Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016) FHD
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 272 cd/m²
Contraste: 1046:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080 | Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), 3200x1800 | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P34W v5 2560x1440 | SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 10% | 3% | -14% | 0% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 66.9 3% | 65.5 0% | 51.4 -21% | 66.2 2% | 64.5 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.4 | 96.8 16% | 86.4 4% | 76.6 -8% | 82.8 -1% | 83.4 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.9 | 68.2 12% | 63.1 4% | 52.8 -13% | 60.5 -1% | 60.9 0% |
| Response Times | -15% | 20% | 7% | -17% | 10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 41 ? 13% | 31.6 ? 33% | 41.2 ? 12% | 56 ? -19% | 40 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 37 ? -42% | 24.4 ? 6% | 25.4 ? 2% | 30 ? -15% | 25 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
| Screen | 29% | 9% | 3% | 1% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 272 | 328 21% | 288.4 6% | 277.8 2% | 282 4% | 321 18% |
| Brightness | 277 | 328 18% | 282 2% | 270 -3% | 266 -4% | 296 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 69 -18% | 83 -1% | 83 -1% | 81 -4% | 88 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.22 15% | 0.35 -35% | 0.38 -46% | 0.22 15% | 0.33 -27% |
| Contrast | 1046 | 1491 43% | 824 -21% | 731 -30% | 1282 23% | 973 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 1.91 58% | 2.61 43% | 2.71 41% | 4.98 -8% | 4.42 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.49 | 3.23 62% | 7.34 14% | 5.47 36% | 10.2 -20% | 9.78 -15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 1.69 61% | 1.18 72% | 2.11 51% | 4.08 5% | 3.34 22% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.51 88% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6848 95% | 6418 101% | 6506 100% | 6314 103% | 5877 111% | 6213 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 63 15% | 56.4 3% | 48.5 -12% | 54 -2% | 55 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 97 17% | 86.4 4% | 76.9 -7% | 83 0% | 83 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
20% | 11% /
9% | -1% /
0% | -5% /
-2% | 4% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5874 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4010 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4942 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4920 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | Gigabyte P34W v5 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe | SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -25% | -73% | 8% | -14% | -58% | |
| Read Seq | 1977 | 1296 -34% | 335.3 -83% | 2269 15% | 1634 -17% | 462.5 -77% |
| Write Seq | 1668 | 603 -64% | 299 -82% | 1524 -9% | 1290 -23% | 462.7 -72% |
| Read 512 | 800 | 655 -18% | 223 -72% | 937 17% | 1149 44% | 335 -58% |
| Write 512 | 1030 | 604 -41% | 246.7 -76% | 1483 44% | 1285 25% | 407.1 -60% |
| Read 4k | 58.1 | 42.22 -27% | 17.68 -70% | 53.8 -7% | 43.82 -25% | 25.61 -56% |
| Write 4k | 145.6 | 139.6 -4% | 35.31 -76% | 167.3 15% | 110.3 -24% | 86.3 -41% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 592 | 573 -3% | 247.4 -58% | 622 5% | 320.5 -46% | 246.7 -58% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 508 | 480 -6% | 156.3 -69% | 418.9 -18% | 287.3 -43% | 301.5 -41% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25367 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11616 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 78946 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21402 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9117 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4873 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3443 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| Gigabyte P34W v5 | |
| Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
| SCHENKER XMG P406 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 347.4 | 312.1 | 261.9 | 131.7 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 184.5 | 164.6 | 148.3 | 94 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 168.1 | 167.8 | 154.1 | 94 |
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 110.4 | 103.3 | 79.2 | 28.6 |
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 85.5 | 62.8 | 52.8 | 27.8 |
| The Division (2016) | 184.6 | 120.7 | 61.2 | 48.2 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 67.9 | 54.8 | 49.4 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 114.4 | 93.8 | 52.4 | 28.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 36 / 37 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 57 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 5% | 7% | 4% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 30 3% | 29.1 6% | 31 -0% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 31 11% | 32 9% | 31.6 10% | 30 14% | 32 9% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 33 8% | 32 11% | 31.6 12% | 32 11% | 33 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 35 5% | 33.5 9% | 32.5 12% | 40 -8% | 34 8% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 39 9% | 50 -16% | 46.5 -8% | 47 -9% | 44 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 51 11% | 51.5 10% | 52.5 8% | 51 11% | 53 7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.9 °C / 103.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11 °C / -19.8 F).
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -22% | -11% | -27% | -24% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 52.7 2% | 55.6 -3% | 59.3 -10% | 55 -2% | 65.3 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.4 | 48.4 2% | 62.4 -26% | 56.5 -14% | 58.7 -19% | 64.4 -30% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 29.3 -5% | 33.2 -19% | 27.8 1% | 36.9 -32% | 35.4 -26% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 28.4 -6% | 37.2 -39% | 31.8 -19% | 41.7 -56% | 31.6 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 14 / 18 / 21 Watt |
| Carga |
70 / 146 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -9% | -5% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14 | 9 36% | 12.1 14% | 12 14% | 16 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 18 | 14 22% | 19 -6% | 16 11% | 19 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21 | 22 -5% | 19.5 7% | 22 -5% | 23 -10% |
| Load Average * | 70 | 72 -3% | 106.7 -52% | 90 -29% | 68 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 146 | 124 15% | 159 -9% | 170 -16% | 157 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 61 Wh | Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -43% | -10% | -38% | -32% | -21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 760 | 577 -24% | 392 -48% | 275 -64% | 315 -59% | |
| H.264 | 312 | 235 -25% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 427 | 243 -43% | 261 -39% | 232 -46% | 197 -54% | 220 -48% |
| Load | 59 | 78 32% | 47 -20% | 72 22% | 87 47% |
Pro
Contra
A Razer coloca muito desempenho em um chassi muito atraente e fino. O sistema consegue rodar todos os jogos modernos, mas as taxas de fotogramas são um pouco baixas em comparação com rivais maiores. O desempenho do resfriamento é limitado por causa das pequenas dimensões do chassi, por isso a velocidade da GPU sofre um pouco. Nunca é um portátil muito silencioso – não esperávamos isso. Porém, você ainda pode viver com o ruído do modo inativo. Um muito veloz SSD garante um sistema responsivo. Não é um problema remover o painel inferior, e o portátil está bem preparado para o futuro com suas portas. Somente falta uma porta Gigabit-Ethernet, a qual deve ser adicionada mediante um adaptador USB, se necessária.
O Blade Full HD é o melhor pacote.
A maior diferença com o modelo anteriormente analisado do Blade e a tela. A tela IPS Full HD com amplos ângulos de visão consegue bons resultados de iluminação e uma boa razão de contraste. Positivo: Em comparação com a tela QHD+ do irmão, não podemos determinar qualquer flickering PWM na tela Full HD. Esta última também é mais eficiente em comparação com a tela táctil QHD+ e consegue durações de bateria muito mais longas, como resultado.
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
- 12/25/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
