Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (i9-9900K, GTX 1080, UHD) Clevo P775TM1-G
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 349 cd/m²
Contraste: 851:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.19 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh AU Optronics B173ZAN (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Asus Chimera G703GI B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -21% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 85.8 | 86.4 1% | 65.8 -23% | 65.3 -24% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 92.6 -7% | 91.2 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 99.1 0% | 67 -32% | 66.3 -33% |
| Response Times | -9% | 68% | 51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 44 ? -7% | 6.4 ? 84% | 18 ? 56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.4 ? | 24.8 ? -11% | 10.8 ? 52% | 12 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 6% | -2% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 349 | 332 -5% | 285 -18% | 297 -15% |
| Brightness | 339 | 313 -8% | 275 -19% | 281 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 82 -6% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.28 32% | 0.22 46% | 0.23 44% |
| Contrast | 851 | 1186 39% | 1295 52% | 1291 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.04 | 3.86 4% | 3.18 21% | 2.19 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.01 | 5.88 2% | 5.99 -0% | 4.81 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.93 | 1.73 -86% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.19 | 4.33 -3% | 2.93 30% | 1.31 69% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.41 91% | 2.45 90% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6411 101% | 6595 99% | 7165 91% | 6464 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87 | 88 1% | 60 -31% | 59 -32% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 93 -7% | 91 -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
3% | 15% /
4% | 15% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5243 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5123 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6959 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Asus Chimera G703GI 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -26% | 8% | -50% | |
| Seq Read | 2823 | 2533 -10% | 4886 73% | 2182 -23% |
| Seq Write | 2492 | 1771 -29% | 4110 65% | 1342 -46% |
| 4K Read | 58.4 | 43.65 -25% | 57.4 -2% | 23.28 -60% |
| 4K Write | 182.5 | 139.5 -24% | 141.3 -23% | 89.9 -51% |
| Score Read | 2125 | 1716 -19% | 1999 -6% | 1058 -50% |
| Score Write | 2816 | 1615 -43% | 1855 -34% | 981 -65% |
| Score Total | 6017 | 4173 -31% | 4843 -20% | 2539 -58% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35252 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 24503 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 175460 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51972 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19041 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7260 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 61.7 | 44.4 | |||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 59.9 | 40.8 | |||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 83.6 | 25.8 | |||
| F1 2018 (2018) | 108 | 53 | |||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 87 | 29 | |||
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 276 | 167 | |||
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 105 | 60 | |||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 60 | 31 | |||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 121 | 39.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 35 / 43 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 59 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh i9-9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | 1% | 1% | 18% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 29 3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 34 -3% | 30 9% | 35 -6% | 25.5 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 35 -0% | 34 3% | 36 -3% | 27.2 ? 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 43 | 40 7% | 42 2% | 41 5% | 30.2 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 45 -5% | 53 -23% | 43 -0% | 42.5 ? 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 52 2% | 51 4% | 53 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 59 | 60 -2% | 53 10% | 54 8% | 53.4 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh i9-9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | -6% | -6% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 41 7% | 50 -14% | 51 -16% | 46.1 ? -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 48 -7% | 50 -11% | 63 -40% | 49.2 ? -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 30 6% | 32 -0% | 27 16% | 31.2 ? 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33 | 35 -6% | 33 -0% | 28 15% | 32.2 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Chimera G703GI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 33 / 42 / 49 Watt |
| Carga |
93 / 293 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh i9-9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -18% | 2% | 32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 32 3% | 29 12% | 23 30% | 13.5 ? 59% |
| Idle Average * | 42 | 38 10% | 37 12% | 33 21% | 18.9 ? 55% |
| Idle Maximum * | 49 | 45 8% | 46 6% | 37 24% | 26.7 ? 46% |
| Load Average * | 93 | 96 -3% | 156 -68% | 115 -24% | 106.6 ? -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 156 | 237 -52% | 252 -62% | 225 -44% | |
| Load Maximum * | 293 | 331 -13% | 314 -7% | 281 4% | 249 ? 15% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh i9-9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | -6% | 60% | 157% | |
| Reader / Idle | 171 | 164 -4% | 169 -1% | 296 73% | 565 ? 230% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 116 | 142 22% | 130 12% | 228 97% | 376 ? 224% |
| Load | 73 | 70 -4% | 51 -30% | 80 10% | 85.3 ? 17% |
| H.264 | 148 | 408 ? |
Pro
Contra
Um desempenho impressionante que vale a pena apenas para poucos usuários - é assim que você pode resumir o Core i9-9900K em uma frase.
Enquanto oito núcleos e dezesseis threads podem trazer uma grande vantagem em alguns cenários de uso específicos, os gamers podem relaxar e continuar confiando em um portátil quad ou hexa-core (com Hyper-theading).
O portátil em si deixa uma boa impressão. No entanto, como é habitual na gama alta absoluta, você é confrontado com um alto nível de ruído e baixa mobilidade (palavras-chave: dimensões, peso e duração da bateria).
Além dessas fraquezas, o dispositivo de 17 polegadas não merece muitas outras queixas. Além do equipamento de conexão e das opções de configuração e atualização, os dispositivos de entrada e som também conseguem nos convencer em grande parte.
O Clevo Barebone P775TM1-G é baseado em um substituto de desktop real que poderia facilmente se enfrentar a uma torre de PC bem equipada. No entanto, o fabricante ainda deve cuidar dos problemas de velocidade acima mencionados que podem estar relacionados ao software em vez de ao hardware.
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
- 10/30/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
