Breve Análise do Portátil Sager NP5852 (Clevo N850HL, i7-7700HQ, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 303.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 691:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.19% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Sager NP5852 ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 66% | 0% | 60% | 56% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.19 | 38.97 2% | 65.7 72% | 38.3 0% | 64.9 70% | 63.3 66% |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.8 | 58.2 2% | 90.3 59% | 57.6 1% | 85.9 51% | 83.6 47% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.58 | 40.3 2% | 65.9 66% | 39.57 0% | 62.8 59% | 61.1 54% |
| Response Times | 0% | 1% | -16% | -8% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.6 ? | 32 ? -8% | 38.8 ? -31% | 41 ? -39% | 38 ? -28% | 38 ? -28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 25.6 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 3% | 26 ? 7% | 28 ? -0% | 29 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 20000 ? 0% | 25910 ? 30% | 21000 ? 5% | 21000 ? 5% | |
| Screen | 2% | 37% | 27% | 32% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 303.9 | 248.4 -18% | 335 10% | 235 -23% | 284 -7% | 276 -9% |
| Brightness | 286 | 241 -16% | 313 9% | 236 -17% | 276 -3% | 283 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 84 -5% | 83 -6% | 80 -9% | 82 -7% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.3 32% | 0.27 39% | 0.17 61% | 0.295 33% | 0.27 39% |
| Contrast | 691 | 828 20% | 1241 80% | 1382 100% | 963 39% | 1022 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 7.5 -3% | 4.7 36% | 4.69 36% | 4.07 44% | 3.92 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 27.3 | 25.2 8% | 8.1 70% | 7.9 71% | 10.52 61% | 9.13 67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 6.5 2% | 5.8 12% | 3.34 49% | 3.13 53% | 2.6 61% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.06 107% | 2.63 84% | 2.41 91% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 7652 85% | 7852 83% | 6518 100% | 6801 96% | 7082 92% | 6561 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.4 | 37 2% | 58.7 61% | 36 -1% | 56 54% | 54.5 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.5 | 57.9 2% | 90.1 59% | 57 1% | 86 52% | 83.7 48% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
2% | 35% /
36% | 4% /
16% | 28% /
30% | 27% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y920-17IKB | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3742 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4741 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5011 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3939 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Sager NP5852 Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B | Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -14% | 215% | -60% | 11% | -34% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 263.6 | 323.5 23% | 889 237% | 214.6 -19% | 410.4 56% | 168.2 -36% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 191.1 | 195.3 2% | 336.4 76% | 71.1 -63% | 266.9 40% | 123.4 -35% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 337.5 | 446.8 32% | 1678 397% | 296.7 -12% | 491.5 46% | 266.9 -21% |
| Score Total | 1027 | 752 -27% | 3731 263% | 1043 2% | 982 -4% | 977 -5% |
| Score Write | 335 | 234 -30% | 1158 246% | 405 21% | 400 19% | 316 -6% |
| Score Read | 453 | 337 -26% | 1727 281% | 414 -9% | 379 -16% | 442 -2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.054 | 0.073 -35% | 0.028 48% | 0.42 -678% | 0.067 -24% | 0.224 -315% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.092 | 0.141 -53% | 0.031 66% | 0.191 -108% | 0.068 26% | 0.084 9% |
| 4K-64 Write | 231.4 | 132.2 -43% | 870 276% | 309.5 34% | 293.5 27% | 233.6 1% |
| 4K-64 Read | 372.9 | 257 -31% | 1430 283% | 328.4 -12% | 301.6 -19% | 364.5 -2% |
| 4K Write | 57.5 | 53.8 -6% | 133.2 132% | 52.5 -9% | 58 1% | 63.5 10% |
| 4K Read | 30.12 | 28.3 -6% | 54 79% | 38.73 29% | 27.05 -10% | 27.19 -10% |
| Seq Write | 457.1 | 479.8 5% | 1540 237% | 425 -7% | 488.7 7% | 190.8 -58% |
| Seq Read | 497.6 | 516 4% | 2429 388% | 471.7 -5% | 501 1% | 502 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
| Ibuypower Chimera CX-9 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
| Ibuypower Chimera CX-9 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
| Ibuypower Chimera CX-9 | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Ibuypower Chimera CX-9 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4906 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72119 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15501 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3353 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1709 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL | |
| Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 | |
| Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Sager NP5852 | |
| Desktop PC Intel Xeon E5 2680v4 Zotac GT 1030 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 95.2 | 51 | 21.2 | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 66 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 202.9 | 113.8 | 95.4 | 34.9 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 97.4 | 84.6 | 49.8 | 25.6 |
| Thief (2014) | 79.2 | 51.9 | 44.1 | 23.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69 | 42 | 23.5 | 12.6 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 57 | 49 | 22 | 8 |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 45.8 | 25 | 19.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 78.4 | 44.6 | 24.5 | 19.2 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 35.1 | 20.7 | 17.1 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 168 | 54.4 | 34.4 | |
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 31.2 | 21.9 | 14 | |
| Prey (2017) | 50.6 | 40 | 34 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 52.9 | 39 | 23.7 | |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 83 | 41 | 32 | 20 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 28.7 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 53.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Sager NP5852 GeForce MX150, i7-7700HQ, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 3% | 0% | 4% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% | 30.1 -6% | 30 -6% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 33 -15% | 29.4 -2% | 30.1 -5% | 30 -5% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.7 | 33.3 -16% | 29.9 -4% | 30.2 -5% | 30 -5% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 34.7 -18% | 29.9 -2% | 30.5 -4% | 30 -2% | 30.3 -3% |
| Load Average * | 41.6 | 44.5 -7% | 38.3 8% | 41.1 1% | 37.3 10% | 35.4 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 | 49.2 -24% | 39.8 -0% | 40.4 -2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 53.7 | 52.8 2% | 39.6 26% | 41.2 23% | 38 29% | 37.2 31% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.9 °C / -10.6 F).
Sager NP5852 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (18% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (19.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.24 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9.2 / 11.2 / 11.3 Watt |
| Carga |
71.3 / 80.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sager NP5852 i7-7700HQ, GeForce MX150, Western Digital WD Blue PC SSD WDS250G1B0B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | 35% | 29% | -5% | -24% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.2 | 8 13% | 2.9 68% | 3.9 58% | 7 24% | 8.3 10% | 3.8 59% |
| Idle Average * | 11.2 | 10.9 3% | 5.9 47% | 7.9 29% | 10.9 3% | 14.8 -32% | 6.5 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 11 3% | 6.4 43% | 11.3 -0% | 12.9 -14% | 16.8 -49% | 7.2 36% |
| Load Average * | 71.3 | 76.7 -8% | 54 24% | 47 34% | 72 -1% | 71 -0% | 62.5 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.8 | 94.9 -73% | 51 7% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 80.1 | 106.4 -33% | 66 18% | 62 23% | 109 -36% | 119.2 -49% | 99.6 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sager NP5852 i7-7700HQ, GeForce MX150, 62 Wh | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P658-G2-MG-7327 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 55 Wh | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | 41% | 72% | 44% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 498 | 493 -1% | 1061 113% | 1253 152% | 429 -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 261 -26% | 535 52% | 517 47% | 506 44% | 268 -24% |
| Load | 121 | 77 -36% | 70 -42% | 142 17% | 87 -28% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 68 |
Pro
Contra
Em termos de desempenho, o potencial de jogos da MX150 é impressionante, considerando que ela consome cerca de 40% menos poder do que o Sabre 15 (GTX 1050) ao jogar, sendo entre 40 e 45% mais lento. Tanto as temperaturas de funcionamento como o ruído da ventoinha são significativamente mais frios e mais silenciosos, respectivamente, para uma experiência de jogo respeitável entre tarefas escolares e descansos. Na verdade, é bastante surpreendente ver o desempenho a par com um antigo portátil de jogos GTX 860M ou GTX 950M de uma CPU Pascal de nível de entrada.
Nossas principais queixas sobre o NP5852 não são tanto sobre o desempenho, como sobre o preço e o chassi. Em primeiro lugar, o preço inicial de $800 USD está bastante próximo ao do Sabre 15, Samsung Odyssey, ou Pavilion 15 Power com gráficos GTX 1050 mais velozes. Os potenciais compradores só precisarão investir cerca de $100 a $200 USD a mais para obter um grande impulso no poder da GPU, se os jogos forem prioridade. Em segundo lugar, o chassi é bastante grande para a GPU MX150 de nível de entrada. As alternativas acima mencionadas não são significativamente maiores ou mais grossas do que o nosso Sager e, portanto, um chassi de tipo Ultrabook menor teria sido mais apropriado para o MX150. Comparar o MX150 com um classe U da Intel, de fato, resultará em um desempenho de jogos ligeiramente mais lento como nossas comparações contra o que o Aspire 5 A515 demonstrou, mas as extremas poupanças de peso e portabilidade provavelmente compensarão as desvantagens para a maioria dos jogadores casuais.
O Sager NP5852 é uma ótima máquina de jogos casual de volta para a escola. Espere alguns meses, no entanto, e o mercado de portáteis estará saturado com designs mais finos e leves que oferecem a mesma GPU MX150. O NP5852 é recomendável somente se os preços da atual safra de portáteis GTX 1050 econômicos caírem mais.
Sager NP5852
- 09/21/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
