Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG A707 (Clevo N871EK1)

Um bom comprometimento. O Schenker XMG A707 é projetado para atrair os amantes de jogos e multimídia. Para este fim, o fabricante equipou a versão mais cara do portátil com um Core i7-8750H e uma GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Será que o portátil de 17 polegadas tem alguma chance em contra dos rivais estabelecidos da Acer, MSI, e Asus?
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 397.93, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, all slots occupied, max. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, Full HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, 250 GB 
, NVMe + Seagate BarraCuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inches
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x micropfone, Card Reader: 6-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 419 x 289
Bateria
62 Wh, 5300 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 332 g
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 150-watts, key ring, pano de limpeza, adesivo, DVD de recuperação, DVD de controladores, cartão de garantia, guia de início rápido, memória USB com software, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.886 kg, Suprimento de energia: 484 g
Preço
1449 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg419 mm 289 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg419 mm 289 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg415 mm 280 mm 23.9 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +26%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.1 MB/s +5%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +43%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.3 MB/s +4%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
670 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s -4%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
614 MBit/s -8%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s -42%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
693 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s 0%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
670 MBit/s -3%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s -36%
359
cd/m²		359
cd/m²		344
cd/m²
361
cd/m²		362
cd/m²		348
cd/m²
334
cd/m²		350
cd/m²		331
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 362 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 349.8 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1248:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.13
ΔE Greyscale 7.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080		Nexoc G739
CMN1738, IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus GL703GE-ES73
Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 1920x1080
Display
6%
2%
30%
Display P3 Coverage
66.1
66.7
1%
67.1
2%
90.1
36%
sRGB Coverage
84.4
91
8%
86.1
2%
99.8
18%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.7
66.4
8%
63
2%
83.1
35%
Response Times
-45%
5%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8)
45 ?(20, 25)
-15%
36 ?(18.8, 17.2)
8%
11.6 ?(6, 5.6)
70%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 ?(10.8, 12.4)
28 ?(7, 21)
-21%
22 ?(10.4, 11.6)
5%
8.8 ?(6, 2.8)
62%
PWM Frequency
119000 ?(90)
450 ?(90)
-100%
122000 ?(95)
3%
26040 ?(25)
-78%
Screen
12%
-3%
15%
Brightness middle
362
312
-14%
365
1%
331.1
-9%
Brightness
350
304
-13%
341
-3%
312
-11%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
89
-2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.29
0.23
21%
0.32
-10%
0.31
-7%
Contrast
1248
1357
9%
1141
-9%
1068
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.06
4.19
31%
6.51
-7%
2.86
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.6
8.7
25%
12.32
-6%
6.35
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.13
2.9
7%
2.66
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.22
3.72
48%
7.65
-6%
4.3
40%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.29 96%
2.64 83%
2.268 97%
CCT
7659 85%
7104 91%
8066 81%
7034 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
59
7%
56
2%
75
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
91
8%
86
2%
100
19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -0%
1% / -1%
21% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
latencies
 
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +60%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points -1%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
163 Points -6%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3421 Points +208%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1112 Points
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
1020 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points -27%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points -2%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -4%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +205%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.2 Points
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.15 Points -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points -28%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points -33%
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.2 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1112 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)
7799 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
4734 Points
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4532 Points -4%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +24%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
4196 Points
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4148 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
5389 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points -1%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5288 Points -2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points -3%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4196 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5389 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4734 pontos
Ajuda
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB		Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND		Asus GL703GE-ES73
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
AS SSD
-3%
-70%
-71%
Seq Read
2589
2628
2%
513
-80%
993
-62%
Seq Write
1449
1164
-20%
128.2
-91%
212.8
-85%
4K Read
52.8
47.68
-10%
26.5
-50%
18.93
-64%
4K Write
112.3
148.5
32%
62.7
-44%
59.1
-47%
Score Read
1153
1619
40%
414
-64%
311
-73%
Score Write
1592
651
-59%
196
-88%
196
-88%
Score Total
3291
3031
-8%
811
-75%
634
-81%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3554 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1533 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 353.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1307 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1420 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.7 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +308%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8027 Points +4%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7953 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7695 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7610 Points -1%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +369%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10008 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9332 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9147 Points -2%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9128 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
9585 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27238 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6956 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +419%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
27.6 fps +12%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
26 fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
26 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
24.7 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)
242 fps +443%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.4 fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
46.7 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
44.6 fps
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 44.6 24.7
The Division (2016) 43.7 33.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 49.3 44.9
Dishonored 2 (2016) 47 41.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 40.1 27.9
FIFA 18 (2017) 205 194
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 54.4
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 56.1 51.2
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 50.3 40.8
The Crew 2 (2018) 46.7 42.2

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 44 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
44 / 46 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL703GE-ES73
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
2%
6%
11%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
29
-0%
28.2
3%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
28.2
9%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
31
3%
30
6%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
44
38
14%
33
25%
32
27%
30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years)
31%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
45
-2%
36
18%
42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
45
-7%
48.8
-16%
Load Maximum *
46
50
-9%
51
-11%
48.8
-6%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 46 °C48 °C55 °C 
 45 °C48 °C51 °C 
 38 °C39 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 44.7 °C
48 °C44 °C48 °C
49 °C45 °C40 °C
33 °C33 °C36 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL703GE-ES73
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
3%
-12%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
50.6
8%
50
9%
58.6
-7%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years)
16%
Maximum Bottom *
49
50.8
-4%
52
-6%
59.4
-21%
49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
32
28.7
10%
33
-3%
35
-9%
31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Bottom *
34
27.1
20%
30
12%
37
-9%
32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.544.32533.336.53129.428.84029.739.55026.229.96324.327.48026.529.810028.428.512524.823.316022.222.720022.625.625024.535.131519.844.940018.152.550017.954.163017.654.880017.559.8100018.267.1125017.867160016.969.7200017.265.5250017.363.9315017.367.8400017.168.3500017.162.9630017.358.6800017.356.41000017.251.21250017.156.1160001759.3SPL29.877.3N1.335.7median 17.5median 56.4Delta1.812.541.64337.239.72830.335.335.728.128.926.129.926.83525.547.422.346.822.143.922.353.322.164.119.768.71970.218.472.217.37717.878.11775.216.968.117.166.31763.71761.71755.917.257.81760.21757.417.156.917.159.116.966.816.860.229.581.91.348.5median 17.1median 61.716.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee LakeAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11 / 14 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 136 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Asus GL703GE-ES73
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
3%
19%
-14%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
6
45%
12.8
-16%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years)
-23%
Idle Average *
14
14
-0%
9
36%
18.1
-29%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
20
23
-15%
13
35%
24.7
-24%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Average *
96
82
15%
95
1%
98.4
-3%
106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years)
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
97
102
-5%
122.5
-26%
Load Maximum *
136
163
-20%
134
1%
114.6
16%
249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years)
-83%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 44min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
0h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 21min
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		Nexoc G739
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Asus GL703GE-ES73
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
-11%
-47%
-20%
Reader / Idle
704
613
-13%
710
1%
347
-51%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)
-20%
WiFi v1.3
378
288
-24%
354
-6%
286
-24%
375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years)
-1%
Load
141
128
-9%
100
-29%
47
-67%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years)
-39%
H.264
322
409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Configurações individuais
+ Emissões moderadas
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Sem bloatware
+ Bom painel IPS
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Um pouco de afogamento da GPU quando o Control Center está ativo (bug de software)
- Controle medíocre da ventoinha
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Som insatisfatório

SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake - 07/07/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 81%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
90%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
45%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Schenker XMG A707
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG A707 (Clevo N871EK1)
Florian Glaser, 2018-07- 3 (Update: 2018-07-10)