Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, Full HD)

15-inch display in a 14-inch chassis.

A Schenker Technologies expande seu portfólio com um interessante portátil de jogos. O XMG Neo 15 não apenas conta com um teclado mecânico, mas também possui marcos finos. Será um concorrente sério para o Gigabyte Aero 15X, o MSI GS65 e o Razer Blade 15?
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z) (XMG Neo 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 398.11, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, all slots in use, up to 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB, 1024 GB 
, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5"
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x Headphones, 1x Microphone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 359 x 243
Bateria
46.7 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Sound Blaster Cinema 5), Teclado: mechanical, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 180-Watt power adapter, cleaning cloth, USB drive with software, key chain, 2.5" bracket, sticker, recovery DVD, Control Center, Killer Performance Suite, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.96 kg, Suprimento de energia: 620 g
Preço
2133 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
384 mm 262 mm 17.8 mm 2.5 kg380 mm 255 mm 19 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.3 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s +664%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s +564%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +284%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s +656%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s +550%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +275%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
677 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
665 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
643 MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
593 MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 MBit/s -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
299
cd/m²		299
cd/m²		300
cd/m²
310
cd/m²		325
cd/m²		305
cd/m²
293
cd/m²		300
cd/m²		292
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 325 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 302.6 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 325 cd/m²
Contraste: 985:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 2018
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
1%
-1%
0%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
64.3
63.4
-1%
66.2
3%
63.6
-1%
64.3
0%
63.4
-1%
sRGB Coverage
94.1
93.3
-1%
92.1
-2%
93.8
0%
93.7
0%
87.7
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.3
64.5
-1%
67.2
3%
64.9
-1%
65.5
0%
Response Times
-6%
-22%
-11%
-17%
-141%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
5%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-10%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
-5%
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
-8%
30.8 ?(13.6, 17.2)
-93%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-17%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-33%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-17%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-25%
27.6 ?(16, 11.6)
-188%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-5%
1%
16%
-6%
-18%
Brightness middle
325
309
-5%
254
-22%
313
-4%
290
-11%
286.7
-12%
Brightness
303
291
-4%
262
-14%
300
-1%
281
-7%
281
-7%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
78
-13%
82
-9%
92
2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.31
6%
0.22
33%
0.33
-0%
0.3
9%
0.39
-18%
Contrast
985
997
1%
1155
17%
948
-4%
967
-2%
735
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.69
2.96
-10%
2.37
12%
1.29
52%
2.85
-6%
4.17
-55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.91
5.14
-5%
4.71
4%
2.04
58%
6.27
-28%
7.22
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.27
1.41
-11%
1.84
-45%
1.39
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.34
2.88
-23%
1.58
32%
0.69
71%
2.4
-3%
2.5
-7%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.33 94%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.34 94%
2.274 97%
CCT
6872 95%
6725 97%
6785 96%
6550 99%
6718 97%
6885 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
57
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
93
-1%
92
-2%
94
0%
94
0%
87
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
-7% / -2%
1% / 9%
-8% / -6%
-54% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
Software
Latency
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points +61%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points +196%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1174 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1154 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points -2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1103 Points -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
983 Points -15%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +70%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points +2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points -1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +189%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.89 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points -3%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.51 Points -18%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.89 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1154 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points +50%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5213 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5191 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points -2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5092 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5046 Points -3%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +14%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4658 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
4585 Points
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
4510 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points -2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4119 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +8%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5687 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5669 Points
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5637 Points -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points -1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5111 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4585 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5669 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5191 pontos
Ajuda
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Razer Blade 15 2018
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
0%
-5%
-14%
-8%
-40%
Read Seq Q32T1
3389
3549
5%
2466
-27%
2627
-22%
3280
-3%
1498
-56%
Write Seq Q32T1
2742
2498
-9%
1919
-30%
1375
-50%
1527
-44%
471.5
-83%
Read 4K Q32T1
348.7
376.8
8%
353.7
1%
332.8
-5%
342.5
-2%
342.2
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
298.1
295.4
-1%
309.9
4%
268.6
-10%
296.2
-1%
264.8
-11%
Read Seq
1278
1200
-6%
1322
3%
1404
10%
1371
7%
707
-45%
Write Seq
1456
1466
1%
1883
29%
1335
-8%
1483
2%
469.5
-68%
Read 4K
48.64
43.49
-11%
40.13
-17%
37.65
-23%
39.23
-19%
32.8
-33%
Write 4K
100.5
113.5
13%
95.3
-5%
94.4
-6%
94.2
-6%
75.6
-25%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3389 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2742 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 298.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1278 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1456 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.5 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +172%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15748 Points +36%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points +31%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points +28%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14146 Points +22%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11733 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11558 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +205%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19969 Points +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points +33%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points +30%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
17680 Points +23%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14975 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14367 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
13509 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32771 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10263 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +232%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
53.5 fps +39%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.7 fps +37%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.4 fps +36%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
50.2 fps +30%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
49.8 fps +29%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
39 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
38.6 fps
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 71.7 38.6
Fortnite (2018) 110 84.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 42
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 57.1 43
Far Cry 5 (2018) 68 64
The Crew 2 (2018) 60 59.9

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 35 / 40 dB
Carga
50 / 58 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
3%
11%
5%
8%
7%
16%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29
-0%
28.6
1%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
31
-7%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
31.4
-8%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
35
37
-6%
31
11%
31
11%
30
14%
31.4
10%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Maximum *
40
43
-8%
34
15%
35
12%
38
5%
34.2
14%
30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
50
45
10%
43
14%
49
2%
46
8%
42.8
14%
42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years)
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
46
13%
42
21%
51
4%
49
8%
50.9
4%
Load Maximum *
58
46
21%
44
24%
54
7%
46
21%
50.9
12%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 54 °C56 °C47 °C 
 40 °C47 °C39 °C 
 39 °C41 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 44.2 °C
64 °C65 °C51 °C
68 °C66 °C43 °C
32 °C38 °C27 °C
Máximo: 68 °C
Médio: 50.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 68 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-8%
12%
3%
-6%
8%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
56
57
-2%
49
12%
53
5%
56
-0%
43
23%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years)
17%
Maximum Bottom *
68
65
4%
63
7%
65
4%
59
13%
46.6
31%
49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years)
28%
Idle Upper Side *
28
33
-18%
24
14%
26
7%
33
-18%
29.2
-4%
31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Bottom *
29
33
-14%
25
14%
30
-3%
34
-17%
34
-17%
32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.941.1253435.93129.228.24029.235.45026.328.26324.929.88025.828.210025.829.61252426.81602227.12002235.125020.85031519.559.140018.462.350017.962.163017.868.980017.376.610001771.8125016.868.2160017.167.220001766.725001762.9315017.169.6400017.466.4500017.267630017.268.9800017.265.61000017.264.11250017.259.41600017.759.6SPL29.580.9N1.349.2median 17.3median 64.1Delta0.99.143.349.239.641.246.232.134.245.427.334.226.730.824.433.628.536.924.829.124.22725.431.327.136.120.641.519.95018.95617.762.819.564.919.567.317.666.517.463.916.867.817.264.117.662.217.262.417.360.417.160.21761.21758.71760.516.854.730.375.81.435median 17.6median 60.41.910.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 95 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-17%
2%
-20%
-19%
-19%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
10
14
-40%
7
30%
14
-40%
14
-40%
12.35
-24%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Average *
13
17
-31%
11
15%
18
-38%
17
-31%
19.98
-54%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
18
22
-22%
20
-11%
22
-22%
21
-17%
25.44
-41%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years)
-48%
Load Average *
95
102
-7%
98
-3%
91
4%
95
-0%
94.28
1%
106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years)
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
114
130
-14%
132
-16%
142
-25%
141
-24%
132.9
-17%
Load Maximum *
179
157
12%
182
-2%
173
3%
179
-0%
140.63
21%
249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 40min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 51min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 55 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh		Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-20%
16%
76%
-1%
-33%
26%
Reader / Idle
400
301
-25%
507
27%
762
91%
382
-4%
271
-32%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)
41%
H.264
288
356
24%
504
75%
324
13%
409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)
42%
WiFi v1.3
262
220
-16%
362
38%
513
96%
322
23%
240
-8%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)
44%
Load
111
89
-20%
81
-27%
156
41%
72
-35%
45
-59%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years)
-23%

Pro

+ mechanical keyboard with RGB illumination
+ light, slim, and sturdy chassis
+ good Turbo utilization of the CPU
+ slim bezels
+ individual configurations
+ optional 144 Hz panel
+ optional NVMe-SSD

Contra

- high temperature & noise development
- no Thunderbolt 3, no USB 3.1 Gen2
- sound could be better
- slow card reader
- small battery
In review: XMG Neo 15. Test model courtesy of Schenker Technologies.
In review: XMG Neo 15. Test model courtesy of Schenker Technologies.

O XMG Neo 15 pode competir no topo do mercado altamente competitivo de portáteis de jogos finos, mas não consegue vencer os atuais líderes Gigabyte Aero 15X (88%) e Razer Blade 15 (87%). 

A impressão geral está mais no nível com o MSI GS65 (86%) ou Asus ROG GU501GM (85%), respectivamente.

Os aspectos positivos incluem o chassi de metal muito compacto e surpreendentemente resistente, que - exceto pelo Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen.2 - oferece muitas portas, bem como um teclado mecânico (com iluminação RGB). O último é um argumento de compra real e eleva o Neo 15 acima da concorrência.

Também gostamos da tela: A combinação da tecnologia IPS, 144 Hz e design de marcos finos é quase tudo que você espera de um portátil caro em 2018.

Há também algumas desvantagens, como a qualidade do alto-falante e as emissões (temperatura, ruído). O Neo 15 não apenas esquenta bastante sob uso intenso, mas também é muito barulhento. O fabricante do Barebone, Tongfang, também deve trabalhar no controle do ventilador enquanto estiver no modo inativo e na capacidade da bateria, que deveria estar pelo menos em 70 Wh para uma melhor mobilidade.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 - 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 75%
Peso
64 / 10-66 → 96%
Bateria
59 / 95 → 63%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
88%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
74 / 95 → 78%
Ruído
57 / 90 → 64%
Audio
60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
72%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, Full HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-08- 1)