Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (Clevo P751TM1-G)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 74 %
iluminação com acumulador: 363 cd/m²
Contraste: 626:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 9.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P56XT LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -7% | -6% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 65.4 -2% | 63.9 -4% | 64.8 -3% | 66 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.7 | 85.5 -6% | 83.1 -8% | 84.6 -7% | 90.5 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 62.5 -6% | 60.8 -8% | 61.8 -7% | 66.2 0% |
| Response Times | -140% | -133% | -132% | -27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.2 ? | 36 ? -49% | 37 ? -53% | 37.2 ? -54% | 25 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 26.4 ? -230% | 25 ? -213% | 24.8 ? -210% | 12 ? -50% |
| PWM Frequency | 20830 ? | 20000 ? | |||
| Screen | 17% | 20% | 14% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 363 | 295 -19% | 310 -15% | 301 -17% | 386 6% |
| Brightness | 365 | 274 -25% | 311 -15% | 280 -23% | 382 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 74 | 88 19% | 85 15% | 87 18% | 93 26% |
| Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.32 45% | 0.3 48% | 0.32 45% | 0.39 33% |
| Contrast | 626 | 922 47% | 1033 65% | 941 50% | 990 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.7 | 4.59 47% | 4.82 45% | 6.21 29% | 10.2 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.91 | 11 15% | 10.14 21% | 10.78 16% | 15.81 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.36 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.26 | 4.03 56% | 3.94 57% | 6.08 34% | 11.28 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.45 90% | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 9390 69% | 7229 90% | 6877 95% | 7375 88% | 11383 57% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 56 -5% | 54 -8% | 55 -7% | 59 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 85 -7% | 83 -9% | 84 -8% | 90 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -43% /
-8% | -40% /
-5% | -41% /
-10% | -7% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K (181 - 181, n=2) | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K (988 - 991, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K () | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile () | |
| Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile () | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile () | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5512 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5618 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5779 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Gigabyte P56XT LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Alienware 15 R3 | Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -27% | -62% | -1% | |||
| Seq Read | 2758 | 1941 -30% | 510 -82% | 2433 ? -12% | ||
| Seq Write | 1836 | 1067 -42% | 288.2 -84% | 1647 ? -10% | ||
| 4K Read | 44.75 | 46.35 4% | 37.2 -17% | 45.5 ? 2% | ||
| 4K Write | 137.1 | 117.3 -14% | 104 -24% | 142.4 ? 4% | ||
| Score Read | 1513 | 1350 -11% | 472 -69% | 1645 ? 9% | ||
| Score Write | 1614 | 570 -65% | 304 -81% | 1518 ? -6% | ||
| Score Total | 3859 | 2574 -33% | 1019 -74% | 3968 ? 3% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (15718 - 19059, n=56) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (13760 - 25604, n=58) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 32601 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18972 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30865 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15777 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (48.2 - 68.4, n=41) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (83 - 123, n=30) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 123 | 65.3 | ||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 137 | 102 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 349 | 345 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 108 | 84 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 67.5 | 65.4 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 113 | 89.1 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 125 | 117 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 87 | 72 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 146 | 122 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 129 | 122 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 135 | 104 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 181 | 131 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 65 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 87.4 | 66.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 35 dB |
| Carga |
| 46 / 62 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 4% | 3% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 32 -7% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 34 -6% | 34 -6% | 34 -6% | 31 3% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 36 -9% | 35 -6% | 35 -6% | 32 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 38 -9% | 36 -3% | 39 -11% | 42 -20% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 41 11% | 40 13% | 39 15% | 49 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54 | 42 22% | 48 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 62 | 50 19% | 46 26% | 49 21% | 50 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | 6% | -30% | -18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 42.3 -1% | 40.6 3% | 65 -55% | 46 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 40.9 18% | 48.4 3% | 71 -42% | 51.8 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 28.4 2% | 26.8 8% | 35 -21% | 36.5 -26% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 25.2 13% | 26.4 9% | 30 -3% | 38.2 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 31 / 38 Watt |
| Carga |
100 / 309 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 26% | 36% | 27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 18 36% | 20 29% | 13 54% | 19 32% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 23 26% | 24 23% | 17 45% | 23 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 30 21% | 29 24% | 22 42% | 29 24% |
| Load Average * | 100 | 89 11% | 82 18% | 85 15% | 85 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 206 | 168 18% | 154 25% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 309 | 213 31% | 193 38% | 208 33% | 192 38% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K, 82 Wh | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 90 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 75 Wh | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 91.2 Wh | Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 64% | 29% | 89% | 35% | 86% | |
| Reader / Idle | 220 | 502 128% | 377 71% | 568 158% | 382 74% | 565 ? 157% |
| H.264 | 186 | 295 59% | 252 35% | 370 99% | 266 43% | 409 ? 120% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 194 | 332 71% | 246 27% | 384 98% | 264 36% | 375 ? 93% |
| Load | 119 | 117 -2% | 98 -18% | 120 1% | 102 -14% | 85.6 ? -28% |
Pro
Contra
O Schenker XMG Ultra 15 herda os pontos fortes e fracos do seu irmão de 17 polegadas, o XMG Ultra 17. Em nossa opinião, a carcaça que facilita a manutenção merece muito crédito (tanto a CPU quanto a GPU podem, teoricamente, ser substituídas!). Ele pode ser amplamente personalizado na ferramenta de configuração online da Schenker. Os dispositivos de entrada, a qualidade de áudio e as portas (Thunderbolt 3) são compatíveis com o preço do XMG.
No entanto, a tela com capacidade para G-Sync de 120 Hz, deixa uma impressão bastante mista. O bom brilho e os baixos tempos de resposta dificilmente eliminam a sensação de decepção deixada pela baixa precisão das cores, a medíocre uniformidade do brilho, os ângulos de visão pobres e o um pouco alto valor de preto.
O maior ponto de crítica que temos diz respeito ao ruído do ventilador. Apesar da carcaça grossa, o dispositivo de 15 polegadas produz muito ruído durante as sessões de jogo. Também tende a produzir muito ruído desnecessário ao trabalhar em tarefas leves. Como o processador e a placa gráfica nunca atingem temperaturas críticas há espaço para uma solução de resfriamento mais silenciosa. Para esse fim, você pode sempre ajustar a velocidade do ventilador manualmente através do utilitário Control Center. A modesta duração da bateria é outra razão pela qual o XMG Ultra 15 não recebe um “A” de nós.
No entanto, quando você leva em consideração todos os aspectos, verá que o XMG Ultra 15 se destaca muito bem de concorrentes como o Acer Predator 15, MSI GT62VR 7REe o Alienware 15 R3.
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
- 03/05/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
