Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (i7-9700K, RTX 2070) Clevo P751TM1-G
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 263 cd/m²
Contraste: 1547:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.77 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R4 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD0540), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -5% | -2% | 0% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 66.8 1% | 65.7 -1% | 63.5 -4% | 65.3 -1% | 64.2 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 90.7 -2% | 86.4 -7% | 93.1 1% | 94.9 2% | 92.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.1 | 66.3 -1% | 63.1 -6% | 64.5 -4% | 66.3 -1% | 65.7 -2% |
Response Times | -1% | -101% | 1% | 7% | 34% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.6 ? | 24.2 ? -38% | 37.6 ? -114% | 16.4 ? 7% | 16.8 ? 5% | 8 ? 55% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 8 ? 37% | 24 ? -88% | 13.6 ? -6% | 11.6 ? 9% | 11.2 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 20830 ? | |||||
Screen | -47% | -14% | 8% | -0% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 263 | 363 38% | 292 11% | 250 -5% | 314.7 20% | 304 16% |
Brightness | 264 | 365 38% | 278 5% | 235 -11% | 312 18% | 299 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 74 -17% | 88 -1% | 85 -4% | 90 1% | 89 0% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.58 -241% | 0.29 -71% | 0.29 -71% | 0.38 -124% | 0.27 -59% |
Contrast | 1547 | 626 -60% | 1007 -35% | 862 -44% | 828 -46% | 1126 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.45 | 8.7 -96% | 4.9 -10% | 1.46 67% | 2.56 42% | 4.66 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.33 | 12.91 -55% | 10.08 -21% | 2.47 70% | 4.89 41% | 9.65 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.93 | 2.36 -22% | 2.27 -18% | 1.71 11% | 1.72 11% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.77 | 9.26 -94% | 4.89 -3% | 1.27 73% | 3.4 29% | 5.53 -16% |
Gamma | 2.52 87% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 7767 84% | 9390 69% | 7598 86% | 6749 96% | 6435 101% | 8028 81% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 59 -2% | 56 -7% | 60 0% | 60.7 1% | 60 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 91 -2% | 86 -8% | 93 0% | 94.6 2% | 93 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-32% | -40% /
-23% | 2% /
5% | 2% /
1% | 8% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31808 - 41034, n=3, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6453 - 7348, n=3, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Edge 41) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Edge 41) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 8114 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5485 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6780 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6258 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6868 pontos | |
Ajuda |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Alienware 15 R4 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -5% | -27% | -15% | -16% | -2% | |
Write 4K | 129.9 | 147.7 14% | 96.8 -25% | 97.1 -25% | 93.9 -28% | 93.6 -28% |
Read 4K | 47.15 | 44.02 -7% | 35.73 -24% | 53.7 14% | 40.56 -14% | 38.82 -18% |
Write Seq | 1840 | 1641 -11% | 362.3 -80% | 1526 -17% | 1468 -20% | 2455 33% |
Read Seq | 1775 | 1830 3% | 2110 19% | 2020 14% | 1540 -13% | 2107 19% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 294.5 | 325.9 11% | 318.6 8% | 285.6 -3% | 293.5 0% | 298.7 1% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 373.6 | 369.1 -1% | 366.7 -2% | 321.8 -14% | 346 -7% | 338.7 -9% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3295 | 1847 -44% | 351 -89% | 1533 -53% | 1941 -41% | 2902 -12% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3535 | 3344 -5% | 2813 -20% | 2351 -33% | 3266 -8% | 3536 0% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 43781 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 22748 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 227837 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 43983 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18616 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7832 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 400.7 | 346 | 320.9 | 187.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 331.2 | 223.1 | 128.4 | 73 |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 214 | 202 | 159 | 108 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 112.4 | 102 | 98.6 | |
Civilization VI (2016) | 224.1 | 163.6 | 129.8 | 121.1 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 206.1 | 181.2 | 169.5 | 144.5 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 128.4 | 114.1 | 92.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 147 | 125 | 115 | 109 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
Alienware 15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Alienware 15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 36 dB |
Carga |
| 55 / 59 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -0% | 11% | 9% | 18% | 17% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 28.8 4% | 24 ? 20% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 32 -0% | 32 -0% | 30 6% | 32 -0% | 28.8 10% | 25.5 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 33 -0% | 32 3% | 34 -3% | 28.8 13% | 27.3 ? 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 35 3% | 50 -39% | 34 6% | 36 -0% | 29.4 18% | 30.4 ? 16% |
Load Average * | 55 | 46 16% | 50 9% | 44 20% | 42 24% | 35.7 35% | 42.8 ? 22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 54 5% | 51 11% | 46 19% | 44 23% | 42.5 25% | |
Load Maximum * | 59 | 62 -5% | 51 14% | 47 20% | 48 19% | 45 24% | 53.4 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -30% | -13% | -11% | 3% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 42 7% | 53 -18% | 49 -9% | 56 -24% | 49 -9% | 46.2 ? -3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 50 -4% | 68 -42% | 58 -21% | 66 -38% | 49 -2% | 49.1 ? -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 29 3% | 39 -30% | 33 -10% | 27 10% | 25.4 15% | 31.3 ? -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 29 3% | 39 -30% | 33 -10% | 27 10% | 27.2 9% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware 15 R4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 35 / 39 / 47 Watt |
Carga |
117 / 299 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 24% | 37% | 45% | 47% | 36% | |
Idle Minimum * | 35 | 28 20% | 23 34% | 16 54% | 16 54% | 10.4 70% | 13.6 ? 61% |
Idle Average * | 39 | 31 21% | 26 33% | 22 44% | 18 54% | 14.6 63% | 19 ? 51% |
Idle Maximum * | 47 | 38 19% | 30 36% | 32 32% | 23 51% | 16.3 65% | 26.8 ? 43% |
Load Average * | 117 | 100 15% | 111 5% | 89 24% | 88 25% | 88.5 24% | 106.3 ? 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 196 | 206 -5% | 182 7% | 147 25% | 120 39% | 155.4 21% | |
Load Maximum * | 299 | 309 -3% | 222 26% | 173 42% | 167 44% | 182.4 39% | 249 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | 52% | 31% | 143% | 135% | 125% | |
Reader / Idle | 194 | 220 13% | 370 91% | 335 73% | 549 183% | 682 252% | 565 ? 191% |
H.264 | 154 | 186 21% | 364 136% | 409 ? 166% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 157 | 194 24% | 304 94% | 190 21% | 382 143% | 387 146% | 375 ? 139% |
Load | 83 | 119 43% | 58 -30% | 81 -2% | 174 110% | 88 6% | 85.6 ? 3% |
Pro
Contra
O XMG Ultra 15 da Schenker é um dispositivo grande Seu tamanho e peso enormes são devidos a uma especialidade que raramente pode ser encontrada em portáteis modernos: CPU e GPU encaixadas e, portanto, trocáveis (o último como módulo MXM).
mais recente iteração XMG Ultra 15 da Schenker é um portátil de jogos de alta qualidade bem feito para aqueles que se beneficiam da capacidade de atualização.
A combinação de uma CPU Core i7 2670QM octa-core e uma GeForce GTX 2070 GPU foi mais do que capaz de renderizar todos os jogos atuais sem problemas na tela FHD mate com detalhes altos ou até máximos. A GPU era claramente capaz de resoluções ainda maiores.
Graças a Nvidia G-Sync e uma tela IPS de 144 Hz, o resultado foi incrivelmente suave. A tela apresentava uma ótima relação de contraste, tempos de resposta curtos e amplos ângulos de visão. Nossa única queixa era que seu brilho máximo era muito baixo. Um SSD NVMe incrivelmente rápido garantiu um desempenho do sistema fluente e rápido, e a carcaça tinha espaço para outro SSD M.2, além de dois HDs de 2,5 polegadas. O teclado com iluminação RGB foi surpreendentemente bom, e a conectividade é muito decente. Em troca, a duração da bateria era tão fraca que mal dava para mencionar.
O gerenciamento de ventiladores definitivamente tem espaço para melhorias. Sob carga, os ventiladores funcionam muito mais rápido do que o necessário para garantir um resfriamento adequado. Suspeitamos que o sistema de resfriamento foi projetado e desenvolvido para um SKU muito mais potente (Core i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080).
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
- 03/04/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck