Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060 Max-Q, FHD)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1265 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 397.93, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, Samsung DDR4, PC4-21300, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
peso
2.07 kg, Suprimento de energia: 680 g
Preço
2200 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 292.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.04 cd/m²iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 801:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 15.4", 2880x1800 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 2% | -1% | 2% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 64.3 0% | 66.2 3% | 63.6 -1% | 66 2% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 93.7 0% | 92.1 -1% | 93.8 0% | 96.5 3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 65.5 0% | 67.2 3% | 64.9 -1% | 66.7 2% | |
| Response Times | -13% | -18% | -9% | -173% | -205% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 17.2 ? -26% | 17.6 ? -29% | 16.8 ? -24% | 42.4 ? -212% | 49 ? -260% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 12 ? -0% | 12.8 ? -7% | 11.2 ? 7% | 28 ? -133% | 30 ? -150% |
| PWM Frequency | 961 ? | |||||
| Screen | -21% | -4% | 15% | 20% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 304.3 | 290 -5% | 254 -17% | 313 3% | 534 75% | 413 36% |
| Brightness | 293 | 281 -4% | 262 -11% | 300 2% | 502 71% | 378 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 82 3% | 89 11% | 78 -2% | 86 8% | 86 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.3 21% | 0.22 42% | 0.33 13% | 0.31 18% | 0.29 24% |
| Contrast | 801 | 967 21% | 1155 44% | 948 18% | 1723 115% | 1424 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.79 | 2.85 -59% | 2.37 -32% | 1.29 28% | 1.8 -1% | 2.44 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.69 | 6.27 -70% | 4.71 -28% | 2.04 45% | 3.8 -3% | 4.46 -21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.4 -118% | 1.58 -44% | 0.69 37% | 2.4 -118% | 2.48 -125% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6665 98% | 6718 97% | 6785 96% | 6550 99% | 6563 99% | 7006 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.8 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 60 0% | 77.92 30% | 62 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.8 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 99.94 8% | 96 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.39 | 1.84 | 2.48 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-16% | -7% /
-4% | 2% /
8% | -77% /
-12% | -68% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4650 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5705 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5184 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -2% | 0% | -9% | -19% | 18% | |
| Write 4K | 97.9 | 94.2 -4% | 95.3 -3% | 94.4 -4% | 118.3 21% | 142.5 46% |
| Read 4K | 41.32 | 39.23 -5% | 40.13 -3% | 37.65 -9% | 26.93 -35% | 29.32 -29% |
| Write Seq | 1594 | 1483 -7% | 1883 18% | 1335 -16% | 350.2 -78% | 2078 30% |
| Read Seq | 1353 | 1371 1% | 1322 -2% | 1404 4% | 2125 57% | 1309 -3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 305.6 | 296.2 -3% | 309.9 1% | 268.6 -12% | 243.4 -20% | 362.6 19% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 354.1 | 342.5 -3% | 353.7 0% | 332.8 -6% | 275.8 -22% | 472.8 34% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2033 | 1527 -25% | 1919 -6% | 1375 -32% | 349 -83% | 2208 9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2543 | 3280 29% | 2466 -3% | 2627 3% | 2732 7% | 3474 37% |
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2543 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2033 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
354.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
305.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1353 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1594 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
97.9 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (12970 - 14487, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (6212 - 11735, n=10) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (42781 - 81720, n=10) | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (9992 - 11366, n=10) | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12756 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23642 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9861 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 274.4 | 226.1 | 211.6 | 109.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 210.7 | 133.2 | 74.2 | 37 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 299.2 | 266.2 | 165 | 107.3 |
The Witcher 3 ultra
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.1 / 33 / 33.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.2 / 45.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 0% | -8% | -8% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 29 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 30 9% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 31 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 38 -13% | 34 -1% | 35 -4% | 33 1% | 33 1% |
| Load Average * | 42.2 | 46 -9% | 43 -2% | 49 -16% | 43 -2% | 49 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.3 | 49 -8% | 42 7% | 51 -13% | 55 -21% | 50 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 46 -1% | 44 4% | 54 -18% | 58 -27% | 52 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.03 / 0.81 Watt |
| Ocioso | 14.9 / 17.5 / 19.2 Watt |
| Carga |
103.2 / 132.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 8% | -8% | -25% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14.9 | 14 6% | 7 53% | 14 6% | 16 -7% | 6.2 58% |
| Idle Average * | 17.5 | 17 3% | 11 37% | 18 -3% | 19 -9% | 12.9 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.2 | 21 -9% | 20 -4% | 22 -15% | 26 -35% | 13.6 29% |
| Load Average * | 103.2 | 95 8% | 98 5% | 91 12% | 103 -0% | 76.1 26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 123.1 | 141 -15% | 132 -7% | 142 -15% | 164 -33% | 84.3 32% |
| Load Maximum * | 132.7 | 179 -35% | 182 -37% | 173 -30% | 223 -68% | 99.4 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -10% | 28% | 68% | 134% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 402 | 322 -20% | 362 -10% | 513 28% | 677 68% | 942 134% |
| Reader / Idle | 382 | 507 | 762 | |||
| Load | 72 | 81 | 156 | 67 | 114 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 76 | 62 |
Pro
+ Manutenção simples; SSD e RAM atualizáveis
+ Tela mate nítida com um mínimo de “ghosting”
+ Thunderbolt 3 c/ suporte para Razer Core
+ Teclas WASD frias sob uso intenso
+ Software Synapse fácil de usar
+ Excelente desempenho dos jogos
+ Comutador gráfico Optimus
+ Design forte e rígido
+ Retro iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Veloz WiFi Intel 9260
+ Trackpad grande
Contra
- Incapaz de manter o Turbo Boost da CPU por longos períodos
- O controle Chroma color requer criação de conta
- Bleeding moderado da iluminação de fundo
- As teclas poderiam ser mais rígidas e profundas
- Sem RJ-45 integrado ou leitor de cartões SD
- Sem leitor de digitais integrado no botão de energia
- Sem armazenamento secundário interno
- A duração da bateria poderia ser melhor
- A retro iluminação RGB utiliza PWM
- Poderia ser mais frio sob uso intenso
- Qualidade média do som
- Leve ruído eletrônico
- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- Sem G-Sync
No final do dia, o SKU Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q é cerca de 30 por cento mais lento em poder GPU do que o SKU Blade 15 1070 Max-Q. O resultado é uma configuração que, na verdade, funciona durante mais tempo, de forma mais fria e mais silenciosa por margens notáveis. É por isso discutível que a SKU GTX 1060 Max-Q oferece uma experiência mais equilibrada para os jogadores tradicionais e para os estudantes em movimento, enquanto a poderosa SKU GTX 1070 Max-Q pode ser vista como a opção entusiasta de "desempenho a todo o custo".
O elefante na sala é o preço pedido do SKU Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q. Os usuários estão pagando pelo design, marca, estética e recursos do chassi. Por causa disso, até mesmo os menores detalhes podem ser decepcionantes. Nossa unidade em particular sofre tanto do moderado bleeding da luz de fundo quanto do ruído eletrônico que achamos que não deveria ter lugar em um portátil nessa faixa de preço. O uso de PWM para sua luz de fundo RGB por tecla e o limitado Turbo Boost da CPU são outros pequenos reveses que os entusiastas podem lamentar. Além disso, é difícil não ficar impressionado com a rigidez do chassi minimalista, especialmente quando comparado ao MSI GS65 ou a série Aorus X5.
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
- 07/08/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
