Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Stealth (i7-8565U, GeForce MX150)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 429.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1343:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), , 12.5", 2560x1440 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 APPA03E, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 LGD0588, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 4% | 29% | 7% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 68.7 5% | 68.9 5% | 98.5 50% | 71.9 10% | 64.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.3 | 95.8 -1% | 98.4 2% | 99.9 4% | 98.1 2% | 94.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 69.9 5% | 69.5 5% | 87.3 32% | 73.1 10% | 66.2 0% |
| Response Times | -20% | -44% | 148% | 8% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 57.6 ? | 37 ? 36% | 69.6 ? -21% | 46 ? 20% | 51.6 ? 10% | 40.8 ? 29% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 33.4 ? 2% | 44 ? -29% | 32 ? 6% | 32.4 ? 5% | 27.6 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 22730 ? | 200 ? -99% | 3759 ? -83% | 118000 ? 419% | ||
| Screen | -64% | -37% | 3% | -27% | -123% | |
| Brightness middle | 429.8 | 402 -6% | 478.5 11% | 519 21% | 329.8 -23% | 316 -26% |
| Brightness | 403 | 382 -5% | 466 16% | 504 25% | 318 -21% | 291 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 86 -3% | 95 7% | 74 -17% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.45 -41% | 0.43 -34% | 0.33 -3% | 0.25 22% | 0.36 -13% |
| Contrast | 1343 | 893 -34% | 1113 -17% | 1573 17% | 1319 -2% | 878 -35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.08 | 3.6 -233% | 3.09 -186% | 1.4 -30% | 2.37 -119% | 5.9 -446% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.96 | 7.5 -89% | 5.94 -50% | 2.8 29% | 4.08 -3% | 12.9 -226% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 2.06 -70% | 1.3 -7% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 4.3 -231% | 2.4 -85% | 2.2 -69% | 2.8 -115% | 8.6 -562% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.063 107% | 2.22 99% | 2.145 103% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6452 101% | 6572 99% | 6883 94% | 6908 94% | 6441 101% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.4 | 62.3 1% | 69.47 13% | 77.3 26% | 67 9% | 60.7 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.3 | 95.7 -1% | 98.36 2% | 99.99 4% | 98 2% | 94.5 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-43% | -26% /
-31% | 60% /
35% | -4% /
-15% | -33% /
-82% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 22730 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 22730 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 22730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3873 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5065 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4219 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 Lite-On CA1-8D256-HP | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 5% | -7% | -4% | -18% | -5% | |
| Seq Read | 1617 | 2205 36% | 1442 -11% | 2133 32% | 1850 14% | 1332 -18% |
| Seq Write | 1017 | 435.8 -57% | 1694 67% | 945 -7% | 661 -35% | 283.6 -72% |
| 4K Read | 40.03 | 29.36 -27% | 9.7 -76% | 29.84 -25% | 38.04 -5% | 35.2 -12% |
| 4K Write | 103.4 | 107.4 4% | 20 -81% | 91.4 -12% | 95 -8% | 127.2 23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 477.3 | 678 42% | 957 101% | 725 52% | 434.3 -9% | 891 87% |
| 4K-64 Write | 281.5 | 444.8 58% | 162 -42% | 404.1 44% | 266.3 -5% | 256.9 -9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.069 | 0.059 14% | 0.121 -75% | 0.069 -0% | 0.06 13% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.063 | 0.055 13% | 0.13 -106% | 0.056 11% | 0.03 52% | |
| Score Read | 679 | 926 36% | 968 43% | 657 -3% | 1059 56% | |
| Score Write | 487 | 596 22% | 590 21% | 427 -12% | 412 -15% | |
| Score Total | 1495 | 1911 28% | 1998 34% | 1373 -8% | 1967 32% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1595 | 585 -63% | 1492 -6% | 539 -66% | 687 -57% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 485.8 | 570 17% | 300.9 -38% | 209.7 -57% | 132.3 -73% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1029 | 503 -51% | 839 -18% | 340 -67% | 252.3 -75% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5219 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15768 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3377 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1280 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 191.1 | 109.8 | 87.8 | 34.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68.8 | 38.2 | 22.6 | 12.6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 71.7 | 44.6 | 24.5 | 19.8 |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Lite-On CA1-8D256-HP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 1% | 6% | 10% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 27.9 2% | 30.5 -7% | 28 1% | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 27.9 2% | 30.7 -8% | 28 2% | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 27.9 4% | 30.7 -6% | 28 3% | 28.2 3% | 29.6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 27.9 4% | 32.11 -10% | 28 4% | 28.2 3% | 29.6 -2% |
| Load Average * | 42.8 | 36.2 15% | 32.9 23% | 32.5 24% | 30.7 28% | 36.7 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.4 | 45 -9% | 32.5 21% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 41.6 | 45.2 -9% | 36.4 12% | 42.2 -1% | 32.9 21% | 46.7 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 29 / 29.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.8 / 41.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.47 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.7 / 8.6 / 9.4 Watt |
| Carga |
64.1 / 64.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Lite-On CA1-8D256-HP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 10% | 15% | 31% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.7 | 5 25% | 2.3 66% | 5.9 12% | 5.6 16% | 4.7 30% |
| Idle Average * | 8.6 | 8.3 3% | 8.7 -1% | 9.8 -14% | 7.5 13% | 8.7 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 8.8 6% | 12.2 -30% | 10.6 -13% | 8.4 11% | 9.8 -4% |
| Load Average * | 64.1 | 46.4 28% | 53.3 17% | 36.6 43% | 33.7 47% | 39.4 39% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 63.7 | 31 51% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 64.1 | 48.6 24% | 64 -0% | 34.3 46% | 34.6 46% | 40.4 37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 53.1 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -23% | 2% | -17% | 2% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1230 | 819 -33% | 1432 16% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 465 -19% | 581 2% | 424 -26% | 550 -4% | 358 -37% |
| Load | 131 | 109 -17% | 121 -8% | 124 -5% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 94 | 115 |
Pro
Contra
O mais recente Blade Stealth oferece o maior aumento de desempenho para a série. Sua nova CPU Whisky Lake-U é muito menos suscetível a afogamentos e sua opção de GPU discreta está próxima do desempenho dos jogos do 2015 Blade Pro. O portátil é a prova de que os Ultrabooks podem oferecer desempenho gráfico razoável sem sacrificar as principais características do subportátil, como longa duração da bateria, design ultrafino, tela com precisão de cores e ventiladores silenciosos para aplicativos que não são jogos. Ele funciona como um candidato ideal para o uso em sala de aula e para aquela partida tão importante de Fortnite, Overwatch, Rocket League ou League of Legends. Ultrabooks concorrentes com a mesma GPU GeForce MX150, como o HP Envy 13t ou Huawei MateBook X Pro, são 25 a 30 por cento mais lento ao jogar.
As principais desvantagens do núcleo incluem aspectos do teclado e da tela. A luz de fundo RGB por tecla e o HDMI na última geração do Blade Stealth foram descartados. A RAM permanece não atualizável e a resposta do teclado poderia ser mais profunda. As teclas Enter e Backspace reduzidas, em particular, podem levar algum tempo para se acostumar. Enquanto isso, os tempos de resposta preto-branco e cinza-cinza são, na melhor das hipóteses, medianos para ghosting mais perceptíveis.
Também experimentamos um pequeno punhado de problemas técnicos que esperamos que sejam específicos da nossa unidade de teste. O cabo de carregamento frouxo, o ruído eletrônico leve e moderado, a descarga da bateria durante os jogos com a energia de CA e alguns comportamentos estranhos da velocidade do processador, são espinhos em um Ultrabook de 13,3 polegadas.
O desempenho por Watt é insano para sua classe de tamanho. Mais poderoso que um MacBook Pro 13sem ser maior ou mais pesado, o novo Blade Stealth está melhor do que nunca em balancear alto desempenho com alta portabilidade.
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
- 10/03/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
