Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD)

Name: Razer Blade 15 2018
Brand: Razer

Overachiever. Como um sucessor do Blade de 14 polegadas de gama alta, a Razer apresentou um novo portátil de jogos compacto com tela de 15 polegadas edge-to-edge. Descubra quão bem este portátil de jogos se desempenhou contra seus concorrentes em nossa análise.

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/11/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 2018 (Blade 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, 32 GB máx

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, multitouch, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB

, SSD. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x 3.5 mm combo

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.3 x 355 x 235

Bateria

80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1 MP (720p)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0 (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 W, pano de limpeza, manual, Razer Synapse, Razer Chroma, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.056 kg, Suprimento de energia: 670 g

Preço

2900 EUR

Links

Razer página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Razer Blade 15 2018 Razer Blade (2017) DIN A4 ❌

left: power, 2x USB-A 3.0, audio combo jack

right: Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.0, MiniDisplayPort 1.4, Kensington lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	677 MBit/s +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	643 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	585 MBit/s -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	685 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	681 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -3%


286 cd/m²	280 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
274 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
251 cd/m²	261 cd/m²	280 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 307 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 967:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-1%	1%	-1%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.3	63.6 -1%	66.2 3%	63.4 -1%	66.1 3%
sRGB Coverage	93.7	93.8 0%	92.1 -2%	93.3 0%	92.7 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.5	64.9 -1%	67.2 3%	64.5 -2%	67.2 3%
Response Times		5%	-5%	10%	38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) 2%	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) -2%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) 12%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 62%
Response Time Black / White *	12 ?(6.8, 5.2)	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 7%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -7%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 7%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 13%
PWM Frequency
Screen		19%	7%	1%	-30%
Brightness middle	290	313 8%	254 -12%	309 7%	307 6%
Brightness	281	300 7%	262 -7%	291 4%	296 5%
Brightness Distribution	82	78 -5%	89 9%	91 11%	89 9%
Black Level *	0.3	0.33 -10%	0.22 27%	0.31 -3%	0.25 17%
Contrast	967	948 -2%	1155 19%	997 3%	1228 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.85	1.29 55%	2.37 17%	2.96 -4%	5.74 -101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.27	2.04 67%	4.71 25%	5.14 18%	11.32 -81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.39		1.84 -32%	1.41 -1%	1.94 -40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	0.69 71%	1.58 34%	2.88 -20%	6.44 -168%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.43 ^91%	2.48 ^89%	2.33 ^94%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	6718 ^97%	6550 ^99%	6785 ^96%	6725 ^97%	8395 ^77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	60 0%	60 0%	60 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	94 0%	92 -2%	93 -1%	93 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 13%	1% / 5%	3% / 2%	3% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.8 ms rise
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +62%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	172 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +248%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1168 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1133 Points +15%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	1103 Points +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	983 Points

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +71%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points +3%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.95 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +254%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	13.29 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.93 Points +23%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H	12.55 Points +19%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	11.82 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	10.51 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.95 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

10.51 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

172 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

983 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +55%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB	5213 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5194 Points +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5059 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5046 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4665 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4658 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4627 Points -1%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB	4510 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4504 Points -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +8%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB	5687 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5676 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5662 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5637 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5621 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4658 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5637 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5046 pontos
Ajuda

	Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		-28%	4%	29%	-4%
Seq Read	2376	2213 -7%	1266 -47%	2685 13%	2091 -12%
Seq Write	1521	1163 -24%	1834 21%	2325 53%	1580 4%
4K Read	46.45	23.36 -50%	48.94 5%	53.6 15%	43.42 -7%
4K Write	93.6	80.4 -14%	107.2 15%	131.9 41%	90.2 -4%
Score Read	1584	1092 -31%	1346 -15%	1661 5%	1471 -7%
Score Write	1450	939 -35%	2051 41%	2200 52%	1446 0%
Score Total	3806	2536 -33%	4122 8%	4701 24%	3649 -4%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3280 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1527 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 296.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1371 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1483 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.23 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.2 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +99%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17046 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15748 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15156 Points -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14780 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14146 Points -10%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +119%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21925 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19969 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19162 Points -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	17680 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		14676 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		26862 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12707 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +140%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	59.4 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	53.5 fps
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.7 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.4 fps -2%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	50.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	49.8 fps -7%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	99.4	53.5
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	142	117
Rocket League (2017)	196
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)	120	84.6
F1 2017 (2017)	112	79
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	91	71
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	51.5	50.5
ELEX (2017)	94.1	73
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017)	97.4	91.8
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	110	94
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	70.2	53.3

Barulho

Ocioso		29 / 30 / 38 dB
Carga		46 / 46 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-4%	4%	-5%	-2%	8%
off / environment *	29	29 -0%	30 -3%	30 -3%	29 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	29	30 -3%	30 -3%	31 -7%	30 -3%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	30	31 -3%	31 -3%	37 -23%	31 -3%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	38	35 8%	34 11%	43 -13%	33 13%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 20%
Load Average *	46	49 -7%	43 7%	45 2%	49 -7%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49	51 -4%	42 14%	46 6%	50 -2%
Load Maximum *	46	54 -17%	44 4%	46 -0%	52 -13%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -16%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


52 °C	56 °C	54 °C
48 °C	52 °C	45 °C
43 °C	43 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 48.3 °C


55 °C	59 °C	50 °C
52 °C	52 °C	47 °C
47 °C	47 °C	44 °C

Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 50.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
32 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


33 °C	34 °C	33 °C
33 °C	33 °C	33 °C
32 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 28 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


50 °C	53 °C	51 °C
47 °C	50 °C	44 °C
40 °C	42 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 46.3 °C


53 °C	55 °C	48 °C
48 °C	49 °C	45 °C
47 °C	47 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 48.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).

	Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		7%	15%	-2%	10%	11%
Maximum Upper Side *	56	53 5%	49 12%	57 -2%	52 7%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Maximum Bottom *	59	65 -10%	63 -7%	65 -10%	49 17%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Upper Side *	33	26 21%	24 27%	33 -0%	31 6%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Bottom *	34	30 12%	25 26%	33 3%	31 9%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	14 / 17 / 21 Watt
Carga	95 / 179 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-1%	15%	1%	-17%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	14	14 -0%	7 50%	14 -0%	16 -14%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Average *	17	18 -6%	11 35%	17 -0%	19 -12%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Maximum *	21	22 -5%	20 5%	22 -5%	26 -24%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -27%
Load Average *	95	91 4%	98 -3%	102 -7%	103 -8%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -12%
Witcher 3 ultra *	141	142 -1%	132 6%	130 8%	164 -16%
Load Maximum *	179	173 3%	182 -2%	157 12%	223 -25%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 12min

	Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh	SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		83%	17%	-10%	-35%	27%
Reader / Idle	382	762 99%	507 33%	301 -21%	237 -38%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 48%
H.264	324	504 56%	356 10%		159 -51%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 26%
WiFi v1.3	322	513 59%	362 12%	220 -32%	164 -49%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) 16%
Load	72	156 117%	81 13%	89 24%	70 -3%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 19%

Pro

+ Desempenho impressionante considerando o formato

+ Carcaça fina, leve e robusta

+ Portas posicionadas de forma inteligente

+ Materiais de alta qualidade

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Marcos finos da tela

+ Carcaça bem feita

+ Iluminação de fundo RGB

+ Ferramentas poderosas

+ Design elegante

+ Painel de 144 Hz

+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Os software Razer requer uma conta

- Muiti barulhento para um design Max-Q

- Superfícies suscetíveis à sujeira

- Sem leitor de cartões, sem RJ45

- 12 meses de garantia

- Altas temperaturas

- Apenas um slot M.2

Razer Blade 15. Review unit courtesy of Razer Germany.

O Razer Blade 15 é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos fino, disponíveis.

A carcaça elegante e sólida coloca, tanto o Clevo P955ER Barebone (Schenker Key 15, Eurocom Q6) como o MSI GS65 Stealth Thin, em seu lugar. Apenas o Gigabyte Aero 15X chega perto em termos e design e qualidade da carcaça.

Ambos os dispositivos estão no mesmo nível na maioria das categorias, mas no final o Gigabyte prevaleceu graças a sua duração de bateria mais longa, e conseguiu chegar ao nosso Lista dos Top 10. De outra forma, o Blade 15 estava quase sempre no mesmo nível do 15X - exceto pelo leitor de cartões e porta Ethernet ausentes - eles são, os dispositivos de entrada (iluminação RGB do teclado), tela (144 Hz), emissões, ou desempenho.

A combinação de Core i7 2670QM, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, e SSD NVMe é ideal para aplicações do dia a dia e todos os jogos atuais, embora o Blade 15 esquentou e se tornou muito barulhento sob uso intenso.

Dito tudo, podemos recomendar o Blade 15, a pesar de seu alto preço. Aqueles que viajam com muita frequência e preferem deixar o adaptador de força em suas mochilas, provavelmente deveriam dar uma olhada no Gigabyte Aero 15X.

Razer Blade 15 2018 - 06/27/2018 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento

90 / 98 → 91%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

65 / 81 → 80%

Peso

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Bateria