Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG U507 (Clevo P751DM2-G)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 573:1 (Preto: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.41 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F5 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -6% | 0% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.5 -3% | 63.9 -4% | 66 -1% | 66.4 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.2 | 83 -7% | 83.1 -7% | 90.5 1% | 88.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 60.7 -7% | 60.8 -7% | 66.2 1% | 65.1 0% |
| Response Times | -188% | -150% | -34% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 33.6 ? -29% | 37 ? -42% | 25 ? 4% | 24 ? 8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 7 ? | 31.2 ? -346% | 25 ? -257% | 12 ? -71% | 12 ? -71% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 21% | 23% | 11% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 384 | 315.8 -18% | 310 -19% | 386 1% | 357 -7% |
| Brightness | 372 | 310 -17% | 311 -16% | 382 3% | 365 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 85 -3% | 93 6% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.33 51% | 0.3 55% | 0.39 42% | 0.5 25% |
| Contrast | 573 | 957 67% | 1033 80% | 990 73% | 714 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.89 | 5 49% | 4.82 51% | 10.2 -3% | 9.93 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.56 | 10.1 31% | 10.14 30% | 15.81 -9% | 14.87 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.41 | 4.2 60% | 3.94 62% | 11.28 -8% | 10.32 1% |
| Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.12 104% | 2.45 90% | 2.23 99% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 9919 66% | 6107 106% | 6877 95% | 11383 57% | 10096 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 54.5 -6% | 54 -7% | 59 2% | 58 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 83 -7% | 83 -7% | 90 1% | 89 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -58% /
-12% | -44% /
-6% | -8% /
3% | -9% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 7892 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5478 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5629 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Alienware 15 R3 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 3% | -61% | -4% | ||
| Seq Read | 2634 | 2819 7% | 510 -81% | 2604 -1% | |
| Seq Write | 1621 | 2046 26% | 288.2 -82% | 1678 4% | |
| 4K Read | 49.18 | 51 4% | 37.2 -24% | 49.2 0% | |
| 4K Write | 180.9 | 150.5 -17% | 104 -43% | 160.3 -11% | |
| Score Total | 4122 | 3943 -4% | 1019 -75% | 3629 -12% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18882 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 189309 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32726 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15106 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Mass Effect Andromeda | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| For Honor | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Dishonored 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| FIFA 17 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| XCOM 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Maximum Preset (8xMSAA instead of FXAA) AA:8xMS AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | 63 | ||
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 87.7 | 42.6 | ||
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 370 | 365 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 104 | 85 | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 92.3 | 67 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 148 | 111 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 94 | 53.9 | ||
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 83.5 | 75.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 35 / 38 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 49 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 3% | -2% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.4 2% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 33.3 -4% | 34 -6% | 31 3% | 33 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 33.5 4% | 35 -0% | 32 9% | 34 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 33.5 12% | 36 5% | 42 -11% | 44 -16% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 44.2 2% | 40 11% | 49 -9% | 46 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 52.5 -7% | 46 6% | 50 -2% | 52 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.6 °C / 99.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 16% | 9% | -14% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.8 | 37.4 22% | 40.6 15% | 46 4% | 49.2 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.1 | 44.8 12% | 48.4 5% | 51.8 -1% | 62 -21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.5 | 25.4 17% | 26.8 12% | 36.5 -20% | 32.4 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 24.8 11% | 26.4 5% | 38.2 -37% | 33 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Eurocom Tornado F5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 34 / 44 Watt |
| Carga |
125 / 270 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 31% | 32% | 40% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 21.2 24% | 20 29% | 19 32% | 14 50% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 25.1 26% | 24 29% | 23 32% | 18 47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 44 | 26.3 40% | 29 34% | 29 34% | 24 45% |
| Load Average * | 125 | 169.4 -36% | 82 34% | 85 32% | 87 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 178 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 270 | 202.4 25% | 193 29% | 192 29% | 201 26% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 82 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | 49% | 55% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 194 | 291 50% | 377 94% | 382 97% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 170 | 216 27% | 246 45% | 264 55% | 195 15% |
| Load | 90 | 67 -26% | 98 9% | 102 13% | |
| H.264 | 252 | 266 | 213 |
Pro
Contra
Poder luxuoso a um preço luxuoso: O XMG U507 da Schenker Technologies poderia ser resumido em essa frase. A configuração básica não é tão cara com 1.749 Euros (~$1879), mas quando opta-se pelo hardware de alto desempeno (GeForce GTX 1070, Core i7 com Hyperthreading, pelo menos 16 GB de RAM, solid state drive baseado em PCIe), o preço pode aumentar muito facilmente para 2500 (~$2686) se não 3000 Euros (~$3223). Os jogadores exigentes que esperam muitas interfaces, boas opções de manutenção, uma configuração individual, e detalhes máximos em Full HD devem ficar contentes com XMG U507.
A decisão entre o painel IPS ou o TN de 120 Hz depende principalmente da preferência do usuário. Os usuários que sentem cada fotograma adicional e que conseguem perceber a mínima mudança na tela, provavelmente podem ignorar as fraquezas da tela de 120 Hz (nível de preto pobre, baixo contraste, forte tonalidade azul). Os paineis IPS são a melhor opção para o resto das pessoas, dado que possuem maior contraste e têm ângulos de visão mais estáveis. A Schenker também deveria fazer melhorias na fonte de alimentação que está um pouco subdimensionada para uma combinação de GeForce GTX 1070 e Core i7-7700K - pelos menos em cenários de uso intenso. De outra forma, somente a duração da bateria e a tampa extremamente instável que acaba produzindo distorções na imagem quando pressionada, devem ser colocadas na lista dos pontos negativos.
Normalmente é suficiente para o primeiro lugar em outros aspectos. A conectividade, desempenho, e o som deixam os concorrentes de 15 polegadas um pouco atrás. No entanto, o MSI GT62VR 7RE, Alienware 15 R3 e o Acer Predator 15 (ainda não testado com Kaby Lake) atingem avaliações comparáveis. Pode valer a penas dar uma olhada no Schenker se preferir um portátil relativamente leve e fino.
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017
- 03/26/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
