Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD)

Overachiever. Como um sucessor do Blade de 14 polegadas de gama alta, a Razer apresentou um novo portátil de jogos compacto com tela de 15 polegadas edge-to-edge. Descubra quão bem este portátil de jogos se desempenhou contra seus concorrentes em nossa análise.
Coffee Lake Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Razer Blade 15 models
Razer Blade 15 models
Razer Blade 15 2018 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, 32 GB máx
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, multitouch, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
, SSD. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x 3.5 mm combo
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.3 x 355 x 235
Bateria
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1 MP (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 W, pano de limpeza, manual, Razer Synapse, Razer Chroma, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.056 kg, Suprimento de energia: 670 g
Preço
2900 EUR
Links
Razer página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
384 mm 261 mm 20 mm 2.5 kg380 mm 255 mm 19 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.3 mm 2.1 kg345 mm 236 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
left: power, 2x USB-A 3.0, audio combo jack
left: power, 2x USB-A 3.0, audio combo jack
right: Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.0, MiniDisplayPort 1.4, Kensington lock
right: Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.0, MiniDisplayPort 1.4, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
677 MBit/s +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
643 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
286
cd/m²		280
cd/m²		307
cd/m²
274
cd/m²		290
cd/m²		304
cd/m²
251
cd/m²		261
cd/m²		280
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 307 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 967:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Razer Blade 15 2018
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
1%
-1%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
64.3
63.6
-1%
66.2
3%
63.4
-1%
66.1
3%
sRGB Coverage
93.7
93.8
0%
92.1
-2%
93.3
0%
92.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.5
64.9
-1%
67.2
3%
64.5
-2%
67.2
3%
Response Times
5%
-5%
10%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
2%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-2%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
12%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
62%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
7%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
7%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
13%
PWM Frequency
Screen
19%
7%
1%
-30%
Brightness middle
290
313
8%
254
-12%
309
7%
307
6%
Brightness
281
300
7%
262
-7%
291
4%
296
5%
Brightness Distribution
82
78
-5%
89
9%
91
11%
89
9%
Black Level *
0.3
0.33
-10%
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.25
17%
Contrast
967
948
-2%
1155
19%
997
3%
1228
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.85
1.29
55%
2.37
17%
2.96
-4%
5.74
-101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.27
2.04
67%
4.71
25%
5.14
18%
11.32
-81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.39
1.84
-32%
1.41
-1%
1.94
-40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
0.69
71%
1.58
34%
2.88
-20%
6.44
-168%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.43 91%
2.48 89%
2.33 94%
2.48 89%
CCT
6718 97%
6550 99%
6785 96%
6725 97%
8395 77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
94
0%
92
-2%
93
-1%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 13%
1% / 5%
3% / 2%
3% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +60%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +245%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points +15%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1103 Points +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
983 Points
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +71%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points +3%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +254%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.29 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points +23%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points +19%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.51 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
983 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +54%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5213 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5046 Points
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4658 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points -1%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
4510 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +8%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5687 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5637 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4658 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5637 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5046 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade 15 2018
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD
-28%
4%
29%
-4%
Seq Read
2376
2213
-7%
1266
-47%
2685
13%
2091
-12%
Seq Write
1521
1163
-24%
1834
21%
2325
53%
1580
4%
4K Read
46.45
23.36
-50%
48.94
5%
53.6
15%
43.42
-7%
4K Write
93.6
80.4
-14%
107.2
15%
131.9
41%
90.2
-4%
Score Read
1584
1092
-31%
1346
-15%
1661
5%
1471
-7%
Score Write
1450
939
-35%
2051
41%
2200
52%
1446
0%
Score Total
3806
2536
-33%
4122
8%
4701
24%
3649
-4%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3280 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1527 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 296.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1371 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1483 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.23 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.2 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +98%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17046 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15748 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14146 Points -10%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +118%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21925 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19969 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
17680 Points -11%
3DMark 11 Performance
14676 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26862 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12707 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +137%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
59.4 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
53.5 fps
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.7 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.4 fps -2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
50.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
49.8 fps -7%
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 99.4 53.5
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 142 117
Rocket League (2017) 196
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 120 84.6
F1 2017 (2017) 112 79
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 91 71
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 51.5 50.5
ELEX (2017) 94.1 73
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 97.4 91.8
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 110 94
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 70.2 53.3

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 30 / 38 dB
Carga
46 / 46 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Razer Blade 15 2018
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-4%
4%
-5%
-2%
9%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
31
-7%
30
-3%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
30
31
-3%
31
-3%
37
-23%
31
-3%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Maximum *
38
35
8%
34
11%
43
-13%
33
13%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
21%
Load Average *
46
49
-7%
43
7%
45
2%
49
-7%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
42
14%
46
6%
50
-2%
Load Maximum *
46
54
-17%
44
4%
46
-0%
52
-13%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highshearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 52 °C56 °C54 °C 
 48 °C52 °C45 °C 
 43 °C43 °C42 °C 
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 48.3 °C
55 °C59 °C50 °C
52 °C52 °C47 °C
47 °C47 °C44 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 50.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
Razer Blade 15 2018
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
7%
15%
-2%
10%
11%
Maximum Upper Side *
56
53
5%
49
12%
57
-2%
52
7%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
18%
Maximum Bottom *
59
65
-10%
63
-7%
65
-10%
49
17%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Upper Side *
33
26
21%
24
27%
33
-0%
31
6%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
5%
Idle Bottom *
34
30
12%
25
26%
33
3%
31
9%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.241.72536.134.23129.632.54033.333.35026.430.56326.131.18024.937.910024.240.712522.34116021.448.120021.754.825022.257.231520.558.340018.962.950018.865.263017.763.980017.470.1100017.273.8125016.874.1160017.173.620001772.125001770315017.267.9400017.265.1500017.262.1630017.261.4800017.255.71000017.2511250017.147.5160001740.3SPL29.681.8N1.347.5median 17.2median 62.1Delta0.91039.144.635.64028.430.433.537.726.428.525.527.429.23028.932.324.532.921.141.520.748.520.955.919.561.218.465.118.366.417.567.61867.918.665.317.469.216.765.817.264.517.365.917.26817.257.317.256.417.261.117.36617.262.217.259.61754.129.777.51.342.2median 17.4median 62.21.86.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 2018Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14 / 17 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 95 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 15 2018
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-1%
15%
1%
-17%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
14
14
-0%
7
50%
14
-0%
16
-14%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
17
18
-6%
11
35%
17
-0%
19
-12%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
20
5%
22
-5%
26
-24%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
-27%
Load Average *
95
91
4%
98
-3%
102
-7%
103
-8%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
141
142
-1%
132
6%
130
8%
164
-16%
Load Maximum *
179
173
3%
182
-2%
157
12%
223
-25%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 22min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 12min
Razer Blade 15 2018
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh		SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
83%
17%
-10%
-35%
27%
Reader / Idle
382
762
99%
507
33%
301
-21%
237
-38%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
48%
H.264
324
504
56%
356
10%
159
-51%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
26%
WiFi v1.3
322
513
59%
362
12%
220
-32%
164
-49%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
17%
Load
72
156
117%
81
13%
89
24%
70
-3%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
18%

Pro

+ Desempenho impressionante considerando o formato
+ Carcaça fina, leve e robusta
+ Portas posicionadas de forma inteligente
+ Materiais de alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Carcaça bem feita
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Ferramentas poderosas
+ Design elegante
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Os software Razer requer uma conta
- Muiti barulhento para um design Max-Q
- Superfícies suscetíveis à sujeira
- Sem leitor de cartões, sem RJ45
- 12 meses de garantia
- Altas temperaturas
- Apenas um slot M.2
Razer Blade 15. Review unit courtesy of Razer Germany.
Razer Blade 15. Review unit courtesy of Razer Germany.

O Razer Blade 15 é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos fino, disponíveis.

A carcaça elegante e sólida coloca, tanto o Clevo P955ER Barebone (Schenker Key 15, Eurocom Q6) como o MSI GS65 Stealth Thin, em seu lugar. Apenas o Gigabyte Aero 15X chega perto em termos e design e qualidade da carcaça.

Ambos os dispositivos estão no mesmo nível na maioria das categorias, mas no final o Gigabyte prevaleceu graças a sua duração de bateria mais longa, e conseguiu chegar ao nosso Lista dos Top 10. De outra forma, o Blade 15 estava quase sempre no mesmo nível do 15X - exceto pelo leitor de cartões e porta Ethernet ausentes - eles são, os dispositivos de entrada (iluminação RGB do teclado), tela (144 Hz), emissões, ou desempenho.

A combinação de Core i7 2670QM, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, e SSD NVMe é ideal para aplicações do dia a dia e todos os jogos atuais, embora o Blade 15 esquentou e se tornou muito barulhento sob uso intenso.

Dito tudo, podemos recomendar o Blade 15, a pesar de seu alto preço. Aqueles que viajam com muita frequência e preferem deixar o adaptador de força em suas mochilas, provavelmente deveriam dar uma olhada no Gigabyte Aero 15X.

Razer Blade 15 2018 - 06/27/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
65 / 81 → 80%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
83%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
72 / 95 → 76%
Ruído
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
68%
Médio
80%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD)
Sebastian Jentsch, 2018-07-11 (Update: 2024-11- 4)