Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro 2017 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1080, 4K)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X7 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X7 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 230 cd/m²
Contraste: 1150:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.54 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), 3840x2160, 17.3" | Aorus X7 v7 AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), 2560x1440, 17.3" | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 LP173WF4-SPD1, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-an014ng AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS73VR 7RF AU Optronics AUO109B, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -26% | -23% | -21% | -25% | -26% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 88.9 | 63 -29% | 64.6 -27% | 64.2 -28% | 66.8 -25% | 67.1 -25% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 87.1 -13% | 92.9 -7% | 96.8 -3% | 85.8 -14% | 85.4 -15% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.7 | 63.7 -36% | 66.1 -34% | 66.4 -33% | 62.8 -37% | 62.5 -37% | |
| Response Times | 73% | 46% | 24% | 35% | 19355% | 19839% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 24 ? 61% | 29 ? 52% | 45.2 ? 26% | 38 ? 37% | 36 ? 41% | 39.2 ? 36% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 38.4 ? | 6 ? 84% | 23 ? 40% | 30.4 ? 21% | 26 ? 32% | 20 ? 48% | 22.8 ? 41% |
| PWM Frequency | 204.9 ? | 119000 ? 57977% | 122000 ? 59441% | ||||
| Screen | -18% | -6% | 7% | 2% | 4% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 230 | 375 63% | 390 70% | 314 37% | 371.1 61% | 384 67% | 379 65% |
| Brightness | 207 | 353 71% | 355 71% | 309 49% | 343 66% | 373 80% | 354 71% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 85 2% | 79 -5% | 88 6% | 86 4% | 93 12% | 89 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.58 -190% | 0.39 -95% | 0.34 -70% | 0.42 -110% | 0.35 -75% | 0.31 -55% |
| Contrast | 1150 | 647 -44% | 1000 -13% | 924 -20% | 884 -23% | 1097 -5% | 1223 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.62 | 6.06 -8% | 5.9 -5% | 3.19 43% | 4.5 20% | 4.81 14% | 4.32 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.24 | 10.54 -3% | 9.89 3% | 6.1 40% | 9.7 5% | 8.69 15% | 8.56 16% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.54 | 5.68 -25% | 6.17 -36% | 3.49 23% | 3.1 32% | 5.33 -17% | 4 12% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.3 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.34 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.47 89% |
| CCT | 6625 98% | 7998 81% | 6955 93% | 7261 90% | 7120 91% | 7137 91% | 6984 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 57 -35% | 55 -37% | 60 -32% | 61 -31% | 56 -36% | 56 -36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 87 -13% | 84 -16% | 93 -7% | 97 -3% | 86 -14% | 85 -15% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
-8% | 20% /
2% | 3% /
3% | 5% /
2% | 6445% /
3627% | 6607% /
3721% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 204.9 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 204.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 204.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4531 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2486 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3991 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Aorus X7 v7 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP Omen 17-an014ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS73VR 7RF Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 35% | -47% | -31% | -33% | -24% | -48% | |
| Seq Read | 2599 | 2690 4% | 493.9 -81% | 2374 -9% | 2826 9% | 1558 -40% | 431.6 -83% |
| Seq Write | 588 | 1067 81% | 470 -20% | 365.5 -38% | 349.6 -41% | 552 -6% | 468.3 -20% |
| 4K Read | 37.57 | 48.35 29% | 35.7 -5% | 47.62 27% | 47.9 27% | 29.02 -23% | 35.64 -5% |
| 4K Write | 104.4 | 123.3 18% | 77.1 -26% | 1.26 -99% | 1.6 -98% | 111.3 7% | 80.7 -23% |
| Score Read | 1414 | 1803 28% | 412 -71% | 1414 0% | 1232 -13% | 690 -51% | 372 -74% |
| Score Write | 676 | 1021 51% | 294 -57% | 161 -76% | 104 -85% | 588 -13% | 265 -61% |
| Score Total | 2715 | 3668 35% | 928 -66% | 2205 -19% | 1852 -32% | 1588 -42% | 842 -69% |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18286 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 147542 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28270 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14825 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5989 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Resident Evil 7 | |
| 3840x2160 High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| For Honor | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Prey | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:8x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Rocket League | |
| 3840x2160 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Dirt 4 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| F1 2017 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Ark Survival Evolved | |
| 3840x2160 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 128 | 64.9 | 46.7 | ||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 182 | 152 | 52 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 163 | 122 | 52.9 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 95 | 55.4 | 37.1 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 137 | 133 | 61.6 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 230 | 103 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 155 | 91.4 | 59 | ||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 107 | 84.4 | 29.9 | ||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 145 | 100 | 51 | ||
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 59.8 | 39.6 | 15 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 31 / 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 58 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T R7 1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -3% | -3% | 7% | 3% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 31.2 -4% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 31 -3% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 33 -10% | 31.2 -4% | 30 -0% | 30.8 -3% | 31 -3% | 32 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 36 -16% | 32.6 -5% | 37 -19% | 30.8 1% | 32 -3% | 38 -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 41 -24% | 34.75 -5% | 39 -18% | 30.9 6% | 33 -0% | 40 -21% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 41 5% | 47.8 -11% | 44 -2% | 42.2 2% | 44 -2% | 42 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 45 18% | 47 15% | 44.4 19% | 46 16% | 54 2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 58 | 52 10% | 49.7 14% | 55 5% | 48.6 16% | 50 14% | 57 2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 49 °C / 120.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-20.1 °C / -36.2 F).
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T R7 1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 11% | 2% | 12% | -2% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 51 4% | 53.3 -1% | 48 9% | 50.2 5% | 57 -8% | 51 4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 64 -21% | 50 6% | 54 -2% | 55.6 -5% | 59 -11% | 54 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 33 6% | 30.3 13% | 35 -0% | 27.8 21% | 36 -3% | 33 6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 37 | 33 11% | 28 24% | 37 -0% | 26.8 28% | 31 16% | 35 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade Pro 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Aorus X7 v7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.8 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 31 / 36 / 44 Watt |
| Carga |
107 / 258 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T R7 1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 33% | 22% | 38% | 50% | -17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 27 13% | 14 55% | 22 29% | 14.2 54% | 7 77% | 43 -39% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 33 8% | 20 44% | 28 22% | 23.5 35% | 13 64% | 50 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 44 | 40 9% | 23.8 46% | 35 20% | 23.8 46% | 20 55% | 57 -30% |
| Load Average * | 107 | 107 -0% | 103 4% | 93 13% | 90.9 15% | 81 24% | 125 -17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 212 | 190 10% | 157 26% | 116 45% | 127 40% | 180 15% | |
| Load Maximum * | 258 | 259 -0% | 212 18% | 208 19% | 171.6 33% | 162 37% | 240 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T R7 1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 76 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | -40% | 26% | -10% | 47% | -51% | |
| Reader / Idle | 253 | 221 -13% | 163 -36% | 349 38% | 301 19% | 611 142% | 103 -59% |
| H.264 | 204 | 165 -19% | 255 25% | 281 38% | 88 -57% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 197 | 180 -9% | 91 -54% | 267 36% | 163 -17% | 279 42% | 90 -54% |
| Load | 81 | 81 0% | 57 -30% | 84 4% | 55 -32% | 54 -33% | 53 -35% |
Pro
Contra
Se colocarmos de lado as emissões, alto-falantes e duração da bateria por um momento, o Razer Blade Pro é um portátil de gama alta bem projetado. Com sua construção fina, materiais de alta qualidade e design elegante, ele deve atrair jogadores que valorizam a qualidade, o refinamento e um grau razoável de transportabilidade. Quando você adiciona o teclado mecânico com retro iluminação RGB, este portátil de 17 polegadas é um dos dispositivos de mais alta qualidade que já tivemos em nossas mãos.
Graças aos 32 GB de RAM DDR4, o SSD RAID, e à GeForce GTX 1080, certamente não falta poder de desempenho - embora nos sintamos compelidos a criticar a Razer pela RAM soldada. A tela na edição UHD que testamos também não é irrepreensível. Por um lado, o painel IGZO marca pontos por sua extensa cobertura de espaço de cores, baixo valor preto e forte contraste. Por outro lado, seu baixo brilho e sua superfície reflexiva são bastante irritantes - por não mencionar os grandes problemas que nosso modelo de teste teve com inconsistências de iluminação.
Há também muito espaço para melhorar quando se trata do som dos alto-falantes integrados, bem como as taxas de consumo de energia do portátil (o que afeta negativamente a duração da bateria). Mas o Blade Pro perde a maioria dos pontos por suas altas temperaturas e altos níveis de ruído. Finalmente, os jogos só podem ser apreciados com fones de ouvido. Parece que o sistema de resfriamento só é adequado para servir uma GeForce GTX 1070 ou GTX 1080 Max-Q. Dadas todas essas deficiências em cima de seu preço de luxo, a versão 4K será duramente pressionada para competir com sucesso com o resto dos portáteis (mais grossos) no mercado de 17 polegadas.
Razer Blade Pro 2017
- 09/27/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
