Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 69 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 1491:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, 3200x1800, 14" | SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -7% | -10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 66.2 -1% | 65.5 -2% | 64.5 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.8 | 82.8 -14% | 86.4 -11% | 83.1 -14% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.2 | 60.5 -11% | 63.1 -7% | 60.8 -11% |
| Response Times | -9% | 29% | 23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 56 ? -37% | 31.6 ? 23% | 38 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37 ? | 30 ? 19% | 24.4 ? 34% | 23 ? 38% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | -58% | -27% | -58% | |
| Brightness middle | 328 | 282 -14% | 288.4 -12% | 315 -4% |
| Brightness | 328 | 266 -19% | 282 -14% | 290 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 69 | 81 17% | 83 20% | 85 23% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.35 -59% | 0.32 -45% |
| Contrast | 1491 | 1282 -14% | 824 -45% | 984 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.91 | 4.98 -161% | 2.61 -37% | 4.88 -155% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.23 | 10.2 -216% | 7.34 -127% | 8.88 -175% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.69 | 4.08 -141% | 1.18 30% | 4.17 -147% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.51 88% | 2.24 98% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 6418 101% | 5877 111% | 6506 100% | 6683 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 54 -14% | 56.4 -10% | 55 -13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 83 -14% | 86.4 -11% | 83 -14% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-41% | -2% /
-15% | -15% /
-37% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3417 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4214 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | -63% | -54% | |
| Read Seq | 1296 | 1634 26% | 335.3 -74% | 485.4 -63% |
| Write Seq | 603 | 1290 114% | 299 -50% | 312.4 -48% |
| Read 512 | 655 | 1149 75% | 223 -66% | 294.8 -55% |
| Write 512 | 604 | 1285 113% | 246.7 -59% | 287.8 -52% |
| Read 4k | 42.22 | 43.82 4% | 17.68 -58% | 21.44 -49% |
| Write 4k | 139.6 | 110.3 -21% | 35.31 -75% | 75.7 -46% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 573 | 320.5 -44% | 247.4 -57% | 149.4 -74% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 480 | 287.3 -40% | 156.3 -67% | 256.3 -47% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11139 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9193 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.2 | 37.3 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 76.5 | |||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 63.6 | 57.4 | 49.1 | |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 81.7 | 59.9 | 56.4 | |
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 52.1 | 47 | 44.1 |
| Battlefield 1 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 33 / 35 dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 51 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -4% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.1 3% | 30 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 30 3% | 32 -3% | 32 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 32 3% | 32 3% | 33 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 40 -14% | 33.5 4% | 34 3% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 47 -21% | 50 -28% | 39 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 51 | 51 -0% | 51.5 -1% | 51 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).
| Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -25% | -20% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 52.7 | 55 -4% | 55.6 -6% | 48 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48.4 | 58.7 -21% | 62.4 -29% | 46.8 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29.3 | 36.9 -26% | 33.2 -13% | 33.7 -15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.4 | 41.7 -47% | 37.2 -31% | 30.5 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.1 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9 / 14 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
72 / 124 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC940 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -27% | -58% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9 | 12 -33% | 12.1 -34% | 20 -122% |
| Idle Average * | 14 | 16 -14% | 19 -36% | 24 -71% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22 | 22 -0% | 19.5 11% | 29 -32% |
| Load Average * | 72 | 90 -25% | 106.7 -48% | 86 -19% |
| Load Maximum * | 124 | 170 -37% | 159 -28% | 183 -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade (2016) 70 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P406 45 Wh | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 61 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 243 | 197 -19% | 261 7% | 196 -19% |
Pro
Contra
Considerando a extensa lista de pros, não podemos evitar nos sentir decepcionados pelo sério afogamento da CPU. O flickering PWM e os lentos tempos de resposta também farão duvidar a alguns compradores potenciais. O registro obrigatório é mais uma inconveniência. Nós aceitaríamos as emissões de ruído graças à fina carcaça do portátil, mas o ruído de alta frequência emitido pelas ventoinhas, definitivamente podem causar problemas aos usuários.
O novo Razer Blade faz bem muitas coisas, mas deixa a desejar em termos de desempenho da CPU e, portanto, perde muito potencial.
Uma grande vantagem, obviamente é o ótimo chassi, realmente não conseguimos imaginar como poderia ser melhorado. O layout pode ser um pouco desconfortável, mas o teclado Chroma é definitivamente um tesouro graças às amplas opções de personalização. Com um veloz ac-WLAN, Thunderbolt 3 via USB Type-C e HDMI 2.0, o Blade está preparado para o futuro. O portátil para jogos também oferece um brilhante painel IGZO com forte contraste e cores precisas.
<s>Se a Razer resolver os problemas de afogamento, outorgaríamos ao Blade uma pontuação de 84%. Poderia ser muito bem que o nosso modelo de teste estava defeituoso. Infelizmente, sentimos a obrigação de tirar 2% da pontuação (por enquanto).</s>
Atualização 05/12/2016: Como foi mencionado antes, o afogamento da CPU foi corrigido por uma atualização EC. A pontuação é, portanto, é aumentada para os originais 84%.
Razer Blade (2016)
-
12/25/2016 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn