Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 Base Model (i7-8750H, GTX 1060 Max-Q)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1265 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 416.34, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N61, IPS, BOE0747, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB
, Secundário: 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174
peso
2.03 kg, Suprimento de energia: 547 g
Preço
1600 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV156FHM-N61 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 291.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 262.5 cd/m² Minimum: 13.84 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 912:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model BOE NV156FHM-N61, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, IPS, 15.4", 2880x1800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 4% | 4% | 2% | 34% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 64.4 -3% | 66.5 0% | 65.8 -1% | 63.6 -4% | 98.7 49% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.6 | 93.4 8% | 91.7 6% | 92.1 6% | 93.8 8% | 99.9 15% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.3 | 65.5 3% | 67.1 6% | 67 6% | 64.9 3% | 86.6 37% |
| Response Times | 66% | 62% | 58% | 63% | 151% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 13.6 ? 65% | 17.6 ? 55% | 20 ? 49% | 16.8 ? 57% | 43.2 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 12 ? 66% | 11.2 ? 68% | 12 ? 66% | 11.2 ? 68% | 31.2 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 21190 ? | 117000 ? 452% | ||||
| Screen | 11% | -8% | -12% | 21% | 42% | |
| Brightness middle | 273.6 | 304.3 11% | 357.5 31% | 250.9 -8% | 313 14% | 520 90% |
| Brightness | 262 | 293 12% | 351 34% | 257 -2% | 300 15% | 492 88% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 80 -7% | 85 -1% | 83 -3% | 78 -9% | 88 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.38 -27% | 0.36 -20% | 0.32 -7% | 0.33 -10% | 0.39 -30% |
| Contrast | 912 | 801 -12% | 993 9% | 784 -14% | 948 4% | 1333 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.22 | 1.79 44% | 4.19 -30% | 2.77 14% | 1.29 60% | 1.2 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.61 | 3.69 52% | 6.97 8% | 5.89 23% | 2.04 73% | 2.3 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.1 | 3.2 22% | 2.5 39% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.1 21% | 3.5 -150% | 4 -186% | 0.69 51% | 1.3 7% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.324 95% | 2.27 97% | 2.43 91% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6636 98% | 6665 98% | 7028 92% | 6901 94% | 6550 99% | 6738 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.4 | 59.8 6% | 60 6% | 60 6% | 60 6% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.2 | 92.8 8% | 91 6% | 92 7% | 94 9% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
16% | 19% /
3% | 17% /
-0% | 29% /
23% | 76% /
64% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21190 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21190 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21190 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø898 (891.76-964.04)
Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø764 (757.32-768.68)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø924 (911.97-1007.8)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4425 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5395 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4896 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Apple SSD AP0512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 25% | 24% | -14% | -12% | -35% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1070 | |||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 495.5 | |||||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1892 | |||||
| Score Total | 2952 | 3806 29% | 4113 39% | 2039 -31% | 2536 -14% | 2119 -28% |
| Score Write | 1499 | 1450 -3% | 2087 39% | 802 -46% | 939 -37% | 347 -77% |
| Score Read | 970 | 1584 63% | 1319 36% | 815 -16% | 1092 13% | 1199 24% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.038 5% | 0.038 5% | 0.045 -13% | 0.046 -15% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.113 | 0.051 55% | 0.051 55% | 0.071 37% | 0.119 -5% | 0.225 -99% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1270 | 1204 -5% | 1808 42% | 570 -55% | 742 -42% | 163.5 -87% |
| 4K-64 Read | 749 | 1300 74% | 1160 55% | 611 -18% | 847 13% | 965 29% |
| 4K Write | 93 | 93.6 1% | 95.9 3% | 83.8 -10% | 80.4 -14% | 18.78 -80% |
| 4K Read | 40.75 | 46.45 14% | 35.03 -14% | 43.09 6% | 23.36 -43% | 9.46 -77% |
| Seq Write | 1367 | 1521 11% | 1829 34% | 1475 8% | 1163 -15% | 1644 20% |
| Seq Read | 1803 | 2376 32% | 1235 -32% | 1612 -11% | 2213 23% | 2239 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3272 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1451 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
406.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
356.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1392 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1450 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
43.09 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
112.5 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (42781 - 81720, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
| MSI GF63 8RC | |
| Razer Blade 14 2015 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (9992 - 11366, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2015 | |
| MSI GF63 8RC | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (12970 - 14487, n=10) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2015 | |
| MSI GF63 8RC | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (6212 - 11735, n=10) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2015 | |
| MSI GF63 8RC | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12856 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25931 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9851 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 288 | 224 | 213.4 | 112 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 204.9 | 134.7 | 71.4 | 38.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 183.7 | 133.3 | 73.3 | 66.4 |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø37.3 (34-41)
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 31.2 / 31.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 47.2 / 44.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 2% | 1% | 5% | -5% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 29 -4% | 28.1 -1% | 28.3 -2% | 28.4 -2% | 29 -4% | 29.6 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29 6% | 28.1 9% | 32.2 -4% | 28.4 8% | 30 3% | 30.1 3% |
| Idle Average * | 31.2 | 30 4% | 33 -6% | 32.4 -4% | 28.4 9% | 31 1% | 30.1 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 38 -21% | 33.5 -7% | 32.4 -4% | 29.6 5% | 35 -12% | 30.1 4% |
| Load Average * | 47.2 | 46 3% | 42.2 11% | 40.2 15% | 43.5 8% | 49 -4% | 46.8 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.3 | 49 4% | 45.3 12% | 45 12% | 45.7 11% | 51 1% | 36 30% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.3 | 46 -4% | 45.7 -3% | 47.2 -7% | 45.7 -3% | 54 -22% | 46.8 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.12 / 1.14 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.2 / 13.2 / 17.6 Watt |
| Carga |
99.5 / 133.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | 17% | 0% | -24% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.2 | 14 -37% | 6 41% | 8.7 15% | 14 -37% | 3.4 67% |
| Idle Average * | 13.2 | 17 -29% | 11.2 15% | 13 2% | 18 -36% | 11 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.6 | 21 -19% | 13.3 24% | 14.3 19% | 22 -25% | 14.9 15% |
| Load Average * | 99.5 | 95 5% | 89.2 10% | 107.4 -8% | 91 9% | 78.9 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 113.6 | 141 -24% | 101.9 10% | 129 -14% | 142 -25% | |
| Load Maximum * | 133.3 | 179 -34% | 134.5 -1% | 151.5 -14% | 173 -30% | 91.2 32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | -3% | -4% | 48% | 86% | |
| Reader / Idle | 690 | 478 -31% | 762 10% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 330 | 402 22% | 375 14% | 372 13% | 513 55% | 614 86% |
| Load | 87 | 95 9% | 70 -20% | 156 79% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 88 |
Pro
+ Ligeiramente mais leve que o Blade 15 Advanced Model
+ Sem afogamento do desempenho durante os jogos
+ Thunderbolt 3; compatível com Razer Core
+ Excelente qualidade de construção e rigidez
+ Baia secundária SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
+ Temperaturas mais frias, no geral
+ Sem bleeding da iluminação de fundo irregular
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ Gigabit RJ-45
Contra
- Modulação de largura de pulso presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- Sem opções iluminação RGB por tecla ou tela de 144 Hz
- O teclado poderia ser mais firme na resposta
- O ruído do ventilador poderia ser mais silencioso durante os jogos
- A garantia básica é de apenas um ano
- Sem leitor de digitais
- Alto falantes sem baixo
- Imã de digitais
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- Um pouco mais grosso
Quando os usuários veem o "Base Model", eles podem assumir que seria mais lento e teria menos recursos do que o "Advanced Model". Isso não poderia estar mais longe da verdade, porque o Base Model é tão rápido quanto o Advanced Model e com dois recursos (compartimento SATA de 2,5 polegadas e RJ-45) não encontrados no segundo. De fato, é ainda mais leve e funciona mais frio. Os usuários estão obtendo o mesmo design de chassi e qualidade de construção em todas as configurações.
Em vez disso, o que torna o Base Model muito mais acessível do que o Advanced Model é sua falta de recursos de gama alta pelos quais os gamers mainstream podem não se importar muito. A GPU GTX 1070 Max-Q, o resfriamento da câmara de vapor, a iluminação RGB por tecla, a tela de 144 Hz e tempos de resposta super rápidos, são todas opções apenas para o Advanced Model. O que mais importa é o desempenho real dos jogos, e é aqui que o Base Model se destaca de igual a igual com o Advanced Model GTX 1060 Max-Q, enquanto custa centenas de dólares a menos.
As principais desvantagens são semelhantes às do Advanced Model, incluindo os ventiladores barulhentos nos jogos e as teclas rasas do teclado. A bateria menor diminui o tempo de duração em cerca de uma hora e fica aquém do GS65 e do Aero 15X. O chassi um pouco mais grosso quando comparado ao Advanced Model na verdade, não é um problema, já que é praticamente imperceptível na prática. O design e a experiência do Razer permanecem intactos de cima para baixo.
O preço de varejo do Blade 15 Base Model está dentro dos $200 USD de seus concorrentes mais próximos, como o MSI GS65, HP Pavilion Gaming 15t, ou Gigabyte Aero 15X v8. Para obter a melhor qualidade e rigidez de construção, não hesitaríamos em recomendar o Razer Base Model sobre outros ultra finos. Para durações mais longas e um painel de 144 Hz, considere os exemplos mencionados anteriormente ou atualize para o Blade 15 Advanced Model.
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
- 10/26/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
