Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G): Diversão e jogos
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.19, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB
, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
peso
2.53 kg, Suprimento de energia: 680 g
Preço
2104 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 30 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.1 % v7 (old) | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 26.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87 % v6 (old) | 03/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 3.5 kg | 38 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
22.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 345.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 346 cd/m²
Contraste: 1236:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -3% | 4% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 66.2 -1% | 64.9 -3% | 69.3 4% | 66.1 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.4 | 97.1 3% | 91 -4% | 98.9 5% | 92.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 67.6 -1% | 65.9 -3% | 70.7 4% | 67.1 -1% |
| Response Times | 17% | 40% | 12% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.2 ? | 15 ? 13% | 7.2 ? 58% | 13.2 ? 23% | 17.6 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 9 ? 20% | 8.8 ? 21% | 11.2 ? -0% | 12.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 23150 ? | |||
| Screen | -7% | 0% | 9% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 346 | 309 -11% | 286 -17% | 277.4 -20% | 263 -24% |
| Brightness | 346 | 284 -18% | 275 -21% | 264 -24% | 264 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 90 1% | 90 1% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.42 -50% | 0.37 -32% | 0.24 14% | 0.17 39% |
| Contrast | 1236 | 736 -40% | 773 -37% | 1156 -6% | 1547 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.62 | 3.99 14% | 2.19 53% | 1.51 67% | 4.45 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.93 | 8.3 7% | 4.4 51% | 4.93 45% | 8.33 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.58 | 1.12 29% | 2.27 -44% | 1.77 -12% | 1.93 -22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 5.43 -10% | 2.2 56% | 3.7 25% | 4.77 4% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.57 86% | 2.41 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.52 87% |
| CCT | 7733 84% | 7767 84% | 6405 101% | 7061 92% | 7767 84% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 63 3% | 59 -3% | 65.1 7% | 60 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 97 3% | 91 -3% | 99.1 5% | 93 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-3% | 12% /
5% | 8% /
9% | -3% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1177 (1160.19-1270.77)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -32% | -19% | -6% | -12% | |
| Write 4K | 120.6 | 133.3 11% | 97 -20% | 125.7 4% | 129.9 8% |
| Read 4K | 46.13 | 55.3 20% | 49.58 7% | 45.04 -2% | 47.15 2% |
| Write Seq | 2900 | 980 -66% | 1838 -37% | 2361 -19% | 1840 -37% |
| Read Seq | 2929 | 1406 -52% | 2421 -17% | 1987 -32% | 1775 -39% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 372.2 | 286.3 -23% | 326.9 -12% | 407.1 9% | 294.5 -21% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 422.2 | 331.5 -21% | 372.9 -12% | 537 27% | 373.6 -12% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3245 | 976 -70% | 1894 -42% | 2398 -26% | 3295 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3565 | 1520 -57% | 2828 -21% | 3309 -7% | 3535 -1% |
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3245 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
422.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
372.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2929 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2900 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
120.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20935 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37846 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17762 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7508 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø75.8 (68-80)
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 142 | 74.4 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153 | 140 | 130 | 122 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 110 | 95.5 | 81.1 | |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 68.5 | 41.1 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 103 | 100 | ||
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 190 | 189 | ||
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 89 | 67 | ||
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 104 | 75.4 | ||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 113 | 92.9 | ||
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 83.5 | 78.1 | ||
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 92.2 | 90.7 | ||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 66.8 | 42.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 32 / 40 dB |
| Carga |
| 56 / 56 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 2% | 6% | -1% | 17% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 30.6 -2% | 31 -3% | 33 -10% | 32 -7% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 30.6 4% | 33 -3% | 33 -3% | 33 -3% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 37.7 6% | 38 5% | 33.1 17% | 36 10% | 30.3 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 56 | 36.5 35% | 50 11% | 38 32% | 55 2% | 42.7 ? 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 52.1 5% | 53 4% | 52.9 4% | 57 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 56 | 48.1 14% | 56 -0% | 57.8 -3% | 59 -5% | 53.4 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | -16% | -17% | -5% | -9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 45.6 -6% | 54 -26% | 45 -5% | 45 -5% | 46.1 ? -7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 55.5 -29% | 47 -9% | 53 -23% | 48 -12% | 49 ? -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 31.8 -10% | 33 -14% | 31.2 -8% | 30 -3% | 31.3 ? -8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 33.3 -11% | 34 -13% | 39 -30% | 30 -0% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15 / 19 / 26 Watt |
| Carga |
101 / 245 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -24% | 1% | -61% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15 | 11.4 24% | 24 -60% | 15 -0% | 35 -133% | 13.6 ? 9% |
| Idle Average * | 19 | 13.5 29% | 27 -42% | 18.5 3% | 39 -105% | 19 ? -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 21.6 17% | 33 -27% | 20.2 22% | 47 -81% | 26.8 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 101 | 106 -5% | 129 -28% | 110.9 -10% | 117 -16% | 106.3 ? -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 177 | 186 -5% | 176 1% | 187.3 -6% | 196 -11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 245 | 196 20% | 216 12% | 260 -6% | 299 -22% | 249 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 60% | 2% | -9% | -16% | 61% | |
| Reader / Idle | 312 | 353 13% | 371 19% | 194 -38% | 567 ? 82% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 208 | 333 60% | 220 6% | 216 4% | 157 -25% | 376 ? 81% |
| Load | 72 | 62 -14% | 35 -51% | 83 15% | 85.7 ? 19% | |
| H.264 | 154 | 413 ? |
Pro
+ Configurações individuais
+ Temperaturas moderadas
+ G-Sync ou Optimus
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Marcos finos
+ 144 Hz
Contra
- Ruído de sistema muito alto sob uso intenso
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Duração curta da bateria
O XMG Pro 15 se encaixa perfeitamente no espaço entre o Gamai fina e leve e o Substitutos de desktop clássico. Os usuários que preferem uma carcaça compacta, mas não querem renunciar ao alto desempenho, chegaram ao lugar certo.
O Core i7-8750H e GeForce GTX 2070 podem exibir todos os títulos atuais com todos os detalhes e são os companheiros ideais para jogadores hardcore. Nossa unidade de teste também oferece luz de fundo RGB complementar para teclado, muitas opções de atualização e configuração e uma ampla gama de portas disponíveis, incluindo Thunderbolt 3. A tela responsiva e de alto contraste de 144 Hz é outro ótimo recurso.
Infelizmente, os ventiladores de refrigeração comprometem o excelente conceito. O fato de que os ventiladores às vezes se ativam aparentemente sem motivo e que a operação 3D geralmente é muito barulhenta é algo que frequentemente observamos com os barebones Clevo. A fraca duração da bateria também afetou nossa classificação geral.
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
- 02/19/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
