Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 558.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1213:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | LG Gram 15Z975 ID: LGD052A, Name: LG Philips LP156WFA-SPC1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 15.4", 2880x1800 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, 15", 3240x2160 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | -18% | 0% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 89.7 38% | 54.9 -16% | 65.2 0% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 100 3% | 77.1 -21% | 97.7 0% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.8 | 100 50% | 56.3 -16% | 67.2 1% | ||
| Response Times | -41% | 19% | 7% | 226% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 57.2 ? -24% | 35.2 ? 23% | 42.4 ? 8% | 37.6 ? 18% | 40.8 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 39.2 ? -32% | 25.6 ? 14% | 28 ? 5% | 22.4 ? 24% | 32.4 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 2976 ? | 962 -68% | 21930 ? 637% | 208.3 ? -93% | ||
| Screen | -0% | -12% | 28% | 26% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 558.2 | 370.1 -34% | 273 -51% | 534 -4% | 446 -20% | 565.6 1% |
| Brightness | 528 | 356 -33% | 276 -48% | 502 -5% | 444 -16% | 524 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 89 -3% | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.37 20% | 0.22 52% | 0.31 33% | 0.25 46% | 0.49 -7% |
| Contrast | 1213 | 1000 -18% | 1241 2% | 1723 42% | 1784 47% | 1154 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.41 | 5.3 -20% | 4.77 -8% | 1.8 59% | 1.7 61% | 2 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.91 | 9.9 9% | 10.76 1% | 3.8 65% | 2.7 75% | 5 54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 4.6 30% | 8.6 -30% | 2.4 64% | 1.7 74% | 2.5 62% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% | 1.7 129% | 2.27 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7615 85% | 6284 103% | 6678 97% | 6563 99% | 6384 102% | 6896 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.3 | 88.3 44% | 50.2 -18% | 77.92 27% | 58.6 -4% | 61.2 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.2 | 100 3% | 76.9 -21% | 99.94 3% | 92.9 -4% | 97.5 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-2% | -4% /
-9% | 18% /
24% | 126% /
72% | -5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2976 Hz | ≤ 91 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2976 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 91 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2976 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3056 - 4106, n=19) | |
| LG Gram 15Z975 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4130 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5325 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5228 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4106 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | LG Gram 15Z975 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 4% | 20% | -103% | 40% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1058 | 540 -49% | 648 -39% | 179.8 -83% | 1134 7% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 479.5 | 411.5 -14% | 497.9 4% | 141.2 -71% | 534 11% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1751 | 1272 -27% | 1685 -4% | 197.5 -89% | 1936 11% |
| Score Total | 2646 | 2810 6% | 3906 48% | 1003 -62% | 3781 43% |
| Score Write | 628 | 1022 63% | 928 48% | 339 -46% | 1556 148% |
| Score Read | 1367 | 1206 -12% | 2011 47% | 442 -68% | 1493 9% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.034 -6% | 0.03 6% | 0.232 -625% | 0.026 19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.034 37% | 0.043 20% | 0.08 -48% | 0.04 26% |
| 4K-64 Write | 392.6 | 789 101% | 674 72% | 246.7 -37% | 1262 221% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1085 | 962 -11% | 1709 58% | 366.5 -66% | 1206 11% |
| 4K Write | 115 | 112.2 -2% | 124.1 8% | 67.6 -41% | 141.1 23% |
| 4K Read | 48.71 | 41.34 -15% | 48.71 0% | 26.24 -46% | 51.9 7% |
| Seq Write | 1206 | 1207 0% | 1299 8% | 248.5 -79% | 1530 27% |
| Seq Read | 2337 | 2026 -13% | 2533 8% | 488.1 -79% | 2342 0% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4642 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46087 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13207 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3104 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1595 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 132.2 | 60 | 59.7 | 30.9 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 53.4 | 41.6 | 36.3 | 17.2 |
| Thief (2014) | 58 | 32.5 | 31.1 | 18.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 46.8 | 33.7 | 20.5 | 11 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 41 | 36 | 20 | |
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 50.9 | 37.2 | 23.2 |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 55 | 34.5 | 18.6 | 17.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 60.9 | 35.4 | 19.2 | 16.4 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 25.2 | 16.2 | 14.1 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 60 | 60 | 46.1 | 27.5 |
| Prey (2017) | 50.6 | 19.2 | 14 | 10.5 |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 55 | 24 | 19 | 14 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 47 | 21 | 15 | 11 |
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 29.1 | 10.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 40 / 40 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | LG Gram 15Z975 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | 5% | 6% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 29.6 | 28.4 4% | 28.3 4% | 29.2 1% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 28.3 4% | 29.2 1% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 28.3 4% | 29.2 1% | 28.4 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 32.2 -6% | 28.3 7% | 29.2 4% | 28.4 6% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 47.1 -18% | 38.3 4% | 32.5 19% | 41.6 -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 52 -30% | 36.1 10% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 47.1 -18% | 38.3 4% | 37.2 7% | 41.6 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.32 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 11.3 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
53.3 / 56.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15" | LG Gram 15Z975 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx R5 2500U, Vega 8, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -103% | -4% | 19% | 3% | 32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 11.9 -240% | 5 -43% | 4.4 -26% | 5.9 -69% | 2.7 23% |
| Idle Average * | 11.3 | 17.1 -51% | 11.6 -3% | 9.1 19% | 8.7 23% | 7.6 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.2 | 17.3 -22% | 12.2 14% | 9.6 32% | 10.5 26% | 7.8 45% |
| Load Average * | 53.3 | 94.7 -78% | 47.8 10% | 34.8 35% | 45.7 14% | 37.5 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.6 | 104.8 -107% | 51.9 -3% | 45.8 9% | 31.7 37% | |
| Load Maximum * | 56.2 | 122 -117% | 55.7 1% | 36 36% | 49.4 12% | 41.6 26% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 75 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh | LG Gram 15Z975 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -8% | -23% | -20% | -47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1810 | 831 -54% | 1642 -9% | 1078 -40% | 934 -48% | 655 -64% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 635 | 434 -32% | 604 -5% | 435 -31% | 511 -20% | 398 -37% |
| Load | 127 | 103 -19% | 116 -9% | 131 3% | 136 7% | 77 -39% |
Pro
Contra
Mencionamos em nossa análise do NP900X5N que seria imprudente comprar a configuração, já que há rumores de que tanto o Kaby Lake-R quanto o Pascal parecem estar ficando obsoletos. Agora que ambos estão finalmente disponíveis, os usuários pacientes agora podem desfrutar de um aumento estimado de 60 por cento de CPU e 115 por cento de GPU sobre o i7-7500U e GeForce 940MX no modelo mais antigo. Isso se torna ainda mais impressionante ao considerar que o modelo mais recente não funciona de forma mais barulhenta, mais quente ou mais breve, por causa de seu melhor desempenho por Watt. A bateria de maior capacidade, em particular, é uma surpresa, já que as durações no modelo do ano passado já estavam acima da média.
A maior desvantagem é o forte afogamento da GPU durante os jogos. É estranho registrar resultados de benchmarks sintéticos normais apenas para descobrir o abominável desempenho dos jogos e taxas de fotogramas amplamente variáveis. Até que tenhamos notícias da Samsung sobre o problema ou uma atualização apropriada seja lançada, não podemos recomendar o SKU mais caro com o MX150.
Tudo o resto sobre o portátil permanece inalterado para melhor ou pior. O Notebook 9 ainda não é contestado para os usuários que desejam o Ultrabook mais leve e brilhante de 15 polegadas para uso leve em qualquer lugar. Do outro lado do espectro, a rigidez da carcaça marca um bom ponto e os usuários perderão as opções 2-em-1 e tela táctil que sistemas como a série Spectre pode oferecer. Estamos ansiosos para ver uma atualização completa da série Notebook 9, pois pensamos que a Samsung pode torná-la ainda melhor, deixando de lado a porta de carregamento de CA proprietária para o carregamento USB Type-C universal, combinando o leitor de digitais com o botão de energia e integrando o eSIM para reforçar a portabilidade do sistema.
Seja muito cauteloso se você comprar o MX150 SKU devido ao afogamento da GPU quando estiver jogando. O SKU mais acessível com apenas gráficos integrados ainda é uma excelente compra para usuários que desejam algo maior que o XPS 13, mas mais leve, brilhante e mais compacto que o XPS 15.
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
-
03/13/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
