Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016) FHD

Name: Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Brand: Razer

Sucesso. O fino aparelho de 14 polegadas da Razer está equipado com hardware poderoso que roda todos os jogos modernos na tela Full HD mate. Você também recebe bons dispositivos de entrada e Thunderbolt 3. A estamina do pequeno sistema também não está nada mal.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/18/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Razer DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade (2016) FHD (Blade Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, 192-Bit-Anbindung, ForceWare 376.33, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4-2133, Dual-Channel, soldada, sem slots

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: combinado, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 345 x 235

Bateria

70 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força: 165 Watts, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.88 kg, Suprimento de energia: 418 g

Preço

2700 Euro

Links

Razer página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	591 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	561 MBit/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	677 MBit/s +32%
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	646 MBit/s +26%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	513 MBit/s


296 cd/m²	286 cd/m²	296 cd/m²
278 cd/m²	272 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
276 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	271 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 296 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 277.1 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 272 cd/m²
Contraste: 1046:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080	Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), 3200x1800	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, 1920x1080	Gigabyte P34W v5 2560x1440	SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080
Display		10%	3%	-14%	0%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	65.2	66.9 3%	65.5 0%	51.4 -21%	66.2 2%	64.5 -1%
sRGB Coverage	83.4	96.8 16%	86.4 4%	76.6 -8%	82.8 -1%	83.4 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.9	68.2 12%	63.1 4%	52.8 -13%	60.5 -1%	60.9 0%
Response Times		-15%	20%	7%	-17%	10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47 ?(14, 33)	41 ?(15, 26) 13%	31.6 ?(10.4, 21.2) 33%	41.2 ?(15.2, 26) 12%	56 ?(22, 34) -19%	40 ?(15, 25) 15%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(6, 20)	37 ?(9, 28) -42%	24.4 ?(5.2, 19.2) 6%	25.4 ?(3.4, 22) 2%	30 ?(8, 22) -15%	25 ?(5, 20) 4%
PWM Frequency		200 ?(90)
Screen		29%	9%	3%	1%	1%
Brightness middle	272	328 21%	288.4 6%	277.8 2%	282 4%	321 18%
Brightness	277	328 18%	282 2%	270 -3%	266 -4%	296 7%
Brightness Distribution	84	69 -18%	83 -1%	83 -1%	81 -4%	88 5%
Black Level *	0.26	0.22 15%	0.35 -35%	0.38 -46%	0.22 15%	0.33 -27%
Contrast	1046	1491 43%	824 -21%	731 -30%	1282 23%	973 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.59	1.91 58%	2.61 43%	2.71 41%	4.98 -8%	4.42 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.49	3.23 62%	7.34 14%	5.47 36%	10.2 -20%	9.78 -15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.28	1.69 61%	1.18 72%	2.11 51%	4.08 5%	3.34 22%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.3 ^96%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.51 ^88%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6848 ^95%	6418 ^101%	6506 ^100%	6314 ^103%	5877 ^111%	6213 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	63 15%	56.4 3%	48.5 -12%	54 -2%	55 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	97 17%	86.4 4%	76.9 -7%	83 0%	83 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 20%	11% / 9%	-1% / 0%	-5% / -2%	4% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6777

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20639

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5550

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.9 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.49 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

93.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

678 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

149 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	149 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	137 Points -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points 0%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points 0%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -1%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20639 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20528 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20394 Points -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20195 Points -2%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points -3%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5550 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5463 Points -2%
Gigabyte P34W v5 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5460 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5348 Points -4%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4937 Points -11%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3542 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3459 Points -2%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12873 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12818 Points 0%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4326 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4286 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	13058 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	12974 Points -1%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	250.1 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD Intel Core i7-6700HQ	247.3 Points
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	236.4 Points -4%

PCMark 7 Score		5874 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4010 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4942 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4920 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4741 Points +18%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4016 Points 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	4010 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	3706 Points -8%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3417 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3371 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	5109 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5023 Points +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	4920 Points
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4796 Points -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4649 Points -6%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4214 Points -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 1977 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1668 MB/s

512K Read: 800 MB/s

512K Write: 1030 MB/s

4K Read: 58.1 MB/s

4K Write: 145.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 592 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD	Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P34W v5 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-25%	-73%	8%	-14%	-58%
Read Seq	1977	1296 -34%	335.3 -83%	2269 15%	1634 -17%	462.5 -77%
Write Seq	1668	603 -64%	299 -82%	1524 -9%	1290 -23%	462.7 -72%
Read 512	800	655 -18%	223 -72%	937 17%	1149 44%	335 -58%
Write 512	1030	604 -41%	246.7 -76%	1483 44%	1285 25%	407.1 -60%
Read 4k	58.1	42.22 -27%	17.68 -70%	53.8 -7%	43.82 -25%	25.61 -56%
Write 4k	145.6	139.6 -4%	35.31 -76%	167.3 15%	110.3 -24%	86.3 -41%
Read 4k QD32	592	573 -3%	247.4 -58%	622 5%	320.5 -46%	246.7 -58%
Write 4k QD32	508	480 -6%	156.3 -69%	418.9 -18%	287.3 -43%	301.5 -41%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		25367 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		11616 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		78946 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21402 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9117 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4873 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3443 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	3576 Points +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	3396 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11776 Points +9%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11622 Points +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10890 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10791 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7457 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7436 Points -31%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15387 Points +14%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14977 Points +11%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13891 Points +3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13534 Points
Gigabyte P34W v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9691 Points -28%
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9649 Points -29%

BioShock Infinite | Battlefield 4

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.3 fps +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.1 fps +9%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps
Gigabyte P34W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	71.4 fps -24%

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.8 fps +6%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	94 fps
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	58.1 fps -38%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	347.4	312.1	261.9	131.7
BioShock Infinite (2013)	184.5	164.6	148.3	94
Battlefield 4 (2013)	168.1	167.8	154.1	94
Anno 2205 (2015)	110.4	103.3	79.2	28.6
XCOM 2 (2016)	85.5	62.8	52.8	27.8
The Division (2016)	184.6	120.7	61.2	48.2
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	67.9	54.8	49.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	114.4	93.8	52.4	28.1

Barulho

Ocioso		35 / 36 / 37 dB
Carga		43 / 57 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Noise		8%	5%	7%	4%	5%
off / environment *	31	30 3%	29.1 6%			31 -0%
Idle Minimum *	35	31 11%	32 9%	31.6 10%	30 14%	32 9%
Idle Average *	36	33 8%	32 11%	31.6 12%	32 11%	33 8%
Idle Maximum *	37	35 5%	33.5 9%	32.5 12%	40 -8%	34 8%
Load Average *	43	39 9%	50 -16%	46.5 -8%	47 -9%	44 -2%
Load Maximum *	57	51 11%	51.5 10%	52.5 8%	51 11%	53 7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


53.9 °C	49.2 °C	54 °C
44.3 °C	49.5 °C	47.5 °C
39.2 °C	39.9 °C	38.1 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 46.2 °C


48.5 °C	49.4 °C	45.3 °C
46.2 °C	47 °C	40.5 °C
39.8 °C	40.2 °C	37.5 °C

Máximo: 49.4 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 49.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.9 °C / 103.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11 °C / -19.8 F).

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Heat		-2%	-22%	-11%	-27%	-24%
Maximum Upper Side *	54	52.7 2%	55.6 -3%	59.3 -10%	55 -2%	65.3 -21%
Maximum Bottom *	49.4	48.4 2%	62.4 -26%	56.5 -14%	58.7 -19%	64.4 -30%
Idle Upper Side *	28	29.3 -5%	33.2 -19%	27.8 1%	36.9 -32%	35.4 -26%
Idle Bottom *	26.8	28.4 -6%	37.2 -39%	31.8 -19%	41.7 -56%	31.6 -18%

* ... smaller is better

Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	14 / 18 / 21 Watt
Carga	70 / 146 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption		13%	-9%	-5%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	14	9 36%	12.1 14%	12 14%	16 -14%
Idle Average *	18	14 22%	19 -6%	16 11%	19 -6%
Idle Maximum *	21	22 -5%	19.5 7%	22 -5%	23 -10%
Load Average *	70	72 -3%	106.7 -52%	90 -29%	68 3%
Load Maximum *	146	124 15%	159 -9%	170 -16%	157 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 59min

	Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 61 Wh	Gigabyte P34W v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P406 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh
Battery Runtime		-43%	-10%	-38%	-32%	-21%
Reader / Idle	760		577 -24%	392 -48%	275 -64%	315 -59%
H.264	312					235 -25%
WiFi v1.3	427	243 -43%	261 -39%	232 -46%	197 -54%	220 -48%
Load	59		78 32%	47 -20%	72 22%	87 47%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alumínio rígida

+ Fino e belo

+ Tela IPS mate

+ Resolução Full HD

+ SSD veloz

+ HDMI 2.0

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Muito boas durações da bateria

+ Sem flickering PWM

Contra

- As ventoinhas funcionam o tempo todo

- O rotulado das letras poderia melhorar

- Sem Ethernet

In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.

A Razer coloca muito desempenho em um chassi muito atraente e fino. O sistema consegue rodar todos os jogos modernos, mas as taxas de fotogramas são um pouco baixas em comparação com rivais maiores. O desempenho do resfriamento é limitado por causa das pequenas dimensões do chassi, por isso a velocidade da GPU sofre um pouco. Nunca é um portátil muito silencioso – não esperávamos isso. Porém, você ainda pode viver com o ruído do modo inativo. Um muito veloz SSD garante um sistema responsivo. Não é um problema remover o painel inferior, e o portátil está bem preparado para o futuro com suas portas. Somente falta uma porta Gigabit-Ethernet, a qual deve ser adicionada mediante um adaptador USB, se necessária.

O Blade Full HD é o melhor pacote.

A maior diferença com o modelo anteriormente analisado do Blade e a tela. A tela IPS Full HD com amplos ângulos de visão consegue bons resultados de iluminação e uma boa razão de contraste. Positivo: Em comparação com a tela QHD+ do irmão, não podemos determinar qualquer flickering PWM na tela Full HD. Esta última também é mais eficiente em comparação com a tela táctil QHD+ e consegue durações de bateria muito mais longas, como resultado.

Razer Blade (2016) FHD - 2016-12-25 12/25/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

93 / 98 → 95%

Teclado

76%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

61 / 81 → 75%

Peso

64 / 10-66 → 97%

Bateria

85%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

91%

Desempenho da aplicação

92%

Temperatura

82 / 95 → 86%

Ruído

58 / 90 → 64%

Audio

66%

Camera

71 / 85 → 84%

Médio

78%

84%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016) FHD

Sascha Mölck, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 4)