Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 269 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 3840x2160 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62 | 91.3 47% | 66.1 7% | 64.3 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.7 | 100 21% | 91.8 11% | 83 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.4 | 86.7 44% | 66.9 11% | 60.6 0% |
| Response Times | 60% | 17% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.4 ? | 9.6 ? 77% | 37.6 ? 11% | 40.8 ? 4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 7.2 ? 77% | 24.8 ? 22% | 30.4 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency | 20490 ? | 26000 ? 27% | 20490 ? 0% | |
| Screen | 12% | -5% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 269 | 285 6% | 358.5 33% | 297 10% |
| Brightness | 274 | 273 0% | 350 28% | 276 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 95 4% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.23 -0% | 0.39 -70% | 0.3 -30% |
| Contrast | 1170 | 1239 6% | 919 -21% | 990 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.25 | 3.52 17% | 4.6 -8% | 5.25 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.39 | 5.18 50% | 8.5 18% | 10.3 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.51 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.11 | 3.41 -10% | 5.2 -67% | 4.64 -49% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.05 107% | 2.28 96% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6851 95% | 7077 92% | 6410 101% | 6600 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 77 43% | 66.9 24% | 54 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 100 20% | 91.8 11% | 83 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
26% | 7% /
1% | -2% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20490 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4697 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5653 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5732 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -59% | -40% | -12% | -4% | |
| Read Seq | 1751 | 507 -71% | 1411 -19% | 1338 -24% | 1642 ? -6% |
| Write Seq | 1375 | 441.4 -68% | 749 -46% | 1188 -14% | 1408 ? 2% |
| Read 512 | 792 | 411.9 -48% | 503 -36% | 780 -2% | 880 ? 11% |
| Write 512 | 1007 | 409.9 -59% | 174 -83% | 1006 0% | 1065 ? 6% |
| Read 4k | 60 | 21.77 -64% | 46.09 -23% | 58.3 -3% | 54.2 ? -10% |
| Write 4k | 164.1 | 88.9 -46% | 130.7 -20% | 134 -18% | 141.9 ? -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 676 | 368.8 -45% | 518 -23% | 577 -15% | 617 ? -9% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 571 | 190.3 -67% | 173.9 -70% | 481.9 -16% | 511 ? -11% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14618 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36010 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10794 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (52.6 - 80.6, n=49) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (51 - 68.8, n=37) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (65.3 - 82, n=24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
| The Division | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (37.8 - 57.4, n=7) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (46.9 - 73.3, n=6) | |
| For Honor | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (42.4 - 78.9, n=8) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (56.3 - 103.2, n=7) | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (34.5 - 38.7, n=6) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (60.1 - 67.8, n=6) | |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (42 - 56, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (49 - 66, n=5) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (37.2 - 47.3, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.5 - 230, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (58.6 - 62.4, n=2) | |
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (59 - 65, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (62 - 69, n=5) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 77.6 | 41.9 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 118 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 76.1 | 67.9 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 72.8 | 56.7 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 108.3 | 103.2 | 78.9 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 67.8 | 38.7 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 74 | 66 | 56 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 62.4 | 47.3 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 75 | 69 | 64 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 38 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 47 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 10 / 14 Watt |
| Carga |
114 / 164 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -38% | -57% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 11 -57% | 15.4 -120% | 18 -157% | 13.6 ? -94% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 16 -60% | 22.4 -124% | 22 -120% | 18.9 ? -89% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14 | 21 -50% | 22.4 -60% | 26 -86% | 26.7 ? -91% |
| Load Average * | 114 | 92 19% | 78.1 31% | 93 18% | 106.9 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 131 | 185 -41% | 97.5 26% | 119 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 164 | 224 -37% | 133.52 19% | 175 -7% | 250 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh | HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -49% | -37% | -29% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 575 | 323 -44% | 298 -48% | 300 -48% | 565 ? -2% |
| H.264 | 304 | 234 -23% | 408 ? 34% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 334 | 201 -40% | 208 -38% | 282 -16% | 375 ? 12% |
| Load | 110 | 42 -62% | 83 -25% | 80 -27% | 85.3 ? -22% |
Pro
Contra
Concedido, o CPU Core i7-8700 da Schenker XMG Apex 15 é demais quando se olha exclusivamente para os requisitos de jogos. No entanto, isso não necessariamente tem que ser uma coisa ruim, dado que as desvantagens usuais, como maior consumo de energia e um ruído de sistema mais pronunciado, estavam suspeitosamente ausentes neste caso.
Tudo considerado o Apex 15 é um portátil divertido. Se não fosse pelo design da tampa ruim.
A um preço aproximado de 1.700 Euros, você obtém um sólido portátil para jogos sem extras, como G-Sync ou Thunderbolt 3. Se você não espera ir além da FHD em um futuro próximo, a GTX 1060 vai durar mais alguns anos, especialmente considerando que o Apex 15 apresenta uma das implementações mais rápidas da GTX 1060 disponíveis atualmente.
Sua conectividade diferencia o portátil de muitos de seus concorrentes e suas opções de manutenção são quase ideais. É verdade que a tela não possui recursos de jogos dedicados aos quais nos acostumamos. No entanto, faz um bom trabalho. A CPU rápida é acompanhada por um SSD muito rápido, e o baixo consumo de energia do portátil resulta em uma longa duração da bateria. A maioria das desvantagens circula ao redor da tela ou, mais especificamente, o design da tampa da tela. Enquanto nós simplesmente não podemos entender quais escolhas levaram a este projeto pobre, o dispositivo ainda merece nosso endosso total. Se você precisa de ainda mais potência 3D, vale a pena dar uma olhada no portátil MSI alimentado pela GTX 1070. No entanto, tome cuidado com o painel TN deste portátil.
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15
- 04/28/2018 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
