Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang GK7CP0S): Um bom pacote
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 960 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB
, NVMe, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
peso
2.52 kg, Suprimento de energia: 682 g
Preço
1857 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.2 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.4 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 286.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 318 cd/m²
Contraste: 1383:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 LG LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV AU Optronics AUO B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH LG Philips LP173WFG-SPD2 (LGD05E0), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US AU Optronics AUO479D (B173HAN04.7), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | 0% | -36% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.6 | 62.9 -3% | 64.8 0% | 41.12 -36% | 61.1 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.6 | 87.2 -9% | 96 0% | 61.1 -36% | 89.4 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 63.8 -3% | 65.8 0% | 42.49 -35% | 62.5 -5% |
| Response Times | 27% | 4% | -89% | 40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 6.8 ? 56% | 14.8 ? 5% | 26 ? -67% | 6.8 ? 56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.6 ? | 12 ? -3% | 11.2 ? 3% | 24.4 ? -110% | 8.8 ? 24% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -17% | 1% | -42% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 318 | 312.3 -2% | 282 -11% | 259.1 -19% | 300.4 -6% |
| Brightness | 286 | 297 4% | 261 -9% | 261 -9% | 289 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 87 1% | 93 8% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.21 9% | 0.27 -17% | 0.25 -9% | 0.32 -39% |
| Contrast | 1383 | 1487 8% | 1044 -25% | 1036 -25% | 939 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.89 | 3.6 7% | 3.18 18% | 4.23 -9% | 2.32 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.56 | 6.74 36% | 8.39 21% | 23.39 -121% | 3.81 64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.03 | 3.95 -283% | 0.95 8% | 3.9 -279% | 2.95 -186% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 3.1 42% | 4.1 23% | 1.3 75% | 1.5 72% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.26 97% | 2.55 86% | 2.076 106% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7462 87% | 7002 93% | 7260 90% | 6542 99% | 6764 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 56.6 -6% | 61 2% | 39 -35% | 57.4 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 86.6 -10% | 96 0% | 61 -36% | 89 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-9% | 2% /
1% | -56% /
-46% | 9% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø991 (962.32-1086.1)
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1096 (1054.52-1187.97)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1205 (1166.45-1263.34)
MSI GL75 9SEK-056US Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1175 (1102.32-1284.15)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -5% | -35% | -1% | 10% | |
| Write 4K | 103.2 | 129.3 25% | 102.7 0% | 149.1 44% | 124.1 20% |
| Read 4K | 42.11 | 54.4 29% | 29.12 -31% | 48.58 15% | 44.75 6% |
| Write Seq | 1087 | 978 -10% | 362.2 -67% | 1292 19% | |
| Read Seq | 974 | 1447 49% | 1010 4% | 1272 31% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 404.7 | 476.8 18% | 298.1 -26% | 462 14% | 514 27% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 469.8 | 338.1 -28% | 349.6 -26% | 606 29% | 596 27% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3279 | 982 -70% | 788 -76% | 1454 -56% | 1892 -42% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3513 | 1622 -54% | 1490 -58% | 1724 -51% | 3209 -9% |
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3513 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3279 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
469.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
404.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
974 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1087 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
42.11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
103.2 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16713 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33879 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13789 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5725 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø56.8 (52-62)
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
The Witcher 3 | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | GRID 2019 | Ghost Recon Breakpoint | FIFA 20 | Borderlands 3 | Control | Rage 2 | Apex Legends
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Average of class Gaming (67.4 - 179.7, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11) | |
| Average of class Gaming (83.5 - 187, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Overboost) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107 | 56.9 | ||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 116 | 114 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 124 | 69.9 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 82 | 59 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 60.8 | 35.7 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 79.9 | 77.8 | ||
| Control (2019) | 54.3 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 64.4 | 49.4 | ||
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 184 | 181 | ||
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 74 | 54 | ||
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 94.6 | 62.2 | ||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 93.9 | 81.5 | ||
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 87.8 | 78.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 33 / 35 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 47 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -3% | 0% | 4% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 28.2 9% | 30 3% | 28.1 9% | 28.2 9% | 24 ? 23% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29.5 5% | 33 -6% | 30.9 -0% | 28.2 9% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 30.3 8% | 34 -3% | 30.9 6% | 28.2 15% | 27.2 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 31.9 9% | 35 -0% | 31 11% | 28.2 19% | 30.2 ? 14% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 50.4 -17% | 48 -12% | 39 9% | 43 -0% | 42.5 ? 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 50.1 -11% | 46 -2% | 53.5 -19% | 48.4 -8% | |
| Load Maximum * | 47 | 50.1 -7% | 49 -4% | 53.5 -14% | 53.4 -14% | 53.4 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -10% | -5% | -26% | 0% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 47.2 2% | 43 10% | 49.4 -3% | 40.6 15% | 46.1 ? 4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 51 6% | 46 15% | 50.6 6% | 45.4 16% | 49.2 ? 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 30.2 -16% | 31 -19% | 39 -50% | 30 -15% | 31.2 ? -20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 35.4 -31% | 34 -26% | 42 -56% | 31 -15% | 32.2 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.8 / 1.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11 / 14 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
100 / 174 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -36% | -25% | 0% | -29% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11 | 16.2 -47% | 20 -82% | 10.7 3% | 16 -45% | 13.5 ? -23% |
| Idle Average * | 14 | 24.8 -77% | 21 -50% | 15.2 -9% | 21.7 -55% | 18.9 ? -35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 28.6 -43% | 26 -30% | 17.8 11% | 26.1 -31% | 26.7 ? -34% |
| Load Average * | 100 | 127.6 -28% | 97 3% | 88.2 12% | 105.6 -6% | 106.6 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 151 | 147.1 3% | 139 8% | 147.8 2% | 161.8 -7% | |
| Load Maximum * | 174 | 212.7 -22% | 168 3% | 206.5 -19% | 225.3 -29% | 249 ? -43% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46 Wh | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 76 Wh | MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | 4% | 4% | -3% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 400 | 414 4% | 474 19% | 565 ? 41% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 280 | 270 -4% | 256 -9% | 254 -9% | 272 -3% | 376 ? 34% |
| Load | 58 | 67 16% | 60 3% | 85.3 ? 47% | ||
| H.264 | 260 | 408 ? |
Pro
+ Carcaça rígida e de alta qualidade
+ Configurações individuais
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Bom painel de 144-Hz
Contra
- A bateria poderia ser melhor
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Qualidade média do som
Com a escassa qualidade de som e a falta da porta Thunderbolt 3, o XMS Neo 17 da Schenker Technologies não apresenta nenhum problema real.
O seu Tongfang Barebone GK7CP0S oferece uma carcaça impressionantemente rígida e de alta qualidade, além de uma tela de 144 Hz responsiva e de alto contraste. Outros destaques incluem o teclado mecânico com luz de fundo RGB.
O fabricante também fez um bom trabalho em termos de desempenho. Dependendo do modo (conforme escolhido no Centro de Controle), o dispositivo de 17 polegadas pode se concentrar no desempenho ou no ruído moderado do sistema. A configuração que testamos com um Core i7-8750H, um GeForce GTX 2060 e 16 GB de RAM pode lidar com quase qualquer aplicativo com facilidade.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
