Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Poder sem fim
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Processador
Intel Core i9-10900K 10 x 3.7 - 5.3 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 250 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1740 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 456.55
Memória
128 GB
, 4x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual-channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 4K/UHD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Z490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB, 2048 GB
, Slots: 4x M.2 2280
peso
4.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.756 kg
Preço
4.932 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 4.7 kg | 43.5 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 4.2 kg | 42 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 3 kg | 20.7 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware m17 R3 P45E (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware m17 R3 P45E (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
26 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
24 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 442 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 423.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 442 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware m17 R3 P45E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -15% | -14% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 83 | 82.5 -1% | 69.2 -17% | 71 -14% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 98 -1% | 97.9 -1% | 99 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.9 | 96.6 -1% | 71.4 -27% | 71.6 -27% |
| Response Times | 50% | 51% | 75% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 ? | 23.2 ? 54% | 16.8 ? 67% | 5.8 ? 88% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.6 ? | 11.6 ? 46% | 14 ? 35% | 8.4 ? 61% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -29% | 4% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 442 | 419.5 -5% | 338.3 -23% | 310 -30% |
| Brightness | 423 | 413 -2% | 325 -23% | 311 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 91 -1% | 82 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.4 -11% | 0.27 25% | 0.41 -14% |
| Contrast | 1228 | 1049 -15% | 1253 2% | 756 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 3.4 22% | 1.88 57% | 2.41 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.85 | 7.4 32% | 3.23 70% | 8.59 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.66 | 3.28 -397% | 1.32 -100% | 1.13 -71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 2 73% | 2.4 67% | 4.3 41% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.39 92% | 2.149 102% |
| CCT | 6906 94% | 6858 95% | 6572 99% | 7059 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 98 | 84.6 -14% | 64.7 -34% | 72 -27% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 97.9 0% | 97.8 0% | 94 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
-14% | 13% /
6% | 17% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2464 (2424.1-2512.72)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7461 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake | |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 R3 P45E 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0) | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | -19% | -18% | |
| Write 4K | 172 | 116.4 -32% | 68 -60% | 125.8 -27% |
| Read 4K | 47.3 | 43.85 -7% | 42.04 -11% | 52.9 12% |
| Write Seq | 2980 | 2927 -2% | 2221 -25% | 1795 -40% |
| Read Seq | 2790 | 1997 -28% | 2202 -21% | 2315 -17% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 481.8 | 467.6 -3% | 494.5 3% | 407.1 -16% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 565 | 538 -5% | 540 -4% | 411.9 -27% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3295 | 3362 2% | 2623 -20% | 2844 -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3550 | 3558 0% | 3159 -11% | 3130 -12% |
| AS SSD | -50% | -187% | -59% | |
| Seq Read | 2980 | 2406 -19% | 2060 -31% | 2450 -18% |
| Seq Write | 2585 | 2867 11% | 2297 -11% | 1436 -44% |
| 4K Read | 52.7 | 41.51 -21% | 35.39 -33% | 49.48 -6% |
| 4K Write | 163.1 | 108.8 -33% | 63.1 -61% | 119.4 -27% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1954 | 1525 -22% | 1337 -32% | 1032 -47% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2347 | 1424 -39% | 1307 -44% | 1229 -48% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.039 | 0.041 -5% | 0.057 -46% | 0.145 -272% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.023 | 0.102 -343% | 0.411 -1687% | 0.036 -57% |
| Score Read | 2304 | 1807 -22% | 1578 -32% | 1327 -42% |
| Score Write | 2768 | 1819 -34% | 1600 -42% | 1492 -46% |
| Score Total | 6232 | 4573 -27% | 3997 -36% | 3456 -45% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-33% | -103% /
-116% | -39% /
-42% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3550 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3295 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
481.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2790 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2980 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
47.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
172 MB/s
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 31493 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22606 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11211 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB: Ø110.5 (105-115)
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (93.4 - 113.2, n=4) | |
| Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (50.6 - 167.6, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (66.4 - 80.5, n=3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187 | 182 | 179 | 98.9 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 209 | 109 | 75.6 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 190 | 172 | 167 | 156 | 145 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 145 | 127 | 103 | 88.2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 142 | 126 | 87.5 | 47.1 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 168 | 152 | 126 | 76.2 | ||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 107 | 89.8 | 65.4 | 37.1 | ||
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 133 | 92.4 | 85.6 | |||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 222 | 219 | 176 | 96.5 | ||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 154 | 125 | 82.1 | 43.2 | ||
| F1 2020 (2020) | 234 | 161 | 122 | 72.5 | ||
| Death Stranding (2020) | 149 | 147 | 108 | 60 | ||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 127 | 104 | 80 | 45 | ||
| Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 64.6 | 47.1 | 37.8 | 23.8 | ||
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 113 | 95 | 84.2 | 54.4 | ||
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 122 | 83.4 | 45.2 | |||
| Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 263 | 243 | 175 | 105 | ||
| FIFA 21 (2020) | 278 | 278 | 274 | 238 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 27 / 32 / 57 dB |
| Carga |
| 56 / 62 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 10% | 1% | 18% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 26.4 -6% | 26.5 -6% | 25 -0% | 24 ? 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27 | 27.5 -2% | 27.8 -3% | 33 -22% | 25.5 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 27.5 14% | 27.8 13% | 38 -19% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 57 | 29.8 48% | 27.8 51% | 45 21% | 30.4 ? 47% |
| Load Average * | 56 | 30.9 45% | 52.1 7% | 54 4% | 42.7 ? 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 60.7 -10% | 51.8 6% | 50 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 62 | 66.6 -7% | 59.1 5% | 55 11% | 53.4 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | -26% | -10% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 36.4 7% | 54 -38% | 59 -51% | 46.2 ? -18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 43 7% | 58.4 -27% | 52 -13% | 49.1 ? -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 28 12% | 40 -25% | 30 6% | 31.3 ? 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35 | 33.4 5% | 39.4 -13% | 29 17% | 32.3 ? 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.9 / 2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 34 / 40 / 47 Watt |
| Carga |
130 / 512 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | 4% | 26% | 45% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 25.9 24% | 33.6 1% | 16 53% | 13.5 ? 60% |
| Idle Average * | 40 | 38 5% | 43.9 -10% | 25 37% | 18.9 ? 53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 47 | 53.2 -13% | 59 -26% | 35 26% | 26.7 ? 43% |
| Load Average * | 130 | 123.8 5% | 134.9 -4% | 177 -36% | 106.3 ? 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 318 | 312.5 2% | 242 24% | 227 29% | |
| Load Maximum * | 512 | 459.8 10% | 320 37% | 280 45% | 249 ? 51% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 97 Wh | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 90 Wh | Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 86 Wh | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 66 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -36% | -27% | 62% | 59% | |
| Reader / Idle | 291 | 221 -24% | 602 107% | 565 ? 94% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 228 | 146 -36% | 191 -16% | 356 56% | 376 ? 65% |
| Load | 73 | 43 -41% | 89 22% | 85.6 ? 17% |
Pro
+ Tela UHD brilhante e colorida
+ Temperaturas moderadas da carcaça
+ Configuração moderna das portas
+ Bateria acessível desde o exterior
+ Desempenho excepcional
+ Bom sistema de som
+ CPU trocável
Contra
- Carcaça massiva e pesada
- Altas emissões de ruído
- Alto consumo de energia
- Dois adaptadores de força
- Duração pobre da bateria
- Muito caro
O XMG Ultra 17 é um substituto de desktop em uma classe própria.
Potência de ponta em uma carcaça grande com muitas conexões: É assim que a Schenker deseja conquistar usuários famintos por poder, para os quais o dinheiro é uma consideração secundária. A tela UHD colorida (embora com tempos de resposta um pouco mais fracos) e os dispositivos de entrada também são agradáveis.
No entanto, você terá que dizer adeus à ideia de mobilidade. As grandes dimensões, o peso pesado e a duração relativamente curta da bateria prendem os usuários às suas mesas. No final, o XMG Ultra 17 foi projetado apenas para uso estacionário; isso levanta a questão de por que não se deve recorrer diretamente a um PC desktop real, que é mais barato e, acima de tudo, mais silencioso.
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
- 10/13/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
