -66% | 264 -40% | 538 23% | 862 97% |
4K-64 Read | 1663 | 1483 -11% | 526 -68% | 633 -62% | 1765 6% | 1465 -12% |
4K Write | 124.8 | 1.2 -99% | 109.4 -12% | 100 -20% | 147.9 19% | 134.4 8% |
4K Read | 51.6 | 42.8 -17% | 34.34 -33% | 38.8 -25% | 48.84 -5% | 56.4 9% |
Seq Write | 1117 | 352.7 -68% | 775 -31% | 777 -30% | 1170 5% | 1190 7% |
Seq Read | 2479 | 1972 -20% | 1649 -33% | 1294 -48% | 2691 9% | 1325 -47% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1789 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6655 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 980 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng |
Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high (sort by value) | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 27 | 17 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 5 | 2 | ||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 7 | 6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28 / 28 / 28.2 dB |
Carga |
| 33.2 / 39.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -4% | -8% | -1% | -3% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.6 -6% | 27.8 1% | 29.9 -7% | 30.4 -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.6 -6% | 30 -7% | 27.8 1% | 29.9 -7% | 30.4 -9% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.6 -6% | 30 -7% | 27.8 1% | 29.9 -7% | 30.4 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 28.4 -1% | 32.2 -14% | 33.2 -18% | 27.8 1% | 30.3 -7% | 30.4 -8% |
Load Average * | 33.2 | 33.2 -0% | 34.2 -3% | 37.2 -12% | 34.8 -5% | 33.9 -2% | 40 -20% |
Load Maximum * | 39.9 | 37.9 5% | 36.1 10% | 37.9 5% | 42 -5% | 34.9 13% | 40 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (0 °C / 0 F).
Toshiba Tecra X40-D audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.45 / 0.69 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.2 / 6.9 / 7 Watt |
Carga |
24.6 / 30.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X270 20HN0012PB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -16% | -6% | -19% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 4.6 12% | 3.8 27% | 3.8 27% | 4.8 8% | 3.6 31% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 7.6 -10% | 7.1 -3% | 7.3 -6% | 6.6 4% | 6.4 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 8.2 -17% | 8.3 -19% | 10 -43% | 7 -0% | 9.2 -31% |
Load Average * | 24.6 | 23.8 3% | 34.2 -39% | 28.1 -14% | 39.2 -59% | 34 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 30.1 | 28 7% | 43.3 -44% | 29 4% | 44.8 -49% | 34.4 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 6% | 14% | 31% | -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 876 | 898 3% | 819 -7% | 1062 21% | 718 -18% |
WiFi v1.3 | 357 | 430 20% | 547 53% | 487 36% | 394 10% |
Load | 126 | 121 -4% | 122 -3% | 172 37% | 77 -39% |
Pro
Contra
O Toshiba Tecra X40 é essencialmente o Portègè X30 com uma tela de 14 polegadas. Como tal, compartilha muitos dos mesmos pontos fortes e fracos de seu irmão menor. O belo chassi é bem projetado e muito robusto enquanto permanece bastante leve para um portátil de 14 polegadas. Os sensores biométricos são rápidos, confiáveis e fáceis de usar. O SSD do NVMe é incrivelmente rápido e faz um ótimo trabalho ao fazer com que o sistema como um todo se sinta muito receptivo e rápido. Juntamente com Core i7-7600U, o Tecra X40 é uma máquina de escritório rápida em um corpo esbelto e deslumbrante.
No entanto, a tampa se flexiona demais para o conforto e o teclado não é nosso favorito. As teclas ruidosas são distrativas, e a barra espaçadora desenvolveu um hábito desagradável de chiar quando pressionado durante nosso período de teste. A tela também não é tão vibrante ou rica quanto a de outros portáteis empresariais, mas é mais do que aceitável para uso diário.
O Toshiba Tecra X40 é um portátil empresarial de tamanho médio competente. Não atinge exatamente o nível do excelente Lenovo X1 Carbono, mas aproxima-se o suficiente para que as compensações possam valer o menor custo. Se os usuários não se importarem em sacrificar alguns portos e podem lidar com um teclado de menor qualidade, definitivamente vale a pena dar uma olhada no Tecra X40. O fato de custar também várias centenas de dólares menos do que o carbono X1, somente adoça o negócio.
Toshiba Tecra X40-D
- 08/28/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley