Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-8750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q) Tongfang GK5CQ7Z
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 268 cd/m²
Contraste: 1117:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.57
ΔE Greyscale 5.36 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE07AF), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.3 1% | 63.5 0% | 65.3 3% | 64.2 1% | 66.2 4% | 66.7 5% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.3 | 94.1 2% | 93.1 1% | 94.9 3% | 92.6 0% | 92.1 0% | 91.2 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65 | 65.3 0% | 64.5 -1% | 66.3 2% | 65.7 1% | 67.2 3% | 66.7 3% |
Response Times | -39% | -61% | -54% | -2% | -64% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.8 ? | 16 ? -82% | 16.4 ? -86% | 16.8 ? -91% | 8 ? 9% | 17.6 ? -100% | 7.4 ? 16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 9.6 ? 4% | 13.6 ? -36% | 11.6 ? -16% | 11.2 ? -12% | 12.8 ? -28% | 10 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | ||||||
Screen | 14% | 16% | 7% | 0% | 15% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 268 | 325 21% | 250 -7% | 314.7 17% | 304 13% | 254 -5% | 294 10% |
Brightness | 270 | 303 12% | 235 -13% | 312 16% | 299 11% | 262 -3% | 275 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 85 1% | 90 7% | 89 6% | 89 6% | 84 0% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.33 -38% | 0.29 -21% | 0.38 -58% | 0.27 -13% | 0.22 8% | 0.24 -0% |
Contrast | 1117 | 985 -12% | 862 -23% | 828 -26% | 1126 1% | 1155 3% | 1225 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 2.69 40% | 1.46 68% | 2.56 43% | 4.66 -3% | 2.37 47% | 2.57 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.58 | 4.91 49% | 2.47 74% | 4.89 49% | 9.65 -1% | 4.71 51% | 4.88 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.57 | 1.27 19% | 1.71 -9% | 1.72 -10% | 1.84 -17% | 2.14 -36% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.36 | 2.34 56% | 1.27 76% | 3.4 37% | 5.53 -3% | 1.58 71% | 2.41 55% |
Gamma | 2.51 88% | 2.38 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.5 88% | 2.48 89% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 7826 83% | 6872 95% | 6749 96% | 6435 101% | 8028 81% | 6785 96% | 6370 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60.7 3% | 60 2% | 60 2% | 59 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 94 2% | 93 1% | 94.6 3% | 93 1% | 92 0% | 91 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
5% | -15% /
2% | -15% /
-1% | -0% /
0% | -16% /
3% | 7% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Lüfter-Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Lüfter-Turbo) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=181, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Edge 44) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 6802 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4582 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5288 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5679 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5651 pontos | |
Ajuda |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 9% | 4% | 25% | 4% | -11% | 8% | |
Write 4K | 92.5 | 97.1 5% | 93.9 2% | 93.6 1% | 95.3 3% | 98.2 6% | 100.5 9% |
Read 4K | 40.45 | 53.7 33% | 40.56 0% | 38.82 -4% | 40.13 -1% | 39.43 -3% | 48.64 20% |
Write Seq | 1197 | 1526 27% | 1468 23% | 2455 105% | 1883 57% | 1386 16% | 1456 22% |
Read Seq | 1018 | 2020 98% | 1540 51% | 2107 107% | 1322 30% | 1100 8% | 1278 26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 288.6 | 285.6 -1% | 293.5 2% | 298.7 3% | 309.9 7% | 270.3 -6% | 298.1 3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 332 | 321.8 -3% | 346 4% | 338.7 2% | 353.7 7% | 340.3 3% | 348.7 5% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3317 | 1533 -54% | 1941 -41% | 2902 -13% | 1919 -42% | 1454 -56% | 2742 -17% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3515 | 2351 -33% | 3266 -7% | 3536 1% | 2466 -30% | 1681 -52% | 3389 -4% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35375 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17617 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 110428 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35086 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15180 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6338 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Lüfter-Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Lüfter-Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing (Lüfter-Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 299.4 | 248.7 | 248 | 148.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 269.2 | 200.6 | 121.7 | 63.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 97.2 | 84.6 | 72.7 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 143.7 | 143 | 115.9 | 115.8 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 108 | 92 | 88 | 79 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 123.2 | 77.2 | 57.3 | 46.6 |
Anthem (2019) | 100.8 | 87.8 | 77.9 | 73.6 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 221.2 | 150.8 | 126.7 | 72.3 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 146 | 107 | 88 | 70 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30 / 32 / 35 dB |
Carga |
| 47 / 55 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 14% | 6% | 8% | -3% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 28.8 4% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 29 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 32 -7% | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% | 29 3% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 34 -6% | 28.8 10% | 32 -0% | 31 3% | 34 -6% | 35 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 36 -3% | 29.4 16% | 34 3% | 34 3% | 40 -14% | 40 -14% |
Load Average * | 47 | 42 11% | 35.7 24% | 44 6% | 43 9% | 47 -0% | 50 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 44 17% | 42.5 20% | 46 13% | 42 21% | 51 4% | 53 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 48 13% | 45 18% | 47 15% | 44 20% | 53 4% | 58 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 68 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | 18% | 4% | 16% | 6% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 58 | 56 3% | 49 16% | 49 16% | 49 16% | 54 7% | 56 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 68 | 66 3% | 49 28% | 58 15% | 63 7% | 60 12% | 68 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 27 10% | 25.4 15% | 33 -10% | 24 20% | 30 -0% | 28 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 27 13% | 27.2 12% | 33 -6% | 25 19% | 30 3% | 29 6% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 1 Watt |
Ocioso | 13 / 16 / 21 Watt |
Carga |
84 / 183 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | 5% | -21% | 11% | -26% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 16 -23% | 10.4 20% | 16 -23% | 7 46% | 17 -31% | 10 23% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 18 -13% | 14.6 9% | 22 -38% | 11 31% | 20 -25% | 13 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 21 | 23 -10% | 16.3 22% | 32 -52% | 20 5% | 29 -38% | 18 14% |
Load Average * | 84 | 88 -5% | 88.5 -5% | 89 -6% | 98 -17% | 112 -33% | 95 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 135 | 120 11% | 155.4 -15% | 147 -9% | 132 2% | 152 -13% | 114 16% |
Load Maximum * | 183 | 167 9% | 182.4 -0% | 173 5% | 182 1% | 211 -15% | 179 2% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 62.3 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 43% | 29% | -23% | 13% | -50% | 0% | |
Reader / Idle | 412 | 549 33% | 682 66% | 335 -19% | 507 23% | 213 -48% | 400 -3% |
H.264 | 292 | 364 25% | 356 22% | 288 -1% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 304 | 382 26% | 387 27% | 190 -37% | 362 19% | 157 -48% | 262 -14% |
Load | 93 | 174 87% | 88 -5% | 81 -13% | 81 -13% | 42 -55% | 111 19% |
Pro
Contra
O Schenker XMG Neo 15 continua sendo um portátil para jogos de 15,6 polegadas relativamente compacto e, portanto, é um concorrente direto do Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 e o Razer Blade 15. Ele preenche todos os requisitos para um portátil para jogos. Todos os jogos atuais podem ser apreciados fluentemente em sua tela FHD mate com detalhes altos ou até máximos.
O XMG Neo 15 da Schenker é um portátil para jogos fino, bem feito. No entanto, ele não consegue acompanhar seus concorrentes diretos, o Aero 15-X9 e o Blade 15.
Ele também possui um teclado mecânico com luz de fundo RGB, bem como um painel IPS de 144 Hz com amplos ângulos de visão, tempos de resposta curtos, uma alta taxa de contraste e uma precisão de cores decente. Dito isso, o brilho da tela deve ser maior, especialmente considerando o preço do Neo.
O sistema funcionou muito fluente e rapidamente graças ao seu incrivelmente rápido SSD NVMe. O SSD pode ser trocado, se necessário. Um slot M.2-2280 secundário está disponível, no entanto, o slot de HD de 2,5 polegadas está ausente devido à maior bateria interna. Em troca, a duração da bateria é ligeiramente maior do que antes. A duração da bateria foi boa para um portátil de jogos.
No entanto, existem algumas falhas que vale a pena mencionar. Por exemplo, suas temperaturas muito altas e o ruído sob uso intenso. Dito isto, seus concorrentes não são necessariamente muito melhores nesses aspectos. O desempenho do Wi-Fi foi abaixo do ideal, e o portátil não tinha recursos de conectividade modernos, como o Thunderbolt 3.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
-
04/09/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck