Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Poder sem fim

Name: SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Brand: SCHENKER

Desempenho premium a um preço de luxo.

Para aqueles que não querem fazer nenhum compromisso técnico, o Schenker XMG Ultra 17 é o portátil certo ou, mais precisamente, o substituto do desktop. O gigantesco equipamento de 17 polegadas é alimentado por uma CPU de desktop e os chips de portátil mais rápidos da Nvidia. Você pode descobrir se o alto custo vale a pena, em nossa análise.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Notebookcheck), Published 10/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake

Processador

Intel Core i9-10900K 10 x 3.7 - 5.3 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 250 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1740 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 456.55

Memória

128 GB

, 4x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual-channel

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 4K/UHD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz

placa mãe

Intel Z490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB, 2048 GB

, Slots: 4x M.2 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Conexões

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 43.5 x 399 x 319

Bateria

97 Wh, 6700 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 adaptadores de força de 280-watts, Cpara para adaptador de força, acessórios M.2, DVD de controladores, unidade USB com software, guia, cartão de garantia, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

4.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.756 kg

Preço

4.932 EUR

Links

SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	4.7 kg	43.5 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	4.2 kg	42 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
85.3 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	3 kg	20.7 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.7 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	2.9 kg	26.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size comparison

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Alienware m17 R3 P45E DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Card reader, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, microphone, headphone

Right side: USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 x2, USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, Kensington lock

Back: Thunderbolt 3, 2x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, RJ45 LAN, 2x power supply

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	218 MB/s
Alienware m17 R3 P45E (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	212 MB/s -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	186.9 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s -56%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m17 R3 P45E (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	236.8 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	220 MB/s
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	197.8 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s -46%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1350 MBit/s
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1279 (982^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w	1182 (613^min - 1213^max) MBit/s -12%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1150 MBit/s -15%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (554 - 1659, n=25)	1020 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1560 MBit/s
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w	1384 (1313^min - 1423^max) MBit/s -11%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1337 (684^min - 1391^max) MBit/s -14%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s -19%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (630 - 1885, n=25)	1037 MBit/s -34%

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake: 18.59 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.81 ∆E


432 cd/m²	438 cd/m²	409 cd/m²
422 cd/m²	442 cd/m²	408 cd/m²
425 cd/m²	424 cd/m²	411 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 442 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 423.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 442 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Alienware m17 R3 P45E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		-1%	-15%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	83	82.5 -1%	69.2 -17%	71 -14%
sRGB Coverage	99.1	98 -1%	97.9 -1%	99 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	97.9	96.6 -1%	71.4 -27%	71.6 -27%
Response Times		50%	51%	75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50.4 ?(23.6, 26.8)	23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8) 54%	16.8 ?(11.6, 5.2) 67%	5.8 ?(2.4, 3.4) 88%
Response Time Black / White *	21.6 ?(7.6, 14)	11.6 ?(6.4, 5.2) 46%	14 ?(7.6, 6.4) 35%	8.4 ?(4.4, 4) 61%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-29%	4%	-10%
Brightness middle	442	419.5 -5%	338.3 -23%	310 -30%
Brightness	423	413 -2%	325 -23%	311 -26%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	91 -1%	82 -11%
Black Level *	0.36	0.4 -11%	0.27 25%	0.41 -14%
Contrast	1228	1049 -15%	1253 2%	756 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.38	3.4 22%	1.88 57%	2.41 45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.85	7.4 32%	3.23 70%	8.59 21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.66	3.28 -397%	1.32 -100%	1.13 -71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.3	2 73%	2.4 67%	4.3 41%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.39 ^92%	2.149 ^102%
CCT	6906 ^94%	6858 ^95%	6572 ^99%	7059 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	98	84.6 -14%	64.7 -34%	72 -27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98	97.9 0%	97.8 0%	94 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / -14%	13% / 6%	17% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)

MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2464 (2424.1-2512.72)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)	276 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	217 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (206 - 224, n=3)	216 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	208 Points -4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	206 Points -5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	203 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)	3392 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (2513 - 2620, n=3)	2555 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	2533 (2290.43^min - 2532.77^max) Points
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	2513 (2424.1^min - 2512.72^max) Points -1%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	1836 (1770.85^min - 1836.46^max) Points -28%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1737 (1552.73^min - 1737.47^max) Points -31%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	286 Seconds * -51%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	239 Seconds * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	190 Seconds *
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	179 Seconds * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (167.3 - 190, n=3)	178.8 Seconds * +6%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +9%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years)	6280 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	5811 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (5349 - 5954, n=3)	5705 MIPS -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	5493 MIPS -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	5349 MIPS -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5336 MIPS -8%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years)	84613 MIPS +21%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	69987 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (67252 - 70968, n=3)	69402 MIPS -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	67252 MIPS -4%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	46659 MIPS -33%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	45938 MIPS -34%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years)	722 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	524 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (493 - 532, n=3)	516 Points -2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	493 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	489 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	465 Points -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years)	8236 Points +41%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	6181 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (5825 - 6381, n=3)	6129 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	5825 Points
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	4487 Points -23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3883 Points -33%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years)	1882 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	1428 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (1336 - 1449, n=3)	1404 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	1351 Points -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	1336 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1302 Points -9%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years)	14892 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	11393 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (10725 - 11414, n=3)	11177 Points -2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	10725 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8666 Points -24%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	7991 Points -30%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +28%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	19.8 fps +9%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (18.2 - 21, n=3)	19.7 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	18.2 fps
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	14.6 fps -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.5 fps -31%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (46.2 - 76, n=3)	56.8 s * -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	51.9 s * -8%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	49.5 s * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	48.1 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	46.2 s * +4%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.581 sec * -9%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K	0.567 sec * -7%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.564 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K (0.528 - 0.567, n=3)	0.542 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K	0.531 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years)	0.4401 sec * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2533 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

226 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

217 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5825 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

524 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)	7771 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	7461 Points
Average Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (7358 - 7461, n=2)	7410 Points -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	7358 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)	6594 Points -12%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)	5556 Points -26%

PCMark 10 Score		7461 pontos
Ajuda

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	10616 μs * -7397%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)	5066 μs * -3478%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)	637 μs * -350%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	141.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)	Alienware m17 R3 P45E 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-9%	-19%	-18%
Write 4K	172	116.4 -32%	68 -60%	125.8 -27%
Read 4K	47.3	43.85 -7%	42.04 -11%	52.9 12%
Write Seq	2980	2927 -2%	2221 -25%	1795 -40%
Read Seq	2790	1997 -28%	2202 -21%	2315 -17%
Write 4K Q32T1	481.8	467.6 -3%	494.5 3%	407.1 -16%
Read 4K Q32T1	565	538 -5%	540 -4%	411.9 -27%
Write Seq Q32T1	3295	3362 2%	2623 -20%	2844 -14%
Read Seq Q32T1	3550	3558 0%	3159 -11%	3130 -12%
AS SSD		-50%	-187%	-59%
Seq Read	2980	2406 -19%	2060 -31%	2450 -18%
Seq Write	2585	2867 11%	2297 -11%	1436 -44%
4K Read	52.7	41.51 -21%	35.39 -33%	49.48 -6%
4K Write	163.1	108.8 -33%	63.1 -61%	119.4 -27%
4K-64 Read	1954	1525 -22%	1337 -32%	1032 -47%
4K-64 Write	2347	1424 -39%	1307 -44%	1229 -48%
Access Time Read *	0.039	0.041 -5%	0.057 -46%	0.145 -272%
Access Time Write *	0.023	0.102 -343%	0.411 -1687%	0.036 -57%
Score Read	2304	1807 -22%	1578 -32%	1327 -42%
Score Write	2768	1819 -34%	1600 -42%	1492 -46%
Score Total	6232	4573 -27%	3997 -36%	3456 -45%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-30% / -33%	-103% / -116%	-39% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3550 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3295 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 565 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2790 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2980 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 172 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)	43524 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	36838 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (34021 - 36838, n=4)	35153 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	35128 Points -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	34623 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	34021 Points -8%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)	31252 Points +23%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	25597 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	25504 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (24211 - 25597, n=4)	24932 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	24416 Points -4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	24211 Points -5%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)	13032 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	10938 Points
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	10718 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (9638 - 10938, n=4)	10301 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	9908 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	9638 Points -12%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=115, last 2 years)	8656 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	6633 Points
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	6621 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (5903 - 6633, n=3)	6386 Points -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	5903 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		31493 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		22606 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		11211 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB: Ø110.5 (105-115)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	126.8 fps +16%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K	113.2 (106^min - 129^max) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K	109 (7.68^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (93.4 - 113.2, n=4)	103.3 fps -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	97.7 (93^min - 103^max) fps -10%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	93.4 (78^min) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (50.6 - 167.6, n=43, last 2 years)	111.4 fps +47%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K	80.5 (74^min - 95^max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K	75.6 (7.77^min, 65.6^P1 - 405^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile (66.4 - 80.5, n=3)	74.2 fps -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	66.4 (54^min) fps -12%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	187	182	179			98.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)			209	109		75.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	190	172	167	156		145
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	145	127	103			88.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			142	126	87.5	47.1
Battlefield V (2018)			168	152	126	76.2
Borderlands 3 (2019)			107	89.8	65.4	37.1
Hunt Showdown (2020)			133		92.4	85.6
Doom Eternal (2020)			222	219	176	96.5
Gears Tactics (2020)			154	125	82.1	43.2
F1 2020 (2020)			234	161	122	72.5
Death Stranding (2020)			149	147	108	60
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)			127	104	80	45
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)			64.6	47.1	37.8	23.8
Serious Sam 4 (2020)			113	95	84.2	54.4
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)			122		83.4	45.2
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)			263	243	175	105
FIFA 21 (2020)			278	278	274	238

Barulho

Ocioso		27 / 32 / 57 dB
Carga		56 / 62 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		12%	10%	1%	18%
off / environment *	25	26.4 -6%	26.5 -6%	25 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=158, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Minimum *	27	27.5 -2%	27.8 -3%	33 -22%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=159, last 2 years) 6%
Idle Average *	32	27.5 14%	27.8 13%	38 -19%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=159, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	57	29.8 48%	27.8 51%	45 21%	30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=159, last 2 years) 47%
Load Average *	56	30.9 45%	52.1 7%	54 4%	42.4 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=159, last 2 years) 24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	55	60.7 -10%	51.8 6%	50 9%
Load Maximum *	62	66.6 -7%	59.1 5%	55 11%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=159, last 2 years) 14%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


37 °C	32 °C	39 °C
32 °C	31 °C	32 °C
30 °C	30 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C


45 °C	43 °C	46 °C
33 °C	36 °C	30 °C
31 °C	35 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	32 °C	32 °C
28 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C


33 °C	32 °C	31 °C
35 °C	34 °C	29 °C
32 °C	28 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 33 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38 °C	34 °C	40 °C
34 °C	32 °C	36 °C
28 °C	31 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C


48 °C	45 °C	48 °C
36 °C	40 °C	37 °C
33 °C	36 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		8%	-26%	-10%	-4%
Maximum Upper Side *	39	36.4 7%	54 -38%	59 -51%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=157, last 2 years) -18%
Maximum Bottom *	46	43 7%	58.4 -27%	52 -13%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=157, last 2 years) -7%
Idle Upper Side *	32	28 12%	40 -25%	30 6%	31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=157, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Bottom *	35	33.4 5%	39.4 -13%	29 17%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=157, last 2 years) 8%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	1.9 / 2 Watt
Ocioso	34 / 40 / 47 Watt
Carga	130 / 512 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		6%	4%	26%	45%
Idle Minimum *	34	25.9 24%	33.6 1%	16 53%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) 60%
Idle Average *	40	38 5%	43.9 -10%	25 37%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) 53%
Idle Maximum *	47	53.2 -13%	59 -26%	35 26%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) 43%
Load Average *	130	123.8 5%	134.9 -4%	177 -36%	106.9 ?(32.1 - 201, n=156, last 2 years) 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	318	312.5 2%	242 24%	227 29%
Load Maximum *	512	459.8 10%	320 37%	280 45%	250 ?(55.3 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) 51%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 51min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 13min

	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 97 Wh	MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 90 Wh	Alienware m17 R3 P45E i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 86 Wh	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 66 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-36%	-27%	62%	58%
Reader / Idle	291		221 -24%	602 107%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 94%
WiFi v1.3	228	146 -36%	191 -16%	356 56%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years) 64%
Load	73		43 -41%	89 22%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 17%

Pro

+ Tela UHD brilhante e colorida

+ Temperaturas moderadas da carcaça

+ Configuração moderna das portas

+ Bateria acessível desde o exterior

+ Desempenho excepcional

+ Bom sistema de som

+ CPU trocável

Contra

- Carcaça massiva e pesada

- Altas emissões de ruído

- Alto consumo de energia

- Dois adaptadores de força

- Duração pobre da bateria

- Muito caro

XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Test device provided by Schenker Technologies

O XMG Ultra 17 é um substituto de desktop em uma classe própria.

Potência de ponta em uma carcaça grande com muitas conexões: É assim que a Schenker deseja conquistar usuários famintos por poder, para os quais o dinheiro é uma consideração secundária. A tela UHD colorida (embora com tempos de resposta um pouco mais fracos) e os dispositivos de entrada também são agradáveis.

No entanto, você terá que dizer adeus à ideia de mobilidade. As grandes dimensões, o peso pesado e a duração relativamente curta da bateria prendem os usuários às suas mesas. No final, o XMG Ultra 17 foi projetado apenas para uso estacionário; isso levanta a questão de por que não se deve recorrer diretamente a um PC desktop real, que é mais barato e, acima de tudo, mais silencioso.

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake - 10/13/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

71 / 80 → 89%

Peso

41 / 10-66 → 56%

Bateria