Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060: Como se compara com o RTX 2080 Max-Q?
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Blade Pro 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1060 MHz, Memoría: 1850 MHz, GDDR6, 431.6, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, AUO409D, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
peso
2.75 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g
Preço
2500 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 300.4 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 289 cd/m² Minimum: 14.49 cd/m²iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 939:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS B173ZAN01.0, IPS LED, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 4% | -0% | 39% | 38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.1 | 62.9 3% | 62.6 2% | 61.9 1% | 88.9 45% | 86.7 42% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.4 | 87.8 -2% | 93.5 5% | 86.3 -3% | 100 12% | 100 12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.5 | 63.9 2% | 64.7 4% | 62.9 1% | 99.7 60% | 99.4 59% |
| Response Times | -8% | -10% | -19% | -565% | -303% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.8 ? | 7.2 ? -6% | 7.2 ? -6% | 7.2 ? -6% | 60.8 ? -794% | 36 ? -429% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 9.6 ? -9% | 10 ? -14% | 11.6 ? -32% | 38.4 ? -336% | 24.4 ? -177% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 204.9 ? | ||||
| Screen | 7% | 17% | -34% | -45% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 300.4 | 288 -4% | 366 22% | 297.4 -1% | 230 -23% | 366 22% |
| Brightness | 289 | 287 -1% | 343 19% | 306 6% | 207 -28% | 349 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 80 -14% | 83 -11% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.2 37% | 0.29 9% | 0.31 3% | 0.2 37% | 0.46 -44% |
| Contrast | 939 | 1440 53% | 1262 34% | 959 2% | 1150 22% | 796 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 2.33 -0% | 1.51 35% | 4.08 -76% | 5.62 -142% | 2.9 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.81 | 5.34 -40% | 3.22 15% | 6.88 -81% | 10.24 -169% | 5.4 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.95 | 2.47 16% | 0.71 76% | 4 -36% | 3.1 -5% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.19 21% | 1.93 -29% | 4 -167% | 4.54 -203% | 3.5 -133% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.38 92% | 2.259 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6764 96% | 6710 97% | 6881 94% | 7205 90% | 6625 98% | 6616 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.4 | 57 -1% | 60 5% | 56 -2% | 88 53% | 88.1 53% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 88 -1% | 94 6% | 86 -3% | 100 12% | 100 12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
4% | 4% /
11% | -18% /
-26% | -190% /
-98% | -93% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4401 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5676 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5641 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 5% | 6% | -34% | -19% | |
| Seq Read | 1810 | 911 -50% | 2855 58% | 1427 -21% | 2599 44% |
| Seq Write | 1797 | 2347 31% | 2687 50% | 1610 -10% | 588 -67% |
| 4K Read | 48.43 | 53 9% | 30.31 -37% | 25.63 -47% | 37.57 -22% |
| 4K Write | 106 | 122.5 16% | 96.3 -9% | 84.2 -21% | 104.4 -2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1156 | 1577 36% | 1460 26% | 588 -49% | 1116 -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1748 | 1734 -1% | 1224 -30% | 732 -58% | 513 -71% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.08 -40% | 0.054 5% | 0.054 5% | 0.051 11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.031 11% | 0.038 -9% | 0.071 -103% | 0.036 -3% |
| Score Read | 1385 | 1721 24% | 1776 28% | 756 -45% | 1414 2% |
| Score Write | 2033 | 2091 3% | 1589 -22% | 978 -52% | 676 -67% |
| Score Total | 4135 | 4771 15% | 4259 3% | 2134 -48% | 2715 -34% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1984 | 2226 12% | 1489 -25% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 588 | 426.4 -27% | 514 -13% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 835 | 1152 38% | 893 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3209 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1892 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
596 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
514 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1272 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1292 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
124.1 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40) | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18741 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15132 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6608 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø61.1 (57-66)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 320.8 | 278 | 246.3 | 153.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 279.4 | 196.4 | 118.5 | 65 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 130 | 97 | 92 | 81 |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -9% | -6% | -9% | -2% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 31 -10% | 28.2 -0% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 32 -13% | 32 -13% | 28.5 -1% | 31 -10% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 33 -17% | 38 -35% | 30 -6% | 33 -17% | 30.8 -9% | 30.1 -7% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 47 -9% | 47 -9% | 51.5 -20% | 43 -0% | 42 2% | 36 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 49 -1% | 48 1% | 55.3 -14% | 55 -14% | 51 -5% | 37.6 22% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 51 4% | 49 8% | 55.3 -4% | 58 -9% | 53 1% | 42.2 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 53.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.76 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 16 / 21.7 / 26.1 Watt |
| Carga |
105.6 / 225.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Liteon CA1-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -16% | -46% | -31% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 16.2 -1% | 18.2 -14% | 31 -94% | 24.6 -54% | 15.2 5% |
| Idle Average * | 21.7 | 20.4 6% | 23 -6% | 36 -66% | 33.1 -53% | 20.4 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 26.1 -0% | 33.1 -27% | 44 -69% | 37.2 -43% | 27.3 -5% |
| Load Average * | 105.6 | 96.5 9% | 124.8 -18% | 107 -1% | 124 -17% | 92.9 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 161.8 | 182.9 -13% | 180.8 -12% | 212 -31% | 180 -11% | 143 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 225.3 | 214.3 5% | 263 -17% | 258 -15% | 236.5 -5% | 190.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | 31% | -13% | -28% | -37% | 3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 272 | 230 -15% | 357 31% | 236 -13% | 197 -28% | 172 -37% | 280 3% |
| Reader / Idle | 298 | 461 | 249 | 253 | 295 | ||
| Load | 52 | 74 | 84 | 81 | 86 |
Pro
+ Thunderbolt 3, Ethernet de 2,5 Gbit e leitor de cartão SD UHS-III
+ Funciona de forma um pouco mais fria que o SKU RTX 2080 Max-Q
+ Manutenção simples; 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 2280
+ Desempenho da RTX 2060 Max-Q acima da média
+ Adaptador de CA pequeno e leve
+ Design Razer fino, clássico
+ Integração com Windows Hello
+ O Wi-Fi 6 vem como padrão
+ Silencioso sob uso leve
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Base e tampa rígidas
Contra
- Sem subwoofer, leitor de impressões digitais, ou baia SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
- O Core i7-9750H não é mais veloz que o Core i7-8750H
- Webcam mais fraca que a do Blade Pro 2017 (1 MP vs. 2 MP)
- Poderia ser mais silencioso durante os jogos em Alto Desempenho
- Resposta fraca do teclado e clickpad
- Menor capacidade da bateria que a do Blade Pro 2017
- O cabo grosso do adaptador de CA é difícil de manusear
- Sem 4K UHD, 240 Hz, ou OLED
- Garantia estendida é cara
- Adaptador de CA muito quente
- Sem G-Sync
Por $2.500 USD, o Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 é mais caro que a maioria das alternativas, como o Asus ROG Scar II GL704GV, Zephyrus S GX701GV, ou MSI GS75 todos configuráveis com a mesma GPU. O preço alto vai em direção não apenas ao design minimalista e mais forte do chassi da Razer, mas também ao resfriado da câmara de vapor, leitor de cartões UHS-III, RJ-45 de 2.5 Gbit e conectividade Wi-Fi 6, que são raros em portáteis concorrentes RTX 2060 Pinte o Cinza Blase Spade e todos provavelmente irão confundi-lo com o MacBook Pro por um bom motivo.
Uma vantagem pequena, mas notável, do Blade Pro 17 é que sua GPU RTX 2060 funciona em velocidades mais rápidas do que outros portáteis com a mesma GPU com desempenho um pouco mais rápido nos jogos. A diferença é grande o suficiente para que o desempenho dos jogos chegue perto da RTX 2070 Max-Q o que realmente torna o SKU Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q uma verdadeira barganha. Ao comparar o SKU RTX 2060 ao RTX 2080 Max-Q, este último oferece desempenho 35% mais rápido para um aumento de 13% no consumo de energia. Outros aspectos importantes, como a duração da bateria, o ruído do ventilador e as temperaturas, são quase os mesmos entre os vários SKUs do Blade Pro 17, apesar de suas diferenças no desempenho gráfico.
O Blade Pro 17 exibe a GeForce RTX 2060 em seu maior esplendor. Recursos auxiliares como os quatro ventiladores, resfriamento com câmara de vapor, leitor de cartões UHS-III, RJ-45 de 2.5 Gbit, e conectividade Wi-Fi 6 não podem ser encontrados em nenhum outro portátil de jogos com a mesma GPU RTX 2060.
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
- 08/05/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
