Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker Technologies XMG P407 (Clevo P641HK1)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 1104:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.11 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| SCHENKER XMG P407 LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade (2016) FHD LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080, 14" | Gigabyte P34W v5 2560x1440, 14" | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 2% | -13% | 31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 66.2 3% | 65.2 1% | 51.4 -20% | 85.4 32% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.1 | 82.8 1% | 83.4 2% | 76.6 -7% | 100 22% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60 | 60.5 1% | 60.9 2% | 52.8 -12% | 83.8 40% |
| Response Times | -15% | 2% | 9% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 56 ? -19% | 47 ? -0% | 41.2 ? 12% | 44 ? 6% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 30 ? -11% | 26 ? 4% | 25.4 ? 6% | 29 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | ||||
| Screen | -1% | -1% | 3% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 298 | 282 -5% | 272 -9% | 277.8 -7% | 258 -13% |
| Brightness | 282 | 266 -6% | 277 -2% | 270 -4% | 234 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 81 1% | 84 5% | 83 4% | 79 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.22 19% | 0.26 4% | 0.38 -41% | 0.54 -100% |
| Contrast | 1104 | 1282 16% | 1046 -5% | 731 -34% | 478 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.42 | 4.98 -13% | 4.59 -4% | 2.71 39% | 9.74 -120% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.57 | 10.2 -19% | 8.49 1% | 5.47 36% | 14.6 -70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.11 | 4.08 1% | 4.28 -4% | 2.11 49% | 11.59 -182% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.51 88% | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6329 103% | 5877 111% | 6848 95% | 6314 103% | 11851 55% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 54 0% | 55 2% | 48.5 -10% | 76 41% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 83 1% | 83 1% | 76.9 -6% | 100 22% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-2% | 1% /
-0% | -0% /
0% | -7% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6266 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4069 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5146 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5234 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Razer Blade (2016) FHD | Gigabyte P34W v5 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 14% | 20% | 31% | -96% | |
| Read Seq | 1345 | 1634 21% | 1977 47% | 2269 69% | 112.4 -92% |
| Write Seq | 1502 | 1290 -14% | 1668 11% | 1524 1% | 107.3 -93% |
| Read 512 | 320.3 | 1149 259% | 800 150% | 937 193% | 43.19 -87% |
| Write 512 | 1276 | 1285 1% | 1030 -19% | 1483 16% | 57 -96% |
| Read 4k | 58.9 | 43.82 -26% | 58.1 -1% | 53.8 -9% | 0.494 -99% |
| Write 4k | 171 | 110.3 -35% | 145.6 -15% | 167.3 -2% | 1.122 -99% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 625 | 320.5 -49% | 592 -5% | 622 0% | 1.088 -100% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 539 | 287.3 -47% | 508 -6% | 418.9 -22% | 1.234 -100% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26084 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9921 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 83626 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22393 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7194 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3766 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2659 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 360.1 | 258.1 | 199.2 | 98.9 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 168.9 | 159.2 | 152.2 | 76.4 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 178.6 | 174.9 | 145.7 | 71 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 63.2 | 45.6 | 40.4 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 99 | 74.7 | 39.8 | 20.3 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 142.1 | 122.1 | 62.4 | 56.3 |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 70.2 | 50.1 | 41.8 | 42.4 |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 143.7 | 136.5 | 68.5 | 58.6 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 36 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 48 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -9% | -2% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 31 -7% | 30.6 -6% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 30 3% | 35 -13% | 31.6 -2% | 32.5 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 32 -0% | 36 -13% | 31.6 1% | 32.5 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 40 -11% | 37 -3% | 32.5 10% | 32.5 10% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 47 -9% | 43 -0% | 46.5 -8% | 36.4 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 51 -6% | 57 -19% | 52.5 -9% | 52.4 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).
| SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -35% | -6% | -18% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 55 -12% | 54 -10% | 59.3 -21% | 44.9 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.8 | 58.7 -16% | 49.4 3% | 56.5 -11% | 38.2 25% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 36.9 -40% | 28 -6% | 27.8 -6% | 27.4 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.1 | 41.7 -73% | 26.8 -11% | 31.8 -32% | 29 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 15 / 24 Watt |
| Carga |
82 / 124 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -10% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 12 -20% | 14 -40% | 10.6 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 15 | 16 -7% | 18 -20% | 14.5 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 22 8% | 21 12% | 15 37% |
| Load Average * | 82 | 90 -10% | 70 15% | 90 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 124 | 170 -37% | 146 -18% | 135 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | 40% | -22% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 443 | 275 -38% | 760 72% | 392 -12% | 387 -13% |
| H.264 | 213 | 312 46% | 217 2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 197 -18% | 427 77% | 232 -4% | 225 -7% |
| Load | 92 | 72 -22% | 59 -36% | 47 -49% | 41 -55% |
Por fora, o XMG P407 não é diferente de seu predecessor. É por isso que devemos nos focar nos novos recursos, que estão principalmente no interior. O novo processador Kaby Lake fornece um leve aumento no desempenho. A nova CPU também tem um bom, porém modesto impacto na duração da bateria. A GeForce GTX 1050 Ti core integrada está na gama média alta da atual linha da Nvidia, mas oferece mais desempenho que muitos modelos topo de gama da geração anterior. Em outras palavras: O chip GeForce GTX 970M no XMG P406 perde nos benchmarks 3DMark , bem como nos jogos na vida real.
A produção de calor sob carga de trabalho pode ser descrito como moderado: A XMG P407 não esquenta tanto quanto seu predecessor. As diferenças entre o P406 e o P407, em termos de ruído de sistema são pequenas. No entanto, notamos um pouco de melhoria: A ventoinha da CPU no P406 gosta de aumentar sua velocidade de forma inesperada e ai se torna claramente perceptível. Este comportamento aparentemente não está presente no P407. As portas suportam futuras atualizações: Uma das quatro portas USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 abrem espaço para uma porta USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2. Além disso, uma das duas Mini DisplayPorts agora está equipado com o padrão 1.4 .
Com o XMG P407, a Schenker entrega um portátil de jogos de 14 polegadas bem equipado.
Um SSD incrivelmente veloz garante um sistema veloz. O espaço de armazenamento requerido é fornecido por um disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas. Ambas as unidades podem ser trocadas, dado que a placa inferior da unidade base pode ser removida facilmente. Um bom teclado também está no pacote. A tela IPS mate tem ângulos de visão amplos agradáveis e bom contraste. No entanto, a tela poderia oferecer mais, em termos de brilho. Os tempos de alternação da tela integrada são apenas um pouco melhores que os da XMG P406.
Pro
Contra
On the outside, the XMG P407 is not different from its predecessor. That is why we shall focus on the new features, which are found primarily on the inside. The new Kaby Lake processor provides a slight performance increase. The fresh CPU also has a good, though modest, impact on battery life. The built-in GeForce GTX 1050 Ti core is in the upper middle range of Nvidia's current line-up, but it offers more performance than many top-range models of the previous generation. In other words: The GeForce GTX 970M chip built into the XMG P406 loses in 3DMark benchmarks as well as in real-world gaming.
The heat development under load can be described as moderate: The XMG P407 does not become as warm as its predecessor. The differences between the P406 and the P407 in terms of system noise are small. However, we notice some improvement: The CPU fan in the P406 likes to speed up unexpectedly and is then clearly perceptible. This behavior is apparently not present in the P407. The ports bear further updates: One of the four USB 3.1 Type-A Gen-1 ports makes way for a USB 3.1 Type-C Gen-2 port. In addition, one of the two Mini DisplayPorts is now equipped with the 1.4 standard.
With the XMG P407, Schenker delivers a well-rounded 14-inch gaming notebook.
A lightning-quick NVMe SSD ensures a snappy system. The required storage space is provided by a 2.5-inch hard drive. Both drives can be exchanged, since the bottom plate of the base unit can be removed effortlessly. A good keyboard is also in the package. The matte IPS display has pleasantly wide viewing angles and good contrast. However, the display could offer more in terms of brightness. The switching times of the built-in display are only slightly better than those of the XMG P406.
SCHENKER XMG P407
- 03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
