Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016)

Name: Razer Blade (2016)
Brand: Razer

Sólido como uma rocha. O novo Razer Blade possui uma GTX 1060 em uma excelente carcaça de alumínio. O portátil oferece dispositivos de entrada confiáveis, Thunderbolt 3 e um incrível painel IGZO. Com tudo isto sobre a mesa, o que poderia dar errado? Além de algum problema pequeno, a maior fraqueza foi a sua falta de desempenho para jogos. No entanto, este último agora foi resolvido com uma atualização EC.

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Razer DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade (2016) (Blade Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, integrada

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixel 262 PPI, 10 pontos de toque, Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, QHD+, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB

, Slots: 1x m.2 PCIe

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Entrada/saída combinada (conector de 3,5 mm), Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 345 x 235

Bateria

70 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0 (Dolby Digital Plus), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força: 165 W

peso

1.96 kg, Suprimento de energia: 420 g

Preço

2600 EUR

Links

Razer página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

SCHENKER XMG P406 MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Razer Blade (2016) DIN A4 ❌

Left: power outlet, 2x USB 3.0, audio in/out

Right: USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	591 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	646 MBit/s


337 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	374 cd/m²
312 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	366 cd/m²
259 cd/m²	283 cd/m²	354 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
iluminação: 69 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 1491:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, 3200x1800, 14"	SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-9%	-7%	-10%
Display P3 Coverage	66.9	66.2 -1%	65.5 -2%	64.5 -4%
sRGB Coverage	96.8	82.8 -14%	86.4 -11%	83.1 -14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.2	60.5 -11%	63.1 -7%	60.8 -11%
Response Times		-9%	29%	23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(15, 26)	56 ?(22, 34) -37%	31.6 ?(10.4, 21.2) 23%	38 ?(16, 22) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	37 ?(9, 28)	30 ?(8, 22) 19%	24.4 ?(5.2, 19.2) 34%	23 ?(5, 18) 38%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)
Screen		-58%	-27%	-58%
Brightness middle	328	282 -14%	288.4 -12%	315 -4%
Brightness	328	266 -19%	282 -14%	290 -12%
Brightness Distribution	69	81 17%	83 20%	85 23%
Black Level *	0.22	0.22 -0%	0.35 -59%	0.32 -45%
Contrast	1491	1282 -14%	824 -45%	984 -34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.91	4.98 -161%	2.61 -37%	4.88 -155%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.23	10.2 -216%	7.34 -127%	8.88 -175%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.69	4.08 -141%	1.18 30%	4.17 -147%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.51 ^88%	2.24 ^98%	2.53 ^87%
CCT	6418 ^101%	5877 ^111%	6506 ^100%	6683 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	63	54 -14%	56.4 -10%	55 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	97	83 -14%	86.4 -11%	83 -14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -41%	-2% / -15%	-15% / -37%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	147 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -3%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points +1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

671 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points +36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4016 Points +18%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3417 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3371 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5023 Points +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points +19%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4796 Points +14%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4214 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3417 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4214 pontos
Ajuda

	Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	-63%	-54%
Read Seq	1296	1634 26%	335.3 -74%	485.4 -63%
Write Seq	603	1290 114%	299 -50%	312.4 -48%
Read 512	655	1149 75%	223 -66%	294.8 -55%
Write 512	604	1285 113%	246.7 -59%	287.8 -52%
Read 4k	42.22	43.82 4%	17.68 -58%	21.44 -49%
Write 4k	139.6	110.3 -21%	35.31 -75%	75.7 -46%
Read 4k QD32	573	320.5 -44%	247.4 -57%	149.4 -74%
Write 4k QD32	480	287.3 -40%	156.3 -67%	256.3 -47%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512

Sequential Read: 1296 MB/s

Sequential Write: 603 MB/s

512K Read: 655 MB/s

512K Write: 604 MB/s

4K Read: 42.22 MB/s

4K Write: 139.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 573 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 480 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22022 Points +59%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14977 Points +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13891 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9649 Points -31%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16525 Points +52%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11776 Points +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10890 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7436 Points -32%

3DMark 11 Performance		11139 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9193 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Mirror's Edge Catalyst | The Witcher 3

Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	92 fps +87%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	49.1 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.6 fps +74%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	57.4 fps

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	55.2 fps +48%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	37.3 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.4 fps +55%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	66.2 fps

	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)		66.2	37.3
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)			76.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	63.6	57.4	49.1
Battlefield 1 (2016)	81.7	59.9	56.4
Dishonored 2 (2016)	52.1	47	44.1

Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	74.2 fps +32%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	56.4 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	77.2 fps +29%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	59.9 fps

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 33 / 35 dB
Carga		39 / 51 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise		-6%	-4%	0%
off / environment *	30		29.1 3%	30 -0%
Idle Minimum *	31	30 3%	32 -3%	32 -3%
Idle Average *	33	32 3%	32 3%	33 -0%
Idle Maximum *	35	40 -14%	33.5 4%	34 3%
Load Average *	39	47 -21%	50 -28%	39 -0%
Load Maximum *	51	51 -0%	51.5 -1%	51 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


50.1 °C	48.5 °C	52.7 °C
45.2 °C	47.3 °C	44.4 °C
37.5 °C	39.1 °C	38.1 °C

Máximo: 52.7 °C
Médio: 44.8 °C


48.4 °C	46.7 °C	48.2 °C
44.9 °C	45.2 °C	40 °C
38.2 °C	38.7 °C	36.2 °C

Máximo: 48.4 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 48.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat		-25%	-20%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	52.7	55 -4%	55.6 -6%	48 9%
Maximum Bottom *	48.4	58.7 -21%	62.4 -29%	46.8 3%
Idle Upper Side *	29.3	36.9 -26%	33.2 -13%	33.7 -15%
Idle Bottom *	28.4	41.7 -47%	37.2 -31%	30.5 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	9 / 14 / 22 Watt
Carga	72 / 124 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC940

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-22%	-27%	-58%
Idle Minimum *	9	12 -33%	12.1 -34%	20 -122%
Idle Average *	14	16 -14%	19 -36%	24 -71%
Idle Maximum *	22	22 -0%	19.5 11%	29 -32%
Load Average *	72	90 -25%	106.7 -48%	86 -19%
Load Maximum *	124	170 -37%	159 -28%	183 -48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing

4h 03min

	Razer Blade (2016) 70 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P406 45 Wh	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 61 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	243	197 -19%	261 7%	196 -19%

Pro

+ 6 SKUs disponíveis

+ Compacto e relativamente leve

+ Carcaça de alumínio muito rígida

+ Acabamento perfeito

+ Marcante design masculino em um preto nobre

+ Portas localizadas de forma ergonômica

+ Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C

+ HDMI 2.0

+ Muito bom desempenho WLAN

+ Fácil de abrir e fazer manutenção, ventoinhas de fácil acesso

+ O teclado Chroma oferece várias opções de iluminação

+ Macros personalizável

+ Muito bom painel IGZO

+ Baixo consumo de energia (para sua classe)

Contra

- Impressões digitais claramente visíveis

- Layout de teclado incomum

- Rotulado pobre das teclas

- Muitos recursos não podem ser utilizados sem se registrar primeiro (Razer Synapse)

- Botões do mouse abaixo da média

- Flickering PWM até 90% do brilho

- Tempos de resposta lentos

- Superfície refletiva da tela táctil

- Os ângulos de visão são limitados em comparação com a IPS

- Afogamento pesado da CPU com uso intenso (pode ser resolvido via atualização EC)

- Leve zumbido da ventoinha com velocidades médias a altas

- Os alto falantes não são muito bons para a música

In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.

Considerando a extensa lista de pros, não podemos evitar nos sentir decepcionados pelo sério afogamento da CPU. O flickering PWM e os lentos tempos de resposta também farão duvidar a alguns compradores potenciais. O registro obrigatório é mais uma inconveniência. Nós aceitaríamos as emissões de ruído graças à fina carcaça do portátil, mas o ruído de alta frequência emitido pelas ventoinhas, definitivamente podem causar problemas aos usuários.

O novo Razer Blade faz bem muitas coisas, mas deixa a desejar em termos de desempenho da CPU e, portanto, perde muito potencial.

Uma grande vantagem, obviamente é o ótimo chassi, realmente não conseguimos imaginar como poderia ser melhorado. O layout pode ser um pouco desconfortável, mas o teclado Chroma é definitivamente um tesouro graças às amplas opções de personalização. Com um veloz ac-WLAN, Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C e HDMI 2.0, o Blade está preparado para o futuro. O portátil para jogos também oferece um brilhante painel IGZO com forte contraste e cores precisas.

<s>Se a Razer resolver os problemas de afogamento, outorgaríamos ao Blade uma pontuação de 84%. Poderia ser muito bem que o nosso modelo de teste estava defeituoso. Infelizmente, sentimos a obrigação de tirar 2% da pontuação (por enquanto).</s>

Atualização 05/12/2016: Como foi mencionado antes, o afogamento da CPU foi corrigido por uma atualização EC. A pontuação é, portanto, é aumentada para os originais 84%.

Razer Blade (2016) - 12/25/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

93 / 98 → 95%

Teclado

76%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

63 / 81 → 77%

Peso

64 / 10-66 → 96%

Bateria