Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 Base Model 2020: A atualização da Intel Comet Lake-H de 10ª Geração
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 15.75 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
83 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 21 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 366.7 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Samsung SDCA029, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -22% | -24% | 0% | -24% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 69.9 -30% | 66.9 -33% | 65.6 -34% | 99.9 0% | 65.3 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.1 -1% | 98.1 -2% | 92.2 -8% | 100 0% | 95.1 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.4 | 71.1 -27% | 68.5 -30% | 66.9 -31% | 98.2 1% | 65.9 -32% |
Response Times | -300% | 13081% | -214% | 17% | 13057% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.7 ? | 11.2 ? -315% | 12.8 ? -374% | 7 ? -159% | 2.2 ? 19% | 16.4 ? -507% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.6 ? | 10 ? -285% | 10.4 ? -300% | 9.6 ? -269% | 1.8 ? 31% | 8.8 ? -238% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 23810 ? 39917% | 60 ? 1% | 23810 ? 39917% | ||
Screen | 8% | 4% | -6% | 20% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 366.7 | 339.4 -7% | 293 -20% | 323.6 -12% | 385 5% | 324.2 -12% |
Brightness | 371 | 331 -11% | 270 -27% | 315 -15% | 390 5% | 304 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 91 0% | 93 2% | 90 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.38 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 1.58 70% | 1.69 68% | 3.31 36% | 2.46 53% | 5.01 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.92 | 3.8 52% | 3.37 57% | 5.74 28% | 4.01 49% | 12.7 -60% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.3 -15% | 2.3 -15% | 2.9 -45% | 1.39 30% | 7.9 -295% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6514 100% | 6952 93% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6395 102% | 8455 77% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.6 | 64.8 -25% | 63 -27% | 59.7 -31% | 98 13% | 60.8 -30% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.4 -1% | 98.5 -1% | 91.8 -8% | 100 0% | 95.5 -4% |
Contrast | 1414 | 1010 | 1116 | 853 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.47 | 1.24 | 2.73 | 2.6 | 1.64 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -104% /
-46% | 4354% /
2801% | -81% /
-42% | 12% /
15% | 4327% /
2763% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.5 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506UI | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (2017 - 3133, n=55) | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (416 - 486, n=55) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506UI | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (342 - 495, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4580 - 5090, n=21) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28512 - 35174, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1117 - 1251, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (4859 - 6262, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (7.1 - 10.7, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (54.5 - 64.7, n=9) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.608 - 0.695, n=14) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3696 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4705 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5244 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 18% | 21% | -27% | -15% | 6% | |
Seq Read | 2021 | 1832 -9% | 1086 -46% | 1239 -39% | 1200 -41% | 1925 -5% |
Seq Write | 2090 | 1864 -11% | 1901 -9% | 920 -56% | 836 -60% | 2371 13% |
4K Read | 47.71 | 52.1 9% | 51 7% | 45.74 -4% | 65.8 38% | 37.2 -22% |
4K Write | 101.1 | 108.3 7% | 117.3 16% | 95.7 -5% | 103.8 3% | 108.9 8% |
4K-64 Read | 856 | 1159 35% | 1503 76% | 322 -62% | 789 -8% | 1177 38% |
4K-64 Write | 1041 | 1807 74% | 1721 65% | 722 -31% | 929 -11% | 1135 9% |
Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.05 4% | 0.059 -13% | 0.073 -40% | 0.103 -98% | 0.065 -25% |
Access Time Write * | 0.111 | 0.034 69% | 0.1 10% | 0.047 58% | 0.045 59% | 0.108 3% |
Score Read | 1105 | 1394 26% | 1662 50% | 492 -55% | 975 -12% | 1407 27% |
Score Write | 1351 | 2102 56% | 2029 50% | 910 -33% | 1117 -17% | 1481 10% |
Score Total | 3037 | 4221 39% | 4588 51% | 1654 -46% | 2594 -15% | 3633 20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2474 | 2083 -16% | 2155 -13% | 1236 -50% | 2073 -16% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 679 | 496.5 -27% | 715 5% | 703 4% | 576 -15% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1037 | 977 -6% | 1506 45% | 812 -22% | 1426 38% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -11% | -9% | -41% | -2% | 4% | |
Write 4K | 118.7 | 137.2 16% | 132.5 12% | 93.9 -21% | 127.4 7% | 108.8 -8% |
Read 4K | 52.4 | 46.82 -11% | 45.03 -14% | 46.29 -12% | 147.5 181% | 45.41 -13% |
Write Seq | 2247 | 1221 -46% | 1987 -12% | 974 -57% | 485.9 -78% | 2467 10% |
Read Seq | 2234 | 1217 -46% | 1434 -36% | 1425 -36% | 1352 -39% | 2456 10% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 515 | 527 2% | 467.5 -9% | 259.4 -50% | 476.5 -7% | 532 3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 584 | 614 5% | 536 -8% | 296.5 -49% | 531 -9% | 590 1% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2235 | 1986 -11% | 2003 -10% | 977 -56% | 1061 -53% | 2801 25% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3171 | 3234 2% | 3306 4% | 1666 -47% | 2552 -20% | 3172 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
7% | 6% /
10% | -34% /
-32% | -9% /
-9% | 5% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 18964 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26823 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15800 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6527 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz | |
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (62 - 98, n=12) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Asus TUF FX705GM |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 289.6 | 203.3 | 118.8 | 61.9 | 43.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 143 | 132 | 124 | 116 | 90.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 94.1 | 88.5 | 79.5 | 51.4 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 129 | 100 | 94 | 85 | 30 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 135.6 | 103.2 | 74.4 | 57.3 | 21.5 |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 7% | -8% | -13% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 28.5 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28.7 -1% | 30 -6% | 28.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 29.8 -5% | 34 -20% | 28.5 -0% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 32.4 -14% | 36 -27% | 28.5 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.7 | 30.9 3% | 29 9% | 38 -20% | 41 -29% | 49 -55% |
Load Average * | 47.7 | 39.5 17% | 33.5 30% | 38.2 20% | 48 -1% | 49 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.5 | 48 -1% | 45 5% | 56.6 -19% | 48 -1% | 49 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 59.4 -20% | 45.2 9% | 56.6 -14% | 54 -9% | 55 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 31.7 dB |
Carga |
| 47.7 / 49.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.7 °C / -19.3 F).
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.55 / 0.86 Watt |
Ocioso | 11.1 / 13.7 / 33.4 Watt |
Carga |
104.4 / 203.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 4% | -26% | -62% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.1 | 14.9 -34% | 12.5 -13% | 18 -62% | 19 -71% | 10 10% |
Idle Average * | 13.7 | 17.5 -28% | 15.3 -12% | 21 -53% | 40.5 -196% | 13 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 29.5 12% | 20.7 38% | 38 -14% | 52 -56% | 20 40% |
Load Average * | 104.4 | 94.8 9% | 90.2 14% | 113 -8% | 132.3 -27% | 100 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 159.9 | 146.1 9% | 162 -1% | 149 7% | 183.3 -15% | 159 1% |
Load Maximum * | 203.8 | 210.9 -3% | 209.3 -3% | 256 -26% | 217.2 -7% | 196 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 65 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 71% | 63% | -25% | 51% | 38% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 413 71% | 393 63% | 181 -25% | 364 51% | 332 38% |
Reader / Idle | 614 | 953 | 518 | 554 | ||
Load | 94 | 102 | 166 | 44 |
Pro
Contra
Antigamente, a Intel tinha um ciclo de processador "tick-tock" onde o "tick" representava um grande redesenho arquitetônico com atualizações significativas de desempenho, enquanto o produto "tock" seria uma versão mais afinada do produto "tick". A analogia se aplica aqui no Razer Blade 15 2020 dado que o novo Core i7-10750H e a GPU GeForce RTX Super Max-Q são atualizações relativamente pequenas para o Core i7-9750H e GeForce RTX Max-Q da 9a geração, respectivamente. O chassi tem alguns ajustes aqui e ali, mas ainda é o mesmo chassi que todos nós conhecemos. Qualquer vantagem em relação aos modelos do ano passado estaria nas porcentagens de um dígito, em média.
Se você está no mercado por um Blade 15, valeria a pena considerar um modelo de 2019, especialmente agora que eles são mais baratos. Você realmente não estaria perdendo nada que valesse a pena, saltando a série 2020 do modelo base. Esperamos que os modelos do próximo ano tragam atualizações mais tangíveis como ventiladores mais silenciosos e GPUs Ampere.
Um refinamento da já excelente série 2019. Há algumas opções novas que são lançadas, mas em sua maioria são menores e nada sobre as quais escrever.
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo