Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro 2017 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 367.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 AU Optronics ID: AUO219D, Name: B173HW02 V1, TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS73VR 7RG ID: CMN1747, Name: Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 v7 AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 35% | 4% | 28% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 88.9 39% | 69.7 9% | 89.6 40% | 63 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.7 | 100 11% | 90.4 1% | 100 11% | 87.1 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.9 | 99.7 54% | 66.8 3% | 86.9 34% | 63.7 -2% |
| Response Times | -34% | 57% | 60% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.8 ? | 60.8 ? -65% | 23.6 ? 36% | 24 ? 35% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 38.4 ? -3% | 8.4 ? 77% | 6 ? 84% | |
| PWM Frequency | 204.9 ? | 26040 ? | |||
| Screen | -6% | -84% | -35% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 367.4 | 230 -37% | 315.5 -14% | 350.9 -4% | 375 2% |
| Brightness | 363 | 207 -43% | 295 -19% | 311 -14% | 353 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 83 -3% | 87 1% | 79 -8% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.2 37% | 0.822 -157% | 0.33 -3% | 0.58 -81% |
| Contrast | 1148 | 1150 0% | 384 -67% | 1063 -7% | 647 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.62 -48% | 12.21 -221% | 7.7 -103% | 6.06 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.4 | 10.24 2% | 14.4 -38% | 10.54 -1% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 4.54 -30% | 13.4 -283% | 11.1 -217% | 5.68 -62% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.36 93% | 2.39 92% | 2.11 104% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6467 101% | 6625 98% | 19530 33% | 11813 55% | 7998 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.1 | 88 51% | 59 2% | 77.74 34% | 57 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.3 | 100 12% | 90.3 1% | 100 12% | 87 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | -40% /
-62% | 17% /
-10% | 11% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| no name | |
| MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
| no name | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| no name | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Productivity | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Essentials | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Score | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4207 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5364 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5159 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4752 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | MSI GS73VR 7RG Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP | Aorus X7 v7 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 40% | -31% | -20% | 75% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 724 | 408.5 -44% | 381.5 -47% | 758 5% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 228.3 | 201.9 -12% | 229.8 1% | 327.2 43% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1193 | 336.3 -72% | 423.5 -65% | 1504 26% | |
| Score Total | 1951 | 2715 39% | 923 -53% | 1064 -45% | 3668 88% |
| Score Write | 406 | 676 67% | 325 -20% | 417 3% | 1021 151% |
| Score Read | 1056 | 1414 34% | 396 -62% | 421 -60% | 1803 71% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.036 -6% | 0.032 6% | 0.032 6% | 0.031 9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.051 15% | 0.052 13% | 0.051 15% | 0.059 2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 267.2 | 513 92% | 197.6 -26% | 273.6 2% | 791 196% |
| 4K-64 Read | 871 | 1116 28% | 310.9 -64% | 337.7 -61% | 1485 70% |
| 4K Write | 109.9 | 104.4 -5% | 101.8 -7% | 96.8 -12% | 123.3 12% |
| 4K Read | 38.31 | 37.57 -2% | 33.98 -11% | 33.69 -12% | 48.35 26% |
| Seq Write | 291.8 | 588 102% | 254.6 -13% | 465.1 59% | 1067 266% |
| Seq Read | 1464 | 2599 78% | 510 -65% | 497.9 -66% | 2690 84% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RG | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12113 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 127207 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25985 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9497 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5057 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 102.6 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 73.5 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 72.2 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.4 | 38.3 | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 84 | 55 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 60 | ||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 66.8 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 71.6 | 58.7 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 58.6 | 52.6 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 105.2 | |||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 42 | |||
| Prey (2017) | 102.3 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 98.5 | 55 | ||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 99 | 61 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.6 / 51.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP | MSI GS73VR 7RG GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP | MSI GF72VR 7RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X7 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -13% | -6% | -6% | -6% | -15% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 30 -7% | 28 -0% | 28.1 -0% | 30 -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 30 -2% | 30.6 -4% | 29.4 -0% | 31.4 -6% | 33 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 31 -5% | 30.7 -4% | 30.7 -4% | 31.4 -6% | 36 -22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 33 -11% | 32.6 -10% | 34 -15% | 32.6 -10% | 41 -39% |
| Load Average * | 31.6 | 43 -36% | 38.8 -23% | 42 -33% | 39.4 -25% | 41 -30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 55 -20% | 45.8 -0% | 45.3 2% | 45 2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 51.8 | 58 -12% | 46.2 11% | 45.8 12% | 52 -0% | 52 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.64 / 0.96 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.6 / 16 / 16.4 Watt |
| Carga |
75.9 / 163.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI GS73VR 7RG i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GF72VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -113% | 18% | -11% | -96% | -24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.6 | 31 -192% | 7.5 29% | 10.1 5% | 27 -155% | 15.7 -48% |
| Idle Average * | 16 | 36 -125% | 12.1 24% | 18.3 -14% | 33 -106% | 21.4 -34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.4 | 44 -168% | 14.3 13% | 19.6 -20% | 40 -144% | 21.9 -34% |
| Load Average * | 75.9 | 107 -41% | 73.5 3% | 87.6 -15% | 107 -41% | 83.9 -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 111.2 | 212 -91% | 108 3% | 136.3 -23% | 190 -71% | 130.2 -17% |
| Load Maximum * | 163.8 | 258 -58% | 110.2 33% | 160.7 2% | 259 -58% | 159.6 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 74 Wh | MSI GS73VR 7RG i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | MSI GF72VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 43 Wh | Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -21% | -42% | -60% | -38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 721 | 253 -65% | 513 -29% | 349 -52% | 201 -72% | 221 -69% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 197 -53% | 251 -40% | 191 -54% | 142 -66% | 180 -57% |
| Load | 72 | 81 13% | 76 6% | 57 -21% | 41 -43% | 81 13% |
Pro
Contra
O Blade Pro é um portátil de jogos único. No papel, suas especificações não são nada especiais; a CPU i7-7700HQ, a GPU GTX 1060 e a tela IPS 1080p são padrão em sistemas mais baratos como o Gigabyte Aero 15, Asus FX502, ou Gigabyte P55W. Os jogadores com orçamentos apertados podem não gostar do fato de que algo parecido com um Acer Aspire 7 possa se desempenhar de forma similar ao Blade Pro GTX 1060 custando centenas de dólares menos.
Em vez disso, as maiores fortalezas do Blade Pro estão em sua qualidade de construção, características térmicas e design exclusivo. O chassi é mais forte do que parece e objetivamente mais inflexível do que concorrentes mais finos como a série MSI GS, a série Asus Zephyrus, e a série Aorus X7. As séries EVGA SC17 e MSI GT73VR são talvez os contendores mais notáveis quando se trata de rigidez do chassi, mas mesmo estes são mais grossos e volumosos do que o Razer. O Blade Pro é um exemplo magistral de finura e estilo, sem sacrificar as fortes qualidades físicas de designs de portáteis de jogos maiores.
Alguns recursos de hardware, além do excelente chassi, também merecem ser elogiados. A RAM atualizável, a taxa de atualização de 120 Hz e o compartimento de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas são boas surpresas considerando que o Blade Pro, mais caro, não possui essas opções. As velocidades High Turbo Boost são sustentáveis e as temperaturas durante os jogos são mais baixas do que o esperado, na faixa de 60 a 70 °C. Até mesmo as temperaturas da superfície são notavelmente mais frias que os sistemas concorrentes. Este é um portátil de jogos fino sem muitas das falhas tradicionalmente associadas à categoria.
Existem algumas melhorias importantes que gostaríamos de ver para tornar os futuros SKUs ainda melhores. Em primeiro lugar, mais opções de telas com tempos de resposta mais rápidos de 3 ms/5 ms, definitivamente atrairão mais os jogadores hardcore, mesmo que isso signifique sacrificar os amplos ângulos de visão IPS. O Ghosting é muito menos um problema na maioria dos portáteis MSI e as séries mais recentes do Aorus X7, como resultado. Em segundo lugar, os controles da ventoinha melhorados via Synapse seria uma excelente adição, se os usuários desejassem ventoinhas mais silenciosas ao custo de temperaturas mais elevadas. O Blade Pro GTX 1060 já é muito silencioso quando não está jogando, mas se tornará tão barulhento quanto alternativas concorrentes quando estiver sob estresse. Finalmente, opções de GPU mais rápidas acrescentariam extraordinariamente mais valor ao sistema. O chassi foi projetado para alojar até uma GTX 1080 e as propriedades térmicas já são excelentes com a GTX 1060, então já dá para imaginar como funcionaria com uma GTX 1070 de gama média, ou inclusive uma GTX 1070 Max-Q.
Outros detalhes menores, como teclas com maior deslocamento, subwoofer, trackpad mais firme e opções integradas de mini DisplayPort, teriam dado ao sistema mais uma vantagem pelo preço. Mesmo assim, é difícil não gostar do que já oferece quando o sistema se sente tão bom quanto parece.
O Blade Pro GTX 1060 é o melhor dos dois mundos. É elegante e atraente como um portátil de jogo fino, mas com a qualidade de hardware mais forte e as temperaturas de funcionamento mais frias de uma alternativa mais grossa. O potencial para as GPUs Max-Q e telas com tempos de resposta mais rápidos ainda não foram realizados para este SKU específico.
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
- 10/25/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
