Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo P775TM1-G)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (XMG Ultra Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8700 6 x 3.2 - 4.6 GHz, Coffee Lake-S, Socket 1151
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1657 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, MXM, ForceWare 390.77
Memória
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2 de 4 Slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, UHD, AHVA, 60 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe, 500 GB
, + Seagate Barracuda ST2000LM015, 2 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 2x M2-2280 & 2x 2.5-inch
peso
4.368 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.274 kg
Preço
3500 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Guru Mars K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Guru Mars K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 312.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332 cd/m²
Contraste: 1186:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Guru Mars K LGD046E, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | -26% | -2% | -28% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.4 | 67.3 -22% | 66 -24% | 90.3 5% | 61.2 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 85.1 -15% | 83.7 -16% | 99.6 0% | 82.9 -17% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.1 | 62.3 -37% | 61.2 -38% | 86.8 -12% | 60.5 -39% |
| Response Times | 5% | -8% | 74% | 40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 37.6 ? 15% | 45 ? -2% | 11.6 ? 74% | 30 ? 32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 26.4 ? -6% | 28 ? -13% | 6.8 ? 73% | 12.8 ? 48% |
| PWM Frequency | 133.3 ? | 25000 ? | |||
| Screen | -7% | -10% | 13% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle | 332 | 343 3% | 380 14% | 274 -17% | 402.3 21% |
| Brightness | 313 | 330 5% | 362 16% | 262 -16% | 372 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 91 3% | 87 -1% | 86 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.32 -14% | 0.37 -32% | 0.26 7% | 0.62 -121% |
| Contrast | 1186 | 1072 -10% | 1027 -13% | 1054 -11% | 649 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.86 | 3.61 6% | 4.12 -7% | 1.36 65% | 5.6 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.88 | 8.16 -39% | 8.19 -39% | 4.1 30% | 9.8 -67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.33 | 3.03 30% | 3.95 9% | 0.64 85% | 4.7 -9% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6595 99% | 6568 99% | 6539 99% | 6551 99% | 7519 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 56 -36% | 55 -37% | 77 -12% | 53.7 -39% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 85 -15% | 84 -16% | 100 0% | 82.2 -18% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-9% | -15% /
-13% | 28% /
18% | -6% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile () | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4865 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4849 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5976 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Guru Mars K Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -23% | 1% | -39% | -3% | ||
| Seq Read | 2533 | 2261 -11% | 3137 24% | 1752 -31% | 2433 ? -4% | |
| Seq Write | 1771 | 1338 -24% | 2352 33% | 735 -58% | 1647 ? -7% | |
| 4K Read | 43.65 | 39.52 -9% | 50.1 15% | 35.61 -18% | 45.5 ? 4% | |
| 4K Write | 139.5 | 133.8 -4% | 128.8 -8% | 113.4 -19% | 142.4 ? 2% | |
| Score Read | 1716 | 1118 -35% | 1412 -18% | 831 -52% | 1645 ? -4% | |
| Score Write | 1615 | 930 -42% | 1289 -20% | 858 -47% | 1518 ? -6% | |
| Score Total | 4173 | 2581 -38% | 3392 -19% | 2072 -50% | 3968 ? -5% |
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3308 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1839 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
392.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
340 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1750 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1725 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
153.5 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30222 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22034 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37952 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17997 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6942 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 ultra
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (50.6 - 167.6, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (44.4 - 55.8, n=11) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (61.7 - 78.1, n=23) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 142 | 75.6 | 51.3 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 289 | 286 | 249 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 136 | 127 | 52.1 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 86 | 76 | 39 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 160 | 131 | 63.2 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 137 | 131 | 48.9 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 137 | 115 | 39.6 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 194 | 141 | 41.4 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 74.4 | 31.8 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 104 | 76.8 | 25.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 34 / 35 / 40 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 60 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Guru Mars K GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | 6% | 0% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 36 -6% | 33 3% | 33 3% | 35.6 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 37 -6% | 35 -0% | 34 3% | 35.6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 40 -0% | 37 7% | 38 5% | 35.7 11% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 45 -0% | 40 11% | 44 2% | 50.2 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 50 4% | 56 -8% | 50.2 3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 60 | 55 8% | 50 17% | 62 -3% | 50.2 16% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Guru Mars K GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 0% | -11% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 46 -12% | 44.2 -8% | 46 -12% | 49.6 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 46 4% | 43 10% | 57 -19% | 56 -17% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 32 -7% | 32.4 -8% | 34 -13% | 29.6 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35 | 31 11% | 32.8 6% | 35 -0% | 29.2 17% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 32 / 38 / 45 Watt |
| Carga |
96 / 331 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Guru Mars K GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | 12% | -7% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 31 3% | 27 16% | 34 -6% | 37.5 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 38 | 37 3% | 32 16% | 41 -8% | 37.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 45 | 44 2% | 41 9% | 50 -11% | 37.6 16% |
| Load Average * | 96 | 116 -21% | 102 -6% | 106 -10% | 122.4 -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 237 | 259 -9% | 257 -8% | 180.3 24% | |
| Load Maximum * | 331 | 312 6% | 248 25% | 320 3% | 277.4 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, 82 Wh | Guru Mars K GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700, 82 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 88.8 Wh | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 75 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 26% | 59% | 1% | 31% | 152% | |
| Reader / Idle | 164 | 200 22% | 313 91% | 182 11% | 276 68% | 565 ? 245% |
| H.264 | 148 | 153 3% | 204 38% | 148 0% | 408 ? 176% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 142 | 251 77% | 144 1% | 181 27% | 375 ? 164% | |
| Load | 70 | 107 53% | 90 29% | 65 -7% | 69 -1% | 85.3 ? 22% |
Pro
+ Tela UHD com ótima reprodução de cor
+ Ótima capacidade de atualização
+ Configurações individuais
+ Ótimo desempenho
+ Hardware moderno
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Sem bloatware
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Bom som
Contra
- Chassi grosso e pesado
- Controlador irritante da ventoinha
- A GPU pode esquentar muito
- Turbo da CPU limitado
- Alto consumo de energia
- Curta duração da bateria
O XMG Ultra 17 foi projetado para gamers exigentes que não querem (mais) um pc de torre, mas com a capacidade de atualização e conectividade de um desktop clássico. Este é o tipo de comprador que a Schenker Technologies tenta atrair com este gigante de 17 polegadas.
No lado positivo, junto com os excelentes dispositivos de entrada, a tela UHD excepcional com suporte para G-Sync, cuja representação de cores é a melhor em sala de aula. O desempenho também é excelente: A CPU Coffee Lake da Intel e a GPU Pascal da Nvidia garantem alto desempenho, embora os jogos de hoje raramente se beneficiem de seis núcleos, se o processador suportar SMT.
Poderiam ser feitas melhorias no controlador do ventilador, dado que está longe de ser perfeito. Uma duração decente da bateria também não deve ser esperada.
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
-
02/23/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
