Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Galaxy Book S: Bateria de longa duração e menos de 1 kg
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.2 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Book S SD 8cx, Adreno 680 | 951 g | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.6 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1064:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
| Samsung Galaxy Book S BOE, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 APPA042, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS BOE08BC, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.3 | 71.5 | 70.3 | 65.7 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 99.4 | 99.8 | 98.6 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.6 | 73.5 | 71.3 | 67.8 | |
| Response Times | 390% | -38% | -36% | 20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.8 ? | 38.4 ? 21% | 60 ? -23% | 50 ? -2% | 59.2 ? -21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.4 ? | 28.4 ? -0% | 33.2 ? -17% | 31 ? -9% | 41.6 ? -46% |
| PWM Frequency | 9524 ? | 119000 ? 1149% | 2500 ? -74% | 192 ? -98% | 21740 ? 128% |
| Screen | 34% | 13% | -5% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 383 | 416 9% | 619 62% | 456 19% | 403.4 5% |
| Brightness | 355 | 403 14% | 591 66% | 432 22% | 397 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 95 8% | 91 3% | 88 0% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.34 6% | 0.35 3% | 0.32 11% | 0.34 6% |
| Contrast | 1064 | 1224 15% | 1769 66% | 1425 34% | 1186 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 0.9 71% | 3 3% | 3.49 -13% | 0.94 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 1.4 74% | 8.2 -55% | 8.4 -58% | 2.92 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1 72% | 5.2 -44% | 5.53 -54% | 0.9 75% |
| Gamma | 2 110% | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.41 91% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6743 96% | 6629 98% | 6340 103% | 6675 97% | 6620 98% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1 | 0.72 | 0.99 | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.9 | 66.9 | 65 | 62.3 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.6 | 99.3 | 100 | 98.7 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 212% /
131% | -13% /
-1% | -21% /
-13% | 24% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 9524 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 9524 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 9524 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 4.4: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3DMark 11: 1280x720 Performance GPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
JetStream 1.1: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Octane V2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6750 - 7753, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Geekbench 4.4 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (30670 - 43897, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| 3DMark 11 / Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| JetStream 1.1 / Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (215 - 476, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 / Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35801 - 106359, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (110 - 674, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx () | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Book S 256 GB NVMe | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Average 256 GB NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 246% | 399% | 319% | 278% | 5% | |
| Write 4K | 30.59 | 34.57 13% | 121.9 298% | 120.6 294% | 112.3 267% | 35.8 ? 17% |
| Read 4K | 20.26 | 28.48 41% | 50 147% | 46.88 131% | 42.13 108% | 16.2 ? -20% |
| Write Seq | 421.4 | 1026 143% | 1497 255% | 1044 148% | 630 50% | 362 ? -14% |
| Read Seq | 1232 | 1109 -10% | 2111 71% | 1147 -7% | 1023 -17% | 726 ? -41% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 39.17 | 178.4 355% | 365.9 834% | 332.4 749% | 336.6 759% | 63.1 ? 61% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 41.14 | 557 1254% | 384.6 835% | 443.3 978% | 399.6 871% | 62.7 ? 52% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 420.9 | 970 130% | 2748 553% | 1052 150% | 821 95% | 455 ? 8% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1047 | 1513 45% | 3119 198% | 2171 107% | 2030 94% | 761 ? -27% |
| AS SSD | 25% | 205% | 137% | 66% | 1% | |
| Seq Read | 1069 | 1135 6% | 2328 118% | 1370 28% | 1387 30% | 984 ? -8% |
| Seq Write | 382 | 1090 185% | 1137 198% | 1019 167% | 504 32% | 393 ? 3% |
| 4K Read | 16.64 | 14.87 -11% | 48.07 189% | 50.8 205% | 42.35 155% | 15.6 ? -6% |
| 4K Write | 35.99 | 26.27 -27% | 120.6 235% | 111.2 209% | 120 233% | 38.5 ? 7% |
| 4K-64 Read | 415.1 | 585 41% | 899 117% | 770 85% | 497.4 20% | 376 ? -9% |
| 4K-64 Write | 229.5 | 154.6 -33% | 1220 432% | 713 211% | 354.9 55% | 256 ? 12% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.126 | 0.085 | 0.055 | 0.05767 ? | ||
| Access Time Write * | 0.093 | 0.058 38% | 0.033 65% | 0.034 63% | 0.093 -0% | 0.08467 ? 9% |
| Score Read | 539 | 713 32% | 1180 119% | 958 78% | 678 26% | 490 ? -9% |
| Score Write | 304 | 290 -5% | 1455 379% | 926 205% | 525 73% | 334 ? 10% |
| Score Total | 1086 | 1365 26% | 3189 194% | 2370 118% | 1520 40% | 1047 ? -4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 764 | 497 ? | ||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 256.1 | 307 ? | ||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 368.4 | 386 ? | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 136% /
124% | 302% /
291% | 228% /
218% | 172% /
161% | 3% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
Samsung Galaxy Book S audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.28 / 0.53 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.61 / 4.3 / 5 Watt |
| Carga |
13.2 / 18.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book S SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Average Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -54% | -120% | -68% | -154% | -8% | -172% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.61 | 2.1 -30% | 3.4 -111% | 3 -86% | 4.4 -173% | 1.955 ? -21% | 4.44 ? -176% |
| Idle Average * | 4.3 | 6.2 -44% | 6 -40% | 6.1 -42% | 7.5 -74% | 4 ? 7% | 7.55 ? -76% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5 | 7 -40% | 10.2 -104% | 8.4 -68% | 7.8 -56% | 5.3 ? -6% | 9.45 ? -89% |
| Load Average * | 13.2 | 24.7 -87% | 36.6 -177% | 25.7 -95% | 41.9 -217% | 13.1 ? 1% | 45.8 ? -247% |
| Load Maximum * | 18.3 | 30.6 -67% | 49.3 -169% | 27.6 -51% | 63.9 -249% | 21.7 ? -19% | 68.4 ? -274% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Book S SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 42 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3 i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 49.9 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 54.5 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -35% | -32% | -59% | -41% | |
| H.264 | 1312 | 666 -49% | 866 -34% | 911 ? -31% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 953 | 661 -31% | 703 -26% | 648 -32% | 495 -48% | 726 ? -24% |
| Load | 369 | 205 -44% | 112 -70% | 115.4 ? -69% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Companheiro móvel com seleção limitada de aplicativos
O Samsung Galaxy Book S deixou uma boa impressão geral durante nossa análise. Gostamos muito da combinação do chassi extremamente leve, longos tempos de duração da bateria e o modem LTE integrado, o que faz muito sentido se você viaja muito e precisa de um dispositivo para feiras comerciais, por exemplo. Se você usa principalmente aplicativos web e o Microsoft Office Suite, dificilmente notará as limitações do processador ARM. Recomendamos ainda verificar se existem versões compatíveis dos aplicativos que você planeja utilizar antes da compra.
A solução de resfriamento passivo e os excelentes alto-falantes são outros dois destaques. Os dispositivos de entrada são médios, mas a iluminação do teclado só é utilizável na escuridão total, porque é muito suave e se ativa após um pequeno atraso. Definitivamente, isso requer algum ajuste fino. A tela também não é ruim, mas a concorrência só usa painéis melhores e o próprio Galaxy Book S da Samsung com o processador Intel também é muito mais brilhante, de acordo com as especificações oficiais.
O Samsung Galaxy Book S é um excelente companheiro móvel com um chassi extremamente leve, LTE integrado e tempos de duração de bateria muito longos. Você deve considerar as limitações da seleção de aplicativos devido ao processador ARM antes da compra.
Já estamos ansiosos para ver como o Galaxy Book S com o processador híbrido Intel irá funcionar. Ele deve oferecer mais desempenho e compatibilidade, mas tem tempos de duração mais curtos em troca e também não possui um modem LTE.
Samsung Galaxy Book S
- 06/22/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
